http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45976
Summary: optional template keyword is not accepted by g++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45975
Summary: template keyword is not allowed, however, accepted by
g++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues 2010-10-12
05:03:56 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Tue Oct 12 05:03:52 2010
New Revision: 165350
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165350
Log:
Fix PR testsuite/45974 by reverting r165323 for n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-12
02:31:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fixed.
Not really until it's committed. Pending approval? Or a missing git2svn push?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl.tools at gmail dot com, |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|ktie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974
Summary: make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix{-m32,}'"
doesn't check -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45972
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-11
23:17:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It is caused by revision 159912:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-05/msg00969.html
This does not make sense as this is fixing an ICE which would have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-11
23:15:01 UTC ---
Silvius --
due to the recent changes to the normal-mode forward_list to enable the
debug-mode version (essentially the use of a nested namespace), now simply
including as part of a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45973
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44731
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45912
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #3 from Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45973
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-11
22:05:17 UTC ---
I think this is the same as PR 44731.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45973
Summary: NRVO gives incorrect location
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45972
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-11
21:49:56 UTC ---
Confirmed on x86_64-apple-darwin10, it works with 4.4.4, 4.5.0 and 4.6 revision
158105, and fails with revision 159105. Hence this is a regression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45972
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45972
Summary: tree check fail in
use_pred_not_overlap_with_undef_path_pred
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-11 21:17:27 UTC ---
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> At -O0, the operation is handled as a COMPONENT_REF. At -O1,
> we have a MEM_REF.
The attached change probab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|ice in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Summary: ice in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45562
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45562
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2010-10-11
20:23:40 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Oct 11 20:23:04 2010
New Revision: 165330
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165330
Log:
2010-10-11 Martin Jambor
PR c++/45562
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445
--- Comment #27 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-11
19:39:41 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon Oct 11 19:39:37 2010
New Revision: 165329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165329
Log:
PR bootstrap/45445
* ira-lives.c (mark_ps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820
Siarhei Siamashka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||siarhei.siamashka at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #16 from John David Anglin 2010-10-11
19:09:48 UTC ---
At -O0, the operation is handled as a COMPONENT_REF. At -O1,
we have a MEM_REF. We get to this point in expand_expr_real_1:
if (mode != BLKmode
&& (unsigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2010-10-11
19:09:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Should I write two bug reports about the found problems?
Sure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35855
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45699
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45699
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor 2010-10-11
18:45:28 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Oct 11 18:45:23 2010
New Revision: 165327
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165327
Log:
2010-10-11 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2010-10-11
18:40:42 UTC ---
And by the way, I'm afraid we really need to somehow address PR 45934
before we attempt to fold more O_T_Rs coming from
constructors/destructors.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45711
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45711
--- Comment #14 from Ralf Wildenhues 2010-10-11
18:08:43 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Mon Oct 11 18:08:36 2010
New Revision: 165325
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165325
Log:
Fix PR libstdc++/45711.
libstdc++-v3/:
PR l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #15 from John David Anglin 2010-10-11
18:08:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Sorry, wrong expansion:
;; D.1972_24 = sB.l;
(insn 135 134 136 (set (reg/f:SI 194)
(high:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("sB") [flags 0x200] ))
) pr45722-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35855
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues 2010-10-11
17:58:56 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Mon Oct 11 17:58:53 2010
New Revision: 165322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165322
Log:
Fix PR bootstrap/35855: awk character classes.
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45926
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2010-10-11
17:46:00 UTC ---
I have run 'make profiledbootstrap' of today's checkout of the 4.5
branc (revision 165315) on i686 and it finished without any problems
for me. I believe I configured it much like it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-10-11
17:37:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please give me pre-processed sources to test. I tried building a
> cross-toolchain to cris-elf, but I don't see that failure. I see
> many others due
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schulze
2010-10-11 17:37:30 UTC ---
Should I write two bug reports about the found problems?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45791
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mjambor at suse dot cz |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45851
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45862
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45862
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2010-10-11
16:52:17 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Oct 11 16:52:12 2010
New Revision: 165319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165319
Log:
PR middle-end/45862
* doc/tm.texi.in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45959
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2010-10-11
16:49:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> #pragma interface
> template struct foo;
> template
> struct foo : foo {
> foo(T* t) : foo(*t) { }
> };
This looks like a different bug that just produc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45965
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-11
16:40:10 UTC ---
This pr is due to revision 164790
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=164790
Author:spop
Date:Thu Sep 30 21:18:48 2010 UTC (10 days, 19 hours
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin 2010-10-11
16:30:09 UTC ---
At -O0, memcpy is used. So, problem doesn't occur.
;; x = sB;
(insn 81 80 82 (set (reg/f:SI 160)(high:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("sB") [flags
0x200] ))
) pr45722-2.c:48 -1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45686
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43034
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45061
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-11 16:05:28
UTC ---
-fira-coalesce was removed by r164959, so this probably can be closed
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=164959
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45965
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-11
15:55:29 UTC ---
Reduced range: r164769 no ICE, r164800 ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2010-10-11
15:20:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Reduced form, Jason, are the "should be" comments below correct?
>
> // should be rejected, value is not a template
> template
> const int A::template val
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45562
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2010-10-11
15:12:40 UTC ---
A proposed patch submitted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00921.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45968
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45970
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45970
Summary: tree DSE misses many obvious dead stores
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45886
--- Comment #2 from Siarhei Siamashka
2010-10-11 14:31:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed though I think this isn't an "enhancement" but more a bug because
> code can't identify whether -mfloat-abi=hard is chosen by use of a
> pre-pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in build_binary_op, at
c-typeck.c:9833
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45966
--- Comment #2 from Marcus Shawcroft
2010-10-11 14:15:05 UTC ---
Hi,
./install/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc -S -O2 mark.i -da
Configured:
Target: arm-none-eabi
Configured with: /work/home/marcus/arm-work/gcc/configure
--target=arm-none-eabi --with-cp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-11
14:14:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Ok. If I understand the standard correct is the template keyword on the
> following places
>
> const int A::template B::value = A::template B::C::value;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45968
Summary: ICE: tree code 'template_type_parm' is not supported
in gimple streams with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-11
14:08:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Ok and how is the case with the first template keyword, which Comeau says is
> incorrect and gcc accepts it?
>
> const int A< a>::B::template value = A::
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schulze 2010-10-11
14:03:46 UTC ---
Ok. If I understand the standard correct is the template keyword on the
following places
const int A::template B::value = A::template B::C::value;
correct but optional, right? The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45955
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45955
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2010-10-11
14:02:08 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Oct 11 14:02:03 2010
New Revision: 165308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165308
Log:
PR middle-end/45955
* ipa.c (build_cd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45966
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-10-11
13:55:03 UTC ---
Over here the replacement isn't happening due to costs:
Successfully matched this instruction:
(set (reg:SI 155)
(and:SI (reg:SI 0 r0 [ p ])
(const_int 4095 [0xfff])))
rej
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45959
Ryan Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||scovich at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
Michael Schulze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45959
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45959
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2010-10-11
13:25:45 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Oct 11 13:25:37 2010
New Revision: 165306
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165306
Log:
PR lto/45959
PR lto/45960
* pt.c (tsubs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45960
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2010-10-11
13:25:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Oct 11 13:25:37 2010
New Revision: 165306
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165306
Log:
PR lto/45959
PR lto/45960
* pt.c (tsubs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45944
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-10-11
13:15:10 UTC ---
FTR, regular bootstrap (rather than profiledbootstrap) seems to work. I'm past
genmddeps in stage3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
Michael Schulze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
Summary: gcc-4.5.x optimizes code with side-effects away
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45966
Summary: Incorrect combiner transformation.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45965
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9:
gfortran.dg/subref_array_pointer_4.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45089
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-10-11
12:28:48 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 11 12:28:42 2010
New Revision: 165304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165304
Log:
PR debug/45656
* cse.c (cse_extended_basic_bloc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #11 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-11 12:18:57 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Mon Oct 11 12:18:47 2010
New Revision: 165302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165302
Log:
PR tree-optimization/45902
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schulze 2010-10-11
11:27:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > template
> > template
> > const int A< a>::B::template value = A::B::C::value;
>
> Are you s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-11
10:13:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> template
> template
> const int A< a>::B::template value = A::B::C::value;
Are you sure the 'template' keyword belongs he
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44561
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-11
09:51:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 22014
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22014
WIP patch
Work-in-progress for the just-stream-lang-type idea. Adding odd LANG_TYPE
handling to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44561
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-11
09:30:57 UTC ---
New problems.
typedef decltype(nullptr) nullptr_t;
class shared_ptr {
public:
shared_ptr(nullptr_t __p);
};
shared_ptr p = nullptr;
exposes a nullptr constant (INTEGER_CST of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
Summary: The compiler does not complain about a required
template keyword.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
98 matches
Mail list logo
