[Bug rtl-optimization/30149] [4.3 Regression] tree-cfg.c:1924: ICE: in cse_find_path, at cse.c:5930

--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:51 --- I posted a patch that fixes the mipsel, HPPA, and CC0 problems here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00800.html Will ask for approval of this patch tonight. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug libfortran/30193] Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays

--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:46 --- > "&test", & > "ihp(1,1) = 2*1", & > "ihp(1,2) = 2", & > "/" > READ (UNIT=22, NML=test) I think the result is *not* well defined: ihp(1,1) = 2*1 does make sense - one cannot assign 2 values to ihp(1,1). I th

[Bug middle-end/20218] Can't use __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) to hide a symbol

--- Comment #47 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:39 --- This is probably (I have not checked yet as I am still bootstrapping) still a problem on MIPS because my fix for the bootstrap breakage caused by H.J.'s patch removes the generic fix in elfos.h. -- daney at gcc d

[Bug tree-optimization/14784] [Tree-ssa] alias analysis deficiency

--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:37 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENE

[Bug tree-optimization/5035] Incorrectly produces '`' might be used uninitialized in this function'

--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:31 --- *** Bug 30086 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/30086] Initialize struct to avoid warnings shouldn't be needed

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:31 --- The problem here is the same as PR 5035 really, just this case has structs and the other case is for scalars but the problems are the same. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5035 *** -- pinskia at g

[Bug bootstrap/30136] bootstrap fail for 4.3-20061209

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:26 --- Does this work now on the mainline? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/30172] Operations with partly constant complex values not folded

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:15 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|

[Bug c/30124] gcc/vec.h line 538 references "vec" which is undefined (should be vec_)

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:12 --- (In reply to comment #2) > If its already spec'd - why are we "calculating" it? Because the layout of the struct dependens on the the target so you don't know the exact offset until compile time. What exact proble

[Bug target/21530] libstdc++ not supported on this target

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:08 --- Actually most likely you just need to configure with --with-newlib. You are using newlib, correct? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21530

[Bug rtl-optimization/27761] combine miscompiles

--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:06 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/30174] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/cxa_vec.C execution test

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: g++.old- |[4.3 Regression] FAIL: |deja/g++.abi/cxa_vec.C

[Bug testsuite/30181] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-57.c scan-tree-dump trunc

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 07:00 --- This is a testsuite failure as this testcase will fail on targets which don't have C99 math functions. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/30195] Using declaration doesn't work in template.

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 06:55 --- Looks related to PR 25994. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThi

[Bug target/30185] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE with struct and divide

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 06:40 --- Reduced testcase: typedef struct num { char is_fixnum; long long ivalue; } num; num num_intdiv(num a, num b) { num ret; ret.ivalue = a.ivalue / b.ivalue; return ret; } --- On the trunk we get a better

[Bug c++/30195] New: Using declaration doesn't work in template.

test case template struct B { void foo(T) {} }; template struct D: B, B { using B::foo; using B::foo; void bar() { foo(3); } }; int main() { D x; x.bar(); return 0; } $g++ cc.cpp cc.cpp: In member function 'void D::bar()': cc.cpp:10: error: reference to 'foo' is ambiguous cc.cpp:

[Bug c++/30108] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:890

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] |make_decl_rtl, at

[Bug tree-optimization/30159] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c is miscompiled

--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 05:42 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/30168] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] C++ constructors can cause invalid gimple to happen with complex typed variables

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 04:40 --- And here is a testcase which makes this a regression: struct aaa { aaa(_Complex float __z) ; _Complex float _M_value; }; aaa::aaa(_Complex float __z) { __z*=2.0f; _M_value = __z; } ---

[Bug tree-optimization/30187] accessing an element via a "pointer" on a vector does not cause vec_extract to be used (non constant index)

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30187

[Bug middle-end/30191] [4.3 Regression] GCC error: in eliminate_regs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3126

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical Keywords||build, ice-o

[Bug tree-optimization/30194] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/pr19633-1.c fails on the mainline

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 04:21 --- Looks like the mem-ssa patches cause this. There are no other patches in that time frame. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/30194] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/pr19633-1.c fails on the mainline

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 04:16 --- It was passing at r119745: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-12/msg00467.html It was failing at r119761: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-12/msg00472.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug libfortran/30193] Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays

--- Comment #5 from mjw99 at ic dot ac dot uk 2006-12-13 04:14 --- Ok, I'll grab the 4.2 pre-release and start playing with that. Once again, thanks for the help. Mark -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30193

