http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46861
Summary: alpha gcc 4.2 -fPIC visibility hidden => gp-relative
relocation against dynamic symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
--- Comment #69 from Dominique d'Humieres
2010-12-09 06:15:02 UTC ---
With gcc46-pr41082.patch, the test passes on darwin with both -mtune=rs64 and
-mtune=power4.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-09 05:55:06
UTC ---
This patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01621.html
is the cause, which says
---
With this, the transpose optimization is back.
The two previous patches permitted to call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46860
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46860
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Froyd 2010-12-09
04:34:26 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Thu Dec 9 04:34:20 2010
New Revision: 167625
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167625
Log:
PR testsuite/46860
* testsuite/20_util/aut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46348
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-09
02:08:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Dec 9 02:08:28 2010
New Revision: 167623
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167623
Log:
PR c++/46348
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_vec_in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531
bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Res
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46701
Andreas Beckmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at abeckmann dot de
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46860
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46860
Summary: [4.6 Regression] New libstdc++ failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46859
Summary: Attribute depends on location
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46858
Summary: ICE: in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:464
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
Andreas Beckmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||3.3.6, 4.6.0
Known to fail|4.4.0,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-09 00:06:51
UTC ---
I can confirm that rev165732 miscompiles tonto and rev162788 is working.
This is at -O0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46857
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (in
-std=c++0x mode)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-12-08
23:22:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 22689
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22689
test case reduced from haifa-sched.c
> objdir/gcc/xgcc -Bobjdir/gcc -O2 -S pr46856.c
pr46856.c:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
Summary: [4.6 regression] internal compiler error in
final_scan_insn breaks m68k-linux bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45370
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45370
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08 23:01:46
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 8 23:01:40 2010
New Revision: 167609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167609
Log:
Fix PR45230, PR45231, and PR45370: fold_stmt_inplace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08 23:01:46
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 8 23:01:40 2010
New Revision: 167609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167609
Log:
Fix PR45230, PR45231, and PR45370: fold_stmt_inplace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
--- Comment #22 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08
23:01:46 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 8 23:01:40 2010
New Revision: 167609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167609
Log:
Fix PR45230, PR45231, and PR45370: fold_stmt_inplac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46625
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
22:43:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 22688
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22688
Draft patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46772
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46772
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
22:35:56 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec 8 22:35:52 2010
New Revision: 167608
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167608
Log:
2010-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45329
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45329
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Froyd 2010-12-08
21:37:54 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Wed Dec 8 21:37:51 2010
New Revision: 167607
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167607
Log:
gcc/cp/
PR c++/45329
* call.c (struct conv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43952
Arnaud Lacombe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lacombar at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46855
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46855
Summary: cc1plus: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(instead of g++-4.5's: expected unqualified-id at end
of input)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
21:04:50 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec 8 21:04:45 2010
New Revision: 167605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167605
Log:
2010-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46564
Andreas Beckmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at abeckmann dot de
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43023
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46853
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-08
20:35:19 UTC ---
This is a dup of x, we apply conditional constant and copy propagation
which will optimize the uninitialized use away before we have a chance to warn.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
--- Comment #68 from Michael Meissner 2010-12-08
20:29:45 UTC ---
gcc46-pr41082.patch looks correct to me. I did a build on a linux power7
system, and saw no regressions in the make check output.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #43 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-08
20:11:13 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed Dec 8 20:11:05 2010
New Revision: 167603
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167603
Log:
PR debug/46749
* config/darwin.h (C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46298
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45822
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-08
20:00:41 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 8 20:00:37 2010
New Revision: 167602
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167602
Log:
PR c++/45822
* cp-tree.h (LOOKUP_DEFAULTED)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46736
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-08
20:00:31 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 8 20:00:27 2010
New Revision: 167601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167601
Log:
PR c++/46736
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46854
Summary: PowerPC optimization regression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
19:52:01 UTC ---
For __float128 detection, there is now a patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-12/msg00045.html
However, one still might change the configure check for symbol versioning.
