http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
--- Comment #11 from Dave Korn 2010-12-04 06:28:48
UTC ---
Created attachment 22626
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22626
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
--- Comment #10 from Dave Korn 2010-12-04 06:28:04
UTC ---
Created attachment 22625
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22625
generated assembler
This is the assembler output that has been generated up to the point when it
ICEs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #33 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-04
03:18:41 UTC ---
Using the patch...
Index: gcc/collect2.c
===
--- gcc/collect2.c(revision 167430)
+++ gcc/collect2.c(working cop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #9 from Bill Westfield 2010-12-04
03:11:23 UTC ---
This is essentially identical to the patch I provided for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44617
so it looks good to me.
I had two worries:
Is R15 used anywhere else in sta
/howarth/dist --with-gmp=/sw
--with-ppl=/sw --with-cloog=/sw --with-mpc=/sw --with-libiconv-prefix=/sw
--with-system-zlib --x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib
--enable-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101203 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-mm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45822
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46776
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46776
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04
01:47:25 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Dec 4 01:47:21 2010
New Revision: 167451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167451
Log:
PR bootstrap/46776
* go-backend.c: N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #28 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-04 01:03:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> No, the build still failed the same way. In fact, when issuing command 'file
> gcc/tm.texi' on the build directory, gcc/tm.texi: ASCII English tex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40125
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22549|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |lto
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2010-12-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #31 from Mike Stump 2010-12-04
00:18:07 UTC ---
On Dec 3, 2010, at 3:20 PM, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> yes, I would have expected that this happens already. Now, I (or
> somebody else) needs to take the time and investigate wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
23:52:55 UTC ---
but it conflicts with the way we pre-seed the cache with our common tree nodes,
so it doesn't actually work but ICEs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
--- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-03
23:45:15 UTC ---
>From dwarfdump of the good .o file:
0x00a1: TAG_formal_parameter [3]
AT_name( "i" )
AT_decl_file( "/Users/mrs/net/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
Summary: debug info missing builtin type names on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #27 from Anh Vo 2010-12-03 23:23:49
UTC ---
No, the build still failed the same way. In fact, when issuing command 'file
gcc/tm.texi' on the build directory, gcc/tm.texi: ASCII English text, with very
long lines is outputed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-12-03 23:20:54 UTC ---
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, mikestump at comcast dot net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
>
> --- Comment #29 from Mike Stump 2010-12-03
> 23:13:02 UT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #29 from Mike Stump 2010-12-03
23:13:02 UTC ---
> The darwin people have to design a more robust way to run dsymutil.
Ok. How's this, you must run LINK_COMMAND_SPEC to link. When you run it, any
temporary real .o files created by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46793
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-03 23:04:52 UTC ---
We should disable this option (with a warning) in
ix86_option_override_internal if we don't think it can work reliably,
rather than leaving it to ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46795
Summary: bootstrap with gccgo fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #26 from Anh Vo 2010-12-03 22:35:13
UTC ---
Rebuilding was just started.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46791
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #25 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-03 21:35:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 22624
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22624
patch to use \r-stripped copy of $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi for comparison
Could you verify if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46793
--- Comment #4 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-03
21:24:06 UTC ---
Thanks, I understand the issue now.
Yes, -fschedule-insns and -fsched-pressure should be a paired options for
x86. -fsched-pressure does not solve the -m32 issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46794
Daniel Kraft changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46794
Summary: ICE on valid code involving power of small integer
kinds
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46793
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2010-12-03
21:05:46 UTC ---
The bug is in the architecture, not in the scheduling pass. You cannot expect
scheduling before register allocation to always yield code that you can
register-allocate with just 3 ge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46793
--- Comment #2 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-03
20:52:11 UTC ---
This bug should be fixed.
We are trying to make -fschedule-insns default for x86, and this enablement
causes
bootstrapping failure at this point.
Of course we can work around this b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46792
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46792
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-12-03
20:38:54 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Dec 3 20:38:47 2010
New Revision: 167442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167442
Log:
PR libffi/46792
* configure.ac (cris-*-el
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46793
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46793
Summary: -fschedule-insns causes ICE in compiling zlib/trees.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46792
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46792
Summary: libffi fails building for cris-elf
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libffi
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
--- Comment #10 from Mike Stump 2010-12-03
20:17:03 UTC ---
Jack says that some of the spurious warnings are fixed in Xcode 3.2.3. I have
3.2.4 on my system. Could you update Xcode and see if any we care about
remain. If so, please file a Appl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-03
20:08:32 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 3 20:08:28 2010
New Revision: 167441
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167441
Log:
PR debug/46123
* dwarf2out.c (gen_type_die_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46791
Summary: GCC fails on "for(struct { } f;;) ;", incorrectly
treating it as a range-based for loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2972
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20817|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-03
18:44:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 3 18:44:04 2010
New Revision: 167438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167438
Log:
PR c++/46058
* tree.c (lvalue_kind) [SCOPE_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45822
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Summary: [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite
with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 18:28:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 22622
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22622
A testcase
/usr/gcc-4.6/bin/g++ -r -W -Wall -flto-partition=none -Werror
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |REOPENED
--- Comment #24 from Jo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #23 from Anh Vo 2010-12-03 18:08:27
UTC ---
Yes, it is. In fact, I downloaded it from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20101113/. The exact name of the
snapshot is gcc-4.6-20101113.tar.bz2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #22 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-03 17:57:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Executing command 'file gcc/doc/tm.texi' yields
> ../gcc-4.6-20101113/gcc/doc/tm.texi: ASCII English text, with CRLF line
> terminators.
