--- Comment #6 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2007-08-10
06:25 ---
The glibc patch now is included in glibc-2.6.1, the failing test cases are not
known anymore. Closing the report.
Matthias
--
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What|Remov
--- Comment #10 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-10 05:48 ---
The patch works fine for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-10 05:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33039
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00643.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-10
04:42 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90 execution
> write_float uses isfinite (n) and isnan (n) to determine if "Infinite" or
> "NaN"
> is emitted and in that case exits before
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 04:02 ---
This was introduced in revision 127273.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-08-10 03:50 ---
Subject: Re: TAB in FORMAT: accept extension, warn with -std=f*
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:27:33AM -, satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in
wrote:
>
> Any plans to backport.
>
No.
Please
--- Comment #10 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-08-10 03:27
---
Hi ,
Any plans to backport.
regards
Satya
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32987
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 03:00
---
write_float uses isfinite (n) and isnan (n) to determine if "Infinite" or "NaN"
is emitted and in that case exits before calling output_float. So if execution
is reaching output_float, one or both of the aforemen
--- Comment #6 from echristo at apple dot com 2007-08-10 02:29 ---
I hadn't but I have now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32722
--- Comment #5 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:39 ---
This should be fixed now (it was a VN/PRE interaction)
I believe echristo bootstrapped with this flag just yesterday, in fact.
The testcase is certainly not crashing for me anymore
Please reopen if it is still brok
--- Comment #4 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:37 ---
This should be fixed now.
I believe echristo bootstrapped with this flag just yesterday, in fact.
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:03 ---
C testcase (at -O3):
typedef float t[52];
void f(t * epstab, int ib, int ib2)
{
int i;
for(i = 0;i<52;i++)
{
ib2 = ib+2;
(*epstab)[(ib)-1] = (*epstab)[(ib2)-1];
ib = ib2;
}
}
--
pinsk
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33029
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33025
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33017
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33011
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33007
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32975
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32970
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32967
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32964
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:55
---
P5 unless/until a C/C++ testcase can be found; upgrade to P3 if found.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32914
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32912
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32898
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32855
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:51 ---
This is most likely caused by:
2005-09-09 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR debug/20998
* cp-tree.def (ALIAS_DECL): Remove.
* cp-lang.c (cp_init_ts): Remove support for it.
*
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32845
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32787
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32772
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32756
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:45
---
P5 until/unless a non-Ada example is found. Upgrade to P3 if so.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32722
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32716
--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:44
---
I'm not convinced that there's anything to fix here; it sounds like we've just
traded which of two examples is better. If there is a bug here, please add a
note explaining, and upgrade back to P3.
--
mmitchel
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-10
00:41 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90 execution
> Still can't reproduce this on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31. I'm starting to think
> that
> printf might be broken there, after all.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32674
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32636
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32628
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:38 ---
What is 'gcjavac'?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32624
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32607
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32596
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32567
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32566
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32565
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32557
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32546
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:30
---
I believe this to be valid code.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32276
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:29
---
Apparently, this only affects libffi/java, so I've marked this P2, rather than
P1. However, build failures are nasty, since many people just do "configure;
make".
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:25
---
Closed, as Sebastian says he cannot reproduce, and as Richard says there is
another testcase in PR31762.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31032
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:23
---
Closed, since Andrew says this can no longer be reproduced.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=14048)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14048&action=view)
Candidate patch from 2005
Here's my patch from 2005 as requested.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:38
---
This report is better than my own. :)
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:37
---
*** Bug 33019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:37
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33039 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-09
23:30 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 at -O1 and above
> Any results? I cannot reproduce this on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31 (neither the
> original bug nor your testcase that gives differe
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:27
---
Regarding the test case:
&codechar='Improper lower case name',X=-3.0/
Fortran 95 Standard 10.9.1 states:
"If a processor is capable of representing letters in both upper and lower
case, a group name or obj
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:06
---
How on earth did that PR get assigned to me?
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Ke
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||32630
nThis||
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 22:23 ---
Some more debugging - I modified gfc_trans_structure_assign to:
--
cm = expr->ts.derived->components; i = 1;
for (c = expr->value.constructor; c; c = c->next, cm = cm->next)
{
p
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-09 22:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 31629
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00607.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 22:20
---
Patch submitted for review.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 22:08 ---
FIXED for gfortran 4.3.0; gfortran now accepts the tab; it checks also at
compile time for the tab character and gives either a warning (-std=gnu/legacy)
or an error (-std=f95/f2003) if a tab has been found.
--
bu
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 22:03 ---
Subject: Bug 32987
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Aug 9 22:02:32 2007
New Revision: 127324
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127324
Log:
2007-08-09 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:58
---
The patch in the previous comment wasn't even building, here is a one that
regtests and that I submitted to review.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:56
---
Still can't reproduce this on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31. I'm starting to think that
printf might be broken there, after all. Since it's a corner case on a platform
that is not the current one, I'd like to close it as
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:54
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have looked into this bug and I think it is an HP math lib bug. The 64 bit
> powf function is using %fr12R but not saving/restoring it the way it is
> supposed to. I have a query in
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:51
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It looks like lroundl there is an implementation using roundl. There
> is an implementation of roundl using ceill, but ceill isn't available.
This has been fixed since, sorry for the b
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-09 21:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 33020
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00604.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:40 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:39 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:39 ---
Subject: Bug 32796
Author: pinskia
Date: Thu Aug 9 21:39:08 2007
New Revision: 127323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127323
Log:
2007-08-09 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:37 ---
Subject: Bug 32813
Author: pinskia
Date: Thu Aug 9 21:36:27 2007
New Revision: 127322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127322
Log:
2007-08-09 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:28 ---
Subject: Bug 33001
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Aug 9 21:27:52 2007
New Revision: 127321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127321
Log:
2007-08-09 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
The following reduced example, based on
http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/services/software/mathematik/gsl/fortran/, gives an
segmentation fault:
fgsl.f90: In function 'fgsl_multifit_fdfsolver_jac':
fgsl.f90:24: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
valgrind shows:
==21413== Invalid read of size 2
--- Comment #9 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 19:33 ---
I'm now testing the patch from Comment #7.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #8 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 19:24 ---
The regression was caused by the following patch
New Revision: 126951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126951
Log:
2007-07-26 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
toplev/
* con
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 19:14 ---
Right now, I'd rather work on something else.
Unassigning myself (for now, at least).
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:54 ---
> This is undefined code, when I rewrote most of the transfer code for scalars,
> I
> had asked what happens when the sizes did not match and everyone I asked said
> it was undefined behavior.
Well, nonetheless gfor
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-09
18:41 ---
Subject: Re: New: Unsatisfied symbol "lroundl" in file libgfortran.sl
> The symbol is from misc_specifics.o.
It looks like lroundl there is an implementation using roundl. There
is an implementation of
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:41 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00119.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00122.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33038
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:39 ---
I think this is a duplicate of PR 33019.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33039
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:07 ---
Yup, it's a bug.
We aren't really fixing bugs in the old front end though.
I'm closing it because this is a weird case and has a couple
simple workarounds.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wha
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:05 ---
See comment #3. The installation manual explains the correct way to
configure and build. I'm closing this.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-09
17:57 ---
Subject: Re: New: Unsatisfied symbol "lroundl" in file libgfortran.sl
The symbol is from misc_specifics.o.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33038
--- Comment #21 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 17:44 ---
I've created abranch for this work at
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-eabi-branch
It's mostly done, but there are still some bugs. I'll post the patches to the
gcc list when they're in a fit state.
-
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
