--- Comment #3 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2005-10-14
05:38 ---
This might be a GNU as bug. I'm going to ping the binutils folks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24345
--- Comment #2 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2005-10-14
05:23 ---
Looking at the section headers for one of the object files:
$ elfdump -h .libs/allocator-inst.o
.libs/allocator-inst.o:
SECTION HEADER TABLE
[No] Type Addr O
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 18082
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 04:53:30
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: symbol.c tran
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 20847
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 04:53:30
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: symbol.c trans
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 20856
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 04:53:30
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: symbol.c trans
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 04:53
---
Subject: Bug 24092
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 04:53:30
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: symbol.c trans
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 03:03 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 03:02
---
Fixed on the mainline, if someone wants to back port the patch, that is fine
with me but I don't have time to do it.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #16 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 03:01
---
Subject: Bug 21304
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 03:01:42
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-dfa.c
Log message:
20
The objc/lang-specs.h file lists objc-cpp-output as an input language.
However, the -x documentation lists objective-c-cpp-output as an input
language.
The objcp/lang-specs.h file lists both objective-c++-cpp-output and
objc++-cpp-output as input languages. However, the -x documentation lists on
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 02:53 ---
There looks like ratfor90 also.
See http://sepwww.stanford.edu/software/ratfor90.html
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
The ratfor support broke when we dropped the old f77 front end.
aretha$ touch tmp.r
aretha$ ./xgcc -B./ tmp.r
xgcc: tmp.r: Ratfor compiler not installed on this system
aretha$
This is the default message we get when a language hasn't been configured in,
but I did configure in the fortran compiler
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 02:33
---
Subject: Bug 23730
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 02:33:11
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.d
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 02:16
---
Here is another testcase which is a related bug but is fixed easier by a check
for SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI in try_look_through_load:
struct f
{
int i;
};
struct h{h();};
int g(void);
int g1(void) throw();
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 01:42
---
Thanks to Daniel, this is caused by try_look_through_load in tree-ssa-pre.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24231
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 01:30
---
Here is a testcase for FRE which can reproduced without -ftree-vrp -ftree-pre
at -O1:
struct f
{
int i;
};
struct h{h();};
int g(void);
int g1(void) throw();
int h(f*);
void ghh(int);
int main(void)
{
int
--- Comment #6 from flash at pobox dot com 2005-10-14 01:23 ---
PalmSource bug 110648
--
flash at pobox dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 00:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Isn't this the same as PR 24009? And, I bet this isn't the new parser, but
> rather the Austern/Weinberg patch to read all tokens up front.
Yes I am sure as we get in 3.4.0 and in 3.4.5 2
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 00:13
---
Isn't this the same as PR 24009? And, I bet this isn't the new parser, but
rather the Austern/Weinberg patch to read all tokens up front.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24037
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 00:03
---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 00:00
---
Subject: Bug 20721
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 23:59:57
Modified files:
gcc/cp : cp-tree.h decl.c ChangeLog
gcc/testsuit
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 23:59
---
Subject: Bug 20721
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 23:59:36
Modified files:
gcc/cp : cp-tree.h decl.c
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 23:53 ---
Actually I am wrong when saying this was caused by PRE, it is caused by DOM as
what PRE inserts is okay. It is what DOM creates where we go wrong.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 23:09 ---
Here is a simplified testcase without templates, just in case you get confused
what the structs look in the source:
struct adaptor_base {};
struct bound_argument {
bound_argument();
};
struct adaptor_functorint : p
--- Comment #9 from gcc-bugzilla at antony dot heightanxiety dot com
2005-10-13 23:07 ---
The problem is indeed fixed in 4.0.2, thank you.
