[Bug target/33369] [4.3 Regression] suffix or operands invalid for `pslld'

--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-09-10 06:32 --- A 64-bit compiler is required. The problem is, that gcc creates a vector shift constant for vector shift instruction, without checking if optab can take vector argument. This one will also create wrong operand for x86_64:

[Bug fortran/33370] [4.3 Regression] Structure component arrays

--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-10 06:20 --- gfortran 4.2: struct foo a[4]; int4 A.1[4]; struct array1_int4 atmp.0; [...] static int4 data.3[4] = {12, 2, 3, 10}; __builtin_memcpy (&(*(int4[0:] *) atmp.0.data)[0], &data.3, 16); [..

[Bug middle-end/33351] [4.3 Regression] segfault in assembler function

--- Comment #7 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2007-09-10 05:50 --- with current SVN (r128305) it is build again. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33351

[Bug c/33373] ICE in vectorizable_type_demotion, at tree-vect-transform.c:4098

--- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2007-09-10 05:41 --- Created an attachment (id=14181) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14181&action=view) dosmem.i -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33373

[Bug c/33373] New: ICE in vectorizable_type_demotion, at tree-vect-transform.c:4098

current SVN: /home/marcus/projects/gcc/BIN/bin/gcc -m32 -c -O3 -ftree-vectorize -msse3 dosmem.i dosmem.i: In function 'DOSMEM_FillIsrTable': dosmem.i:1: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_type_demotion, at tree-vect-transform.c:4098 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed sourc

[Bug target/33369] [4.3 Regression] suffix or operands invalid for `pslld'

--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-09-10 05:35 --- Confirmed. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/33350] copy constructor error

--- Comment #6 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-09-10 04:04 --- Are you referring to DR 152? http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#152 -- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/33346] [4.3 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/ia64-1.C ICEs at -O1 on spu-elf

-- lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|lauras at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org

[Bug middle-end/33351] [4.3 Regression] segfault in assembler function

-- lauras at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33351

[Bug other/32154] sim-crt0.o/crt0.o isn't found during configure due to missing -L or -B

--- Comment #11 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-09-10 02:43 --- Subject: Bug number PR 32154 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00815.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

[Bug fortran/29396] segfault with character pointer association

--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-09-10 02:42 --- Subject: Bug number PR29396 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00779.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug c++/33324] [4.3 Regression] ICE on new array of objects with virtual destructors.

--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-09-10 02:40 --- Subject: Bug number PR 33324 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00704.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug c++/33372] New: segfault on incomplete code in openmp mode

Playing with the code reduction tools, i produced a segfault with the following (incomplete) code: === template < typename T > void f ( ) { unsigned n ( ) ; #pragma omp parallel num_threads(n) === $ /suse/NOBACKUP/gcc/gcc-4.2

Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled

> I succeed past this failure if I revert Zdenek's iv-opts patch (r128272). Same here. The failure also occurs on all hppa targets. Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)

[Bug c++/33324] [4.3 Regression] ICE on new array of objects with virtual destructors.

--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 23:33 --- Now fixed by the patch. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Sta

[Bug c++/33324] [4.3 Regression] ICE on new array of objects with virtual destructors.

--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 23:31 --- Subject: Bug 33324 Author: daney Date: Sun Sep 9 23:31:35 2007 New Revision: 128312 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128312 Log: PR c++/33324 * init.c (build_new_1): Use POINTER

[Bug target/33359] [4.3 Regression] libgcc is miscompiled on SH

--- Comment #1 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 22:37 --- Fixed with r128284 which reverts r128224. -- kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c/33111] Bad code generation with -O2 (ARM 7 architecture)

--- Comment #8 from gressau at optusnet dot com dot au 2007-09-09 22:23 --- Subject: RE: Bad code generation with -O2 (ARM 7 architecture) The -fno-strict-aliasing does not fix the unaligned access. -Original Message- From: rask at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

[Bug target/11180] [avr-gcc] Optimization decrease performance of struct assignment.

