[Bug fortran/45744] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_op, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1366

--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-22 06:46 --- Confirmed as a regression: the tests compile with 4.5.0 and revision 163718, but not with revision 164232. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45744

[Bug fortran/45745] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_stride

-- Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.6.0 Known to work||4

[Bug fortran/45745] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_stride

Very recent regression: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. gfc_conv_array_stride (descriptor=0x0, dim=0) at /data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2259 2259 type = TREE_TYPE (descriptor); (gdb) bt #0 gfc_conv_array_stride (descriptor=0x0, dim=0) at /data03/

[Bug java/44095] [4.5/4.6 Regression] massive java failures due to -findirect-dispatch breakage on sparc64-linux

--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 06:06 --- Jakub, what do you think? gcc.c reads: %http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44095

[Bug fortran/45654] -fwhole-file doesn't warn about INTERFACE vs. definition mismatches

--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 05:31 --- No. Confirmed - thanks for picking it up. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45710] Adjust format and padding for WRITE of NAMELIST group to internal file

--- Comment #11 from urbanjost at comcast dot net 2010-09-22 05:19 --- Subject: Re: Adjust format and padding for WRITE of NAMELIST group to internal file Great! Although I (too?) find the f2008 reference a little confusing on whether the line beginning the NAMELIST output needs to ha

[Bug fortran/45744] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_op, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1366

--- Comment #2 from jpr at csc dot fi 2010-09-22 04:52 --- somewhat simpler testcase: MODULE m CONTAINS FUNCTION rnd(n) INTEGER, INTENT(in) :: n REAL(8), DIMENSION(n) :: rnd CALL RANDOM_NUMBER(rnd) END FUNCTION rnd SUBROUTINE GeneticOptimize(n) INTEGER :: n LO

[Bug fortran/45744] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_op, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1366

--- Comment #1 from jpr at csc dot fi 2010-09-22 04:48 --- P.S. don't mind my directory naming. This is trunk gfortran from ~6 hours ago. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45744

[Bug fortran/45744] New: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_op, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1366

ead model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20100921 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O1' '-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=pentiumpro' /home/wrk/jpr/gcc-4.5/bin/../libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/f951 a.f90 -quiet -dumpbase a.f90 -mt

[Bug libfortran/45723] opening /dev/null for appending writes

--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 03:10 --- Subject: Bug 45723 Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Sep 22 03:10:24 2010 New Revision: 164507 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164507 Log: 2010-09-21 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/45723

[Bug rtl-optimization/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-09-22 03:10 --- My mistake... dg-prune-output is insufficient to prevent scan-assembler-not from accidentally matching on live_support in the intel darwin assembly. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed:

[Bug rtl-optimization/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-09-22 02:56 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Fixed. > The new trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr45739.c erroneously fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10 as ... FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45739.c scan-assembler-not por since i

[Bug fortran/45710] Adjust format and padding for WRITE of NAMELIST group to internal file

--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 02:52 --- Created an attachment (id=21860) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21860&action=view) Tentative patch, not regression tested Our interpretation of this: 3 An ampersand character followed immed

[Bug fortran/45710] Adjust format and padding for WRITE of NAMELIST group to internal file

--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 02:26 --- Changed summary of this bug to reflect that I will be adjusting the padding of internal unit character arrays and initial space on some lines. On my system I see: &NL1 JUNK space A= 1.000,JUNK space B=

[Bug target/45701] [4.6 Regression] Fail to prefer using r3 for padding a push/pop multiple to 8-byte alignment

--- Comment #3 from qiyao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 02:18 --- Patch is submitted to gcc-patches for review http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01741.html -- qiyao at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 00:33 --- (In reply to comment #13) > I seem to be getting this bug on arm thumb also That is a different bug, see PR 38644. This bug records the PowerPC specific bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

--- Comment #13 from darrenrjenkins at gmail dot com 2010-09-22 00:20 --- I seem to be getting this bug on arm thumb also USB_INT16U ReadLE16U ( volatile USB_INT08U *pmem ) { USB_INT16U val; USB_INT08U *bytes = (USB_INT08U *)&val; bytes[0] = pmem[0]; bytes[1] = pm

[Bug rtl-optimization/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 00:06 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 23:33 --- Subject: Bug 45739 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 21 23:33:01 2010 New Revision: 164501 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164501 Log: PR rtl-optimization/45739 * simplify-rtx.c (simpl

[Bug tree-optimization/45743] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/whole_file_3.f90 ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -finline-small-functions

The ICE message is similiar to PR45076 and PR45733, but this might be different problem. Compiler output: $ gfortran -O -finline-small-functions whole_file_3.f90 whole_file_3.f90:17.71: call PHLOAD (R, 1) ! { dg-error "Missing alternate return spec" }

[Bug java/44095] [4.5/4.6 Regression] massive java failures due to -findirect-dispatch breakage on sparc64-linux

--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:45 --- > Java is severely broken on sparc64-linux with gcc 4.5/4.6, which is a major > regression from 4.4: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg00853.html (4.6 broken) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testre

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:44 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Created an attachment (id=21858) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21858&action=view) [edit] It fixes the bug with no regressions for r164480. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug rtl-optimization/41085] [4.5/4.6 Regression]: cris-elf gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c

--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:30 --- . -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/45051] [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c and abs-3.c due to "track subwords of DImode allocnos"

--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:26 --- Subject: Bug 45051 Author: hp Date: Tue Sep 21 21:25:57 2010 New Revision: 164498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164498 Log: PR rtl-optimization/41085 Backport from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/41085] [4.5/4.6 Regression]: cris-elf gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c

--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:26 --- Subject: Bug 41085 Author: hp Date: Tue Sep 21 21:25:57 2010 New Revision: 164498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164498 Log: PR rtl-optimization/41085 Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/45742] New: VOLATILE not honored in comparison

i...@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Compare> cat op.f90 program main integer, volatile :: j if (j>j) call notfound end program main i...@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Compare> gfortran op.f90 i...@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Compare> The call to notfound should not be elided. -- Summary: VOLATILE not hono

[Bug driver/44933] --help=common undocumented

--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:58 --- Please send patches to the gcc-patches list, in the usual format and with all information attached as per . You might want to consider wrapping lines so neither source file nor --he

[Bug other/44253] libdecnumber .o vs. obj => @OBJEXT@

--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:56 --- trunk is fixed by r163993, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00285.html -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug web/43133] changes.html needs to document configure API changes due to autotools upgrade

--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:52 --- The changes.html patch went in a while ago; I'm leaving open PR 43132 for remaining issues but closing this one. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug objc/23710] objc front-end should not "abort" after erroring out about method definition not in class context

--- Comment #4 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:48 --- Fix committed to trunk. Thanks -- nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug objc/23710] objc front-end should not "abort" after erroring out about method definition not in class context

--- Comment #3 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:47 --- Subject: Bug 23710 Author: nicola Date: Tue Sep 21 20:47:04 2010 New Revision: 164497 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164497 Log: PR objc/23710 In gcc/: * c-family/c-common.h (objc_star

[Bug lto/45702] [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures

--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-09-21 20:40 --- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures > > Similar errors on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. Excess errors are: > > > > cc1: error: LTO support has not been enabled in this configuration > > cc1: er

[Bug target/45694] [MinGW64] fortran host associated variables+optimization==failure?

--- Comment #14 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 19:09 --- Issue fixed on mainline and backported to 4.5 branch -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/45694] [MinGW64] fortran host associated variables+optimization==failure?

--- Comment #13 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 19:05 --- Subject: Bug 45694 Author: ktietz Date: Tue Sep 21 19:05:18 2010 New Revision: 164495 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164495 Log: 2010-09-21 Kai Tietz PR target/45694 * con

[Bug fortran/45648] [4.6 regression] Unnecessary temporary for transpose calls as actual argument.

--- Comment #7 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 19:04 --- Subject: Bug 45648 Author: mikael Date: Tue Sep 21 19:04:09 2010 New Revision: 164494 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164494 Log: 2010-09-21 Mikael Morin PR fortran/45648 *

[Bug objc/25965] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Allows duplicate member names in objc subclasses

--- Comment #11 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 18:52 --- Patch applied to trunk. Thanks -- nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug objc/25965] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Allows duplicate member names in objc subclasses

--- Comment #10 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 18:51 --- Subject: Bug 25965 Author: nicola Date: Tue Sep 21 18:51:34 2010 New Revision: 164491 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164491 Log: PR objc/25965 In gcc/objc/: * objc-act.c (objc_get_inte

[Bug target/45694] [MinGW64] fortran host associated variables+optimization==failure?

--- Comment #12 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:58 --- Subject: Bug 45694 Author: ktietz Date: Tue Sep 21 17:58:32 2010 New Revision: 164489 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164489 Log: 2010-09-21 Kai Tietz PR target/45694 * con

[Bug libstdc++/41975] [C++0x] [DR579] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

--- Comment #30 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-21 17:55 --- More correctly (in the meanwhile went through a exchange at the beginning of this year), Howard stores the hash, which boils down to a memory requirement similar to that of the traditional doubly linked list s

[Bug c/45741] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in string_constant (expr.c:9863) when parsing memcmp()

--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 17:37 --- It is caused by revision 164438: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00734.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/45737] Bootstrap comparison failure

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal GCC target triplet||ia64-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/45572] [4.6 Regression] various ICEs with -finline-small-functions -findirect-inlining -finline-functions

--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:19 --- Created an attachment (id=21859) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21859&action=view) Proposed fix. I'm testing this fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45572

[Bug tree-optimization/45563] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/opt/devirt1.C ICEs in ipcp_init_cloned_node, at ipa-cp.c:190 with -fno-early-inlining -fipa-cp-clone

--- Comment #2 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:14 --- The same patch works for both bugs so I assume they are duplicates. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45572 *** -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/45572] [4.6 Regression] various ICEs with -finline-small-functions -findirect-inlining -finline-functions

--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:14 --- *** Bug 45563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45572

[Bug c/45741] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in string_constant (expr.c:9863) when parsing memcmp()

Command line: $ gcc testcase.c $ cat testcase.c static const int data[2048]; void foo (void *ptr) { __builtin_memcmp (data, ptr, 1); } Relevant valgrind output: $ valgrind --trace-children=yes /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-164484-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/bin/gcc testcase.c ==13187== Invali

[Bug c++/45562] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_build_unary_op (typeck.c:5083) with -std=gnu++0x -fipa-cp-clone -fcompare-debug

--- Comment #3 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:08 --- This is the full backtrace: #0 0x081e945d in cp_build_unary_op (code=ADDR_EXPR, xarg=0xb76d0dac, noconvert=0, complain=3) at /home/mjambor/gcc/icln/gcc/cp/typeck.c:5091 #1 0x080d10b3 in build_this (obj=0xb76d7

the arm

I misunderstood you. I thought you said 'anybody,' and so I supposed 'anybody' included--well, anybody; that is, everybody." "It doth--anybody that is of lofty birth; and the better if he be royal." "That, it meseemeth, might well be," said the abbot, who saw his opportunity to smooth things and a

[Bug rtl-optimization/45678] [4.4/4.5 Regression] crash on vector code with -m32 -msse

--- Comment #31 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 16:42 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 16:34 --- Created an attachment (id=21858) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21858&action=view) Same patch, just gunzipped this time. :) -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/45678] [4.4/4.5 Regression] crash on vector code with -m32 -msse

--- Comment #30 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 16:30 --- Subject: Bug 45678 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 21 16:30:21 2010 New Revision: 164486 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164486 Log: PR middle-end/45678 * expr.c (expand_expr_real_1

[Bug lto/45729] -flto conflicts with -mthumb

--- Comment #1 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:30 --- Unfortunately, LTO does not officially work on ARM yet. There are many LTO failures in the gcc testsuite at the moment. Can you retry without LTO so we can diagnose the interworking problems? -- ibolton at gcc

[Bug lto/45727] ICE: in subreg_get_info, at rtlanal.c:3092

--- Comment #4 from rafael dot carre at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 15:20 --- Same output with -mcpu=arm926ej-s or -mcpu=arm7tdmi What did you mean with "when I configure" ? I posted gcc -v output, should I rebuild gcc with a specific option? I build with http://www.rockbox.org/gcc/rockb

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:17 --- Created an attachment (id=21857) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21857&action=view) Same patch, just s/0/NULL_RTX/ in two places. As mentioned plus one more place. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org cha

[Bug target/45250] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc

--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-09-21 15:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc > Hm, fixed? It's fixed on the target. I left it open because I wasn't sure whether the va

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:11 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Created an attachment (id=21855) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21855&action=view) [edit] > Patch that fixes the problem > > cse was losing track of cc0 set/use because of

[Bug ada/45394] [4.6 regression] gnat fails to build on s390, trunk 20100918

--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:09 --- Investigating. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Assigne

[Bug ada/45394] [4.6 regression] gnat fails to build on s390, trunk 20100918

--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-09-21 14:59 --- https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gcc-snapshot yes, 20100918 still fails to build: -- doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/45562] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_build_unary_op (typeck.c:5083) with -std=gnu++0x -fipa-cp-clone -fcompare-debug

--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 14:54 --- It is caused by revision 162911: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00122.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/45563] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/opt/devirt1.C ICEs in ipcp_init_cloned_node, at ipa-cp.c:190 with -fno-early-inlining -fipa-cp-clone

--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 14:46 --- It is caused by revision 162911: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00122.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug lto/45727] ICE: in subreg_get_info, at rtlanal.c:3092

--- Comment #3 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:40 --- Which architecture/cpu are you wanting to build for? I'm not sure what the default is. If you can specify that when you configure, and then post the outcome of the build, that would be helpful. -- ibolton at gc

[Bug libgcj/40182] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on sparc-linux

--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:39 --- Fixed on the 4.4 branch: LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: branches/gcc-4_4-branch revision 164288 Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:19 --- (In reply to comment #1) > TODO: Check whether the code is really invalid I have now asked at J3, cf. http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-September/thread.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug rtl-optimization/45678] [4.4/4.5 Regression] crash on vector code with -m32 -msse

--- Comment #29 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:19 --- Subject: Bug 45678 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 21 14:18:34 2010 New Revision: 164480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164480 Log: PR middle-end/45678 * expr.c (expand_expr_real_1

[Bug c++/45645] pr44972.C fails with error: �__assert_fail� was not declared in this scope

--- Comment #9 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:13 --- Subject: Bug 45645 Author: iains Date: Tue Sep 21 14:12:58 2010 New Revision: 164479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164479 Log: 2010-09-21 Jonathan Wakely Jack Howarth

[Bug middle-end/45687] [4.6 Regression] possible wrong code bug

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45687

[Bug tree-optimization/45653] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in cgraph_decide_inlining_of_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1241 with -fno-early-inlining -fno-ipa-cp -fno-ipa-pure-const

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:00 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/45626] [4.6 Regression] Segfault in fold_const_aggregate_ref

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:56 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/45290] [F08] pointer initialization

--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:52 --- (In reply to comment #9) > procedure(), pointer :: ptr3 => p2 I now believe that this is invalid (all quotes are F2008): R505 initialization is [...] or => initial-data-target R443 initial-data-target is desi

[Bug tree-optimization/45572] [4.6 Regression] various ICEs with -finline-small-functions -findirect-inlining -finline-functions

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45572

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:47 --- TODO: Check whether the code is really invalid - C551 talks only about nonpointers, but it also talks about "proc-target" - which only applies to procedures and the PROTECTED only applies per C549 to variables and pro

[Bug tree-optimization/45734] [DR 1116] Devirtualization results in wrong-code

--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:37 --- Not a bug; all these testcases (should) have undefined behavior. I'm working on clarifying the standard to that end. This is related to http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#1116 and on the C

[Bug middle-end/45565] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1276 with -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-inline -fipa-cp-clone -fkeep-inline-functions

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45565

[Bug tree-optimization/45563] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/opt/devirt1.C ICEs in ipcp_init_cloned_node, at ipa-cp.c:190 with -fno-early-inlining -fipa-cp-clone

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45563

[Bug c++/45562] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_build_unary_op (typeck.c:5083) with -std=gnu++0x -fipa-cp-clone -fcompare-debug

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45562

[Bug middle-end/45550] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:34 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c/45491] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr45085.c

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:32 --- Probably another callee-copy thing. Needs investigation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45491

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445

[Bug ada/45394] [4.6 regression] gnat fails to build on s390, trunk 20100814

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:24 --- Still broken? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UN

[Bug middle-end/45251] [4.6 Regression] Java testsuite regressions on hppa-linux

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45251

[Bug target/45250] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc

--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:17 --- Hm, fixed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45250

[Bug c/45054] [4.6 Regression] struct-by-value-1.c fail.

