--- Comment #12 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 07:51
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> small testcase:
This particular testcase doesn't fail for me anymore on mainline
as of 2006-02-24. However, QEMU 0.8.0 still doesn't build with
this compiler (you'll have to configure wi
--- Comment #3 from george dot wieggers at gmail dot com 2006-02-24 07:40
---
Your suggestion works, thanks! I bootstrapped gcc-3.4.5 and used that to build
gcc-4.1.0 20060219
Maybe this solution could be added to the hppa*-hp-hpux11 platform specific
notes...
--
george dot wiegger
--- Comment #1 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 06:30 ---
Subject: Bug 26453
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Feb 24 06:30:51 2006
New Revision: 111415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111415
Log:
PR target/26453
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs600
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 03:23
---
I have confirmed that the regression occurred after Thomas patch to pr23815. I
think Janne is on the right track related to pr25949.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423
--- Comment #3 from pkambadu at gmail dot com 2006-02-24 02:24 ---
This was a big misunderstanding. I thought all the front-ends for openmp had
been integrated into trunk. it seems like only the C one has been integrated.
I downloaded the right branch as mentioned on the web-site.
--
--- Comment #20 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-02-24 02:17 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] rejects "i"(&var
+ 1)
mrs at apple dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #19 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-02-24 02:14 ---
> This was not 4.1.0 before, it was 4.0.3.
Yes. I
--- Comment #19 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-02-24 02:14 ---
This was not 4.1.0 before, it was 4.0.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200
--
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |amodra at bigpond dot net
|dot org
The following segfaults in rs6000_output_function_epilogue when compiled with
-m64 -mtraceback=full. r_o_f_e is being called via final_end_function in
rs6000_output_mi_thunk. This is a regression from gcc-3.3.x.
class A1 {
public:
virtual ~A1();
};
class A2 : public A1 { };
class A3 : virtual
--- Comment #2 from pkambadu at gmail dot com 2006-02-24 01:52 ---
Sorry for the incomplete post. Here is the complete story:
I tried looking into what might be wrong and have the following thoughts:
In gcc/cp/parser.c, line 17661, there is the following assertion
assert(id >= PRAGMA_
--- Comment #1 from pkambadu at gmail dot com 2006-02-24 01:48 ---
I tried looking into what might be wrong and have the following thoughts:
1. in gcc/cp/parser.c, line 17661, there is the following assertion
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26452
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 01:39
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 01:39
---
Patch applied to 4.1.
This patch is OK for 4.0; please apply there.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 01:37
---
Subject: Bug 26379
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Feb 24 01:37:22 2006
New Revision: 111411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111411
Log:
Backport:
2006-02-21 Jakub Jelinek <[EMA
--- Comment #23 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 01:20
---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #22 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 01:18
---
Subject: Bug 25603
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Feb 24 01:18:27 2006
New Revision: 111409
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111409
Log:
Backport:
2006-02-16 Denis Nagorny <[EMA
g++ version:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gomp-sources/configure --prefix=/home/pkambadu/gomp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20060223 (experimental)
Program:
void foo() {
#pragma omp parallel
}
Output:
/home/pkambadu/gomp/bin/g++ -c
--- Comment #12 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:49 ---
It appears that the LT stands for libtool. So the first one (LIBICONV) is
supposed to be used for linking if you aren't using libtool, and the second one
(LTLIBICONV) is used for linking if you are using libtool. I
--- Comment #22 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:27
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:27
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:27
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:27
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:27
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #35 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #49 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #35 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #28 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #36 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #28 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #38 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #23 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #20 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #20 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #65 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:19
---
I've closed this bug on two grounds: (1) there's nothing for GCC to do about
it, as the problem is either a binutils or HP-UX linker bug, and (2) the
binutils change has been checked in, so affected users can simpl
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26365
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 23:46
---
This problem concerns quasi-invalid debug information in an obscure compilation
mode; P2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from law at redhat dot com 2006-02-23 22:52 ---
Should be fixed now with today's patch.
--
law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from law at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 22:48 ---
Subject: Bug 26425
Author: law
Date: Thu Feb 23 22:47:58 2006
New Revision: 111399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111399
Log:
PR tree-optimization/26425
* tree-vrp.c (vrp_visit_
--- Comment #8 from law at redhat dot com 2006-02-23 22:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ice on valid C
code with flag -Os
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 18:07 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 18:07
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 22:42
---
The testcase in comment #3 crashes again on mainline
when compiled with "-O2 -ftree-loop-linear" at least
on i686-pc-linux-gnu and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
The 4.1 branch seems not to be affected.
The testcase cr
--- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-02-23 22:37 ---
I have been unable to reproduce this. I am on 11.11 and using the same
binutils and GCC sources. The main difference I see is that I am using GCC
4.0.2 to bootstrap with and you are using GCC 3.2.3 as your starting poin
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 22:31
---
A few binary search steps later: Works with revision 111270, fails with 111271.
It seems to be related to the patch
2006-02-19 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* resolve.c (resolve_contained_functions): Cal
I get segmentation fault when executing this input/output program:
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
#include
#endif
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int num, rest, len, result;
int control= 0;
char *str;
bool flag = true;
int multi10 = 1;
--- Comment #3 from olh at suse dot de 2006-02-23 22:06 ---
I did some more testing today, and now even the -O1 compiled kernel starts to
fail randomly.
So I suspect either a kernel bug or a hardware failure.
--
olh at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #14 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 21:03
---
Subject: Bug 26316
Author: rakdver
Date: Thu Feb 23 21:03:05 2006
New Revision: 111397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111397
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/26316
* rtlanal.c (enum
--- Comment #6 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 20:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=10904)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10904&action=view)
Causes ICE when compiled with -O3
This is a self-contained example that show the tree bug. It doesn't appear with
-O
--- Comment #10 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 19:47 ---
I'm working on a patch for this, I think I found the problem.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 19:25 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran does not compile cp2k
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 18:37 +, jb at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 18:37 ---
> I have the current
--- Comment #4 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 19:25 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran does not compile cp2k
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 18:37 +, jb at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 18:37 ---
> I have the current
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 18:37 +, jb at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 18:37 ---
> I have the current CVS of cp2k, it fails with
>
> gfortran -c -O3 -g -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer message_passing.f90
> ...
> message_passing.
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