--
gcc-bugzilla at antony dot heightanxiety dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 22:56
---
I think I know why PRE is doing somthing wrong.
we have before PRE:
theTempManager_86 = theTemp$m_memoryManager_265(ab);
...
theTemp$m_memoryManager_268(ab) = D.1851_87;
theTemp.m_memoryManager = theTe
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 22:03
---
Zdenek, can you look into this? It seems this (latent) bug was exposed with
your patch to enable -fweb and -frename-registers with -funroll-loops.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-13 22:00 ---
Sorry, I don't have available anymore systems not provided of libunwind...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17789
--- Comment #8 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-13 21:58 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] GCC 4.1 pending patches
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:38
> ---
> What should be done with this meta-bug? The
--- Comment #7 from law at redhat dot com 2005-10-13 21:35 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] GCC 4.1 pending patches
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 20:38 +, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:38
> ---
> What should b
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 21:23 ---
A regression hunt on mainline identified this patch from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 2004-02-16:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-02/msg00790.html
A version of the patch was added to the 3.4 branch at the same time.
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Last reconfirmed|2005-06-23 19:49:18 |2005-10-13 21:0
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 21:00 ---
I should note that foo is not declared anywhere so you cannot get access to it
in main.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19809
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:57 ---
It gets worse if the unknown escape is at the beginning of the file and then
you have about 100 more lines.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:38 ---
What should be done with this meta-bug? The remaining pending patches
are all large patches from Joern that add new functionality, but they
do not fix regressions. Move forward to 4.2?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu do
--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:13
---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:11 ---
: Search converges between 2003-07-29-trunk (#308) and 2003-07-30-trunk (#309).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23211
I've built gcc-4.0.2 successfully with ADA on HP-UX 11.00 and 11.11. Trying on
11.23/PA using the 11.00 gcc-3.3.2 binaries:
...
cp -p /opt/build/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/ada/sinfo.ads
/opt/build/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/ada/nmake.adt /opt/build/gcc-4.0.2/gcc/ada/xnmake.adb
ada/bldtools/nmake_b
(cd ada/bldtools/nmake_b
--- Comment #43 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:06
---
: Search converges between 2004-05-11-trunk (#454) and 2004-05-14-trunk (#455).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20103
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:03 ---
: Search converges between 2003-10-24-trunk (#384) and 2003-10-25-trunk (#385).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23457
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:00 ---
If I have time, I will look into this in the next hour or two. I just have to
look at where the types are compared.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23103
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:57
---
Moving to 4.2 as sh-linux-gnu is not a primary/secondary target.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:55 ---
Any news on getting this partial patch committed, as this will at least bring
us back to pre 4.0 times.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:51 ---
: Search converges between 2004-07-17-trunk (#488) and 2004-07-18-trunk (#489).
I suspect this was caused by:
2004-07-16 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* class.c (finish_struct_methods): Remove unncess
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:49 ---
Does this work now or do we still need the patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17789
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:48 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Working on a patch.
Been a couple of months now, any progress?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22293
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:40 ---
Confirmed, because this was really a break out from another bug and I had
written this small testcase for that.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:36 ---
This also effects some C code too like:
int f(int (*fptr)(void))
{
return fptr();
}
int main(void)
{
int t;
int g(void){ return t; }
t = 2;
f(&g);
}
Compile at -O0 and you will see that it fails too.
I tried building Ada from a bootstrap binary found on the net. HP-UX 11.23
unlike 11.00 and 11i, doesn't allow executing code on the stack by default. To
enable this for individual binaries:
$ chatr +es enable [binary]
To enable execution of code on the stack system-wide, the executable_stack
ke
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:27 ---
: Search converges between 2004-02-01-trunk (#445) and 2004-03-01-trunk (#446).
