[Bug c++/46221] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra 2010-10-30 04:41:54 UTC --- Created attachment 22203 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22203 aliases.i reduced C testcase This reduced testcase shows lack of "wobbly" alias when compiled with gcc

[Bug c++/46221] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra 2010-10-30 04:37:38 UTC --- The one thing that makes the missing alias different from other aliases is that its target is itself an alias. Hmm, that suggests a reduced C testcase might be easy.

[Bug tree-optimization/46236] New: Local aggregate not eliminated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46236 Summary: Local aggregate not eliminated Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-

[Bug rtl-optimization/46235] New: inefficient bittest code generation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46235 Summary: inefficient bittest code generation Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 --- Comment #6 from Zeev Tarantov 2010-10-29 23:44:49 UTC --- Setting -finline-limit high didn't produce different code. This function: 4007f8: 48 8b 77 10 mov0x10(%rdi),%rsi 4007fc: e9 c5 ff ff ff jmpq

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 --- Comment #3 from Ian Harvey 2010-10-29 23:32:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 22202 [details] > Possible patch for PR44265 Apologies - I wrote several paragraphs of reasonably coherent explanation, but it got lost when

[Bug tree-optimization/46213] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/aliasing_array_result_1.f90 ICE: in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4046 with custom compiler flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug objc++/46222] [4.6 Regression] ICE in grokdeclarator, at cp/decl.c:9441

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46222 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-29 23:28:39 UTC --- Especially since we now predict main as cold (it's called once).

[Bug tree-optimization/46229] gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-?.c issues on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46229 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46230] Several SLP tests XPASS on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46231] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-[36].c FAIL on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46231 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46232] [4.6 regression] 64-bit gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46232 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46234] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-29 23:22:24 UTC --- So, what is it? please properly mark bugs as regression if you know a working version.

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 --- Comment #2 from Ian Harvey 2010-10-29 23:20:42 UTC --- Created attachment 22202 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22202 Possible patch for PR44265

[Bug middle-end/44569] Debug statements passed to rtx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44569 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/46227] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/vector-shift2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46227 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug tree-optimization/46233] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block 3 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #93 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-29 22:39:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #92) > See followup here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01636.html Ah yes, that's better.

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #92 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-29 22:33:04 UTC --- See followup here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01636.html

[Bug objc++/46222] [4.6 Regression] ICE in grokdeclarator, at cp/decl.c:9441

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46222 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #91 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-29 22:29:10 UTC --- I just noticed that the latest patch is causing a failure of gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 with -O1 on my ia64-hp-hpux11.23 platform. Note that the original bug we were fixing was

[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 --- Comment #24 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-29 21:58:46 UTC --- On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, sebpop at gmail dot com wrote: > here is a preliminary patch (not tested yet other that the PR testcase). How does this patch deal with needing

[Bug fortran/46152] [F03] ALLOCATE with type-spec fails for intrinsic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152 --- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl 2010-10-29 21:51:20 UTC --- On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:51:33PM +, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > program hmm > > doubleprecision, allocatable :: x > > allocate(doubleprecicion :: x) > > end p

[Bug tree-optimization/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 --- Comment #23 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 21:44:09 UTC --- Hi, here is a preliminary patch (not tested yet other that the PR testcase). This patch improves chrec_apply to also handle these very uncommon cases that some like to make

[Bug middle-end/46234] New: ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 Summary: ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assigne

[Bug rtl-optimization/46204] g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C fails to compile on IA64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/46186] Clang creates code running 1600 times faster than gcc's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46186 Thorsten Glaser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot org --- Comment #22 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/46233] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block 3 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/46233] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block 3 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-29 20:56:43 UTC --- Here is a simple testcase which shows the problem is not in the tail call optimization pass: int foo () { int i = 0; while (1) { i += foo (); } } --- CUT --- Compile at -O

[Bug tree-optimization/46233] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block 3 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block 3 with -foptimize-sibling-calls Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Statu

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.5.2 |--- --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 20

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|no

[Bug tree-optimization/46232] New: [4.6 regression] 64-bit gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.c FAILs on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46232 Summary: [4.6 regression] 64-bit gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.c FAILs on SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug tree-optimization/46231] New: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-[36].c FAIL on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46231 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-[36].c FAIL on SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/46230] New: Several SLP tests XPASS on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230 Summary: Several SLP tests XPASS on SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unass