--- Comment #12 from dmixm at marine dot febras dot ru 2007-09-09 21:59 --- Andy Hutchinson wrote (comment #6) that addition a 'movdi' instruction improves the result. I have try to add a very simple 'movdi' (which split into 2 SImode instuctions). In result: -O0 --> 85 words, -O

Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled

I succeed past this failure if I revert Zdenek's iv-opts patch (r128272). David

[Bug target/32097] m32c: ICE in expand_builtin_apply, at builtins.c:1525 building libobjc

--- Comment #2 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 21:17 --- This still happens with revision 128297. -- rask at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/33111] Bad code generation with -O2 (ARM 7 architecture)

--- Comment #7 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 21:08 --- Did you read comment #1? Does -fno-strict-aliasing magically "fix" your code? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33111

[Bug c/33111] Bad code generation with -O2 (ARM 7 architecture)

--- Comment #6 from gressau at optusnet dot com dot au 2007-09-09 20:44 --- Created an attachment (id=14180) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14180&action=view) Test of optimized comparison (-O2) Comparison of four consecutive bytes gets optimized (-O2) as comparison

[Bug libgomp/33371] gcc: libgomp.spec: No such file or directory

--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-09-09 20:26 --- Subject: Re: New: gcc: libgomp.spec: No such file or directory > gcc: libgomp.spec: No such file or directory It appears libgomp didn't get installed although it builds and there are no fails in the test

[Bug java/31842] [4.2/4.3 Regression] r124338 causes java Divide_1 and pr6388 to fail

--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 20:13 --- Subject: Bug 31842 Author: rguenth Date: Sun Sep 9 20:12:56 2007 New Revision: 128306 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128306 Log: 2007-09-09 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ba

[Bug libgomp/33371] New: gcc: libgomp.spec: No such file or directory

gcc -fopenmp -O2 -s -o .libs/msgmerge msgmerge-msgmerge.o msgmerge-msgl-fsearch. o msgmerge-plural-count.o -fopenmp ./.libs/libgettextsrc.sl /xxx/gnu/gettext-0. 16.1/objdir/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib/.libs/libgettextlib.sl /xxx/gnu/gettext-0.1 6.1/objdir/gettext-tools/intl/.libs/libintl.sl -lc -lm -

[Bug fortran/33370] Structure component arrays

--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 20:03 --- Reduced testcase due to Paul Thomas: $ cat > goo.f90 program main type foo integer :: i character(len=3) :: c end type foo type(foo), dimension(4), target :: a a%i = (/ 12, 2, 3, 10 /) print *, a%

[Bug fortran/33370] Passing structure component arrays as actual arguments

-- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33370

Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled

> Kaveh R GHAZI writes: Kaveh> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. Kaveh> 0x002cf780 in reload_combine_note_store (dst=0xff0b90e0, set= optimized out>, data=0x0) Kaveh> at ../../egcc-SVN20070909/gcc/postreload.c:1018 Kaveh> 1018 reg_state[i].store_ruid = reload_co

[Bug fortran/33370] New: Passing structure component arrays as actual arguments

... doesn't work: $ cat foo.f90 program main type foo integer :: i character(len=2) :: c end type foo type(foo), dimension(4) :: a a%i = (/ 12, 2, 3, 10 /) a%c = 'xy' print *,maxval(a%i) print *,maxloc(a%i) call bar(a%i) contains subroutine bar(b) integer, dimension

[Bug rtl-optimization/33346] [4.3 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/ia64-1.C ICEs at -O1 on spu-elf

--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-09-09 19:27 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.eh/ia64-1.C ICEs at -O1 on spu-elf > Please try after r128284. See also story about this test-case for cris-elf at >

[Bug c/33369] bad sse assembler emitted

--- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2007-09-09 19:25 --- Created an attachment (id=14179) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14179&action=view) painting.i testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33369

[Bug c/33369] New: bad sse assembler emitted

/home/marcus/projects/gcc/BIN/bin/gcc -m32 -c -O2 -ftree-vectorize -msse3 painting.i /tmp/ccXpPr3E.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccXpPr3E.s:17: Error: missing or invalid immediate expression `0x4000400040004' taken as 0 /tmp/ccXpPr3E.s:17: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pslld'

[Bug target/30315] optimize unsigned-add overflow test on x86 to use cpu flags from addl

--- Comment #15 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 19:22 --- Subject: Bug 30315 Author: rask Date: Sun Sep 9 19:21:59 2007 New Revision: 128305 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128305 Log: PR target/30315 * config/i386/i386.h (CANONICALIZE

Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled

On Sun, 9 Sep 2007, David Edelsohn wrote: > Kaveh> The stage2 gcc cannot compile this simple program. The stage1 > Kaveh> compiler can, so looks like stage2 was miscompiled. Running it under > Kaveh> gdb doesn't yield any useful info. > > I am seeing the same failure on AIX. The SEGV on A

Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled

> Kaveh R GHAZI writes: Kaveh> Rats, I'm getting another bootstap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10. Kaveh> This time it happens in stage2 building libgcc. What happens is that Kaveh> when it runs configure for stage2 libgcc, I get: Kaveh> checking for suffix of object files... Kaveh> configu

Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled

Rats, I'm getting another bootstap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10. This time it happens in stage2 building libgcc. What happens is that when it runs configure for stage2 libgcc, I get: checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files

[Bug libgcj/33326] libjava - testsuite fails on intel Macintosh

--- Comment #4 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 18:43 --- Checked in the mentioned patch. Fixed. -- andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libgcj/33326] libjava - testsuite fails on intel Macintosh

--- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 18:40 --- Subject: Bug 33326 Author: andreast Date: Sun Sep 9 18:40:36 2007 New Revision: 128302 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128302 Log: 2007-09-09 Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P

Unable to compile a simple C program... Please Help!

I have pasted the source file and the error log below that contains the error message displayed when I invoke 'gcc' to compile this file. sample.c: (source file) #include void main() { printf("Hello World!\n"); } error log: Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../s

[Bug rtl-optimization/33353] Vector RTL arithmetic operations with constant arguments are not fully folded.

-- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Con

[Bug bootstrap/33368] [4.3 regression] bootstrap comparision failure with --enable-targets=all

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 15:39 --- This is a latent problem that comes and goes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368

[Bug bootstrap/33368] New: [4.3 regression] bootstrap comparision failure with --enable-targets=all

seen with r128190 on the trunk, works with r128189; configure with: --enable-languages=c --enable-targets=all i486-linux-gnu build with: make BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2" CFLAGS="-g -O2" make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/packages/gcc/svn/build-tst' Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: ./cc1-checksum.o diffe

[Bug testsuite/33367] A few tests fail

--- Comment #1 from Vladislav dot Mikhailikov at paradox-neo dot uz 2007-09-09 14:10 --- So, far gcc-4.2,2 is fine with GCC suite test results like: # of expected passes4 # of unexpected failures10 # of expected failures 116 # of unresolved testcases

[Bug tree-optimization/33361] ICE in find_outermost_region_in_block, at tree-cfg.c:4803

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 14:24 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/33361] ICE in find_outermost_region_in_block, at tree-cfg.c:4803

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 14:24 --- Created an attachment (id=14178) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14178&action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33361

[Bug testsuite/33367] New: A few tests fail

FAIL: gcc.target/i386/ssefn-1.c scan-assembler-not movsd FAIL: gcc.target/i386/ssefn-1.c scan-assembler-not mulsd FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11b.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 0 loops 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11c.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 0 loops 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-apply4

[Bug testsuite/33366] New: 20050316-2.c execution failure with -O0, -O1 and -O2

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20050316-2.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20050316-2.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20050316-2.c execution, -O2 The preprocessed source is: # 1 "gcc-4.2.2-2007090

[Bug testsuite/33365] New: GCC test 20000804-1.c with -O0

gcc-4.2.2-20070907/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/2804-1.c: In function 'f': gcc-4.2.2-20070907/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/2804-1.c:15: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload gcc-4.2.2-20070907/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/2804-1.c:15: error: 'asm' operand

[Bug web/33364] reporting bugs + minimizing testcases

--- Comment #2 from gcc at abeckmann dot de 2007-09-09 13:49 --- Another URL valuable for minimize.html: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33364

