The following code gives compile-time warnings that are wrong, and segfaults at
runtime:
module foo_mod
implicit none
contains
pure function outerprod(a,b)
real, intent(in) :: a(:),b(:)
real :: outerprod(size(a),size(b))
outerprod = spread(a,dim=2,ncopies=size(b)) * spread(b,dim=1,ncop
--- Comment #2 from sambitdash at gmail dot com 2006-06-05 06:29 ---
So is:
struct A
{
};
template<> A i;
which means the specilization syntax does not mandate a need the qualifying
class needs to be a template type. That looks interesting!!!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Comment #2 from sambitdash at gmail dot com 2006-06-05 06:22 ---
I am not sure if this code is invalid.
It's no different from saying:
struct B
{
struct A;
};
A is just a forward declaration here.
In the following code is not invalid but the statement ::A is innocuous and f
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-05 06:18 ---
Agreed, let's close it.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONF
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 04:49 ---
This works with 4.2.0 on x86_64-*-* though not for 4.1.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 03:08 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 03:08 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:54
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:54
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:54
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:53
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:52
---
Subject: Bug 27806
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:52:37 2006
New Revision: 114383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114383
Log:
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Pr
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:52
---
Subject: Bug 27722
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:52:37 2006
New Revision: 114383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114383
Log:
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Pr
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:52
---
Subject: Bug 27807
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:52:37 2006
New Revision: 114383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114383
Log:
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Pr
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:52
---
Subject: Bug 27819
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:52:37 2006
New Revision: 114383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114383
Log:
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Pr
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:46
---
Subject: Bug 27722
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:46:38 2006
New Revision: 114382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114382
Log:
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Pr
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:46
---
Subject: Bug 27807
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:46:38 2006
New Revision: 114382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114382
Log:
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Pr
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:46
---
Subject: Bug 27819
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:46:38 2006
New Revision: 114382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114382
Log:
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Pr
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:46
---
Subject: Bug 27806
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:46:38 2006
New Revision: 114382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114382
Log:
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Pr
--- Comment #5 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:31 ---
Subject: Bug 27150
Author: sayle
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:31:41 2006
New Revision: 114381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114381
Log:
PR middle-end/27382
PR c/27150
* gcc.dg/
--- Comment #4 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:31 ---
Subject: Bug 27382
Author: sayle
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:31:41 2006
New Revision: 114381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114381
Log:
PR middle-end/27382
PR c/27150
* gcc.dg/
--- Comment #4 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:28 ---
Subject: Bug 27150
Author: sayle
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:28:20 2006
New Revision: 114380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114380
Log:
PR middle-end/27382
* c-common.c (c_common_truth
--- Comment #3 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 02:28 ---
Subject: Bug 27382
Author: sayle
Date: Mon Jun 5 02:28:20 2006
New Revision: 114380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114380
Log:
PR middle-end/27382
* c-common.c (c_common_truth
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 01:54 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yeah - the website wouldn't let me uploaded it at first cause it was too
> large.
Can you try to compress it? Also if it still does not fit, can you just email
it to me?
--
http://gc
--- Comment #3 from appfault at hotmail dot com 2006-06-05 01:48 ---
Yeah - the website wouldn't let me uploaded it at first cause it was too large.
So I decided I'd get a script running to strip down the lines of the file to
get a bare-bones repro case. It should be complete in a coup
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 01:26 ---
Could you attach the preprocessed source?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from appfault at hotmail dot com 2006-06-05 01:14 ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--enable-checking=release --w
"internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" with -O
g++ -O -w -DHL2MP -DHL2_DLL -DUSES_SAVERESTORE -DNDEBUG -DGAME_DLL -DVECTOR
-DPROTECTED_THINGS_ENABLE -DAOA_SERVER -march=pentium -mmmx -fpermissive
-D_LINUX -o gccbug.o -c gccbug.cpp
../dlls/../game_shared/soundenvelope.cpp: In member functi
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 00:51 ---
Subject: Bug 27020
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon Jun 5 00:51:45 2006
New Revision: 114378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114378
Log:
PR c/25161
PR c/27020
* c-decl.c (grokdec
--- Comment #12 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 00:51 ---
Subject: Bug 25161
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon Jun 5 00:51:45 2006
New Revision: 114378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114378
Log:
PR c/25161
PR c/27020
* c-decl.c (grokde
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 00:26
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 00:24
---
Subject: Bug 27804
Author: reichelt
Date: Mon Jun 5 00:24:41 2006
New Revision: 114377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114377
Log:
PR c++/27804
* init.c (constant_value_1):
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 00:03
---
Original testcase on mainline, 4.1 branch, and 4.0 branch.
