Given the following test case:
#define f(x, y) "x y"
extern void abort (void);
int main ()
{
const char *str1 = f("a", "\"a\"");
const char *str2 = f( \t, " \t");
if (strcmp (str1, "\"a\" \"\\\"a\\\"\""))
abort ();
if (strcmp (str2, "\t \" \\t\""))
abort ();
Given the following test case:
#define f(x, y) "x y"
extern void abort (void);
int main ()
{
const char *str1 = f("a", "\"a\"");
const char *str2 = f( \t, " \t");
if (strcmp (str1, "\"a\" \"\\\"a\\\"\""))
abort ();
if (strcmp (str2, "\t \" \\t\""))
abor
--- Comment #3 from jconner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-04 01:37 ---
Subject: Bug 29683
Author: jconner
Date: Thu Jan 4 01:37:15 2007
New Revision: 120425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120425
Log:
2007-03-01 Josh Conner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR midd
--- Comment #6 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-04 00:09 ---
Subject: Bug 16634
Author: pbrook
Date: Thu Jan 4 00:09:48 2007
New Revision: 120413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120413
Log:
2007-01-03 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/
--- Comment #20 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-04 00:01 ---
Fixed in 4.1 as well.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to wo
--- Comment #19 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:56 ---
Subject: Bug 28217
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:56:44 2007
New Revision: 120412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120412
Log:
Backported from mainline
2006-07-12 Jason Merri
--- Comment #18 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:54 ---
Subject: Bug 28217
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:54:24 2007
New Revision: 120411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120411
Log:
PR c++/28217
* g++.dg/pch/template-1.C: New test
--- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:53 ---
Subject: Bug 28217
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:53:18 2007
New Revision: 120410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120410
Log:
PR c++/28217
* g++.dg/pch/template-1.C: New test
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:00 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:00 ---
Subject: Bug 30353
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:00:40 2007
New Revision: 120404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120404
Log:
2007-01-03 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 23:00 ---
Subject: Bug 20353
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Jan 3 23:00:40 2007
New Revision: 120404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120404
Log:
2007-01-03 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #5 from rich at phekda dot gotadsl dot co dot uk 2007-01-03
21:55 ---
Thanks for the quick response and the reference to the attribute documentation.
I agree my comment about the documentation being incorrect is wrong. But it
doesn't look to me like the visibility is correc
Folks,
Not sure what if youc an help. By way of background, I'm running FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006. Very nice indeed. AFter some
littel experience usign Linus (RH9, FC4 & FC5), I have ventured into less
chartered waters. What better way to learn to plunge int the deep e
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:46 ---
gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 20061011 (Red Hat 4.1.1-30)
This should also tell you, that you are using a modified version of the
compiler and the bug report should have been filed up with redhat first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:45 ---
Read:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/Attribute-Syntax.html
Which describes the syntax.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30361
--- Comment #2 from rich at phekda dot gotadsl dot co dot uk 2007-01-03
21:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=12853)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12853&action=view)
A test case
When I compile the attached test case, I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test-cases]$ make
g++ -
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:43 ---
> Note that the attribute is attached to the return type of the function "f",
> not
> the function declaration itself. I think this means that the hidden visibility
> is applied to the type, not the function, which
The documentation for the visibility attribute shown by the "info gcc 'c
extension' function" command is misleading. It says:
"`visibility ("VISIBILITY_TYPE")'
The `visibility' attribute on ELF targets causes the declaration
to be emitted with default, hidden, protected or internal
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-01-03 21:31 ---
Subject: Re: New: Complex divide bug
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> fails when compiled with -O0 -std=c99 but succeeds when compiled with -O2
> -std=c99. ISO C99 says it should be (inf
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:30 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:29 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:27 ---
Subject: Bug 25818
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 3 21:27:17 2007
New Revision: 120399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120399
Log:
2007-01-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport f
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 21:27 ---
Subject: Bug 30084
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 3 21:27:17 2007
New Revision: 120399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120399
Log:
2007-01-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport fr
/* { dg-options "-O0 -std=gnu99" } */
int
main (void)
{
_Complex double d;
__real__ d = 1.0;
__imag__ d = 1.0;
d = d / 0.0;
if (!__builtin_isinf (__real__ d) || !__builtin_isinf (__imag__ d))
__builtin_abort ();
return 0;
}
fails when compiled with -O0 -std=c99 but succeeds when c
--- Comment #13 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 19:17 ---
I'm not sure whether the updated patch can be committed without
another review. I'll try to find out.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13676
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-03 18:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR20896
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00145.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
These tests passed yesterday early morning, but give me ICEs today:
Running /u01/var/tmp/gcc_trunk_svn/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-1.c scan-ipa-dump-times versione
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-03 17:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR debug/30189
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00140.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-03 16:50 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27698
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00137.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 16:46 ---
Related to PR 12242.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30357
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 14:24 ---
Subject: Bug 28754
Author: aph
Date: Wed Jan 3 14:23:48 2007
New Revision: 120396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120396
Log:
2007-01-03 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR java/28754
I would appreciate adding the enumeration typecast warnings. I mean:
When I cast one enum to another and the first enum is not a subset of the
second warning will be shown.
Example:
enum EParent
{
EP_VAL0 = 0,
EP_VAL1 = 1,
EP_VAL2 = 2
};
enum EChild
{
EC_VAL0 = 0,
EC_VAL1 = 1
};
int m
--- Comment #3 from maxim dot yegorushkin at gmail dot com 2007-01-03
12:31 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm having a similar problem on Linux Fedora Core 5. Is there any quick way to
> fix it? I am new to autoconf and would appreciate any hints.
>
> Here is the output:
The same pro
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:19 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:18 ---
Backported to 4.1.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:17 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:16 ---
Fixed on gcc-4_1-branch.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assign
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:15 ---
Subject: Bug 30286
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:15:24 2007
New Revision: 120393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120393
Log:
PR middle-end/30286
* fold-const.c (negate_expr):
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:14 ---
Subject: Bug 29535
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:13:50 2007
New Revision: 120392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120392
Log:
PR c++/29535
Backported from mainline
20
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:14 ---
Subject: Bug 28261
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:13:50 2007
New Revision: 120392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120392
Log:
PR c++/29535
Backported from mainline
200
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:11 ---
Subject: Bug 29054
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:11:02 2007
New Revision: 120391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120391
Log:
PR c++/29054
* decl.c (revert_static_member_fn):
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 30286
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:07:33 2007
New Revision: 120390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120390
Log:
PR middle-end/30286
* gcc.dg/pr30286.c: New test.
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:06 ---
Subject: Bug 29535
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:06:42 2007
New Revision: 120389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120389
Log:
PR c++/29535
* g++.dg/template/crash66.C: New te
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:06 ---
Subject: Bug 29054
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:05:53 2007
New Revision: 120388
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120388
Log:
PR c++/29054
* g++.dg/template/friend49.C: New te
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:04 ---
Subject: Bug 30286
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:04:11 2007
New Revision: 120387
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120387
Log:
PR middle-end/30286
* gcc.dg/pr30286.c: New test.
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:03 ---
Subject: Bug 29535
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:03:26 2007
New Revision: 120385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120385
Log:
PR c++/29535
* g++.dg/template/crash66.C: New tes
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 08:00 ---
Subject: Bug 29054
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 3 08:00:30 2007
New Revision: 120384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120384
Log:
PR c++/29054
* g++.dg/template/friend49.C: New te
48 matches
Mail list logo