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45054

[Bug fortran/44945] [4.6 Regression] Wrong decl for module vars / FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_array_structure_constructor.f90

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945

[Bug java/44495] [4.6 regression] ICE in java_mangle_resource_name, at java/mangle.c:658

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495

[Bug middle-end/45730] Undefined symbol __gnu_cxx::stdio_sync_filebuf >::xsgetn(char*, long)

--- Comment #6 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:01 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thus, I would say middle-end? However, certainly doesn't happen on Linux, for > some reason... Honza, in case please recategorize. This happens also on i686-darwin9 at m32 & m64. However, i

[Bug fortran/45290] [F08] pointer initialization

--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 12:37 --- Another issue besides comment 5 is the following program (from PR 45740), which gives an ICE. Actually, I am not quite sure the example is valid as "p2"'s target is not known at compile time. module m procedure(

[Bug fortran/45740] New: PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

>From Fortran 2008: C549 An entity with the PROTECTED attribute shall be a procedure pointer or variable. C551 A nonpointer object that has the PROTECTED attribute and is accessed by use association shall not appear in a variable definition context (16.6.7) or as the data-target or proc-target in

[Bug rtl-optimization/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 12:23 --- Created an attachment (id=21856) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21856&action=view) gcc46-pr45739.patch Fix. For further optimizations (like vector A | ~0, A | ~A, A ^ ~0, A & ~0), I guess we'd ne

[Bug middle-end/45738] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl, have debug_expr_decl in const_value_known_p, at varpool.c:375

--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 12:23 --- It is caused by revision 164438: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00734.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

--- Comment #20 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-09-21 11:30 --- (In reply to comment #19) > Can you provide a .i file for which this is reproducible with a cross > compiler? > > Before/after -fdump-rtl-ira dumps and assembly files could also be helpful. I'm leaving in a couple of

[Bug target/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

--- Comment #19 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 11:12 --- Can you provide a .i file for which this is reproducible with a cross compiler? Before/after -fdump-rtl-ira dumps and assembly files could also be helpful. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445

[Bug tree-optimization/45704] [4.5 Regression] load byte instruction is used for volatile int

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:47 --- Subject: Bug 45704 Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 21 10:47:28 2010 New Revision: 164475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164475 Log: 2010-09-21 Richard Guenther PR middle-end/45704

[Bug tree-optimization/45704] [4.5 Regression] load byte instruction is used for volatile int

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:47 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/45736] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:245 with -flto and attribute((constructor))

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug middle-end/45738] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl, have debug_expr_decl in const_value_known_p, at varpool.c:375

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug middle-end/45712] [4.6 Regression] Segmentation violation when compiling spec source on either x86 or ppc with debugging

--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:29 --- this should be fixed by patch introducing static_object_in_other_unit_p. However it seems bit strange that we can get into VAR_DECL not in a varpool by folding. I know this is possible for vtables and type infos, bu

[Bug target/45694] [MinGW64] fortran host associated variables+optimization==failure?

--- Comment #11 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 10:28 --- Hi, (In reply to comment #0) > Hi, > (i first reported this to mingw32-w64's bug tracker: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3067541&group_id=202880&atid=983354 > and was forwarded here) Kai has posted a pat

[Bug target/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:25 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|norma

[Bug target/35906] build fails when building with -m32 -mcpu=ultrasparc (sparcv9 or -mv8plus also)

--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:15 --- Target: sparc-linux-gnu Configured with: /home/ebotcazou/src-4.4/configure --build=sparc-linux-gnu --prefix=/home/ebotcazou/install-4.4 --enable-languages=c,ada --with-cpu=ultrasparc Thread model: posix gcc versio

[Bug middle-end/45739] New: [missed optimization] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

Testcase: #include __m128i foo; int main() { foo = _mm_xor_si128(_mm_setzero_si128(), foo); return 0; } Resulting Assembly (with -O3): pxor%xmm0, %xmm0 xorl%eax, %eax pxorfoo(%rip), %xmm0 movdqa %xmm0, foo(%rip) ret Expected Result: since any value xor zero does not change t

  1   2   >