http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47163
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23621
Thorsten Glaser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47164
Summary: libffi fails to build for alternate target in multilib
configuration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-04
05:17:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 22893
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22893
A proposed patch
The regression was caused by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47163
--- Comment #1 from Victor K. 2011-01-04
05:17:03 UTC ---
Forgot to mention about 5-th issue:
Failure to copy adainclude/adalib libraries in MSYS.
Caused by LN_S set to cp -p for MSYS and this command is not suitable to copy
folder to folder(only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47163
Summary: Failure building target-libada for MingW64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
Summary: [4.6 Regression] LTO is broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-04 01:48:23
UTC ---
Thanks for the patches. Are you OK with signing the copyright license
agreement described at the end of http://golang.org/doc/contribute.html ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47161
Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found a memory leak in
gcc/gcc/go/gofrontend/expressions.cc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47160
Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found a memory leak in
gcc/gcc/go/gofrontend/import.cc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47159
Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found missmatch in allocation and
deallocation of memory in
gcc/gcc/go/gofrontend/import-archive.cc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found a memory leaks in
gcc/gcc/go/gofrontend/gogo-tree.cc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-03
23:59:58 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 3 23:59:55 2011
New Revision: 168447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168447
Log:
PR middle-end/47017
* expr.c (expand_ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-03 23:58:41 UTC ---
The problem appears to be in decl.c(variable_decl)
/* If this symbol has already shown up in a Cray Pointer declaration,
then we want to set the type & bail out. */
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig 2011-01-03
23:43:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 22887
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22887
Tentative patch
This could to the trick.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #11 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-03 23:31:29
UTC ---
Sorry, it was Joseph, not Jakub, who mentioned the patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-03 22:39:37 UTC ---
Reduced testcase.
subroutine host_sub
implicit none
real xg
pointer (paxg, xg)
call internal_sub
contains
subroutine internal_sub
implicit none
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47053
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-03 22:37:36
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 151559:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00305.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #8 from Changpeng Fang 2011-01-03
22:30:22 UTC ---
>
> Which instructions are missing in Bobcat?
At least 3DNow instructions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-03 22:04:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The OS is SLES 11, SP1. The machine (bobcat) indeed does not
> support some instructions that K8 supports.
>
Which instructions are missing in Bobcat?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #6 from Changpeng Fang 2011-01-03
21:59:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Does your glibc have CPU specific optimizations?
I don't think so.
The OS is SLES 11, SP1. The machine (bobcat) indeed does not
support some instructions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46912
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe 2011-01-03 21:54:37
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:06 PM, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > > gcc/system.h :
> >
> > > # define bool unsigned char
> >
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47141
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47139
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47125
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47087
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47067
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47053
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47022
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47155
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47020
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47009
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-03
21:10:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 3 21:10:31 2011
New Revision: 168441
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168441
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47148
* ipa-split.c (s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46977
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47155
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-03
21:01:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 3 21:01:14 2011
New Revision: 168440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168440
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47155
* tree-ssa-ccp.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46791
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46970
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46912
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-03
20:59:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:06 PM, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > gcc/system.h :
>
> > # define bool unsigned char
>
> This is wrong. The solution is si
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47157
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-03
20:59:25 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 3 20:59:20 2011
New Revision: 168439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168439
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/47157
* combine.c (try_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46904
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Richard Gu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46903
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46890
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46537
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46791
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46781
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-03
20:31:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Comment on attachment 22612 [details]
> Code produced by GCC 4.6.0
>
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Where did you get this testcase from?
>
> May I know
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46537
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-03 20:30:40
UTC ---
Indeed seems to be fixed now, even the original testcase doen't crash anymore.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46688
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46537
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dseketel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46557
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46537
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46535
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45051
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45051
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46102
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46912
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653
--- Comment #4 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-01-03 18:24:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 4.5.1 shows the same issue when building Clang 2.8.
Persists with 4.5.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-03
18:04:04 UTC ---
There's a suggestion at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-01/msg1.html
to use a URL and let the catalog resolve that to a local file, which would mean
no need to test for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47146
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl
2011-01-03 18:01:11 UTC ---
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:12:10PM +, babelart at yahoo dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47146
>
> Sorry, I was not specific enough. It is the integer co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-03
17:40:57 UTC ---
The aforementioned patch did not do type comparisons correctly and so
only hid the problem. I have already committed a subsequent patch
that addresses this (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47146
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-03 17:40:24
UTC ---
> fprintf( stdout, "Float 100.0 * 0.3894949=%d\n", 100.0 * elapsed );
> fprintf( stdout, "Float 100 * 0.3894949=%d\n", 100 * elapsed );
>
> both produce the value '-536870912'.
Unde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-03
17:20:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 22886
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22886
Tentative fix (for gcc/ada)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47146
--- Comment #3 from Pierre Innocent 2011-01-03
17:12:05 UTC ---
Dear kargl:
Sorry, I was not specific enough. It is the integer conversion that seem
to be wrong,for example the following two lines:
fprintf( stdout, "Float 100.0 * 0.3894949=%d\n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46922
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-03 17:09:14 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jan 3 17:09:12 2011
New Revision: 168435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168435
Log:
2011-01-03 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47021
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47021
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-01-03 17:01:39
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Mon Jan 3 17:01:36 2011
New Revision: 168433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168433
Log:
Fix PR47021: ADDR_EXPRs don't contain SCoP parameter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47157
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-03
16:37:12 UTC ---
Benjamin knows...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46922
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-03
16:33:46 UTC ---
Jakub, I'll commit momentarily the fix for std::bad_function_call. Can you take
care of the max_digits10 vs long double thing? You know it much better than me
and I don't know how to t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-03 16:22:17 UTC ---
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The problem is in save_expr called by convert_to_complex when converting
> non-COMPLEX_EXPR _Complex float expres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #2 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2011-01-03 16:13:14 UTC ---
/home/js/gcc-trunk/configure --enable-long-long --disable-multilib
--enable-threads --disable-symvers --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++ --with-mpf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-03 16:11:45 UTC ---
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The issue here is AC_CHECK_FILE, which is documented to not work for
> cross-compiling scenario. By replacing th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47054
Deji Akingunola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.5.1
--- Comment #3 from Deji Akinguno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo