--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 07:44 ---
I kept losing this because the title is no longer applicable.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 07:33 ---
This is not a bug on the GCC side.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-11-19 07:17 ---
Please provide a testcase, as outlined in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 06:29
---
Fixed on mainline. Not worth backporting to other branches.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 06:27
---
Subject: Bug 34036
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Nov 19 06:27:31 2007
New Revision: 130286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130286
Log:
PR tree-optimization/34036
* opts.c (set
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33960
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 06:05
---
Regressed on PPC. I am working on a fix. If I can not fix by end of tomorrow,
I will revert the previous patch
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33947
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:54 ---
Confirmed. the regression is an ICE for error recovery.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:53 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:46 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:43 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33766
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:41 ---
Confirmed. the regression is only an error recovery regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:37 ---
Confirmed. Another nested function with openmp interaction case.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:36 ---
2.95.3 ICEd on this. I don't know if I can consider this a regression.
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:23 ---
*** Bug 34110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:23 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34144 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:22 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:21 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34080
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:20 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:18
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:05 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Why not use ___builtin_memset in the testcase instead of poisoned name ?
Because this is an old testcase.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
build toolchains using buildroot. but when compile the
busybox, an internel compiler error show.
/home/mahua/opt/arm/build_arm/busybox-1.1.3/editors/vi.c: In function 'do_cmd':
/home/mahua/opt/arm/build_arm/busybox-1.1.3/editors/vi.c:2989:
internal compiler error: in set_iv, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopt
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:03 ---
Confirmed, the ICE is an error recovery regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bootstrap broken on mips- |[4.3 Regression] Bootstrap
|sgi-irix6.5
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:01 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> And on ARM too. pinskia: is PR31128 the same as this one?
No, it is unrelated to that bug report.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31032
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:00 ---
3.4.x is no longer maintained so I am going to close this as fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||33723
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.3
http://
Exactly like PR 33723 except the compound literal is inside a CONSTRUCTOR (you
can combine compound literals and normal constructors to make this worse).
Testcase:
typedef struct
{
int f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7, f8;
long int f9, f10;
int f11;
} f;
typedef union
{
f f;
char s[5
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33955
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:47 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:44 ---
Confirmed, the ICE is an error recovery regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:42 ---
I get this now:
t.cc:21: error: cannot expand 'Args ...' into a fixed-length argument list
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33965
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:40 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:38 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:36 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:36 ---
I saw this too, see PR 30702.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:34 ---
Fixed. Thanks Janis for doing this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:32 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:17 ---
Confirmed, the regression part is an error-recovery issue.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:15 ---
This works on the trunk.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:11 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:10 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-o
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:04 ---
*** Bug 34122 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:04 ---
This was fixed by the fix for PR 34127.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34127 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 03:57 ---
t.cc:28: warning: returning reference to temporary
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34075
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 03:52 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 03:50 ---
With checking enabled, we get:
t.cc:2: internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or union_type
or qual_union_type, have lang_type in xref_basetypes, at cp/decl.c:10395
Please submit a full bug report,
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 03:48 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 03:45 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 01:22
---
I found the problem. We key off of the kind of shift to determine which
version of the runtime to resolve to. In your test case, shift is kind=4 so we
load in the cshift0_4 instead of the cshift0_8 version of c
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 23:45
---
No sorry necessary. Could you post the -fdump-tree-original for your test
case?
In the mean time I will get logged on to a linux PPC machine and see if I see
it there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 23:41
---
OK, the original test case fails as reported. Replacing aborts with printin
the line number that fails:
fail 39
fail 40
fail 80
fail 81
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34143
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 22:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=14576)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14576&action=view)
gcc43-pr30589.patch
Updated patch with wild guesses what to do about the dir separators.
I can't test it though
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 22:55 ---
It seems fixincl isn't supported for mingw at all, from what Danny Smith mailed
me privately. 1) mkfixinc.sh makes fixincludes a nop on several targets
including mingw 2) there seems to be either directory separator
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-11-18 22:46 ---
Sorry to reopen the bug, but I have a lot of failures in my tests. A reduced
case is:
integer(8) :: i
i = 1_8
print *, cshift((/.true.,.false.,.true.,.false./),1,dim=i)
end
which fails at runtime with:
Fortran ru
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 22:21 ---
Fixed on the trunk.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 22:21 ---
Subject: Bug 30988
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Nov 18 22:20:54 2007
New Revision: 130280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130280
Log:
PR c++/30988
semantics.c (finish_call_expr): Set
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 22:04 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The test case given here passes for me on x86-64 with both -m32 and -m64 and
> with or without -fdefault-integer-8. hmm!
