--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
06:22 ---
Subject: Bug 16435
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 06:22:00
Modified files:
libgfortran/io : transfer.c write.c io.h
libg
GNAT will produce the "Storage Error" below when trying to compile any Ada
source files.
The system is running an up-to-date (as of Thursday 14 July 2005 AEST) Fedora
Core 3 distribution with:
gcc-3.4.3-22.fc3
gcc-gnat-3.4.3-22.fc3
libgnat-3.4.3-22.fc3
glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1
glibc-comm
Currently the -Wmissing-format-attribute works on functions by examining the
current function body for calls to vprintf-like functions and if so it flags
the current function as a candidate for another format attribute. You can then
back-track to callees and propagate the attribute as necessary
--- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-07-14
03:49 ---
Subject: Re: Character length incorrect.
> fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
Feng> Having a good start, why not fix entirely? If somebody agrees to fix step
by
Feng> step, I have no objection.
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
03:46 ---
I just hope you could work on this ;-)
Having a good start, why not fix entirely? If somebody agrees to fix step by
step, I have no objection.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730
--- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-07-14
03:37 ---
Subject: Re: Character length incorrect.
> fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
fengwang> IMHO, your patch only handles the scalar character and is not entire,
though a
fengwang> different bug is
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
03:30 ---
For comment #5, here is the backtrace:
#0 gfc_internal_error (
format=0x8447620 "Initialization expression didn't reduce %C")
at ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/error.c:662
#1 0x0805da16 in gfc_match_init_e
--- Additional Comments From fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
02:49 ---
I think we have to consider character arrays. See:
character*2 a (1)
character*4 b
character*6 c
parameter (a="12")
parameter (b = a(1))
write (c,'("#",A,"#"
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22475
4.1.0 20050713 (experimental)
alias CONFIGURECVS='../gcc/configure --verbose --enable-languages=c++
--disable-nls >clog 2>&1 &'
alias BUILD='nice gmake CFLAGS='\'''\'' BOOT_CFLAGS='\'''\''
LIBCFLAGS='\'
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
01:47 ---
A testcase which is exposed by PR 22368's second patch:
int __show_backtrace(void *rw)
{
return (rw && (((unsigned long) rw) >= 0xf000) );
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22398
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
01:24 ---
The ICE is:
Object.c:11: error: types mismatch in comparsion
struct a *
struct objc_object *
selfD.1337 == anObjectD.1339;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22474
Take the following code:
typedef struct objc_class *Class;
@interface a
{
Class isa;
}
@end
@implementation a
- (int)isEqual:anObject
{
return self==anObject;
}
@end
We get an type mismatch in the EQ_EXPR which is wrong.
I will attach the patch to find this in PR 22368
--
Summa
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22474
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-04-06 18:30:23 |2005-07-14 00:54:22
date||
Summary|ICE with -msse2 -mfpma
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
00:52 ---
Should have been marked as a regression.
On the mainline we get:
org/tritonus/util/TCircularBuffer.java: In class
'org.tritonus.util.TCircularBuffer':
org/tritonus/util/TCircularBuffer.java: In method
'or
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
00:43 ---
Maybe this is -fweb issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22472
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
00:25 ---
Subject: Re: New: corrupted profile info with
-O3 -fprofile-use
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 23:28 +, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Several of the SPEC CPU2000 tests currently fail on powerpc6
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.0/objdir/gcc/ /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/co
nversion.c -w -O0 -fno-show-column -lm -o /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/objdir/gc
c/testsuite/conversion.x0(timeout = 300)
PASS: gcc.c
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-07-13 23:59 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] testsuite failure
gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c -O3 -funroll-loops
> Question is does this fail on the 3.3 (or 3.4) branch where =
> -frename-registers is enabled
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
23:56 ---
It might not be a regrename bug. I see this at the end of the .ce pass:
;; Start of basic block 0, registers live: 2 [%r2] 22 [%r22] 26 [%r26] 28 [%r28]
30 [%r30]
(note 9 2 145 0 [bb 0] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BL
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22472
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
23:47 ---
Question is does this fail on the 3.3 (or 3.4) branch where -frename-registers
is enabled at -O3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22469
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
23:47 ---
Question is does this fail on the 3.3 (or 3.4) branch where -frename-registers
is enabled at -O3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22472
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
23:43 ---
This is obvious caused by:
+2005-07-12 Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ PR rtl-optimization/20376
+ * toplev.c (process_options): Enable -fweb and -frename-registers when
+ unrolling
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
23:41 ---
15023 is the bug for rename-registers being buggy.
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
23:41 ---
15023 is the bug for rename-registers being buggy.
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.0/objdir/gcc/ -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -w -fno-show-column -c -o 930621-1.o
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c(t
imeout = 300)
PASS: gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c -O
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
23:36 ---
I cannot reproduce this with "4.0.1 20050605" with the testcase you attached.
Can you attach the correct test that fails and try a 4.0.1 release version also?
--
What|Removed
Several of the SPEC CPU2000 tests currently fail on powerpc64-linux
with -fprofile-generate/-fprofile-use plus -O3. Some of the failures
start recently and appear to be intermittent. Failures for 176.gcc
with either -m32 or -m64 and 175.vpr with -m64 start with this patch
from dberlin (Remove var
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-13 22:30 ---
known to fail 4.0.1-20050521
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4
--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
22:28 ---
Bootstrap on s390-ibm-linux is still broken because of this issue. Can we just
check in the patch from comment #45?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20126
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||3.3.6 4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22470
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-13 22:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=9263)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9263&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22470
error: no match for 'operator=' in 'i = QValueList::begin() const [with T =
NormalizedRect*]()'
/usr/include/qt/qvaluelist.h:76: note: candidates are:
QValueListIterator&
QValueListIterator::operator=(const
QValueListIterator&)
--
Summary: [4.0 regression] reject-valid-code
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-07-13 18:18
---
Updated summary to reflect that this is actually caused by the libgcj verifier.
A workaround is to use "gij -noverify"
--
What|Removed |Added
--
>
> With "Wed Jul 13 00:19:06 UTC 2005" this test passed.
> With "Wed Jul 13 13:14:33 UTC 2005" it fails:
This is obvious caused by:
+2005-07-12 Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ PR rtl-optimization/20376
+ * toplev.c (process_options): Enable -fweb and -frename-registers when
+
With "Wed Jul 13 00:19:06 UTC 2005" this test passed.
With "Wed Jul 13 13:14:33 UTC 2005" it fails:
Running
/home/hp/combined/combined/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/941014-2.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
(test for excess errors)
FAIL:
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-07-13 20:11 ---
Proposed patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00954.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
20:06 ---
Even though PR 22398 is not caught by my patch it is caught later by VRP. I
will add a patch to catch
mismatch in comparisons.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2
Version|4.1.0 |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22461
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
19:52 ---
Nope. Stuff::Bar is injected as Bar inside Foo as Stuff::Bar is the supper
class.
GCC is correct.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||dish at csua dot berkeley
||dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
19:46 ---
Hmm, since this has now reported on i686-pc-linux-gnu, I have no idea what is
going on. The only
thing I can think of is gcj is being miss compiled but I really doubt that
since this also on sparc too.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
19:44 ---
*** Bug 22323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
19:44 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21206 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
19:43 ---
*** Bug 22468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
19:43 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21206 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From aaronw at net dot com 2005-07-13 19:33 ---
Here's a bit more info for the context including libtool parms:
creating libgij.la
(cd .libs && rm -f libgij.la && ln -s ../libgij.la libgij.la)
/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=GCJ
--mode=link /var/tmp/gcc4/gcc-4.0.1/
Ran /bin/bash ../configure --prefix=/tools/freeware/gcc4.0 --with-gnu-ld
--with-ld=/tools/freeware/gcc4.0/bin/ld --with-gnu-as
--with-as=/tools/freeware/gcc4.0/bin/as --with-cpu=ultrasparc
then
make profiledbootstrap
/var/tmp/gcc4/gcc-4.0.1/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/gcc/gcj
-B/var
Two types exist with the same name, one ::Bar in the global namespace and one
Stuff::Bar in a named
namespace.
A new type ::Foo is derived from Stuff::Bar and given a member declared as "Bar
b". The type of Foo::b
ought to be ::Bar, since Foo is in the global namespace. However, Foo::b is
i
--- Additional Comments From albertm at uphs dot upenn dot edu 2005-07-13
19:14 ---
*** Bug 22466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22464
--- Additional Comments From albertm at uphs dot upenn dot edu 2005-07-13
19:14 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22464 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Error message:
:g++ -c bug02.cc
bug02.cc: In constructor ?do_something(const T (*)[M])::helper_t::helper_t()
[with T = double, int M = 3]?:
bug02.cc:10: instantiated from ?void do_something(const T (*)[M]) [with T =
double, int M = 3]?
bug02.cc:16: instantiated from here
bug02.cc:6: in
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
18:53 ---
Fixed already by:
2005-07-13 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* doc/tm.texi: Remove @xref{Cross-profiling}.
--
What|Removed |Added
current snapshot doesn't build:
if [ xinfo = xinfo ]; then \
makeinfo --split-size=500 --no-split -I . -I ../../gcc/doc \
-I ../../gcc/doc/include -o
doc/gccint.info ../../gcc/doc/gccint.texi; \
fi
../../gcc/doc//tm.texi:9284: Cross reference to nonexistent
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
18:36 ---
Confirmed, a 4.0 regression only.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-07-13
18:23 ---
Subject: Re: Character length incorrect.
> What about the testcase, David?
I was focussing on the patch itself. Here's a testcase:
! PR fortran/21730
! {do-do run}
character*2 a
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
18:21 ---
Confirmed, this is invalid code, you cannot reference a local variable in a
local class.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
Error message:
:g++ -c bug02.cc
bug02.cc: In constructor ?do_something(const T (*)[M])::helper_t::helper_t()
[with T = double, int M = 3]?:
bug02.cc:10: instantiated from ?void do_something(const T (*)[M]) [with T =
double, int M = 3]?
bug02.cc:16: instantiated from here
bug02.cc:6: in
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
18:12 ---
*** Bug 22463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17021
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
18:12 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17021 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
The libgcj verifier attempts to resolve dependent classes using Class.forName().
This causes ClassNotFoundException to be thrown too early - the exception should
occur when an attempt to use the missing class is made, not during verification.
public class Test
{
Missing a()
{
return new Mi
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22300
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-07-13 17:49 ---
Fixed by twiddling testcase.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RE
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-13
17:43 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Patch here
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00937.html
What about the testcase, David?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Component|c++ |target
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 17:39
---
Patch here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00937.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21730
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
bug.cpp: In function 'void func()':
bug.cpp:45: error: could not split insn
(insn:HI 106 27 115 (parallel [
(set (reg/v:SF 21 xmm0 [orig:59 _max.21 ] [59])
(if_then_else:SF (le:SF (reg/v:SF 21 xmm0 [orig:59 _max.21 ]
[59])
(reg/v:SF 21 xmm0
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
17:38 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
17:20 ---
Can you try this after:
2005-07-13 David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tree-ssa-dom.c (lookup_avail_expr): Do not pass member in freed
structure as argument.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
17:17 ---
According to mjw there is already code in classpath's ClassLoader
to do gnu.* checking (whether it is exactly what we want is not clear --
aph suggested we rename packages to make it very clear which parts
ar
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-07-13 17:09 ---
Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00930.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 16:59
---
Oops. This one passes with 20050709 and fails with 20050710, and is exactly
the format and input line from mgrid.
PROGRAM BUG
REAL*8 A(0:3)
READ 1000, A
1000 FORMAT (4D8.0)
STOP
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
15:10 ---
Confirmed. Reduced testcase (compile with -O3):
int foo();
void bar()
{
int N, i, j, k, *p;
if (i)
while (1)
{
while (N)
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-07-13 16:17 ---
Simple fix (tested by doing make bootstrap; make install with and w/o
--enable-bootstrap) :
--- Makefile.tpl~ 2005-07-13 20:12:15.0 +0400
+++ Makefile.tpl2005-07-13 20:13:03
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-07-13 16:11 ---
Subject: Re: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure:
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr22051-2.c scan-tree-dump-times if \(\(int\) q 1
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 15:28 +, jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Addition
--- Additional Comments From tsarkov at cs dot man dot ac dot uk
2005-07-13 15:46 ---
The same happens if I try to bootstrap fresh gcc HEAD with gcc 4.0.1 build
without athlon switches:
> gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --enable-s
The test g++.dg/conversion/simd2.C has been newly added to 4.0 branch, but fails
there (at least on hppa2.0w-hpux, hppa64-hpux, i686-linux, ia64-hpux) because
the expected message is not correct for that branch.
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-07-12-4.0/src/gcc-4.0/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/simd2.
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 15:28
---
The test has now been added to 4.0 branch and fails there as well.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22460
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
14:45 ---
Fixed by the patch above.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
14:42 ---
Subject: Bug 21921
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-13 14:42:26
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-iterator.c
gc
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
14:23 ---
Michael, thank you very much. Your analysis will probably help a lot.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19653
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
14:19 ---
Note I think I already fixed the DOM problem in PR 22335.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
14:16 ---
Note fixing all of these issues and we can remove the "hack" in
may_propagate_copy which right now
says:
/* FIXME. GIMPLE is allowing pointer assignments and comparisons of
pointers that have diffe
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
14:08 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01783.html crashes on richard
guenther's libsse2, fwiw.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19653
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
14:05 ---
Subject: Bug 22445
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: sh-elf-4_1-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-13 14:05:26
Modified files:
gcc: Cha
compile the following to byte-code and then to native (and use the patch in
22368 to see the ICE):
public class t
{
t(){}
}
--
Summary: GCJ produces mis-match (non compatible) types in
MODIFY_EXPR (from byte-code)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22460
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368
--- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-07-13 13:55 ---
I was going to add this text to PR22453, when I noticed that it was closed
as duplicate to this one. So putting it here for reference, although
everything seems to be analyzed already:
The reload happens, because
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
13:37 ---
Suspending based on the fact the DR report is still not fully resolved yet, it
is still in drafting phase.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
13:35 ---
*** Bug 22459 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
13:35 ---
Actually this is a dup of bug 12056.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12056 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
13:34 ---
So suspend this bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
13:34 ---
Confirmed but the DR is still not fully a defect yet (it is is in drafting) so
...
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
13:31 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
Dear all,
I would like to post a bug report for the GNU C/C++ compiler 3.3-e500.
We use the compiler to generate code for a PowerPC processor.
Used invokation line for the GNU C++ compiler:
ccppc -c -x c++ -ansi -Wall -Werror -mcpu=8540 -fverbose-asm -mbig
-fmerge-templates -mmultiple -mn
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