: Search converges between 2004-02-02-3.4 (#1) and 2004-03-01-3.4 (#2).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:25 ---
I am going to move this to 4.2 since 5.5 is a very old release of darwin and it
is semi useless when it comes to java and C++ coding.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:23 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think the relevant part of the C++ standard here is [temp.inst] paragraph 5:
So closing as invalid then.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:22 ---
Moving to 4.2 since java and netbsd are not primary/secondary
targets/languages.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:13 ---
A regression hunt identified this patch from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-07/msg00934.html
(Note that GCC doesn't build just before or after that patch was added without
the patch from msg0
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:01 ---
hmm, we need some more checking to catch this ICE earlier than out of SSA and
then people will believe me when I say this is a PRE bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24231
When compiled with -O1 -finline-functions -funroll-loops cxg1003 fails on x86
(but passes on x86_64) as of
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Oct 13 05:13:16 UTC 2005
,.,. CXG1003 ACATS 2.5 05-10-13 15:22:26
CXG1003 Check that the subprograms defined in the package
Text_IO.Complex_IO provide
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 18:48 ---
Fixed on x86 and x86_64-linux as of:
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Oct 13 05:13:16 UTC 2005
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 18:41 ---
I think this a dup of bug 24251 which was just fixed on the mainline, if you
want to try again, that would be nice.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21326
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work||4.1.0
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 17:36
---
Subject: Bug 24251
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-13 17:36:07
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog link.cc
Log message:
2005-10-12
--- Comment #8 from law at redhat dot com 2005-10-13 17:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Dominator opts
slows down bresenham line drawing by roughly 20%
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 00:37 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> int g(int);
> int f(int i, int j)
> {
> i +=
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:35 ---
This still happens with mainline GCC built a few hours ago.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24093
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Target Milestone
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:15 ---
Reconfirmed with current mainline :(
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:12
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true
where n is 1073741824
>
>
>
> --- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09
> ---
> As in:
>
> if (v
>
>
>
> --- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09
> ---
> As in:
>
> if (value != 0
> && (!flag_wrapv || TREE_OVERFLOW (value))
> && (flag_wrapv || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
>
> which in turn means
>
> if (value != 0
> && (flag_wrapv ?
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09 ---
As in:
if (value != 0
&& (!flag_wrapv || TREE_OVERFLOW (value))
&& (flag_wrapv || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
which in turn means
if (value != 0
&& (flag_wrapv ? TREE_OVERFLOW (value) : !TYPE_UN
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:05 ---
Sorry, let me rephrase. Could build_range_check not cast to the unsigned type
if flag_wrapv?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
GCC build triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu|
GCC host
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:01 ---
Maybe you could add a reload_completed split to not use autoincrements if Rd ==
Rn?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20972
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:01 ---
Reduced a little further without any labels or gotos:
extern int *F2 (void) __attribute__ ((__const__));
void
S4 (int *i)
{
int *D2171;
D2171 = F2 ();
do
*D2171 = 62;
while (*i !=0);
}
--
pinskia at
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:59 ---
Why can't build_range_check first cast to an unsigned type?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:48 ---
*** Bug 23949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:48 ---
... to mark as dup of PR24351, as this now looks like
#0 0x00ac7920 in do_simple_structure_copy (lhs=
{type = SCALAR, var = 15, offset = 0}, rhs=
{type = SCALAR, var = 11, offset = 0}, size=24)
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:47 ---
Reopen ...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOL
--- Comment #22 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:32
---
*** Bug 24352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:32 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13470 ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
I built gcc-3.3.2 with the ADA bootstrap binary from Rainer Orth,
gcc-3.3.2-alpha-dec-osf5.1b-bin.tar.gz. I then tried to build gcc-3.4.3 with
the ADA binaries from the gcc-3.3.2 build:
$ cd /opt/build
$ gtar jxf /opt/src/devel/gcc-3.4.3/src/gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2
$ mkdir gcc-3.4.3-objdir
$ cd g
--- Comment #6 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:25
---
Fixed again (hopefully).
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:24
---
Subject: Bug 23926
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 15:24:11
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog acinclude.m4 configure
Log message:
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:09 ---
Confirmed, nice small testcase:
struct adaptor_base {
};
struct bound_argument {
bound_argument();
};
template struct adaptor_functor : public adaptor_base {
explicit adaptor_functor(const T_functor& _A_functor)
--- Comment #2 from erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-10-13 14:49
---
Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-10/msg00292.html
--
erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24348
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.3 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22352
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22464
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23307
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:56 ---
Reopening for now as this change causes netbsd to fail to compile. There are
more == below which I did not noticed until now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:46 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #10 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:19 ---
Could probably backport to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:17 ---
could probably backport to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:16 ---
could probably backport to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:15 ---
wont fix for 3.4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23694
--- Comment #6 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:14 ---
wont fix for 3.4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22180
--- Comment #12 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:14 ---
probably should be backported to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:12 ---
wont fix for pre 4.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21592
--- Comment #8 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:11 ---
Wont fix for pre 4.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21117
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