However, we still ICE on member functions (static or non-static):
struct bar {
int foo();
};
int a = __builti
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 23:51
---
Subject: Bug 27601
Author: reichelt
Date: Sun Jun 4 23:51:52 2006
New Revision: 114371
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114371
Log:
PR c++/27601
* c-common.c (fold_offsetof_1
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 23:47
---
Subject: Bug 27601
Author: reichelt
Date: Sun Jun 4 23:47:15 2006
New Revision: 114370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114370
Log:
PR c++/27601
* c-common.c (fold_offsetof_1
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 23:42
---
Subject: Bug 27601
Author: reichelt
Date: Sun Jun 4 23:42:04 2006
New Revision: 114369
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114369
Log:
PR c++/27601
* c-common.c (fold_offsetof_1
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-04
22:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
> > Will this go away with the changes to make the scheduler not extend regions
> > by
> > default?
Found it.
--- Comment #5 from law at redhat dot com 2006-06-04 22:32 ---
Someone who understands SCEV really needs to fix it. It's been a consistent
source of problems for VRP -- whether it's giving us bogus ranges (ranges
outside the given type) or claiming variables do not wrap when in fact the
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 21:05 ---
C testcase:
int main(void)
{
_Complex int x;
void f(void)
{
x = x + x;
}
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 21:04 ---
Reopening ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RE
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 21:02 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm amazed that 27889 is a duplicate of this bug, although I agree that they
> have similar error messages. They happen in very different (and specific
> circumstances). FYI, the testcases
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:58
---
I'm amazed that 27889 is a duplicate of this bug, although I agree that they
have similar error messages. They happen in very different (and specific
circumstances). FYI, the testcases from 27889 are:
[on 4.1 at
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-04
20:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
> Will this go away with the changes to make the scheduler not extend regions by
> default?
Can you provide th
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:51 ---
I'm closing this PR as fixed although it's not clear what actually
fixed this problem. By March 28, this problem no longer was present.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #31 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:46
---
FYI, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01010.html
about the MIPS16 situation. To summarise, mips16.S should be considered
legacy code, and I've never seen a report of it being used (never mind
r
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:06 ---
P2 before P3 became default.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:06 ---
It would be nice if we could get 4.1.x numbers.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27893
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:03 ---
This was a P2 before P3 became default.
It would also be nice if we can get numbers for 4.1.1.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:02
---
This is a critical installation problem.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:02 ---
This was a P2 before P3 was default. Also I mentioned this was much improved
on the mainline which might mean this was fixed but I don't have a place to
test it
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27875
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:00
---
This patch is OK.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Prio
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|3.4 regression: |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|__builtin_constant_p not
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27665
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26949
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|debugging regression when |[4.1/4.2 Regression]
|debugging libgcj|de
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Optimizer regression: |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|SciMark sparse matrix
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:58 ---
This was a P2 before P3 became the default.(In reply to comment #4)
> first$current$current$current.506 = first$current$current$current.506 + 8B;
> D.34505 = D.34505 + first$current$current$current->value;
If we
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|BYTEmark bitmap test: |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|Regression with Profiled
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26778
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|BYTEmark floating-point |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|emulation: Regression with
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|4.0 regression: excessive |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|compiler resource usage
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:56
---
Upon review, I see that this applies to any attribute in the function; marking
as P1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:54 ---
for(uint32_t i = 0; i < Loops; i+=1)
{
#define T memcpy(mb1, mb2, Block_Size); memset(mb2, i, Block_Size);
T T T T T
T T T T T
#undef T
}
That should just reduce to
memcpy(mb1, mb2, Block_Size); memset
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|HDF5 1.7.52 test segfaults |[4.1/4.2 Regression] HDF5
|with 4.1.0, fine with 4.0.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Compile time regressions|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|with tramp3d
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Inlining related regression |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|for gcc-4.x
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25468
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perfomance regression |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|between gcc 3.4.5 and 4.*
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24698
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27884
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:47
---
I propose we close this PR. The 4.0 series is what it is, and, as I understand
it, the libstdc++ ABI for this allocator isn't guaranteed and Debian has
changed its defaults, so it doesn't seem particularly useful
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:45 ---
Patch committed, so I presume fixed.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27880
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27865
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27863
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27861
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27858
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27830
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27821
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27820
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27819
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27807
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27806
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27805
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:41
---
Submitter agrees code is invalid.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:39
---
This patch is OK.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Prio
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27802
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:37
---
Checking DECL_INITIAL is not a reliable way to determine whether or not a C++
variable is initialized. (It never really has been, although I certainly made
the problems more severe!) Because C++ variables may be
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27893
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27875
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26949
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26866
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 19:35 ---
This was a binutils bug, fixed there.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 282 matches
Mail list logo
