http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
07:47:09 UTC ---
> It looks like the fix came after the first gcc was built, so I should rebuild
> it with Jan 9 snapshot using --disable-bootstrap, install it, and then rebuild
> it again with disabl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
John Marino changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnugcc at marino dot st
--- Comment #12 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46535
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Many tests fail with -flto due
unaligned load in lto-plugin.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22949|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47263
Summary: [C++0x] lambda + dynamic-exception-specification
std::unexpected() is not called.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #23 from Mike Stump 2011-01-12
00:46:43 UTC ---
Ok.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371
--- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett 2011-01-11 23:44:22 UTC
---
Is the last remaining issue with this test case fixed by the patch for PR46076?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47262
Summary: Better error message upon finding a @property in the
instance variable list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47261
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47261
Summary: ICE on @property declaration in the wrong place
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: objc++
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-01-11
23:14:45 UTC ---
I've tried 168661 with arm, hppa and sh64 cc1's. The problem
has gone away on all these 3 targets. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #1 from Craig Powers 2011-01-11
23:12:55 UTC ---
I've also tried using dlltool and a .def file to coerce my procedure into being
exported, with no luck. Does gfortran not support exporting a function?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-11
21:38:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > ...
> > ... this produces loads of regressions.
>
> ... but the following variant doesn't:
> ...
Confirmed, however the following code
[macbook]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46955
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46955
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-11
21:20:13 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Jan 11 21:20:07 2011
New Revision: 168681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168681
Log:
Fix PR debug/46955
gcc/cp/
* cp-lang.c (get_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Summary: DLLEXPORT attribute requires additional capabilities
to be useful
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
19:32:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 22949
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22949
proposed patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-01-11 18:47:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 22948
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22948
Backtrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Summary: LTO and global register variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47255
--- Comment #2 from Seth Robertson 2011-01-11 18:40:36
UTC ---
Created attachment 22946
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22946
Revised test program exhibiting missed optimization
Well, my point is that even if I remove the obv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
18:06:31 UTC ---
This brute force approach works for both a standard and lto-bootstrap...
Index: gcc/config/darwin.c
===
--- gcc/config/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31528
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #10 from Ian Bolton 2011-01-11
17:42:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created attachment 22945 [details]
> Test patch
>
> Could you try the following? It's a variant of a patch Richard Sandiford
> recently posted.
Thanks for lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #34 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
17:29:57 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Jan 11 17:29:52 2011
New Revision: 168666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168666
Log:
PR lto/45721
PR lto/45375
* tree.h (s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
17:29:57 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Jan 11 17:29:52 2011
New Revision: 168666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168666
Log:
PR lto/45721
PR lto/45375
* tree.h (sy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-01-11
17:02:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 22945
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22945
Test patch
Could you try the following? It's a variant of a patch Richard Sandiford
recently posted.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
17:01:45 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 11 17:01:37 2011
New Revision: 168665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168665
Log:
2011-01-11 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 16:56:35
UTC ---
> Why not retain the original code behavior unless generating lto? The patch
Because the original code bahviour is wrong. It assumes that debug_hooks is
initialized
while it is not at
> Why not retain the original code behavior unless generating lto? The patch
Because the original code bahviour is wrong. It assumes that debug_hooks is
initialized
while it is not at the point.
Honza
> below works with both a standard and lto-bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10.
>
> Index: gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44951
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43863
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wake
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-11
16:48:38 UTC ---
Of course no objections, I just couldn't figure out what we were up to.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
16:46:40 UTC ---
path posted. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00654.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-11
16:41:56 UTC ---
If you have no objections I'll resolve PR 43863 for 4.6.0 (by putting
recurisve_init_error in a separate file) but I think this "quiet mode" needs a
bit more thought and time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jwakely.gcc at gmail dot|
|com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
16:35:23 UTC ---
But we'll create bogus debug info for the typedef type decls then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
16:34:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> After tried patches one-by-one, I believe the misoptimization is down to the
> following patch.
Which is a correctness patch. You can try dumbing it dow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-11
16:34:31 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.0 can't be built on NetBSD (PR 47147) so unless that gets fixed there's
no way to test the changes, and so I thought no urgency to fix this one
I'm happy to commit the chang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45191
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
16:32:00 UTC ---
Why not retain the original code behavior unless generating lto? The patch
below works with both a standard and lto-bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10.
Index: gcc/config/darwin.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-11
16:27:28 UTC ---
Are we still waiting for feedback? PS: IMHO, if just is ok instead of
, it would be much nicer. Besides that nit, it would be nice to
have the tweak in 4.6.0, if we can make it...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
--- Comment #2 from Bingfeng Mei 2011-01-11 16:16:28
UTC ---
After tried patches one-by-one, I believe the misoptimization is down to the
following patch.