[Bug libfortran/30193] Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays

--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2006-12-13 04:12 --- Subject: Re: Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays 4.2 is in pre-release stage now. It is usually not too difficult to build it yourself. You could consider downloading the source, build, and i

[Bug tree-optimization/30177] [4.3 Regression] ICE in ssa_operand_alloc, at tree-ssa-operands.c:365

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/30194] [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/pr19633-1.c fails on the mainline

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30194

[Bug tree-optimization/30194] New: [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/pr19633-1.c fails on the mainline

gcc.dg/pr19633-1.c fails on the mainline with the following error message: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr19633-1.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors: pr19633-1.c:(.text+0xd7): undefined reference to `link_error' This started between r119726 and r119792. -- Summary: [4.3 Regression] gcc.dg/pr1

[Bug libfortran/30193] Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 04:07 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thank you Jerry for the testing. How does one ascertain if this bug warrants > backporting to 4.1? > If this is a regression with respect to a previous version of gfortran, then a backport

[Bug rtl-optimization/30163] error at combine pass

--- Comment #1 from hth94 at cs dot ccu dot edu dot tw 2006-12-13 03:46 --- wrong compare RTX -- hth94 at cs dot ccu dot edu dot tw changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/30193] Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays

--- Comment #2 from mjw99 at ic dot ac dot uk 2006-12-13 03:32 --- Thank you Jerry for the testing. How does one ascertain if this bug warrants backporting to 4.1? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30193

[Bug libfortran/30193] Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays

--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2006-12-13 03:18 --- Subject: Re: New: Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays With gfortran 4.3 I get: $ ./a.out 1 1 2 10922 The last element is odd because gfortran does not i

[Bug libfortran/30193] New: Namelist issues when reading in asterisk preceeded arrays

Recently, I've been testing gfortran builds of some molecular dynamics code; AMBER (http://amber.scripps.edu/) and found a strange quirk in the READ function when using namelists. I'm not sure if this is a bug; but the behaviour is inconsistent with other F90 compilers. The host system is i686 Fedo

[Bug target/30192] New: [arm] Wrong sp value on exit after calling __floatdidf or __floatundidf

In a private arm based target on gcc 4.1.1 I noticed that the sp stack value is wrong after having called __floatdidf or __floatundidf (at gcc/config/arm/ieee754-df.S). The reason is that for this target I don't have __VFP_FP__ nor __SOFTFP__ defined which means that both routines will finally cal

[Bug middle-end/29683] Arg split between stack/regs can cause stack corruption

--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-13 01:55 --- Subject: Bug number PR middle-end/29683 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00915.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/30191] GCC error: in eliminate_regs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3126

--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 01:39 --- Yes. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/30191] GCC error: in eliminate_regs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3126

--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 00:45 --- This is for revision 119802M. Maybe, 2006-12-12 Peter Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * reload1.c (eliminate_regs_in_insn): Merge the plus_src "else" and the offset == 0 "then" clauses. -- http:

[Bug middle-end/30191] GCC error: in eliminate_regs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3126

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 00:42 --- I hit this also on spu-elf when compiling libstdc++, complex-io.cpp. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30191

[Bug middle-end/30191] New: GCC error: in eliminate_regs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3126

DETECTED==+ | 4.3.0 20061212 (experimental) (hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11) GCC error: | | in eliminate_regs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3126 | | Error detected at namet.adb:1375:1 | -- Summary: GCC error

[Bug tree-optimization/30159] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c is miscompiled

--- Comment #6 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 23:20 --- The patch fixes the problem also on sh-elf and mips-elf. Thanks! BTW, I'm a bit surprised that current testcases didn't catch it on x86. How about to add a new testcase? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug fortran/30190] Bounds check generates wrong code for associated(p1(i)%p2,p1(i)%p2)

--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 22:59 --- If I dump the original tree, I find: { ... int8 D.1351; int8 D.1350; int8 D.1349; D.1351 = (int8) i; if( ... (t.dim[0].lbound > D.1351, 0)) ... if( ... (t.dim[0].ubound < D.1351, 0)) ... D.1352 = _gfortran_associated

[Bug fortran/30190] New: Bounds check generates wrong code for associated(p1(i)%p2,p1(i)%p2)

The following program crashes with -fbounds-check; if one replaces the the "t(i)" by "t(1)" it works. In associated.c, GFC_DESCRIPTOR_DATA(target) is ok, but for GFC_DESCRIPTOR_DATA(pointer), one gets a memory access error. TYPE particle_type INTEGER, POINTER :: p(:) END

