[Bug middle-end/37221] Missed early loop-unroll optimization - causes 40% degradation on SPU

--- Comment #10 from tehila at il dot ibm dot com 2008-09-03 06:58 --- (In reply to comment #9) > If you give the patch bootstrap & testing I'll approve it for trunk. > Richard. Great. I'm bootstraping and testing it on x86 now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37221

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] [4.4 Regression] Bootstrap failure compiling libgcc

--- Comment #23 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-03 05:22 --- On powerpc-apple-darwin9 revision 139912, I get: ... /opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/./gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/./gcc/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.4w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.4w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/lib/ -isy

[Bug tree-optimization/37310] gfortran errors in compilation and the making for upgraded compilers

--- Comment #13 from petermorgan at grapevine dot net dot au 2008-09-03 05:10 --- Created an attachment (id=16199) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16199&action=view) a runable fragment that generates the error when compiled with optimization tssumc00.f is a standalo

[Bug c++/37208] C++0x deleted functions and SFINAE

--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 04:11 --- Subject: Bug 37208 Author: jason Date: Wed Sep 3 04:10:27 2008 New Revision: 139926 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139926 Log: PR c++/37208 * call.c (build_over_call): Make =de

[Bug rtl-optimization/37341] Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)

--- Comment #2 from regehr at cs dot utah dot edu 2008-09-03 03:12 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Looks like the same as PR 37290. > Sorry... I misremembered that the last segfault I reported had been fixed already. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37341

[Bug rtl-optimization/37341] Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 03:10 --- Looks like the same as PR 37290. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added B

[Bug middle-end/37044] Heisenbug: SVN of gcc throws internal compiler error on PPC

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:49 --- I want to say this was really fixed by: 2008-07-24 Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c: Move GTY(()) markers to match conventional usage. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c/37341] New: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)

Seen on Ubuntu Hardy on r139924. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/volatile/tmp23$ current-gcc -O3 small.c current-gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1) Please submit a full bug report. See for instructions. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/volatile/tmp23$ current-gcc -v Us

[Bug c/31983] Add option to gcc to display specific language manual section reference for error/warning encountered.

--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:42 --- for warnings, we do provide (in most cases) the option that enables/disables the warning. But I don't see this happening any time soon, if ever. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31983

[Bug target/36040] Using %rsi instead of %esi for a u32 in generated code

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:39 --- No feedback in 3 months and the ABI says unsigned int is zero extended for arguments so closing as invalid. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/35715] openmp usage fault

--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:36 --- Works for me with 4.3.0 so closing as fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/35263] Erroneous Application Execution Starting With GCC Version 4.1.3

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:21 --- No, we need the actual source code that shows the wrong code. Also are you sure that you are not writing over the bounds of the array? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35263

[Bug middle-end/31268] Non-deterministic bug producing a run-time infinite loop

--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:19 --- Lets mark this as fixed, there have been some aliasing fixes between the release of 4.2.0 and now. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug gcov-profile/35103] cannot compile GCC on solaris8

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:17 --- No feedback in 3 months so closing. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24776] [GOMP] non-TLS and thread private

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:15 --- No this has been fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/32466] illegal loop store motion of bitfield

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:15 --- Fixed for me with 4.3.0 so closing. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/27140] Compiling LLVM now takes nearly 5x as long with 4.1 as it did with 4.0

--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:12 --- 2008-05-08 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Remove struct aliasing which fixed some compile time, there were other patches too like mem-ssa. But it would be nice if we could get new compile time numbers here

[Bug target/19201] [m68k] Inefficient code for array accesses (from old PROBLEMS)

--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:05 --- This should not have been in waiting as it was waiting on a developer response and not the reporter. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/34418] Runtime segfault when compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG defined

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:04 --- No testcase in 3 months so closing as invalid. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/34823] Floating point rounding mode error in inline asm code, linux/cell be cross compiler

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:02 --- No feedback in 3 months, plus this was reported against a non FSF GCC so closing as invalid. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/31348] Error in compilation

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 02:00 --- No feedback in 3 months so closing. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] [4.4 Regression] Bootstrap failure compiling libgcc

--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 00:42 --- (In reply to comment #21) > -fomit-frame-pointer is broken due to IRA merge. On Linux/ia32, there are I get those on i386-darwin also. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37296

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] [4.4 Regression] Bootstrap failure compiling libgcc