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46846
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
19:47:50 UTC ---
Cf. also for REAL:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/bc0e811575b758ab
-- The documentation seems to be OK, but an ICE is shown at the very end (in
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46846
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
19:31:57 UTC ---
Cf. also
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/8cdbfa22b5b1ab00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46761
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46853
Summary: gcc fails to warn about uninitialized variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46852
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, |alpha-dec-osf5.1b
|alph
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46631
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46844
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-08
16:43:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 8 16:43:14 2010
New Revision: 167596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167596
Log:
PR middle-end/46844
* regrename.c (check_ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46852
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have
‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in
cp_parser_class_specifier, at cp/parser.c:16947
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46631
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw 2010-12-08
16:38:14 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Wed Dec 8 16:38:10 2010
New Revision: 167595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167595
Log:
2010-12-08 Richard Earnshaw
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42694
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner 2010-12-08
16:34:26 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Dec 8 16:34:20 2010
New Revision: 167594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167594
Log:
PR 42694: add checks to make sure sqrt is sup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44856
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
16:28:07 UTC ---
Other example - from James,
cf.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/1a695db0fcfaa3e9
program kindtest
use ISO_FORTRAN_ENV
implicit none
inte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46851
Summary: ICE: in compute_affine_dependence, at
tree-data-ref.c:3897 with -fcheck-data-deps
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #19 from Chris Litchfield
2010-12-08 16:10:47 UTC ---
For now, we keep the -iquote in and hope the other parts are not removed. In
our shop we have many different functions to try and mitigate the problem.
Include files have #defines
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #18 from Chris Ferguson 2010-12-08
15:59:03 UTC ---
So there is no hope for this option then ? Anybody have a work around... We
are considering drastic measures to work around this.
Thanks,
Chris
From: "chris.litchfield at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46850
--- Comment #2 from brad.king at kitware dot com 2010-12-08 15:57:25 UTC ---
[smacks forehead]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46850
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46850
Summary: optimization of inline function leads to incorrect
integer comparison result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46772
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
15:10:29 UTC ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00664.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45471
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-08 14:37:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This patch indeed fixes the problem. (verified at r167585, x86_64-linux)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-12-08 14:19:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I stumbled into the underlying cause of this bug
Should clarify: I'm referring to the broken-ness referred to in comments 1 and
4. My patch probably won't mak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46845
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-08
14:12:31 UTC ---
Sorry for the confusion. I meant to show that your latest patch didn't fix this
issue (which actually has been present in gcc trunk for some time now...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-08
14:07:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Mine. Thanks Jack for letting me know that the posted patch
> also fixes this one. I added the testcase of this bug to the patch.
Yes. This patch resolves
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-08
13:56:00 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Dec 8 13:55:57 2010
New Revision: 167588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167588
Log:
PR target/43603
* haifa-sched.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.5.1, 4.6.0
--- Comment #2 from Tobias B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46816
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
--- Comment #23 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
13:11:02 UTC ---
Using the last draft patch: With the attachment 22685 to bug 46849, one gets an
error as "fun_qag" is regarded as FL_PROCEDURE and not as DERIVED; the issue
seems to be unrelated to t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-08
13:08:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 22685
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22685
Test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46849
Summary: [OOP] MODULE PROCEDURE resolution does not work in
BLOCK or SELECT TYPE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46626
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-08 12:39:59
UTC ---
Thank you, I did my flag reduction wrongly. It seems using of precompiled
headers sometimes causes wrong code, but it's unrelated to this PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44045
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||magicdice at hotmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46848
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46848
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46847
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46847
--- Comment #3 from Jens Kilian 2010-12-08 12:10:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> GCC 4.5 doesn't move end computation inside the loop. What do you expect
> to be "good" code? I get at -O[23]:
[snip]
The code generated by 4.5 is what I wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46848
Summary: ICE with initializer list for std::vector
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46847
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-08
12:02:09 UTC ---
GCC 4.5 doesn't move end computation inside the loop. What do you expect
to be "good" code? I get at -O[23]:
foo:
.LFB0:
mov %esi, %ecx
subl%edi, %esi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46804
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-08
11:53:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 22682
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22682
gcc46-pr46804.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46844
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46816
--- Comment #6 from yikey326 at hotmail dot com 2010-12-08 11:37:07 UTC ---
Now it works, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46819
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-12-08 10:17:09 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, ian at airs dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46819
>
> Ian Lance Taylor changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46847
--- Comment #1 from Jens Kilian 2010-12-08 09:12:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 22681
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22681
Source code and generated assembly
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo