--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
06:58 ---
Patch committed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RES
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
06:56 ---
Subject: Bug 22167
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-21 06:56:24
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21 06:55
---
For some reasons Bugzilla did not want to understand that I'm reporting the
bug agains 4.1.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
06:53 ---
Subject: Bug 22167
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-21 06:53:29
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
06:51 ---
Subject: Bug 22167
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-21 06:51:26
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog gcse.c
gcc/testsui
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-
GCC mainline is now ICEing on the following snipped
(reduced from real-world code)
struct A {
virtual ~A() { }
};
void f()
{
struct B : A {
};
B b;
}
Use g++ -g.
My preliminary analysis indicates that the ICE occurs while
building the vtable for the loca
--- Additional Comments From irar at il dot ibm dot com 2005-07-21 05:45
---
I submitted a patch to fix this - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-
07/msg01388.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
05:33 ---
Confirmed, the reduced even extra options on the mainline to disable to get the
same tree output from
the mainline, the ICE is not reproducible there.
Reduced testcase:
struct nand_chip {
int
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-21
05:33 ---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text
output.
Steven,
>> The output looks good though:
>>19 1 4 9162536496481 100
>> 121 144 169 196
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
05:12 ---
Also supply the preprocessor source.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
05:08 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
05:03 ---
Confirmed, I did not notice this until now.
make[5]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent make
rule.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
04:53 ---
This blocks PR 5362 which is the PR about target options and since this is not
available on all targets,
this is considered a target option.
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed
--
Bug 15272 depends on bug 2922, which changed state.
Bug 2922 Summary: [DR 197] two-stage lookup for unqualified function calls with
type-dependent arguments
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2922
What|Old Value |New Value
-
--
Bug 5660 depends on bug 2922, which changed state.
Bug 2922 Summary: [DR 197] two-stage lookup for unqualified function calls with
type-dependent arguments
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2922
What|Old Value |New Value
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
04:51 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
03:56 ---
Subject: Bug 2922
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-21 03:56:46
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/g++.d
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
03:53 ---
Subject: Bug 2922
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-21 03:53:08
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog name-lookup.c semantics.c
The flag -rdynamic is not and has never been documented after its addition
back in 1995:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-07/msg00262.html
A patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00492.html
W.
--
Summary: -rdynamic is undocumented
Produc
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-07-21 02:35 ---
Subject: Re: ICE with anonymous unions
"giovannibajo at libero dot it" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yes, it's because of my patch.
|
| I would like to know if we agree that the code is invalid or n
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-21
02:08 ---
Does ICC put this in .rodata?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22575
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-21
01:51 ---
Yes, it's because of my patch.
I would like to know if we agree that the code is invalid or not. It's a bit
hard to have a definitive answer since it is GNU C++ (uses an extension), but
given that the C fr
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-21
01:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=9313)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9313&action=view)
Proposed patch
Can you test this patch please?
--
What|Removed |Adde
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
00:55 ---
The code of the original reporter is in fact not valid.
>From the Fortran 95 standard:
Section 4.4.2: "Two data entities have the same type if they are declared with
reference to the same derived-type
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
00:46 ---
I cannot reproduce this at all anymore, maybe I am doing something wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10735
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
00:37 ---
Someone should apply this patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-02-23 01:28:
--
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |
|patches/2004- |
|09/msg00426.html|
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20312
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
00:13 ---
Another testcase:
=== file1.c ===
void f();
extern __inline__ void f (void) {}
int main()
{
f();
return 0;
}
=== cut ===
=== file2.c ===
void f (void) {}
=== cut ===
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-21
00:11 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
=== file1.c ===
void f();
int main()
{
f();
return 0;
}
=== cut ===
=== file2.c ===
extern __inline__ void f (void) {}
=== cut ===
Compile with -O1 -combine and see the ICE.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
23:49 ---
*** Bug 22581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
23:49 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8081 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8081 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
On FreeBSD 5.4#p4, I've install gcc41 from ports : the port use the gcc41
20050716 snapshot.
I passed -DWANT_SHARELIB to the port to build it.
platform :
dagoba# uname -a
FreeBSD dagoba.glconseil.net 5.4-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p4 #0: Tue Jul
19 16:50:48 CEST
2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|"make -j" doesn't effect|'make -j' doesn't effect
|source->bytecode compilation|source->bytecode compilation
http://
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Since the classpath merge, I have noticed that the source->bytecode stage of the
libgcj build is not being paralellized.
This warning was also seen:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/mckinlay/cvs/gcc/build-x86_64/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/lib
make[4]: warn
--- Additional Comments From black dot hole dot sun16 at gmail dot com
2005-07-20 23:13 ---
(From update of attachment 9309)
>#include
>
>/* Program prints the first 10 postitive integers and their factorials */
>
>main()
>{
>long double i, j, k = 1;
>
>for(i = 1; i <= 100; i++)
>
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
22:46 ---
This is now fixed, right?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20178
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
22:23 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-20
22:02 ---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text
output.
Steve,
There are two problems:
>The output looks good though:
>19 1 4 9162536496481 100 121 14
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
21:26 ---
Reduced testcase:
int foo(long double d)
{
return d==0;
}
Comparison of long doubles with zero seems to be a problem.
This is a regression from gcc 3.
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 21:23
---
Can you please also backport http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-07/msg00126.html
to gcc-4_0-branch? The testcase fails on gcc-4_0-branch ATM. Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20842
--- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-07-20 20:49
---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 22:46, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Output of libgfortran from 2005-07-20 with the patches from
> Jerry[1] and Paul[2] applied:
--- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-07-20 20:46
---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 22:16, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2005 22:03, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 July 2005 21:07,
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
20:42 ---
Confirme.d
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
20:42 ---
Confirmed, make sure they get inlined using either VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR or using
an union, otherwise
aliasing problems will show up.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
Right now URLClassLoader diverges from Classpath.
The primary reason for this is that we have our own special URL handlers
which aren't appropriate for classpath.
One approach to fixing this would be to break out the inner class
URLLoaders into package-private classes and allow VMs to register
oth
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-20 20:41 ---
known to work: 4.1.0-20050711
known to fail: 4.1.0-20050717+
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22533
Currently Float and Double diverge from classpath.
I think we could safely inline these methods wherever they are called,
and then fully merge with Classpath. The result would not appreciably
affect performance, I think (and these aren't called much anyway).
--
Summary: should inline
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ada / raised STORAGE_ERROR :|[4.1 regression] ada /
|stack overflow (or erroneous|raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21882
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21880
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 20:31
---
Fixed by classpath -> libgcj merge. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIR
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 20:24
---
I can't reproduce this. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
20:18 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-07-20 20:17
---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 22:03, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2005 21:07, Paul Thomas wrote:
> > pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote
Bootstrap is failing on mainline on 20050720 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and
hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
hppa2.0w:
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-07-20-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/libgcc2.c:661:
internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_list, have predecrement_expr
in reloc_needed, at config/pa/pa.c
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 20:04
---
The same problem occurs in standalone GTK text areas, so I'm going to close this
as invalid here. If you feel strongly that the behaviour should be to select up
to the next space we can re-file this in GNOME bug
--- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-07-20 20:03
---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 21:07, Paul Thomas wrote:
> pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> >--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords||missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |200
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|graydon at redhat dot com |roman at kennke dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-20 19:48
---
This is a valid bug, however hard it may be to solve (see PR 4131).
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-20 19:47
---
*** Bug 4131 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-20 19:47
---
It may be true that this bug isn't going to be fixed in this cycle,
but there's no reason not to keep it open instead of suspending it.
The "suspend" state is mean for PRs where we need external things to
hap
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19847
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19846
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19838
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16708
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 19:43
---
Fixed by Sven de Marothy in GNU Classpath. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|N
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 19:42
---
Fixed by Sven de Marothy in GNU Classpath. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|N
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 19:41
---
Fixed by Sven de Marothy in GNU Classpath. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|N
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17060
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17008
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 19:40
---
Fixed by Sven de Marothy in GNU Classpath. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|N
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 19:39
---
Fixed by Sven de Marothy in GNU Classpath. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|N
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-07-20 19:39
---
Fixed by Sven de Marothy in GNU Classpath. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|N
--- Additional Comments From black dot hole dot sun16 at gmail dot com
2005-07-20 19:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=9312)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9312&action=view)
#included file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22576
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
19:33 ---
This is a target bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c
--- Additional Comments From black dot hole dot sun16 at gmail dot com
2005-07-20 19:32 ---
If it is at all relevant, I'm using the glibc that breezy provides (2.3.5).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22576
--- Additional Comments From black dot hole dot sun16 at gmail dot com
2005-07-20 19:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=9311)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9311&action=view)
-save-temps output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22576
--- Additional Comments From black dot hole dot sun16 at gmail dot com
2005-07-20 19:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=9310)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9310&action=view)
-save-temps output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22576
--- Additional Comments From black dot hole dot sun16 at gmail dot com
2005-07-20 19:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=9309)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9309&action=view)
bug causing program...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22576
Hello. Sorry if the summary is a little vague, I dont really know a whole bunch
about gcc terminology ;) So anyway, I wrote a simple program in C that computes
the factorials of numbers 1 through 100 (yes, after 7 they get super big). When
this program is compiled as
gcc -ffast-math factorial.c
--- Additional Comments From roman at kennke dot org 2005-07-20 19:26
---
I'll take care if this. I already checked in the icon that should display the
CheckBox in the MetalLookAndFeel, now it only needs to get wired to the actual
CheckBox. Note that there is no CheckBox icon in the Basi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-20
19:11 ---
Subject: Re: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to
".rodata" section?
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> - given that 4.1's front end has already evolv
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
- given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for
4.1.
(so should no likely assumed as being so).
It still is true since the front-end still
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-20
19:07 ---
Subject: Re: Null Characters instead of blanks in text
output.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
>15:41 ---
>Confirmed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
19:04 ---
Reducing right now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22574
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-20 19:03
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
> > 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
> Not any more since we are in stage3 already.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
18:58 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
> 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
Not any more since we are in stage3 already.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-20 18:57
---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4131 ***
Please correct me if I misunderstand, but it doen't seem reasonable to
close this bug as won't fix, based on it being difficu
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-20 18:53 ---
hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
18:44 ---
*** Bug 22575 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-20
18:44 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4131 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
class obj {
private:
int value;
private:
obj() { }
obj(int v) : value(v) { }
public:
int getValue() const { return value; }
const static obj seven;
};
const obj obj::seven = obj(7);
int getSeven()
{
return obj::seven.getValue();
}
gcc (3.3.6,4.1.0) place
--- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-07-20 18:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=9308)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9308&action=view)
Preprocessed sources to reproduce the bug (tar.bz2 file)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
When trying to compile xterm-202 using -fwhole-program --combine I get an
internal compiler error:
VTPrsTbl.c:7215: internal compiler error: in propagate_bits, at
ipa-reference.c:669
This worked fine with gcc from CVS about 2 weeks ago, it fails now.
The command line used is:
gcc -fwhole-pr
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-20
18:22 ---
Absolutely not! There is no "best" way: sometimes it is better to go through
the typedef, sometimes it is better to print the typedef.
To tell you the truth, I consider the fact that GCC prints both a *feat
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