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug tree-optimization/46229] New: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-?.c issues on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46229 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-?.c issues on SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assigned

[Bug target/41822] pdp11 code generation bug & temporary fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41822 Paul Koning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46226] asm goto may leave stack pointer invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46226 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson 2010-10-29 17:16:16 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Fri Oct 29 17:16:11 2010 New Revision: 166070 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166070 Log: PR rtl-opt/46226 Move test case to x86 test direc

[Bug rtl-optimization/46226] asm goto may leave stack pointer invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46226 --- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2010-10-29 17:12:51 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Fri Oct 29 17:12:46 2010 New Revision: 166069 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166069 Log: PR rtl-opt/46226 Move test case to x86 test direc

[Bug rtl-optimization/46226] asm goto may leave stack pointer invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46226 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46226] asm goto may leave stack pointer invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46226 --- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson 2010-10-29 16:58:43 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Fri Oct 29 16:58:36 2010 New Revision: 166068 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166068 Log: PR rtl-opt/46226 * stmt.c (expand_asm_operands):

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] New: code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 Summary: code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/46226] asm goto may leave stack pointer invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46226 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2010-10-29 16:56:26 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Fri Oct 29 16:56:18 2010 New Revision: 166067 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166067 Log: PR rtl-opt/46226 * stmt.c (expand_asm_operands):

[Bug middle-end/45270] CPU2006 435.gromacs: Segmentation fault with -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45270 Changpeng Fang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46219] Generate indirect jump instruction on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46219 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/46227] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/vector-shift2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46227 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/vector-shift2.c Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: u

[Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bur...@net-b.de --- Comment #8 fro

[Bug rtl-optimization/46226] asm goto may leave stack pointer invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46226 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/46226] New: asm goto may leave stack pointer invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46226 Summary: asm goto may leave stack pointer invalid Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/46152] [F03] ALLOCATE with type-spec fails for intrinsic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46213] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/aliasing_array_result_1.f90 ICE: in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4046 with custom compiler flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from H.

[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-29 14:18:21 UTC --- Comeau has a similar warning. Here's a slightly smaller testcase that should produce a warning: #include #include void* operator new( std::size_t num_bytes, const char* ) throw

[Bug target/40191] fails to build a cross-compiler in-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40191 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from

[Bug libobjc/39465] libobjc does not find classes of DLLs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39465 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16 fro

[Bug target/46225] New: Wrong code generated for certain constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46225 Summary: Wrong code generated for certain constants Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug driver/32469] error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32469 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46224] New: Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 Summary: Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-29 13:03:07 UTC --- Actually we rewrite it into SSA form where we have no way to convince the operand scanner to preserve the volatileness. I guess whoever uses automatic volatiles deserves to get sta

[Bug c++/46221] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra 2010-10-29 13:01:34 UTC --- I poked at this a little today. remove_unreachable_alias_pairs prunes the alias_pair we need for some reason. I don't know my way around the cgraph code well enough to figure out why..

[Bug tree-optimization/46216] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/46217] [4.6 Regression] store to volatile is removed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46190] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment when building fma3d

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46190 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46184] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vectorizable_reduction (tree-vect-loop.c:4067) with -O -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46184 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/46183] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:396 with -O -fno-dse -fgcse -ftree-pre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/46212] Segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46223] New: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223 Summary: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-29 11:09:25 UTC --- So this is part of http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3164.html

[Bug c++/46222] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in grokdeclarator, at cp/decl.c:9441

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46222 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in grokdeclarator, at cp/decl.c:9441 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-29 08:31:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Meanwhile I am puzzled by the patch. My understanding of > compare_type_rank and compare_type_rank_if is that these tests should be > symmetric: tes

[Bug target/46219] Generate indirect jump instruction on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46219 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2010-10-29 08:17:17 UTC --- For some reason, memory operand is prohibited in a sibcall, see predicates.md: ;; Test for a valid operand for a call instruction. (define_predicate "call_insn_operand" (ior (match_op

[Bug testsuite/46211] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c compilation on powerpc-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46211 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|