[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-04 04:44:30 UTC --- "- we need to improve heuristics to figure out that inlining is smaller than call sequence (if it really is)" Well, we can't do that here. What I missed is that the function in questi

[Bug tree-optimization/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46298] New: constexpr ICE on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46298 Summary: constexpr ICE on ARM Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/46277] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166167 failed to build 252.eon in SPEC CPU 2000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46293] constexpr vs. tuple, ice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46293 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46289] [4.6 regression] ICE in build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at cp/semantics.c:5513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46285] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2642 with -mavx -fsplit-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-04 02:32:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Please try this > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c > index 8b8cbcf..de705b0 100644 >

[Bug tree-optimization/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-04 02:16:26 UTC --- Created attachment 22271 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22271 auto-reduced testcase

[Bug c++/46293] constexpr vs. tuple, ice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46293 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-04 02:15:11 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 4 02:15:08 2010 New Revision: 166297 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166297 Log: PR c++/46293 * semantics.c (build_data_memb

[Bug c++/46289] [4.6 regression] ICE in build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at cp/semantics.c:5513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-04 02:15:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 4 02:15:00 2010 New Revision: 166296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166296 Log: PR c++/46289 * call.c (can_convert_array):

[Bug tree-optimization/46297] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 Summary: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/46285] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2642 with -mavx -fsplit-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-04 02:09:18 UTC --- Please try this diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c index 8b8cbcf..de705b0 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285

[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] Missing ifcvt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 --- Comment #4 from davidxl 2010-11-04 00:55:35 UTC --- Another case that needs to be handled (none of the compiler tested handle it) For ifcvt to happen, control flow needs to be simplified (for case of if-then-else if ..) this is possible whe

[Bug target/46285] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2642 with -mavx -fsplit-stack

src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/ /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/gcc-4.6-20101103/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c -mavx -fsplit-stack -mtune=generic -S -m32 -o pr46285.s(timeout = 300) cc1: error: '-fspl

[Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010 --- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-04 00:38:21 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 4 00:38:17 2010 New Revision: 166295 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166295 Log: 2010-11-03 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-04 00:34:20 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 4 00:34:16 2010 New Revision: 166294 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166294 Log: 2010-11-03 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-04 00:25:15 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 4 00:25:10 2010 New Revision: 166293 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166293 Log: 2010-11-03 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-04 00:16:55 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Nov 4 00:16:47 2010 New Revision: 166288 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166288 Log: 2010-11-03 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 --- Comment #8 from Dave Korn 2010-11-03 23:13:55 UTC --- Author: davek Date: Wed Nov 3 23:13:51 2010 New Revision: 166285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166285 Log: PR lto/46291 * lto-plugin.c (claim_file_handler

[Bug middle-end/44569] ICE in simplify_subreg for debug insn with CONCATN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44569 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 22:44:07 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 3 22:44:04 2010 New Revision: 166282 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166282 Log: Revert: 2010-10-30 Uros Bizjak

[Bug middle-end/44569] ICE in simplify_subreg for debug insn with CONCATN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44569 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.6.0

[Bug middle-end/44569] ICE in simplify_subreg for debug insn with CONCATN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44569 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 22:46:11 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 3 22:46:08 2010 New Revision: 166283 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166283 Log: Revert: 2010-10-30 Uros Bizjak

[Bug middle-end/44569] ICE in simplify_subreg for debug insn with CONCATN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44569 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 22:42:42 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 3 22:42:39 2010 New Revision: 166281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166281 Log: Revert: 2010-10-30 Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/46200] [4.6 Regression] optimization regression in simple pointer loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200 davidxl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46296] New: Compiler causes assembler warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46296 Summary: Compiler causes assembler warning Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, lto, patch URL|

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22267|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 --- Comment #28 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-11-03 21:41:38 UTC --- OK, added.

[Bug tree-optimization/46214] internal compiler error: in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2135

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/45393] [4.5 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2135

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45393 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve_talmage at yahoo dot

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-linux |powerpc-linux, i?86-linux --- Comment

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 --- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2010-11-03 21:35:11 UTC --- Thanks Cary. I shall prepare a different patch that simply deletes the lines that close the fd, and shall fix LD to match.

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant 2010-11-03 21:31:22 UTC --- Sorry, the original design was for the plugin to maintain responsibility for the file descriptor. That didn't work well, so we added the GET_INPUT_FILE and RELEASE_INPUT_FILE interfaces

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/46289] [4.6 regression] ICE in build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at cp/semantics.c:5513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/46295] Missing vzeroupper

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46295 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 21:16:40 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 3 21:16:36 2010 New Revision: 166277 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166277 Log: Set use_avx256_p if 256bit AVX register is u

[Bug target/46295] Missing vzeroupper

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46295 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923 --- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-11-03 20:55:42 UTC --- Created attachment 22268 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22268 constexpr diagnostics test case #04 This is just a test case for previously-reported-and fixed bu

[Bug tree-optimization/46036] [4.6 Regression] verify_ssa failed: definition in block 3 follows the use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46036 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Po

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 --- Comment #3 from Dave Korn 2010-11-03 20:51:02 UTC --- Created attachment 22267 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22267 only close fd if we were called by gnu ld About to put this through a test cycle.

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923 --- Comment #7 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-11-03 20:48:38 UTC --- Created attachment 22266 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22266 constexpr diagnostics test case #03 more locality, from this under-development chrono snippet. %

[Bug target/46295] New: Missing vzeroupper

eParse_Vector, .-Parse_Vector .ident"GCC: (GNU) 4.6.0 20101103 (experimental)" .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits [...@gnu-6 969]$

[Bug c/45780] Warning for arithmetic operations involving C99 _Bool variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45780 Eric Blake changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ericb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/40935] [avr] conditional comparison uses short instead of char

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40935 Georg Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avr at gjlay dot de --- Comment #1 from Georg

[Bug tree-optimization/45965] [4.6 Regression] ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9: gfortran.dg/subref_array_pointer_4.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45965 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-03 19:49:32 UTC --- > Could you please apply the attached patch and see if it fixes the problem? Unless I did something wrong (I just used 'make' after the patch), it does not!-( > Otherwise, cou

[Bug middle-end/46292] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-shift2.c compilation, -O3 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292 --- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-03 19:32:50 UTC --- > Dave, can you please regression test this patch? Sorry, I'm just about to run out the door for a flight. Possibly, tomorrow. Dave

[Bug target/32523] disastrous scheduling for POWER5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32523 Christian Cornelssen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccorn at cs dot

[Bug tree-optimization/45965] [4.6 Regression] ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9: gfortran.dg/subref_array_pointer_4.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45965 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46289] [4.6 regression] ICE in build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at cp/semantics.c:5513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-03 19:13:30 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 3 19:13:27 2010 New Revision: 166270 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166270 Log: PR c++/46289 * semantics.c (build_constexpr

[Bug middle-end/46292] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-shift2.c compilation, -O3 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/23047] Combine ignores flag_wrapv

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23047 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org Known to fail

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/46238] [4.6 Regression] s390x bootstrap problem: wrong code generated in cfgcleanup/crossjumping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Summary|s390x bootstrap pr

[Bug middle-end/46292] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-shift2.c compilation, -O3 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-03 18:27:28 UTC --- Related to the fix for PR44569.

[Bug rtl-optimization/44374] Hoist same instructions in different branches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44374 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/46294] Spinlock with atomic primitives fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294 Dan Weber changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46292] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-shift2.c compilation, -O3 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292 --- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-03 18:19:59 UTC --- > What happens if you just remove the assert? Testing. Dave

[Bug libstdc++/46294] Spinlock with atomic primitives fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294 --- Comment #6 from Dan Weber 2010-11-03 18:19:04 UTC --- Created attachment 22264 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22264 TBB Spinlock assembler (includes compare and swap and fetch and store ops inline)

[Bug libstdc++/46294] Spinlock with atomic primitives fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294 --- Comment #5 from Dan Weber 2010-11-03 18:16:28 UTC --- Probably requires testing using a machine that has multiple cores :) My Machine is an INtel i7 720qm, so it has 4 cores + 4 hyperthreads fyi.