[Bug web/33364] reporting bugs + minimizing testcases

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 13:36 --- Confirmed. Danny, can you adjust the bug-writing url to the gcc specific one? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/33361] ICE in find_outermost_region_in_block, at tree-cfg.c:4803

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 13:41 --- There are http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HowToPrepareATestcase http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33361

[Bug tree-optimization/33361] ICE in find_outermost_region_in_block, at tree-cfg.c:4803

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 13:37 --- Reducing. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/33362] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure (rev. 128287)

--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 13:27 --- > Shell I close this PR? Yes, please. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33362

[Bug c/33362] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure (rev. 128287)

--- Comment #5 from victork at il dot ibm dot com 2007-09-09 13:33 --- As bootstrap passes in revision 128297, I change the status to "FIXED". -- victork at il dot ibm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c/33362] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure (rev. 128287)

--- Comment #3 from victork at il dot ibm dot com 2007-09-09 13:22 --- Just tried with revision 128297, and bootstrap passed OK. Shell I close this PR? -- victork at il dot ibm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug web/33364] New: reporting bugs + minimizing testcases

Hi, the bugzilla enter-a-new-bug-page http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=gcc points to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=bug-writing.html (which is a bit mozilla centric). Unfortunately neither page directs the user to the relevant pages for reporting gcc bugs: http://gcc.gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/33361] ICE in find_outermost_region_in_block, at tree-cfg.c:4803

--- Comment #1 from gcc at abeckmann dot de 2007-09-09 12:51 --- Created an attachment (id=14177) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14177&action=view) testcase (reduced to be < 500k) Sorry for the delay of the testcase, I had to reduce it from 1.9 MB to 440 KB. (Is the

[Bug middle-end/33362] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure (rev. 128287)

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 12:41 --- works for me -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33362

[Bug fortran/33363] New: gfortran is missing -fcase-preserve option

Split-off from PR31310. g77 has a huge number (~20) of case options, cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/g77/Fortran-Dialect-Options.html#index-g_t_002dfintrin_002dcase_002dinitcap-option-237 -fcase-preserve would probably be the most useful option; I don't know how much needed this optio

[Bug fortran/31310] gfortran is missing -fcase-preserve option

--- Comment #6 from mralanmorgan at gmail dot com 2007-09-09 11:12 --- oooh someone's got their panties in a bunch. Sorry that you are so disillusioned by your own importance or whatever. My intial point stands... no "real" point in raising simple bugs if it takes years to fix. I apprec

[Bug c++/33358] Slow calls through simple member function pointers

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 10:37 --- Subject: Re: Slow calls through simple member function pointers On 9 Sep 2007 06:47:40 -, dleska at gmail dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this optimisation not possible in gcc? Only because the ABI tha

Re: [Bug c++/33358] Slow calls through simple member function pointers

On 9 Sep 2007 06:47:40 -, dleska at gmail dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this optimisation not possible in gcc? Only because the ABI that GCC follows (the IA64 C++ ABI) says otherwise so we have to follow that. If you want this optimization, you will need the whole program as even if

[Bug c++/33350] copy constructor error

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 10:33 --- Subject: Re: copy constructor error > --- Comment #4 from stevenyi at 163 dot com 2007-09-09 05:26 --- > I can not see any reason to call the copy constructor here. If you remove > keyword explicit so that

Re: [Bug c++/33350] copy constructor error

> --- Comment #4 from stevenyi at 163 dot com 2007-09-09 05:26 --- > I can not see any reason to call the copy constructor here. If you remove > keyword explicit so that let the code compile, you can find that the copy > constructor is not called at all. Again the 1998 standard (as writte

[Bug middle-end/33362] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure (rev. 128287)

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 10:31 --- There have been chating about this on the IRC channel. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug other/33357] collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]

--- Comment #3 from schwab at suse dot de 2007-09-09 08:09 --- Use -B${binutils-bindir}, where ${binutils-bindir} is the directory where the binutils binaries were installed. `-BPREFIX' This option specifies where to find the executables, libraries, include files, and data fil