[Bug debug/30189] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on modified_type_die

/* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-g -O" } */ extern void foo (void); static void baz (int i) { foo (); typedef char A[i]; struct { A b; } *x = 0; } void bar (i) { baz (i); } ICEs in modified_type_die in 4.1.x (x86_64-linux -m32, -m64, ppc-linux -m32, -m64 at least). Works with

[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 22:45 --- Fixed in 4.3.0, will test for the 4.2 branch later this week or during the weekend. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2/4.3 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 22:45 --- Subject: Bug 28624 Author: pinskia Date: Tue Dec 12 22:45:25 2006 New Revision: 119802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119802 Log: 2006-12-12 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR tr

[Bug tree-optimization/30187] New: accessing an element via a "pointer" on a vector does not cause vec_extract to be used (non constant index)

#define vector __attribute__((vector_size(16))) float f(vector float t, int i) { return ((float*)&t)[i]; } -- Summary: accessing an element via a "pointer" on a vector does not cause vec_extract to be used (non constant index) Product: gcc V

[Bug tree-optimization/30186] New: accessing an element via a "pointer" on a vector does not cause vec_extract to be used (non-zero index)

#define vector __attribute__((vector_size(16))) float f(vector float t) { return ((float*)&t)[1]; } -- Summary: accessing an element via a "pointer" on a vector does not cause vec_extract to be used (non-zero index) Product: gcc Version: 4.3

[Bug middle-end/28436] accessing an element via a "pointer" on a vector does not cause vec_extract to be used

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28436

[Bug middle-end/28436] accessing an element via a "pointer" on a vector does not cause vec_extract to be used

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 22:34 --- Fixed mostly, I will file a new bug for the other issues, in that a nonzero index and a non constant index. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/28436] accessing an element via a "pointer" on a vector does not cause vec_extract to be used

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 22:33 --- Subject: Bug 28436 Author: pinskia Date: Tue Dec 12 22:33:06 2006 New Revision: 119801 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119801 Log: 2006-12-12 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR tr

[Bug target/30185] ICE with unrecognizable insn on powerpc64 while building gimp with -O1+

--- Comment #4 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-12-12 22:15 --- Created an attachment (id=12792) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12792&action=view) PR30185.i blah i knew i was missing something -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30185

[Bug target/30185] ICE with unrecognizable insn on powerpc64 while building gimp with -O1+

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 22:12 --- Testcase? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30185

[Bug target/30185] ICE with unrecognizable insn on powerpc64 while building gimp with -O1+

--- Comment #2 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-12-12 21:56 --- tested these versions/snaps and got same result: 4.1.1 4.1.0-20061208 4.2.0-20061205 4.3.0-20061209 -- vapier at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/30185] ICE with unrecognizable insn on powerpc64 while building gimp with -O1+

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 21:56 --- This is obvious an incorrect RTL instruction: (insn 973 971 974 95 (set (reg:SI 546) (subreg:DI (reg/v:TI 355 [ b ]) 8)) -1 (nil) (nil)) We cannot set a SI from a DI :). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug target/30185] New: ICE with unrecognizable insn on powerpc64 while building gimp with -O1+

trying to build gimp on PPC64 triggers an ICE when building with optimization: if powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -DGIMP_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DPANGO_DISABLE_

[Bug c++/30156] [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] ICE on invalid template declaration

--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-12 21:45 --- Subject: Bug number PR c++/30156 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00892.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug libgcj/29869] LogManager class loading failure with Tomcat

--- Comment #3 from twisti at complang dot tuwien dot ac dot at 2006-12-12 21:25 --- Ohh, funny, I didn't notice there are no stacktraces :-) Here they are: WARNING: error instantiating 'org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager' referenced by java.util.logging.manager, class not found ja

[Bug tree-optimization/30038] Call to sin(x), cos(x) should be transformed to sincos(x)

--- Comment #16 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2006-12-12 20:59 --- (In reply to comment #13) Looks like what's blocking vectorization of the loop is: sinc.f90:8: note: value used after loop. sinc.f90:8: note: not vectorized: relevant stmt not supported: D.1408_32 = (*radius_31)[D.140

[Bug other/30184] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-sin-mpfr-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 20:49 --- Oh, this is mpfr bug and I need to finish updating mpfr. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/30184] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-sin-mpfr-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors)

Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /te st/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-sin-mpfr-1.c -O0 -fno-sh ow-column -lm -o builtin-sin-mpfr-1.exe(timeout = 300) /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: link_error (first referenced in /v

[Bug c/30183] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/pr16876.c -O0 (test for errors, line 10)

Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /te st/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noncompile/pr16876.c -O0 -O -finline-func tions -fno-show-column -S -o pr16876.s(timeout = 300) FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/pr16876.c -O0 (test for errors, line 10) PASS: gcc.