Index: tree-ssa-copyrename.c
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-01-11
15:45:34 UTC ---
I think the real problem here is that when reloading autoincs, we somehow end
up with
(gdb) p spill_reg_store[3]
$42 = (rtx) 0xf7a1118c
(gdb) pr
(insn 3163 3161 3164 99 rectmm.c:1041
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47242
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45235
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45235
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
15:41:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 11 15:41:17 2011
New Revision: 168663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168663
Log:
2011-01-11 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-11 15:28:56 UTC ---
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I don't think we should add hacks like that. Either the type signatures
> are compatible for the middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
15:23:34 UTC ---
Both the patch in comment 16 and 17 produce the same errors in a standard
bootstrap...
../../gcc/libdecnumber/decContext.c:1:0: error: variable tracking requested,
but useless unless
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
15:11:49 UTC ---
I assume you really meant...
if (flag_var_tracking
&& (generating_for_darwin_version >= 9)
&& (flag_gtoggle ? (debug_info_level >= DINFO_LEVEL_NORMAL)
: (debug_inf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-11 14:51:17
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Jan 11 14:51:07 2011
New Revision: 168662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168662
Log:
2011-01-11 Kai Tietz
PR bootstrap/47215
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 14:43:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> > ===
> > --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c(revision 16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-11 14:42:40
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/11 07:22, zsojka at seznam dot cz wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
>
> --- Comment #6 from Zdenek So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
14:23:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 11 14:23:20 2011
New Revision: 168661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168661
Log:
2011-01-11 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-11 14:21:49
UTC ---
Thank you for fixing this.
It is not planned for backport to 4.5? Target Milestone set to 4.5.3 will cause
this bug to be shown as fixed in 4.5.3, which is not true.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-11
14:21:26 UTC ---
> > Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> > ...
> > continue;
>
> ... this produces loads of regressions.
Confirmed;-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47087
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-11 14:16:18
UTC ---
*** Bug 47087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-11 14:10:58
UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Jan 11 14:10:54 2011
New Revision: 168659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168659
Log:
* PR tree-optimization/47086
* tree-ssa-loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 14:08:41 UTC
---
> Is pr39968 related (a duplicate) of this pr?
No, it is older than the problem and it is about plugins, not lto-plugin.
Perhaps plugins Make also needs to play the games with --enable-s
> Is pr39968 related (a duplicate) of this pr?
No, it is older than the problem and it is about plugins, not lto-plugin.
Perhaps plugins Make also needs to play the games with --enable-shared I added
into lto-plugin configury.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 14:06:58
UTC ---
> The patch will also be problematic for powerpc-apple-darwin9 and darwin8 since
> it relies on dwarf2 and those OS releases still use stabs.
It should not be problem. For stabs we don
> The patch will also be problematic for powerpc-apple-darwin9 and darwin8 since
> it relies on dwarf2 and those OS releases still use stabs.
It should not be problem. For stabs we don't do var tracking.
The original test tested if target debug info supports var tracking and dwarf2
is the
only on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-11
14:06:26 UTC ---
Is pr39968 related (a duplicate) of this pr?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
14:03:29 UTC ---
testing the following patch.
Index: gcc.c
===
--- gcc.c (revision 168655)
+++ gcc.c (working copy)
@@ -621,11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44217
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
13:48:30 UTC ---
The regression testresults a lto-bootstrap of the proposed patch in Comment 10
on x86_64-apple-darwin10...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00899.html
The patch will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
--- Comment #1 from Bingfeng Mei 2011-01-11 13:38:13
UTC ---
Created attachment 22944
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22944
Preprocessed test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
Summary: Extra instruction generated in 4.5.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
13:29:58 UTC ---
I believed that we are supposed to update the statement first and only then try
to inline it. Otherwise we would get into problem with inliner not skipping the
args.
Anyway lookup base
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
13:27:54 UTC ---
Even when we do not default to -flinker-plugin w/o LTO this remains a problem.
We should chase out cases where we build plugin but it is useless.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46469
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47087
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 13:06:18 UTC
---
> > If you want to use BFD linker for LTO plugin, you need the Linux binutils
> > 2.21.51.0.5. LTO plugin support in binutils-2.21 is incomplete.
>
> I hope it will be fixed on the 2.21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coolypf at qq dot com
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47221
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 13:03:00 UTC
---
> we don't check for an error of inflateInit2 in which case state is
> not initialized.
Probably we should fix that, but still I don't think we should leak our well
engineered
MEM_REF gi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47252
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-11
12:50:39 UTC ---
I think this has been fixed anyway, using Boost 1.42 it works with 4.5.2 and
4.6.0 - so you should probably report it to Ubuntu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46871
Andreas Beckmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at abeckmann dot de
--- Comment #1
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
