--- Comment #3 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-09-08 05:47 ---
I have been playing with following patch to optabs.c that forces operands in
functions expand_sync_operation(), expand_sync_fetch_operation() and
expand_sync_lock_test_and_set() into registers through subregs of word-mode
t
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 05:38 ---
fixed in 4.1 as well.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 05:16 ---
Subject: Bug 27724
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 8 05:16:26 2006
New Revision: 116778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116778
Log:
PR middle-end/27724
* varasm.c (output_constant)
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 05:11 ---
Subject: Bug 27724
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 8 05:11:40 2006
New Revision: 116777
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116777
Log:
PR middle-end/27724
* varasm.c (output_constant)
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 04:44 ---
This is just like PR 14492 now.
Janis,
Could you do a regression hunt on when the reduced testcase in comment #4
started to pass without any options?
Thanks,
Andrew
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 04:33 ---
Confirmed, note this is semi undefined code. Really this is a big weird as we
are taking the difference between two function pointers. I think the ICE with
tree_low_cst has been fixed but the ICE with loc_descripto
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 04:31 ---
Reduced testcase:
extern void dynreplace_trampoline(void);
extern void dynreplace_trampoline_endlabel(void);
int dynreplace_add_trampoline(void)
{
unsigned long trampoline_code[(((unsigned long)
(&(dynreplace_tramp
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 04:20 ---
Well 20060218 is almost 7 months ago but I get a different error with the
mainline as of yesterday:
dynreplace.c:110: internal compiler error: in loc_descriptor_from_tree_1, at
dwarf2out.c:9407
Please submit a full b
--- Comment #2 from mkgnu at mkgnu dot net 2006-09-08 04:14 ---
gcc42 originated from running a:
# pkg_add -r gcc42
in FreeBSD 6.1. This command installed the package gcc-4.2.0_20060218
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28980
--- Comment #1 from mkgnu at mkgnu dot net 2006-09-08 04:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=12210)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12210&action=view)
The preprocessed source that causes this bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28980
internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:4423
First, If I run this with -E, I get the preprocessed source that I will attach.
vmfreebsd# gcc42 -E -g -I/usr/local/include
-I/root/devel/dynamos/src/shared/include
-I/root/devel/dynamos/src/framework/include
-I/root/devel/dynamos/src/disas
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 02:49
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 02:49
---
Subject: Bug 28906
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Sep 8 02:49:11 2006
New Revision: 116776
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116776
Log:
006-09-07 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR C
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 01:18
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> We can even back out the patch and close it as a dup for PR 13685.
Not really and here is why:
-Os on the file containing main will still crash. -Os -msse on the file with
main will not
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-08 00:52 ---
We can even back out the patch and close it as a dup for PR 13685.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28621
--- Comment #9 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-08 00:51 ---
Fix for PR 13685 should also fix this bug. In fact, we can back out the
change in comment #3.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #21 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-08 00:45 ---
*** Bug 27537 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #12 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-08 00:45 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13685 ***
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 00:43 ---
I don't think disabling the assertion is enough. Yes, the compiler would do
the right thing for this particular testcase, but would be wrong if the
subtraction produces a negative result.
Rather, we should stop stri
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 00:37 ---
I bet this was fixed in 4.2.0 with the ABI changing patch which changed the ABI
to also include the return type.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from vnasardinov at gmail dot com 2006-09-08 00:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=12209)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12209&action=view)
hamming.scala
the offending Scala program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28979
--- Comment #1 from vnasardinov at gmail dot com 2006-09-08 00:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=12208)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12208&action=view)
hamming.jar
the promised jar file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28979
I'm getting an error when trying to compile the following classes with
gcj:
| $ scalac hamming.scala
| $ ls -lh *.class
| -rw-rw-r-- 1 vadim vadim 1.1K Sep 7 20:16 hamming$$anonfun$0.class
| -rw-rw-r-- 1 vadim vadim 1.1K Sep 7 20:16 hamming$$anonfun$1.class
| -rw-rw-r-- 1 vadim vadim 1.1K
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 00:28 ---
Subject: Bug 13685
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 8 00:28:30 2006
New Revision: 116775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116775
Log:
PR target/13685
* config/i386/i386.c (override_o
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 00:05
---
Fixed in GCC 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 00:04
---
Subject: Bug 28886
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Sep 8 00:04:42 2006
New Revision: 116768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116768
Log:
PR c++/28886
* pt.c (unify): Avoid unnece
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:07 ---
now closed, too
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:07 ---
I don't think this patch is safe enough to backport to 4.1. Closing.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:05 ---
Fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:05 ---
Fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:04 ---
Fixed
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26571
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:04 ---
fixed in 4.0, 4.1, 4.2
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:03 ---
fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:03 ---
fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-09-07
22:56 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/nrv3.c scan-tree-dump-times return slot optimization
2
> I see this failing on hppa64 as well.
Same here. When I filed the report, I thought I had seen a codesourcery
build wher
--- Comment #8 from jason at redhat dot com 2006-09-07 22:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Does not warn about unused function
result (__attribute__((warn_unused_result)))
Whoops, I checked the patch in disabled. Fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:47 ---
Subject: Bug 27371
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:47:34 2006
New Revision: 116765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116765
Log:
PR c++/27371
* cvt.c (convert_to_void): Enable pr
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 26696
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 26671
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 26195
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_dec
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 19809
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_dec
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 26571
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 19809
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_dec
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26102
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26571
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26195
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_dec
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26671
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26696
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
* decl.c (make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 21:55 ---
../../../libgfortran/mk-kinds-h.sh: Unknown type
This means you have a broken GMP.
Please reinstall GMP and try again.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
[...]
make[2]: Entering directory
`/tmp/gcc-4.1.1/build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgfortran'
/bin/sh ../../../libgfortran/mk-kinds-h.sh '/tmp/gcc-4.1.1/build/./gcc/gfortran
-B/tmp/gcc-4.1.1/build/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/i686-pc-li
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 21:23 ---
waiting for feedback.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-07 21:10 ---
FWIW, g++.dg/warn/unused-result1.C fails:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-09/msg00338.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 21:06 ---
Subject: Bug 26957
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 21:06:28 2006
New Revision: 116760
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116760
Log:
PR c++/26957
* method.c (use_thunk): Clear DECL_
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 20:26 ---
A regression hunt on powerpc-linux identified the following patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=99850
r99850 | rakdver | 2005-05-17 19:55:53 + (Tue, 17 May 2005)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 20:24 ---
You can work around this bug with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13685
--- Comment #5 from raif at swiftdsl dot com dot au 2006-09-07 20:03
---
comparing the JNI header files, generated by javah in both versions 1.4.2_12
and 1.5.0_08, with that generated by gcjh indicates that gcjh is producing a
similar output.
i'm resolving this PR as invalid.
--
ra
--- Comment #4 from raif at swiftdsl dot com dot au 2006-09-07 19:58
---
Created an attachment (id=12207)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12207&action=view)
JNI header file generated by javah (JDK 1.5.0_08)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28972
--- Comment #3 from raif at swiftdsl dot com dot au 2006-09-07 19:57
---
Created an attachment (id=12206)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12206&action=view)
JNI header file generated by javah (JDK 1.4.2_12)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28972
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 19:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=12205)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12205&action=view)
Patch to clear DECL_VALUE_EXPR
This patch fixes the testcase in comment #3 with a cross compiler. Could
someone
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 18:36 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from jeff dot lanam at hp dot com 2006-09-07 18:36 ---
Subject: RE: ld internal error building libmath in gcc 4.1.1
Thank you for the quick response. I updated binutils and got past that.
I'm a novice at using GNU.
-Original Message-
From: pinskia at gcc dot
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 18:40 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well, I have a library for XML processing that comes with a test suite, and it
> expects the Sun behaviour. Besides it's documented in Sun's API, so it can
> potentially matter.
Really if
--- Comment #2 from marcus at better dot se 2006-09-07 18:37 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Does this really matter as UTF-16 BOM is correct?
Well, I have a library for XML processing that comes with a test suite, and it
expects the Sun behaviour. Besides it's documented in Sun's API, s
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 18:28 ---
Does this really matter as UTF-16 BOM is correct?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28977
This program gives different results with Sun's JDK (Debian sun-java5-jdk
1.5.0-08-1) and gcj:
Test.java
import java.io.*;
public class Test
{
public static void main(String[] args) throws java.io.IOException
{
OutputStreamWriter o = new OutputStreamWriter(System
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 18:01 ---
This is a bug in Redhat's ld and should be reported to them. It has been fixed
on the mainline (and in a couple of releases) of binutils already.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|R
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-07 18:01 ---
binutils has its owner bug tracker: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Also, 2.15 is fairly old. Can you try with the current binutils release, 2.17?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28976
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 17:36 ---
Quadratic (or worse?) behavior
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 17:45 ---
Subject: Bug 28946
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 7 17:45:48 2006
New Revision: 116756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116756
Log:
PR target/28946
* config/i386/i386.md ("*ashldi3_c
I was attempting to build gcc 4.1.1 on an I386 system running Linux, RedHat 4ES
U3, and got an internal error from ld. I realize that ld is not part of gcc
but I could not find anywhere to report bugs on it. Since I was building gcc
at the time, I decided to file a report with you. Please let me
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 17:25 ---
Subject: Bug 28284
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 17:25:05 2006
New Revision: 116755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116755
Log:
PR c++/28284
* pt.c (fold_non_dependent_expr): Ma
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 16:58 ---
Paul, the code fails with
troutmask:kargl[205] gfc --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060711 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
but works with
troutmask:sgk[248] gfc4x --version
GNU
--- Comment #2 from paul dot thomas at jet dot uk 2006-09-07 16:16 ---
Oskar,
This works for me with gcc-4.2.0 20060905; I know of nothing that would have
effected this change so I am at a bit of a loss. I hung a main program on it
and checked the output too.