Does the original test case pass?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
The test case passes, but somehow _gfortran_compare_string
is still called.
$ gfortran -fdump-tree-original -fdefault-integer-8 single_char_string.f90
$ grep _gfortran.*string single_char_string.f90.003t.original
if (_gfortran_compare_string (MAX_EXPR <(1 - D.507) + D.508, 0>, (char[1:5]
*)
--- Comment #5 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:58
---
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/export/home/tobleran/devel/gcc/head/gcc/gcc/reg-stack.c: In function
\ufffd\ufffd\ufffdswap_to_top\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd:
cc1: error: array subscript is below array bounds
aka du
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:55 ---
Is this a dup of PR34110?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34144
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:49 ---
This would be useful.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:48
---
The test case given here passes for me on x86-64 with both -m32 and -m64 and
with or without -fdefault-integer-8. hmm!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34143
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:38
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:26 ---
Please post the error message.
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34144
--- Comment #31 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:18
---
Subject: Bug 32770
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 18 21:18:07 2007
New Revision: 130279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130279
Log:
2007-11-18 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:15
---
Fixed on trunk. Rev 130276
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/fortran/check.c?view=log&pathrev=130276
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 20:59
---
Subject: Bug 33317
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Nov 18 20:59:41 2007
New Revision: 130277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130277
Log:
2007-11-18 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 20:59
---
Subject: Bug 34139
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Nov 18 20:59:41 2007
New Revision: 130277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130277
Log:
2007-11-18 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 20:51 ---
I have mentioned this before but nobody really listens to me.
--disable-checking or turning off the asserts should disable the unitialized
warnings since they are no longer true warnings.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gn
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-18 20:48 ---
Revision 130005 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-11/msg00197.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34144
On Linux/i686 and Linux/x86-64, revision 130005 causes bootstrap
failure with --disable-checking.
--
Summary: [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap
failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 20:06
---
*** Bug 34142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30572
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 20:06 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30572 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Reduced from a failure of alloc_comp_constructor.f90
with -fdefault-integer-8 on i686-pc-linux-gnu:
$ cat alloc_1.f90
Program test_constructor
implicit none
type :: thytype
integer(4) :: a(2,2)
end type thytype
type :: mytype
integer(4), allocatable :: a(:, :)
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 19:23 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 19:23 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
* gcse.c (try_replace_reg): Avoid rtx sharing between REG_EQUAL note
and insn.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/20071118-1.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20071118-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/gcse.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-11-18 19:20 ---
--- ../_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/subref_array_pointer_2.f90
2007-11-15 13:26:25.0 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/subref_array_pointer_2.f902007-11-18
19:06:02.0 +0100
@@ -81,7
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 19:18 ---
Subject: Bug 5
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Nov 18 19:18:39 2007
New Revision: 130274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130274
Log:
PR middle-end/5
* optabs.h (optab_table): Ch
--- Comment #2 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-11-18 19:10
---
In fact, *many* installed .dylibs point incorrectly to /libgcc_s.1.dylib.
libffi.4.dylib
libgcj-tools.9.dylib
libgcj-tools.dylib
libgcj.9.dylib
libgfortran.3.dylib
libgij.9.dylib
libgomp.1.dylib
libobjc-gnu.2.dyl
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 19:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> How about this:
>
> if (any(abs(ptr3 - (/cos(1.0_4), cos(3.0_4)/)).gt. 1e-05)) call abort ()
>
Jerry,
Looks "obvious" to me...
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
--- Comment #5 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2007-11-18 18:17 ---
I am not completely sure whether this is the same underlying problem, but I get
a bogus warning "array subscript is above array bounds" with the code snippet
below when compiled with gcc -c -O3 -Wall:
=
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 17:27
---
How about this:
if (any(abs(ptr3 - (/cos(1.0_4), cos(3.0_4)/)).gt. 1e-05)) call abort ()
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34139
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
