--- Comment #2 from mtrojanovich at doubleclick dot net 2006-11-18 06:31
---
My first error is in how I'm compiling the library file... Since that in
itself is faulted I'm dropping severity. It's user error, but it is also user
error that causes an internal compiler error.
--
mtro
--- Comment #3 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-18 06:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=12639)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12639&action=view)
.i source file not causing segfault
This is .i source file with line #157..167 commented out, and there is no
segfa
--- Comment #2 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-18 06:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=12638)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12638&action=view)
.i source causing segfault
This is the .i file which causes segfault.
Line #157..167 are not commented out.
--
--- Comment #1 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-18 06:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=12637)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12637&action=view)
the "C" file causing the failure
If I run this file, it fails with:
"
checkpoint 1
&signal_spectrum_L[0]=80491e0
&
--- Comment #1 from mtrojanovich at doubleclick dot net 2006-11-18 06:02
---
Created an attachment (id=12636)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12636&action=view)
Employee base class that caused the error.
No other files related.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
Hello,
this bug is most likely related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29818
, but now it's gcc-4.1.1, gcc-4.0.1, not gcc-3.4.6.
Actually, it's the same code using which I discovered
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29818
, just this is the full version of the code,
29258 looks similar but is unconfirmed. Perhaps this will be straightforward
to confirm.
COMMAND THAT GENERATED THE ERROR. COMPILING WITH...
$ g++ -Wall -o Employee.h Employee.h -mno-cygwin
Employee.h:169: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report, with preproces
--- Comment #3 from shinwell at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-18 04:57
---
Created an attachment (id=12635)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12635&action=view)
Proposed patch
2006-11-17 Mark Shinwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gcc/
* tree-outof-ssa.c (check
--
membar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |membar at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-18 02:26 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> There might be a bug about GCC testsuite also.
And there is PR 25241.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-18 01:34 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Shouldn't this be fixed by Roger Sayle's recent fold-const.c patch?
No, in fact the generic (the one where 2 is turned into a variable) is not
optimized either.
--
pinskia at gcc dot g
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-18 01:27 ---
Shouldn't this be fixed by Roger Sayle's recent fold-const.c patch?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-18 00:14 ---
The problem here I think is unions.
Here is how I would have written this code (without using unions in fact):
void array_sample_fun(__m128 *dst, const __m128 *src, int length) {
__m128 af = _mm_set1_ps(1.
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-18 00:04 ---
I think this is a known issue.
There might be a bug about GCC testsuite also.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29882
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 23:45
---
Are you saying that it matches the message text emitted and thinks its OK, but
does not recognize that it was an error vs a warning?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29882
gfortran.dg/io_constraints_2.f90 issues an error on line 33 instead of a
warning, but it still PASSES.
--
Summary: gfortran testsuite doesn't recognize warnings and errors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
hello!
I'm writing fast approximations of some complex math functions. I'm trying do
them as low-level as possible, far from hand-written assembly though. I often
check the assembly code to verify the quality of it. During one of the checkups
i found that gcc (i checked 3.4.5/win32 and 4.0/4.1/fc5
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Regression] ICE: |[4.3 Regression] ICE:
|verify_flow_info:
--- Comment #3 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-11-17 22:00
---
Subject: Re: Can't build 64-bit 4.2.0 with 4.1.1 on darwin-ppc
This problem no longer occurs. (This is not the correct way to build
a 64-bit 4.2.0, either, but this specific problem no longer occurs.)
Thank
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 21:15
---
*** Bug 29880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 21:15
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29879 ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Configure:
../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/ed/bin-4.3 --with-gmp=/usr/local
--with-mpfr=/usr/local --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
This is mainline revision 118945.
Here is the last stuff:
/home/ed/obj-4.3/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/ed/obj-4.3/./gcc/
-B/home/ed/bin-4.3/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 21:09
---
Created an attachment (id=12633)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12633&action=view)
Patch fixing this PR
This patch allows $ at other places than the end of the format, and makes
gfortran issu
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 21:07 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
The following program gives with current gcc SVN 4.3.0 20061117 an ICE when
compiled with "-O2 -funroll-loops":
ice.c: In function 'main':
ice.c:14: error: verify_flow_info: Block 2 has loop_father, but there are no
loops
ice.c:14: internal compiler error: verify_flow_i
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 19:55 ---
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec 'jc1': Check GNU Java Compiler 'gcj' is
installed.
Except this is not really a GCC issue because when java is not enabled, you get
an error about java not being installed.
Wha
--- Comment #2 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-11-17 19:28 ---
A .i file would have been handy. IN any case thats easily worked around.
The issue here isn't that the lifetoime of something is being extended since
the tree optimizers already made __res function scope. The problem i
--- Comment #27 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 18:58
---
We've been using this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01488.html
successfully in a 4.1.1 based compiler.
It is not optimal, though: the check for equality of the regsets in
struct_equiv_init is
Hello,
I'd like to submit a patch to clarify the error message below, as "jc1" would
never be a directory. I'll also do the same for cc1 and cc1plus and a Fortran
equivalent if there is one.
As part of that patch I'd like to make the error message give a clearer
indication that the GNU Java Compi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 18:31 ---
TER causes this ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summ
There is a bug on the tree optimization code generated by gcc that produces
corruption of variables on some corner cases of code generated by Linux kernel
for ARM. I originally found the bug on codesourcery releases but was able to
reproduced it on gcc 4.1 that I builded.
Detailed explanation and
The first error below is expected, but the second one should not be printed out
that way :)
$ cat translation_tests.f90
module foo
end module foo
program test
use foo, only : bar, operator(.none.)
end program test
$ gfortran translation_tests.f90
translation_tests.f90:5.17:
use foo, only :
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 16:22 ---
A patch is on its way - the error is in expr.c(find_array_section); the code
presently returns FAILURE if the elements of the array section are not
constant. This is not correct for any of the simplify functions, whic
--- Comment #12 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-11-17 15:30 ---
now fixed on all affected branches.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #11 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-11-17 15:30 ---
Subject: Bug 29802
Author: bonzini
Date: Fri Nov 17 15:29:54 2006
New Revision: 118941
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118941
Log:
2006-11-16 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile.t
--- Comment #13 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 15:14
---
Sorry for long delay.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 15:11
---
Subject: Bug 27936
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 17 15:11:17 2006
New Revision: 118940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118940
Log:
PR ada/27936
* ada-tree.h (DECL_READONL
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 15:11 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> indeed it does, thanks!
> are you going to submit it to mainline?
Should be submitted this weekend, today is a party day for me, launch and all
:).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 15:10
---
Subject: Bug 27936
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 17 15:10:28 2006
New Revision: 118939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118939
Log:
PR ada/27936
* trans.c (add_decl_expr):
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 15:10
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 15:09
---
Subject: Bug 29788
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Nov 17 15:09:12 2006
New Revision: 118938
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118938
Log:
2006-11-17 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 11:16
---
Fixed on mainline (rev. 118930)
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-11-17 10:32 ---
Subject: Bug 29802
Author: bonzini
Date: Fri Nov 17 10:31:47 2006
New Revision: 118927
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118927
Log:
2006-11-16 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile.t
--- Comment #7 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 10:29 ---
Subject: Bug 29801
Author: rakdver
Date: Fri Nov 17 10:29:07 2006
New Revision: 118926
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118926
Log:
PR tree-optimization/29801
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 09:01 ---
Subject: Bug 29584
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 17 09:01:31 2006
New Revision: 118923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118923
Log:
PR middle-end/29584
* tree-ssa-dom.c (simplify_s
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 08:59 ---
Subject: Bug 29584
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 17 08:59:08 2006
New Revision: 118922
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118922
Log:
PR middle-end/29584
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simpli
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 08:58 ---
Subject: Bug 29584
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 17 08:57:45 2006
New Revision: 118921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118921
Log:
PR middle-end/29584
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simpli
47 matches
Mail list logo