--- Comment #21 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-03 00:27 --- (In reply to comment #15) > It's the same issue as the __muldi3 thing. cgraphbuild.c:rebuild_cgraph_edges > is miscompiled at -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer by regalloc/reload because of some > problem with elimination

[Bug middle-end/37243] [4.4 Regression] IRA causes wrong code generation

--- Comment #21 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-02 23:52 --- On ira-merge branch at revision 139914, Linux/ia32 has regression: +FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla7.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test +FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla7.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-l

[Bug target/33034] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/DFcmp.c & SFset.c: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 23:35 --- I've seen these in 4.3-based toolchains, but don't see them with recent trunk. Do you still get them with current trunk or not? If not, I think we can close this as FIXED in 4.4. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug middle-end/37318] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/compat//scalar-by-value-4_x.c:72: ICE: in emit_group_store, at expr.c:2084

--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 22:55 --- With HJL's patch, this changes to: FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-4 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37318

[Bug tree-optimization/37310] gfortran errors in compilation and the making for upgraded compilers

--- Comment #12 from petermorgan at grapevine dot net dot au 2008-09-02 22:45 --- Subject: Re: gfortran errors in compilation and the making for upgraded compilers I have attached a distro copy of kf, the parent module, it contains the following

GNAT Cross Compiling Issues

Hello! I'm trying to get a native Ada compiler working on ARM, but have ran into a few (primarily Makefile) problems. Before the problem, a little background: I successfully built a cross compiler to build Ada programs from my laptop (x86_64) to the target system (Debian ARMEL). My process was

[Bug c/37303] const compound initializers in structs are written to .data instead of .rodata

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:57 --- Confirmed, not a regression as far as I can tell. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c/37267] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] #pragma inside structure initialization causes error

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:53 --- Confirmed, this is most likely caused by the pragma changes in 4.2 as 4.1.1 works. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/37101] [4.2 Regression] wrong code: tree vectorizer omits bogus movq/movlps construct

--- Comment #15 from Emmanuel dot Thome at inria dot fr 2008-09-02 20:53 --- *** Bug 37340 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Emmanuel dot Thome at inria dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/37340] -foptimize-register-move => wrong code for loading an sse2 register

--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel dot Thome at inria dot fr 2008-09-02 20:53 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sounds like a dup of PR37101 which is fixed for GCC 4.3.2. indeed. Thanks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37101 *** -- Emmanuel dot Thome at inria dot fr changed

[Bug c/37331] ICE trying to compile /dev/null

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:50 --- Most likely the same issue as PR 37215. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37331

[Bug middle-end/37334] gcc.dg/fastmath-2.c doesn't work

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:48 --- This testcase really should not be applied as it really depends on the precision of -ffast-math which we don't guarantee at all. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug ada/37328] [4.4 Regression] ACATS la14021 ICE in gimple_assign_set_rhs1, at gimple.h:1747

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug debug/37020] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die3.c scan-assembler-not DW_AT_inline

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:45 --- *** Bug 37321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug debug/37321] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die3.c scan-assembler-not DW_AT_inline

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:45 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37020 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/37313] [4.4 Regression]: trunk broken for sel-sched patches

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/37312] -Os significantly faster than -O2 on test case wiht -funroll-all-loops

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:45 --- The main difference between -O2 and -Os is that csum_partial is inlined for -Os and unrolling is disabled for -Os. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37312

[Bug bootstrap/37304] [4.4 Regression]: in-tree-binutils gcc configure tests fail because of unexpanded $(objdir)

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/37299] [4.4 Regression] libgcc2.c:806: ICE: vector VEC(me m_ref_p,base) index domain error, in create_vop_ref_mapping_loop at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:1519

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug middle-end/37243] [4.4 Regression] IRA causes wrong code generation

--- Comment #20 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-02 20:40 --- On ira-merge branch at revision 139902, Linux/ia32 has regression: +FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stoi.cc execution test +FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stol.cc exe

[Bug middle-end/37278] [4.4 Regression] Revision 139760 causes many failures

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:40 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/37275] [4.4 Regression] ICE when compile libgomp/task.c

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:39 --- Can you say what the ICE is? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/37315] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/931018-1.c int-compare.c ieee/inf-2.c mzero6.c

--- Comment #7 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-09-02 20:29 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/931018-1.c int-compare.c ieee/inf-2.c mzero6.c > > > --- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 10:41 --- > (In reply to comment #5) > > > Well