So, doe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #21 from Anh Vo 2010-12-03 17:45:58
UTC ---
Executing command 'file gcc/doc/tm.texi' yields
../gcc-4.6-20101113/gcc/doc/tm.texi: ASCII English text, with CRLF line
terminators.
However, executing command 'file gcc/tm.texi' in the bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-12-03 17:22:07 UTC ---
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
>
> --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-03
16:56:59 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 3 16:56:53 2010
New Revision: 167436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167436
Log:
PR debug/46123
* dwarf2out.c (gen_tagged_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-03
16:56:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 3 16:56:37 2010
New Revision: 167435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167435
Log:
PR c++/46058
* tree.c (lvalue_kind) [SCOPE_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45638
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46761
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 16:40:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I understand the issue now. Stock r167430 is fine but the addition of the
> approved patch to fix the md files and default i386 darwin to -mtune=core2
> causes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:29:31 UTC ---
Note the original i386 darwin patch with the rational for the movq to movd
assembly changes can be found at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01024.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:27:52 UTC ---
I understand the issue now. Stock r167430 is fine but the addition of the
approved patch to fix the md files and default i386 darwin to -mtune=core2
causes the failure in...
FAIL: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
16:25:40 UTC ---
Please report to CodeSourcery or use a FSF version.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Richard Gu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46745
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:22:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 22621
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22621
darwin core2 patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:20:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 22620
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22620
assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
at r167430 with darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:20:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 22619
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22619
assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
at r167430
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46745
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
16:10:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 3 16:10:36 2010
New Revision: 167433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167433
Log:
2010-12-03 Richard Guenther
PR c/46745
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
15:55:42 UTC ---
This works:
character*2 ddname,dname
dname(x)= 'x '
ddname=dname(0.0)
END
We fail to pad the string for this case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46789
Summary: go configuration with --prefix=/usr pollutes the
/usr/lib namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 15:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
15:39:49 UTC ---
Btw, I wonder why we bother to check the defs at all and not just do
def1 && flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def1))
we should be able to handle all vectorizable reduc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46781
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22612|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45133
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan W
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788
Summary: unsigned int possible treated as signed in a
union/struct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46787
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
15:37:16 UTC ---
To fix:
/* FIXME -- data dependence analysis does not work correctly for objects
with invariant addresses in loop nests. Let us fail here until the
problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 15:34:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > Created attachment 22616 [details] [details] [details]
> > > assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46787
Summary: Does not vectorize loop with load from scalar variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-12-03
15:26:32 UTC ---
gcc-3.4.6 is no longer supported upstream. Please upgrade to gcc-4.4 or
gcc-4.5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-12-03 15:21:51 UTC ---
Jan, your patch has broken bootstrap on two platforms for a week now,
and there's not even an indication that you're looking at the problem.
Please fix or revert AS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
15:21:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Created attachment 22616 [details] [details]
> > assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on
> > x86_64-apple-darw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 15:06:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created attachment 22616 [details]
> assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
> at r167375
It was fixed by revision 167398.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46786
Summary: ICE: verify_stmts failed: statement marked for throw,
but doesn't with -fopenmp -fnon-call-exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785
Summary: Doesn't vectorize reduction x += y*y
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
14:50:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 22616
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22616
assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
at r167375
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
14:49:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 22615
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22615
assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
at r167372
Generated w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39501
--- Comment #17 from Martin Guy 2010-12-03
14:46:28 UTC ---
Sort of. The cause of the bug was never found, and the workaround is to disable
an instruction. It might be worth trying enabling movsfcc in current GCC and
re-running the tests, since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
Summary: Internal compiler error with cairo In function
`_cairo_bo_sweep_line_compare_edges'
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schulze 2010-12-03
14:16:30 UTC ---
> I don't know anything about AVR, so I can't say that (I just noticed the r1
> issue).
Ok due to the compiler abi for the avr, r0,r1 are fixed registers that are
never allocated by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46783
Summary: [OOP] TRANSFER with polymorphic MOLD=
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46782
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fvar-tracking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedT
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo