http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46031
--- Comment #4 from Justin Lebar 2010-10-15
05:54:28 UTC ---
> Actually it says the target processors might not include all of the builtins.
Maybe I'm not making sense. My point is that there's a builtin (*) that is
supported by some target pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46031
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-15
05:39:53 UTC ---
Actually it says the target processors might not include all of the builtins.
What is a target processor is up to each target and likewise on how to change
the processor.
This should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46031
--- Comment #2 from Justin Lebar 2010-10-15
05:30:20 UTC ---
"Not all operations are supported by all target processors" isn't the same as
"not all operations supported by target processors are listed here."
If you want to be vague and say "some
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46031
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-15
05:08:00 UTC ---
I don't think the atomics page should reference a target specific option.
I think the following sentence makes that clear that the builtins are dependent
on target options as they ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46031
Summary: Atomic Builtins page should indicate that 16-byte
compare-and-swap is available with -mcex16
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45447
--- Comment #3 from Yao Qi 2010-10-15 04:03:14 UTC
---
Author: qiyao
Date: Fri Oct 15 04:03:10 2010
New Revision: 165493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165493
Log:
gcc/
PR target/45447
* config/arm/arm.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45089
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-15
02:43:12 UTC ---
Excellent!
If you send me this patch and path for the other Mozilla -g PR, I will give
them a try on full Mozilla build.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44951
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-15
02:41:58 UTC ---
Hmm, shall we just trim down freeing of lang datastructures to not depend on -g
or simply refuse link LTO objects compiled with -g0 with -g (and convince
Mozilla to update their Makefile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44871
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-15
02:39:00 UTC ---
Richard, any hope for a clean fix or shall we go with the hack above for next
release?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44236
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-15
01:29:38 UTC ---
Updated summary...
- Last patch needed to get Mozilla working is posted as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01286.html
- Configuration needs to be done with -fwhopr for C+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45621
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45621
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-15
01:20:59 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Oct 15 01:20:55 2010
New Revision: 165492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165492
Log:
PR middle-end/45621
* g++.dg/lto/pr45621.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46028
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-15 01:01:13 UTC ---
Note that you can't trivially extend the laxity in
/* Handle a size folded to an integer constant but
not an integer constan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46029
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-15 00:53:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 22048
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22048
hopefully reduced testcase
$ g++ -O -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores pr46029.C
$ ./a.out
Segmentation f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46030
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-linux,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46029
Summary: -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores causes FAIL:
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/pb_ds/example/tree_interval
s.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46030
Summary: registers trashed with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46028
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-14
23:23:10 UTC ---
Comeau C/C++ gives the following error message for the above testcase:
"ComeauTest.c", line 5: error: expression must have integral type
<= 16.0)];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46028
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-14
23:21:53 UTC ---
16.0 is a floating point number which I think is causing the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46028
Summary: Regression from GCC 4.4: "storage size of 'test_array'
isn't constant"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45730
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
--- Comment #11 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-14 22:49:12
UTC ---
Created attachment 22045
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22045
reduced testcase from comment #1
Reduced from the original testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers 2010-10-14
22:41:10 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Oct 14 22:41:05 2010
New Revision: 165485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165485
Log:
PR c/45969
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45730
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-14
21:32:40 UTC ---
I fixed some additional problems in the area that may lead to undefined
symbols, so hope the PR is fixed for good and can be closed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45736
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45871
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #4 from Art Haas 2010-10-14 20:13:45 UTC
---
Created attachment 22044
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22044
Pre-processed 'lto-lang.c' file
The pre-processed 'lto-lang.c' output has been sent and is compressed due
cal
--with-mpfr=/export/home/arth/local --enable-checking=release
--enable-threads=posix --with-gnu-as --with-as=/export/home/arth/local/bin/as
--with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/export/home/arth/local/bin/ld
--enable-libstdcxx-pch=no --enable-objc-gc --build=i386-pc-solaris2.10
Thread model: posix
gcc version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46008
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-10-14
19:34:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Oct 14 19:34:16 2010
New Revision: 165476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165476
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46008
* tree-if-conv.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-10-14
19:13:30 UTC ---
This one is on the top of my list. I usually take a few days to sort it out.
I already have a general idea what the problem is. I will use your added test
cases when I nail it. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45621
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-14
18:59:58 UTC ---
The testing went fine, I just wanted to give more tought if some cheaper self
testing can be made instead of keeping clone info and then forgot about the
patch.
Will re-test and commit.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46027
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46027
Summary: (unsignedtype1)(unsignedtype2)(unsignedtype1_var) not
changed into unsignedtype1_var & NNN when
sizeof(type1) > sizeof(type2)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46026
Summary: [trans-mem] Unable to build libitm on Solaris/x86
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #10 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45921
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46025
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth 2010-10-14 18:31:31
UTC ---
*** Bug 46025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46025
Summary: [4.6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr38240.c FAILs on
Solaris 8 and 9/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46024
Summary: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
--- Comment #5 from Marco van Hulten 2010-10-14
18:15:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> [...]
> The issue is really the ".true." ("T","true", ".false.", "F", "false"). If the
> last item (in the namelist and in the derived type) is an integer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46023
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/pr43430-2.c FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46022
Summary: [4.6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-double-reduc-5.c
FAILs on Solaris 10/x86 with gas
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Summary: 3 tree-ssa tests XPASS almost everywhere
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #48 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
17:29:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> One should note that GCC's implementation of PCH is way different from
> MSVC's.
> So comparing with PCH is not the correct thing to do really.
I unders
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-14
17:14:45 UTC ---
Thinking of it again, one probably needs also NAGs error message as:
FUNCTION F_X(A) bind(c,name='F_X')
CHARACTER*(*) F_X
END FUNCTION
...
interface
FUNCTION F_X(A) bind(c,name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #47 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-14
17:13:01 UTC ---
One should note that GCC's implementation of PCH is way different from MSVC's.
So comparing with PCH is not the correct thing to do really. PCH in GCC is
really preprocessed/sematic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #46 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
17:09:05 UTC ---
Another data point after having a closer look at .drectve section in all of the
files: as previously noticed, 4.4 generates "-export" directives for 180
symbols while 4.5 generates th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
Summary: Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1
character return type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Comment #10 from Stephen Clarke 2010-10-14
17:01:47 UTC ---
OK, I can see that the ARM ARM states for Rm == PC then its unpredictable.
But for Rn == PC, I can only see that its unpredictable if W is 1
or P is 0 (I am looking at encoding A1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019
Summary: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] x / (0x2ULL << y)
miscompilation with 32-bit HWI
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Comment #9 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com 2010-10-14 16:39:26 UTC ---
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:33 +, stephen.clarke at st dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
>
> Stephen Clarke changed:
>
>
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:33 +, stephen.clarke at st dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
>
> Stephen Clarke changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
Stephen Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stephen.clarke at st dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #45 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
16:12:00 UTC ---
Here are the files.
Notice that about half of the size of the MSVC object file is taken by debug
information ("/Zi" option was used when compiling it) while all gcc versions
contain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
Vadim Zeitlin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22041|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #43 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
16:01:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 22041
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22041
appbase.cpp file from wxWidgets compiled with MSVC 9 (a.k.a. 2008)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #42 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
16:01:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 22040
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22040
appbase.cpp file from wxWidgets compiled with g++ 3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45343
xunxun1982 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-14 15:57:52
UTC ---
Please also show the full options passed to cc1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44913
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44913
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-14
15:51:22 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 14 15:51:15 2010
New Revision: 165473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165473
Log:
2010-10-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #41 from Dave Korn 2010-10-14 15:50:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> (In reply to comment #36)
> > could Vadim and/or Cesar please add
> > some of the object files we've been discussing as attachments to this bug
> > report, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers 2010-10-14
15:48:59 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Oct 14 15:48:52 2010
New Revision: 165472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165472
Log:
PR c/45969
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #40 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
15:47:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> could Vadim and/or Cesar please add
> some of the object files we've been discussing as attachments to this bug
> report, so that we can all take a close l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
Vadim Zeitlin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22037|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #38 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
15:44:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 22038
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22038
appbase.cpp file from wxWidgets compiled with g++ 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #37 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
15:42:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 22037
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22037
appbase.cpp file from wxWidgets compiled with g++ 4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #36 from Dave Korn 2010-10-14 15:37:34
UTC ---
Hi everyone, sorry I've been busy working on LTO stuff for a bit but I haven't
forgotten this.
Before this discussion gets too heated, could Vadim and/or Cesar please add
some of the obj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i386-pc-solaris2.10
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
PR lto/45382
* g++.dg/lto/20101014-2_0.C: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/20101014-2_0.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
Summary: Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #35 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
15:24:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > Because of this issue, I have been using GCC4.4.x, but do not want to
> > upgrade
> > to 4.5.x.
> > Why this issue can not b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@htw-saarland.de
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46014
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45957
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #34 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-14
15:09:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Because of this issue, I have been using GCC4.4.x, but do not want to upgrade
> to 4.5.x.
> Why this issue can not been confirmed?
The way I read it, this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46016
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-14
13:51:36 UTC ---
The docs for --with-mpc do mention this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46015
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46016
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45984
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #33 from Loaden YC 2010-10-14 12:18:58
UTC ---
Because of this issue, I have been using GCC4.4.x, but do not want to upgrade
to 4.5.x.
Why this issue can not been confirmed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46017
Summary: Reject ALLOCATE(a, a%b) as "a%b" depends on the
allocation status of "a"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity:
cc version 4.6.0 20101014 (experimental) (GCC)
configure:3004: $? = 0
configure:2993: /home/amit/build/gcc/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/amit/build/gcc/./gcc/
-B/home/amit/install/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/home/amit/install/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/home/amit/install/gcc/x86_64-unk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44561
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: fo...@rmki.kfki.hu
/* test.c */
int f(int i)
{
static void* labs[2] =
{ &&lab1,
&&lab2
};
goto *(labs[i&1]);
lab1: return 1;
lab2: return 2;
return 0;
}
/* test.c end */
GCC 4.6.0 20101014 -Wall prints the followiung
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44561
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-14
11:59:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 14 11:59:47 2010
New Revision: 165462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165462
Log:
2010-10-14 Richard Guenther
PR lto/445
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45764
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-14
11:54:13 UTC ---
The snippet seems to work as far as to set SUB_DISTANCE to chrec_dont_know,
together with the suggested fix in comment #5 it fixes this PR.
Now, the hunk below alone would already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690
--- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora 2010-10-14 11:17:55
UTC ---
attached gcc build script builds libstdc++.a with dwarf3 debuginfo
which works with testcase compiled with dwarf3 or dwarf4.
if you change CUSTOM_FLAGS in build script to emit dwarf4 fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690
--- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2010-10-14 11:13:10
UTC ---
Created attachment 22036
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22036
my gcc build script.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46014
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