[Bug middle-end/37293] [4.4 Regression] r139762 breaks libstdc++ build on darwin

--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:28 --- >With -O3 -ffast-math on Linux/x86-64, we got Can you file a separate bug as it is unrelated to the darwin issue, even though it is related to IPA-CP, it is a different issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug bootstrap/37308] bootstrap hangs in libstdc++

--- Comment #9 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:16 --- GNU Java does not work on AIX, so TLS is irrelevant there. AIX 5.1 no longer is supported in general. I no longer have access to AIX 5.1 systems. GCC currently does not explicitly support AIX TLS -- __thread calls are

[Bug c/37340] -foptimize-register-move => wrong code for loading an sse2 register

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:06 --- Sounds like a dup of PR37101 which is fixed for GCC 4.3.2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37340

[Bug c/37340] -foptimize-register-move => wrong code for loading an sse2 register

--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel dot Thome at inria dot fr 2008-09-02 19:56 --- > Here is the diff of the generated asm. One more note. The flags are, respectively: -O -O -foptimize-register-move -- Emmanuel dot Thome at inria dot fr changed: What|Removed

[Bug objc++/37335] [4.4 Regression] Boostrap failed on obj-c++ "too many arguments to function 'build_array_ref'"

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 20:01 --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg00042.html . -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug testsuite/37325] [4.4 Regression] Visibility test fails

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:58 --- For elf targets, default_elf_asm_output_external should be called. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37325

[Bug c/37340] wrong code for loading an sse2 register

--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel dot Thome at inria dot fr 2008-09-02 19:53 --- Created an attachment (id=16198) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16198&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37340

[Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Comment #25 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-09-02 19:53 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > Fixed. Thanks, Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766

[Bug c/37340] New: wrong code for loading an sse2 register

The following code is miscompiled at -O3 with gcc 4.3.0 ; g[1] is filled with movq+movlps instead of movq+movhps. void frob(long long *t, const long long *s1, const long long *s2) { long long w_s2[2]; long long z; z = s2[0]; w_s2[0] = z & 0x1fUL; z >>= 5; w

[Bug testsuite/37325] [4.4 Regression] Visibility test fails

--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-09-02 19:52 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Visibility test fails > > Checked visibility-14.c. The .hidden directive is not being emitted. I'm not sure why a .hidden directive should be expected in this case as foo d

[Bug objc++/37335] Boostrap failed on obj-c++ "too many arguments to function 'build_array_ref'"

--- Comment #2 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2008-09-02 19:48 --- Subject: Re: Boostrap failed on obj-c++ "too many arguments to function 'build_array_ref'" On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:22 PM, 3dw4rd at verizon dot net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graphite just went it. > > I might just wa

[Bug target/36756] [4.4 Regression] g++.dg/tls-3.C ICE with section-anchors, unit-at-a-time, no-toplevel-reorder

--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:47 --- I still think the fix was correct. Before r139892, the relevant options were processed in decode_options before the call to optimization_options and so section anchors were only disabled for -O0. -- http://gcc.gn

Re: [Bug objc++/37335] Boostrap failed on obj-c++ "too many arguments to function 'build_array_ref'"

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:22 PM, 3dw4rd at verizon dot net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graphite just went it. > > I might just wait till the turbulence dies down and try again. This should be another problem: graphite has not touched the code of build_array_ref, nor the code of gcc/objc/objc-act.

[Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Comment #24 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:33 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/36332] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/type-generic-1.c execution test on powerpc-*

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:32 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/37328] [4.4 Regression] ACATS la14021 ICE in gimple_assign_set_rhs1, at gimple.h:1747

--- Comment #7 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-09-02 19:25 --- Cumulative patches fix the ACATS FAIL, thanks! testresults: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-09/msg00129.html (I didn't have a baseline) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37328

[Bug preprocessor/36906] #pragma GNU poison index()

--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:22 --- One problem with this approach is that this code would not error: #include char (*fnptr)() = rindex; I tend to agree with Andrew -- poisoning is too crude a tool for this use. Is there a reason you do not use depr

[Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Comment #23 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:15 --- Subject: Bug 36766 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 2 19:13:47 2008 New Revision: 139908 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139908 Log: PR tree-optimization/36766 * tree-cfg.c (gimple_

[Bug testsuite/36332] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/type-generic-1.c execution test on powerpc-*

--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 19:13 --- Subject: Bug 36332 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 2 19:11:55 2008 New Revision: 139907 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139907 Log: PR target/36332 * real.c (real_maxval): Clear a l

[Bug middle-end/37339] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4 Regression]|[4.4 Regression] |gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-|gcc.

[Bug middle-end/37338] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/array-init-1.c

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37338

[Bug middle-end/37339] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t

On Linux/ia32, revision revision 139894 gave FAIL: gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t Revision 139891 is OK. Revision 139892 may be the cause. -- Summary: [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/pr33645-3.c scan-assembler-not var1_t Product: gcc V

[Bug middle-end/37338] [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/array-init-1.c

--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-02 18:56 --- Revision 139854 is OK and revision 139856 is bad. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/37338] New: [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/array-init-1.c

On Linux/ia32, revision 139863 gave FAIL: gcc.dg/array-init-1.c scan-assembler-not abcdefghi FAIL: gcc.dg/array-init-1.c scan-assembler-times 7017280452245743464|7523094288207667809|6867666564636261|1684234849|64636261 2 revision 139848 is OK. -- Summary: [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/arr

[Bug testsuite/36332] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/type-generic-1.c execution test on powerpc-*

--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:47 --- Subject: Bug 36332 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 2 18:46:29 2008 New Revision: 139906 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139906 Log: PR target/36332 * real.c (real_maxval): Clear a l

[Bug c/37171] [4.4 Regression] Canonical spelling optimization dependency

--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:44 --- Subject: Bug 37171 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 2 18:42:48 2008 New Revision: 139904 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139904 Log: PR c/37171 * g++.dg/ext/attrib34.C: New test. A

[Bug middle-end/37337] [4.4 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Keywords||ice-on-val

[Bug middle-end/32913] -fprofile-generate/use: Program 24% slower than without

--- Comment #1 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:36 --- I get 0m9.829s for non-profiled run and 0m9.801s for profiled run, so things seems to be in order on mainline. I would be curious if there are still some profile generate/use related regressions on polyhedron testsu

[Bug middle-end/37243] [4.4 Regression] IRA causes wrong code generation

--- Comment #19 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:28 --- Subject: Bug 37243 Author: hjl Date: Tue Sep 2 18:27:34 2008 New Revision: 139902 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139902 Log: 2008-09-02 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR rtl-op

[Bug c++/37337] ice for legal C++ code

--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2008-09-02 18:25 --- Created an attachment (id=16197) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16197&action=view) C++ source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37337

[Bug middle-end/37243] [4.4 Regression] IRA causes wrong code generation

--- Comment #18 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:24 --- Subject: Bug 37243 Author: hjl Date: Tue Sep 2 18:22:59 2008 New Revision: 139901 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139901 Log: 2008-09-02 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR rtl-op

[Bug c++/37337] New: ice for legal C++ code

I just tried to compile the Suse Linux package bochs-2.2.1-202 with the GNU C++ compiler version 4.4 snapshot 20080829. The compiler said In constructor 'bx_null_pktmover_c::bx_null_pktmover_c(const char*, const char*, void (*)(void*, const void*, unsigned int), void*, char*)': eth_null.cc:88: er

[Bug middle-end/37243] [4.4 Regression] IRA causes wrong code generation

--- Comment #17 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:17 --- Subject: Bug 37243 Author: hjl Date: Tue Sep 2 18:16:24 2008 New Revision: 139900 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139900 Log: 2008-09-02 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Backport from main

[Bug rtl-optimization/37251] [4.4 Regression] ICE with ira: delete_allocno_from_bucket

--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:17 --- Subject: Bug 37251 Author: hjl Date: Tue Sep 2 18:16:24 2008 New Revision: 139900 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139900 Log: 2008-09-02 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Backport from mainl

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] [4.4 Regression] Bootstrap failure compiling libgcc

--- Comment #20 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-09-02 18:13 --- Isn't that supposed to be detected by reload? Yea, right. I missed that. Eric, sorry for to be in hurry with the wrong response. I am still working on the issue. I hope to find a solution today or tomorrow. --

[Bug fortran/37099] [4.3, 4.4 regression] Wrong results when comparing a character array to a character expression

-- domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug bootstrap/37330] mpfr & 32/64 multilib issue

--- Comment #3 from brian at dessent dot net 2008-09-02 17:36 --- Subject: Re: mpfr & 32/64 multilib issue g++ (and gcc, gfortran, etc.) are just driver programs that invoke other programs, they don't use these libraries. You need to look at cc1 (or cc1plus, f951, etc.) to see the de

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] [4.4 Regression] Bootstrap failure compiling libgcc