Paul
--
http://gcc.g
--- Comment #3 from waspswarm at gmail dot com 2006-09-07 15:46 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> So that means when __STDC_VERSION__=199901 then _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T needs
> to be defined or something like that.
>
> Anyways this is a target issue.
>
Thanks!
Adding -D_GLIBCXX_HAVE_M
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 15:42 ---
So that means when __STDC_VERSION__=199901 then _GLIBCXX_HAVE_MBSTATE_T needs
to be defined or something like that.
Anyways this is a target issue.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #1 from waspswarm at gmail dot com 2006-09-07 15:39 ---
Here is /usr/include/sys/_mbstate_t.h
/*
* @(#)B11.23_LR
*/
#ifndef _MBSTATE_T_INCLUDED
#define _MBSTATE_T_INCLUDED
# ifndef _MBSTATE_T
# define _MBSTATE_T
typedef struct {
unsigned char __parse_
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 15:37
---
Waiting for the testcase to settle before applying to the 4.1/4.0 branches.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 15:37
---
Subject: Bug 28862
Author: pinskia
Date: Thu Sep 7 15:36:50 2006
New Revision: 116751
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116751
Log:
2006-09-07 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
When compiling the following test application with g++ and
-D__STDC_VERSION__=199901 I receive errors about duplicate declarations.
$ uname -a
HP-UX yellow B.11.23 U ia64 1794711014 unlimited-user license
// g++ -o test.o -g -O2 -mlp64 -D__STDC_VERSION__=199901 -c testmbstate.cpp
// remove -D__ST
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 15:20 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Andrew, could you elaborate on the FC5 kernel bug and "the rules that are
> always used"?
This kernel problem has been fixed for a while now, since around June or so.
--
http://gcc.gnu
Compilation of enumerated DATA statements is extremely slow.
Related PR:
* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13465
Related threads on ML:
* http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-08/msg00131.html
* http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-09/msg00025.html
Shell script to generate example dat
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-09-07 14:46 ---
Subject: Re: New: FAIL: gcc.dg/nrv3.c scan-tree-dump-times
return slot optimization 2
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.2/objdir/gcc/xgcc
> -B/ho
--- Comment #1 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 14:38 ---
This bug appeared on 4.1 branch between 20060718 (revision 115546) and 20060721
(revision 115639), so a regression.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from raif at swiftdsl dot com dot au 2006-09-07 10:37
---
Created an attachment (id=12203)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12203&action=view)
generated JNI header file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28972
--- Comment #1 from raif at swiftdsl dot com dot au 2006-09-07 10:36
---
Created an attachment (id=12202)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12202&action=view)
class file with name ending with dollar
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28972
invoking gcjh on a class named OC$ for example, the generated JNI header file
includes method definitions with names like so:
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_OC_00024_method...
--
Summary: gcjh does not correctly handle dollar symbol in class
name
Product:
--- Comment #1 from enok at lysator dot liu dot se 2006-09-07 09:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12201)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12201&action=view)
Valid code snippet that causes ICE
gfortran -c tst.f90
tst.f90:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
P
When compiling a small file with standard flags the compiler crashes.
This seems to be related to a WHERE construct.
The code is accepted without warnings by e.g. Intel fortran compiler and
others.
The version of gfortran is 4.2.0 20060819
--
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault on valid
--- Comment #19 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-09-07 09:11 ---
A side note, maybe not completely obvious to everyone and clarifying the
relationship to 24581. I understand that:
(+0) + (-0) = +0
therefore, when in the expansion of the complex product one of the two terms of
the ima
--- Comment #17 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-09-07 08:20 ---
fixed.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Comment #16 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-09-07 08:19 ---
Subject: Bug 27117
Author: bonzini
Date: Thu Sep 7 08:19:32 2006
New Revision: 116746
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116746
Log:
2006-09-07 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/27
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-09-07 08:15 ---
BTW, what did 4.0 and 3.4 produce?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28940
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-09-07 08:11 ---
It's not really CSE's fault, though I agree that doing addressing mode
selection there is wrong. fwprop does not fix the bug for example, though
teaching it about this case could be easier than teaching CSE.
Unlike CSE, fw
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 07:18 ---
If we resolve A::X to int while parsing the template definition, we need to
check access then, too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26693
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 07:08 ---
The patch looked good to me, so I applied it. Sorry for the delay.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
98 matches
Mail list logo
