ally hope this helps you pin-pointing the bug!
For completeness:
% g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.2.0 20070225 (prerelease)
This is SVN revision 122315.
--
rwgk at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Remove
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-02-26 07:05 ---
Fixed in SVN.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-02-26 07:04 ---
Fixed in SVN.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 06:46 ---
If you name the class you get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc t.cc
t.cc:8: error: uninitialized const `MyAnonymous'
This has nothing to do with const anonymous class object but just an
uninitialized class object in genera
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 06:38 ---
I think this is my fault.
Reduced testcase for powerpc64-linux-gnu:
struct pwc_dec23_private
{
unsigned int table_dc00[256];
};
void fill_table_dc00_d800(struct pwc_dec23_private *pdec)
{
int i;
unsigned int offs
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 06:28
---
Fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30509
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 06:28
---
Fixed I say.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|A
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 06:27 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30958
--- Comment #15 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 04:38
---
I'll happily confirm I can reproduce it on my i686-pc-linux-gnu machine
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #14 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2007-02-26 03:37 ---
> Yes.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00817.html
> It also fixed vect-101 testcase, in addition to 464.h264ref from spec2006.
> It initially caused a failure in 403.gcc, but this was later found to
> be a lat
--- Comment #13 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 02:42
---
Subject: Re: -fPIC -O3 optimizer bug (32-bit target only)
On 26 Feb 2007 02:26:12 -, rwgk at yahoo dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #12 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2007-02-26 02:26 ---
--- Comment #12 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2007-02-26 02:26 ---
Daniel Berlin wrote:
> This change actually made us more conservative with points-to, it certainly
> won't cause *more* things to be optimized away.
Was the change supposed to fix a certain problem?
If not I suggest the two
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 00:25 ---
Fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01995.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 00:14 ---
I have a patch to permit gfc_check_random_seed to deal with arguments
with the optional attribute set. I was waiting on pault's size0/size1
patch to hit the tree to see if it does the right thing.
--
http://gcc.g
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-02-25 23:19 ---
Fixed on SVN for real.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 23:18 ---
Subject: Bug 30938
Author: uros
Date: Sun Feb 25 23:18:45 2007
New Revision: 122323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122323
Log:
PR tree-optimization/30938
* tree-vect-transform.c
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 22:51
---
Created an attachment (id=13109)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13109&action=view)
patch to fix testcase in comment 10
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19431
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 22:50
---
We start with
D.59982_3 = variable_2(D) + 4B;
__unary_op = __unary_op.65;
goto ();
:;
D.61146_10 = __unary_op._M_arg1;
D.61147_11 = __unary_op._M_arg2;
D.61093_12 = D.61146_10 + D.61147_11;
*variab
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 22:23
---
Not really as this is only exposed by TER. Though I remember forwprop catching
similiar stuff before. I'll have a look.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19431
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 22:01
---
> if (variable != variable + 8B) goto ; else goto ;
That issue was fixed just yesterday by PR 30951.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19431
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-02-25 21:57 ---
Sorry, I was too quick. Please ignore comment #2, bootstrap with
BOOT_CFLAGS="-Os -g -ftree-vectorize" still fails with the same error.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
This is similar to PR 30865. Any of the
arguments to random_seed may be specified if they
are optional arguments to the subroutine that is called.
The following is legal:
program trs
implicit none
integer :: size, ierr
integer, allocatable, dimension(:) :: seed
call test_random_seed(size)
--- Comment #5 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 21:15 ---
Subject: Bug 30400
Author: sayle
Date: Sun Feb 25 21:14:49 2007
New Revision: 122322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122322
Log:
2007-02-25 Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul Tho
--- Comment #4 from sherpya at netfarm dot it 2007-02-25 20:13 ---
I've compiled other things and this messages is a warning in 4.1, but doesn't
crashes
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30956
--- Comment #12 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-25 20:09 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Bonus points if you can make that self-contained ;)
-fdump-tree-optimized shows the same code for both variants
and there is the if-with-dereferencing :)
(...)
if (variable != variable + 8B) g
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 19:52
---
Bonus points if you can make that self-contained ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19431
--- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-25 19:00 ---
one more testcase:
#include
#include
extern void assign( long* variable, long v )
{
std::transform( variable, variable + 1, variable,
std::tr1::bind( std::plus< long >(), 0L, v ) );
}
extern void a
First I cannot find the exact C++ definition of "const anonymous object" so I
am not sure the below reporting is valid or not. The question to me is: why
adding 'const' to the class declaration will invalidate the code while without
'const' is ok?
The following code will compile and run without er
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-02-25 18:29 ---
Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01979.html.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-25 18:27 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > adjust summary ( 4.2 regression status reopened ).
> That is a target specific issue really and should be filed seperately.
filled as PR30961
--
http://gcc.gnu
float convert( unsigned in )
{
float f;
__builtin_memcpy( &f, &in, sizeof( in ) );
return f;
}
unsigned short load( void* p )
{
unsigned short v;
__builtin_memcpy( &v, p, sizeof( v ) );
return v;
}
gcc-4.2.0-20070221
$ g++ temp.cpp -O2 -S
_Z7conve
--- Comment #10 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 18:11
---
Subject: Bug 30509
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Feb 25 18:11:20 2007
New Revision: 122314
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122314
Log:
PR middle-end/30509
* tree-inline.c (copy_b
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 17:42 ---
*** Bug 30768 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #31 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 17:42
---
Yes this is a dup as the patch which honza added to that bug fixes this one
also. Plus there is a small testcase. So closing as a dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30509 ***
--
pinskia at g
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 17:39 ---
*** Bug 30866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 17:39 ---
The patch which honza added in PR 30509 fixed this testcase so closing as a
dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30509 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 17:39 ---
There is a slight error in the patch here, CB_CGE_MOVE should really be
CB_CGE_MOVE_CLONES.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30509
--- Comment #8 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 17:37 ---
Subject: Bug 30778
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Feb 25 17:37:37 2007
New Revision: 122313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122313
Log:
PR target/30778
* i386.c (counter_mode): New
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 16:49
---
*** Bug 30959 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 16:49 ---
The C++ standard as written requires this error, though the intent of the C++
standards committee was not having this error message. There was a defect
report against the C++ standards about this error and that is r
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 16:46 ---
This works for me and others, you just have a miss installed/configured
GMP/MPFR.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 16:17 ---
Fixed in 4.2. Closing as fixed as this is a request for a new feature.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 16:11 ---
There's is/was a discussion at the ML whether GNU extensions should allow
default integer only, fold anything into a default integer and recast
afterwards or whether the library shall provide calls for any type.
As
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 16:03 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
> as i have said, i need a compilation error on such casts.
> 4.2 has a nice -Werror=foo feature, but this PR is about 4.1.
> if you don't plan to backport -Werror=
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 15:56 ---
> $> gfortran-svn fget.f90 && ./a.out
> x
> x
>
> I.e. the string is cleared and the first character is set to the input.
> This also "works" with substrings, e.g. s(3:6).
> In my eyes I would consider the blank
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 15:29 ---
configure:4917: /usr/gcc/host-i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/gfortran
-B/usr/gcc/host-i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include
--- Comment #1 from gcc at pellmont dot dyndns dot org 2007-02-25 15:11
---
Created an attachment (id=13108)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13108&action=view)
logfile as stated in the error message
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30960
i tried to compile gcc from trunk on my ubuntu system, but i only get the
error:
checking whether the GNU Fortran compiler is working... no
configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working; please report a bug in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla, attaching
/usr/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgfortran/config.log
m
--- Comment #3 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-02-25 14:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=13107)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13107&action=view)
testcase for MVE
Running the executable of the attached testcase (compiled with MVE)
succeeded. This looks strange
--- Comment #2 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-02-25 14:50 ---
The execution fails also when acc is float (and not double)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30957
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-02-25 14:22 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Could you elaborate a litte bit more for me?
>
> We have already -Wint-to-pointer-cast and -Wpointer-to-int-cast enabled by
> defaul in C. Don't those work for you?
as i have said, i need a compil
Depending on whether the copy constructor CA(const CA& a) (see following code)
is private, public or not (explicitly) defined the constructor CA(const SA&
a) from the unrelated class SA gets compile errors.
It compiles for public and undefined, but not for private.
If CA(const CA& a) is public, t
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-02-25 12:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=13106)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13106&action=view)
C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30958
I just tried to compile Linux kernel 2.6.20.1
with the GNU C++ compiler version 4.3 snapshot 20070223.
The compiler said
drivers/media/video/pwc/pwc-dec23.c: In function 'pwc_dec23_init':
drivers/media/video/pwc/pwc-dec23.c:305: error: invalid reference prefix
{63368}
drivers/media/video/pwc/pwc
--- Comment #1 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2007-02-25 11:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=13105)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13105&action=view)
RTL unroller's dump (compiled with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller)
reg:DF 137 is the new variable expansion creat
Compiling mzero6.c with -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller flag causes unexpected
abortion of the executable.
testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero6.c -w -O2 -fno-show-column -lm
-funroll-loops --fast-math -O2 -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -o out
--
Summary: Misscompare
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 10:29 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|norma
57 matches
Mail list logo