[Bug libstdc++/46294] Spinlock with atomic primitives fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294 --- Comment #4 from Dan Weber 2010-11-03 18:12:58 UTC --- Created attachment 22263 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22263 TBB based spinlock (working) Compiler with -ltbb keep -fopenmp, but -std=c++0x is unnecessary

[Bug middle-end/46292] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-shift2.c compilation, -O3 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-03 18:12:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > at ../../gcc/gcc/lower-subreg.c:416 > 416 gcc_assert (VECTOR_MODE_P (innermode)); > (gdb) p innermode > $1 = TImode What happens if you just rem

[Bug libstdc++/46294] Spinlock with atomic primitives fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294 --- Comment #3 from Dan Weber 2010-11-03 18:12:01 UTC --- Created attachment 22262 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22262 Spinlock Test G++ object file

[Bug libstdc++/46294] Spinlock with atomic primitives fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294 --- Comment #2 from Dan Weber 2010-11-03 18:11:37 UTC --- Created attachment 22261 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22261 G++ Assembler Output atomic test

[Bug libstdc++/46294] Spinlock with atomic primitives fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294 --- Comment #1 from Dan Weber 2010-11-03 18:11:11 UTC --- Created attachment 22260 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22260 Spinlock Test g++ ii output

[Bug libstdc++/46294] New: Spinlock with atomic primitives fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294 Summary: Spinlock with atomic primitives fails Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassig.

[Bug c++/46293] New: constexpr vs. tuple, ice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46293 Summary: constexpr vs. tuple, ice Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/46292] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-shift2.c compilation, -O3 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292 Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-shift2.c compilation, -O3 -g Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug fortran/43899] Wrong unused-variable warning with NAMELISTs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-03 17:47:51 UTC --- This patchlet gets rid of the bogus warning. All that remains is to check that namelists are used or not. Also note that we do not now check to see if commons are used either. Ind

[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923 --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-11-03 17:42:08 UTC --- Created attachment 22257 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22257 constexpr diagnostics test case #02 This diagnostic is for defaulted constructors. At this point,

[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-11-03 17:37:39 UTC --- Created attachment 22256 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22256 constexpr diagnostics test case #01 This is a test case that shows locality information for faile

[Bug target/46234] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug target/46234] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2010-11-03 16

[Bug middle-end/46234] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED Component|target

[Bug fortran/43310] -pedantic errors involving PARAMETERs and out of range result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43310 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-11-03 17:32:23 UTC --- This is going to be re-purposed into a more general bugreport about constexpr and diagnostics. The goal is to try and get compiler messages about why code constructs are or are not

[Bug target/46234] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-03 17:27:35 UTC --- Created attachment 22255 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22255 gcc46-pr46234.patch Untested fix. Could anyone please bootstrap/regtest this on ppc and s390? It m

[Bug lto/46291] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291 --- Comment #1 from Dave Korn 2010-11-03 17:12:51 UTC --- I am investigating.

[Bug libobjc/39465] libobjc does not find classes of DLLs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39465 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/46238] s390x bootstrap problem: wrong code generated in cfgcleanup/crossjumping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46114] [4.6 regression] g++ SEGV when built with gld on Solaris 10+/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-0

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-03 17:09:36 UTC --- Please try revision 166259.

[Bug fortran/45210] compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45210 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45865] [4.6 Regression] ifcvt/crossjump failed to mark return jump

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865 --- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 17:07:08 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 3 17:07:04 2010 New Revision: 166259 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166259 Log: Revert revision 164552. gcc/ 2010-11-03

[Bug c++/46289] [4.6 regression] ICE in build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at cp/semantics.c:5513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug tree-optimization/46288] ICE: SIGSEGV in walk_gimple_op (gimple.c:2857) with -O -fno-tree-dce and __builtin_expect()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46288 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46288] ICE: SIGSEGV in walk_gimple_op (gimple.c:2857) with -O -fno-tree-dce and __builtin_expect()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46288 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03 16:58:57 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 3 16:58:50 2010 New Revision: 166258 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166258 Log: 2010-11-03 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug middle-end/46234] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46233] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block 3 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c++/46270] [trans-mem] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46270 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/43849] Add _gfortran_finalize function to close down the library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43849 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug web/46260] Upgrade GCC and Sources Bugzilla from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46260 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/45572] [4.6 Regression] various ICEs with -finline-small-functions -findirect-inlining -finline-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45572 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46269] [trans-mem] internal compiler error in expand_block_tm of trans-mem.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/45985] [trans-mem] internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45985 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/45818] Missing message-ids in Bugzilla messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45818 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   3   >