--- Comment #19 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 17:35 --- > I've looked at the cgraphbuild.i code and I think something is wrong with > inlining. There are two paths achieving L21 with different stack > adjustments. > Here is the code. I marked insns adjusting SP by

[Bug rtl-optimization/37296] [4.4 Regression] Bootstrap failure compiling libgcc

--- Comment #18 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-09-02 17:29 --- I've looked at the cgraphbuild.i code and I think something is wrong with inlining. There are two paths achieving L21 with different stack adjustments. Here is the code. I marked insns adjusting SP by -> and the two

[Bug objc++/37335] Boostrap failed on obj-c++ "too many arguments to function 'build_array_ref'"

--- Comment #1 from 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2008-09-02 17:22 --- Graphite just went it. I might just wait till the turbulence dies down and try again. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37335

[Bug fortran/37336] Fortran 2003: Finish derived-type finalization

--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 17:08 --- For the needed parts to actually call finalizers building upon the attached patch from comment #1, some means for temporary-creation before trans are needed to handle things like: x = foo (x) or foo (bar ()) Some i

[Bug fortran/37336] Fortran 2003: Finish derived-type finalization

--- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 17:05 --- Created an attachment (id=16196) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16196&action=view) Proposed patch implementing the main part This is an experimental patch that implements the logic to create code

[Bug middle-end/37293] [4.4 Regression] r139762 breaks libstdc++ build on darwin

--- Comment #17 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-02 17:05 --- (In reply to comment #16) > Revision 139762 also failed to build povray in SPEC CPU 2006. > With -O3 -ffast-math on Linux/x86-64, we got g++ -O3 -ffast-math -DSPEC_CPU_LP64atmosph.o bbox.o bcyl.o bezi

[Bug middle-end/37293] [4.4 Regression] r139762 breaks libstdc++ build on darwin

--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-02 17:02 --- Revision 139762 also failed to build povray in SPEC CPU 2006. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/37336] Fortran 2003: Finish derived-type finalization

-- domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336

[Bug fortran/37336] New: Fortran 2003: Finish derived-type finalization

Derived-type finalization as defined in Fortran 2003 is at the moment partially implemented in gfortran. FINAL bindings are parsed and stored/loaded in .mod module files, but finalizers are not yet executed and a not-yet-implemented error appears on using FINAL. -- Summary: Fortran 2

[Bug tree-optimization/37310] gfortran errors in compilation and the making for upgraded compilers

--- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2008-09-02 16:57 --- Subject: Re: gfortran errors in compilation and the making for upgraded compilers On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:11:23PM -, petermorgan at grapevine dot net dot au wrote: > > gfortran -O -Wunini

[Bug bootstrap/36908] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap forever with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -ftree-loop-distribution"

--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 16:44 --- Why got this even marked as regression? GCC 4.3.1 didn't support -ftree-loop-distribution, it is a new option, so it can't regress. The loop in question is: : # state_89 = PHI # prephitmp.18_6 = PHI state_17 =

[Bug testsuite/37325] [4.4 Regression] Visibility test fails

--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-09-02 16:25 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Visibility test fails > No, the tests are new. I'll have to check the assembly output to > see why they are failing. Checked visibility-14.c. The .hidden directive is not b

[Bug target/37283] [4.4 Regression] Cannot build crtbegin.o for ARM

--- Comment #6 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 16:25 --- This is fixed in SVN trunk. -- sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Sta

[Bug target/37283] [4.4 Regression] Cannot build crtbegin.o for ARM

--- Comment #5 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 16:24 --- Subject: Bug 37283 Author: sam Date: Tue Sep 2 16:23:29 2008 New Revision: 139892 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139892 Log: gcc/ PR target/37283 * opts.c (decode_options): M

[Bug objc++/37335] New: Boostrap failed on obj-c++ "too many arguments to function 'build_array_ref'"

A bootstrap of the trunk failed at stage 2 with the following: gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/bid -I../libdecnumber ../../gcc/gcc/objc/objc-act.c -o objcp/objcp-act.o ../

[Bug middle-end/37334] New: gcc.dg/fastmath-2.c doesn't work

On Linux/ia32, I got Executing on host: /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/xgcc -B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fastmath-2.c -O2 -ffast-math -lm -m32 -o ./fastmath-2.exe(timeout = 300) PASS: gcc.dg/fastmath-2.c

[Bug c++/37332] [4.4 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1297

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 15:59 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/37332] [4.4 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1297

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 15:58 --- Created an attachment (id=16195) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16195&action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37332

  1   2   >