[Bug other/30182] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c (test for excess errors)

Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /te st/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c -O2 -funsafe-math-optimization s -fno-finite-math-only -fno-show-column -lm -o ./pr28796-2.exe(timeout = 300) /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: finite (f

[Bug libgcj/29869] LogManager class loading failure with Tomcat

--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 20:30 --- A stack trace would help here ... can you install debug info or something and try again? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29869

[Bug tree-optimization/30181] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-57.c scan-tree-dump trunc

--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-12-12 20:28 --- Subject: Re: New: FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-57.c scan-tree-dump trunc Attached tree dump. Dave --- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-12-12 20:28 --- Created an attachmen

[Bug tree-optimization/30181] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-57.c scan-tree-dump trunc

Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /te st/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtins-57.c -fdump-tree-gimple -fno-show -column -S -o builtins-57.s(timeout = 300) PASS: gcc.dg/builtins-57.c (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/builtins-57.c scan-tree-

[Bug libgcj/26139] provide gorbd and gtnameserv executables

-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||28067 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc do

[Bug libgcj/24182] standard.omit not properly rebuilt

-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfir

[Bug libgcj/25414] should update rmic

-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||28067 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc do

[Bug testsuite/30180] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-1.c (test for excess errors)

Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /te st/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-1.c-fno-show-column -S -o builtin-bswap-1.s(timeout = 300) /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-1.c:5: error: stdint.h: No such file or direct

[Bug testsuite/30179] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/mode-dependent-address.c compilation, -O0

Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /te st/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/mode-dependent-address.c -w -O0 -fno-show-column -lm -o /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gcc/mode-dep endent-address.x0(timeout = 300) /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gc

[Bug tree-optimization/30159] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c is miscompiled

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 19:53 --- *** Bug 30178 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/30178] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c execution, -O1

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 19:53 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30159 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/30178] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c execution, -O1

Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /te st/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c -w -O1 -fno-s how-column -lm -o /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gcc/20010422-1.x1 (ti meout = 300) PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c co

[Bug c/30177] ICE in ssa_operand_alloc, at tree-ssa-operands.c:365

--- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2006-12-12 19:38 --- Created an attachment (id=12790) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12790&action=view) sysparams.i gcc -c -O2 sysparams.i -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30177

[Bug c/30177] New: ICE in ssa_operand_alloc, at tree-ssa-operands.c:365

current trunk ICEs with: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/projects/wine/dlls/user32/tests> /home/marcus/projects/gcc/BIN/bin/gcc-O2 -c sysparams.i sysparams.i: In function 'f': sysparams.i:26: internal compiler error: in ssa_operand_alloc, at tree-ssa-operands.c:365 Please submit a full bug report, with p

[Bug c++/30112] pragma redefine_extname fails when namespaces are involved

--- Comment #1 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2006-12-12 18:40 --- In gcc/cp/decl.c, I see: if (global_scope_p (current_binding_level)) asmspec_tree = maybe_apply_renaming_pragma (decl, asmspec_tree); So if I understand correctly (it is the first time I have a look a

[Bug c++/19564] -Wparentheses does not work with the C++ front-end

--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-12 18:00 --- Subject: Bug number PR c++/19564 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00868.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug c++/19564] -Wparentheses does not work with the C++ front-end

--- Comment #6 from ian at airs dot com 2006-12-12 18:00 --- Copyright status is cleared, my patch is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00868.html -- ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/30171] non-portable va_list abuse is permitted on i386

--- Comment #2 from dwmw2 at infradead dot org 2006-12-12 17:33 --- Yeah, fair enough. Enable the warning by default everywhere then. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30171

[Bug c/30171] non-portable va_list abuse is permitted on i386

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 17:31 --- > This warning could perhaps be enabled by default on any platform which code is > expected to be portable (like Linux) but disabled on i386-only platforms > (win32). No, I disagree with the last part of that statem

[Bug tree-optimization/28624] [4.2/4.3 regression] latent segfault in remove_phi_node

--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 17:12 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Wow, nice you tracked this down. I thought this bug would stay open forever > as > unreproducible. I only tracked it down because of the duplicate to this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug testsuite/30176] New: gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-1.c fails

FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-1.c scan-tree-dump memcpy.*4\\) looks like a wrong regexp? -- Summary: gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-1.c fails Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug tree-optimization/30175] New: Runtime regressions with mem-ssa merge in Polyhedron and tramp3d-v4

Both tramp3d-v4 and Polyhedron gas_dyn regress in runtime with the mem-ssa merge. See http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/polyhedron/polyhedron-summary.txt-2-0.html and http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/tramp3d/split-run.html -- Summary: Runtime regressions with mem-ssa merge

[Bug tree-optimization/30105] reassoc can sometimes get in the way of PRE

--- Comment #7 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 16:49 --- Subject: Re: reassoc can sometimes get in the way of PRE > > Here is a slightly modified example that shows that there's still a PRE > opportunity > > void motion_test22(int * data, int i) > { > int j; > if (da

[Bug tree-optimization/30089] Compiling FreeFem3d uses unreasonable amount of time and memory

--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 16:44 --- We're now ICEing in internal compiler error: in ssa_operand_alloc, at tree-ssa-operands.c:365 for the second testcase. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/30151] [4.3 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Duplicate symbol "global destructors keyed to _ZNSt3tr112_GLOBAL__N_16ignoreE"

--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 16:33 --- Same failures occur on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/30174] New: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/cxa_vec.C execution test

See for example . This test has been failing since the following change was introduced: 2006-10-31 Geoffrey Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * tree.c (get_file_function_name): Rename from get_file_function_name_long; impro

[Bug regression/30173] New: Regression in ARM softfloat routine __adddf3

Version Information [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ arm-elf-gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: arm-elf Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/usr/local/armdev-926ej-s-4.1.1 --target=arm-elf --enable-languages=c --with-float=soft --enable-interwork --enable-multilib --with-cpu=arm926ej-s --disab

[Bug tree-optimization/30159] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c is miscompiled

--- Comment #4 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-12-12 15:50 --- Subject: Bug 30159 Author: amacleod Date: Tue Dec 12 15:50:06 2006 New Revision: 119792 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119792 Log: 2006-12-12 Andrew Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR tre

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Comment #45 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:24 --- Subject: Bug 11953 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:24:07 2006 New Revision: 119790 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119790 Log: PR libstdc++/11953 * gthr-posix.h (_REENTRANT):

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Comment #44 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:22 --- Subject: Bug 11953 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:21:53 2006 New Revision: 119789 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119789 Log: PR libstdc++/11953 * gthr-posix.h (_REENTRANT):

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Comment #43 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:15 --- Subject: Bug 11953 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:15:19 2006 New Revision: 119788 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119788 Log: PR libstdc++/11953 * gthr-posix.h (_REENTRANT):

[Bug rtl-optimization/27761] combine miscompiles

--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:07 --- Subject: Bug 27761 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:07:23 2006 New Revision: 119787 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119787 Log: PR rtl-optimization/27761 * combine.c (try_combin

[Bug rtl-optimization/27761] combine miscompiles

--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:05 --- Subject: Bug 27761 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:05:08 2006 New Revision: 119786 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119786 Log: PR rtl-optimization/27761 * combine.c (try_combin

[Bug rtl-optimization/27761] combine miscompiles

--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 15:03 --- Subject: Bug 27761 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 12 15:03:39 2006 New Revision: 119785 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119785 Log: PR rtl-optimization/27761 * combine.c (try_combin

[Bug target/30120] [4.3 Regression] silent miscompilation of argument passing

--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2006-12-12 14:41 --- Fixed (by reverting x87 register-passing patch). Look at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00729.html for a discussion. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/28265] iconv-related errors while building a cross-compiler for MinGW

--- Comment #12 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 14:31 --- Fixed. -- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/28265] iconv-related errors while building a cross-compiler for MinGW

--- Comment #11 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 14:29 --- Subject: Bug 28265 Author: bkoz Date: Tue Dec 12 14:28:53 2006 New Revision: 119784 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119784 Log: 2006-12-12 Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libs

[Bug libstdc++/28265] iconv-related errors while building a cross-compiler for MinGW

--- Comment #10 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 14:19 --- Subject: Bug 28265 Author: bkoz Date: Tue Dec 12 14:18:36 2006 New Revision: 119783 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119783 Log: 2006-12-12 Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libst

[Bug tree-optimization/30159] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20010422-1.c is miscompiled

--- Comment #3 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-12-12 14:11 --- Analyzing Edge Insertions. foo (x) { unsigned int x.24; : if (x.24 <= 4) goto ; else goto ; Yeah, this is clearly wrong. It looks like the coalescer somehow neglected to coalesce the parameter to the first use in b

  1   2   >