[Bug c++/22452] New: [4.1 regression] ICE expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'const_decl' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:2132

// C++ testcase, compile with -O0 extern "C" { struct T { enum { E }; }; } bug.ii:5: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'const_decl' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:2132 -- Summary: [4.1 regression] ICE expe

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22451 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug c++/22451] New: C++ front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR (pointer to member functions)

testcase: struct s {}; struct const_mem_fun_t { const_mem_fun_t(); void operator()(const s* __p) const { return (__p->*_M_f)(); } void (s::*_M_f)() const; }; const_mem_fun_t p1; void test02(const s *a) { p1(a); } Compile at -O1. Use patch in PR 22368 to find this. -- Summ

[Bug c++/22434] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in simplify_{,gen_}subreg

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 03:12 --- With my patch for PR 22368, I get a different ICE: t.cc:10: error: statement types mismatch D.1751 = iD.1737; struct AD.1716 const intD.2 t.cc:10: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed Please submit

[Bug libfortran/21593] [4.0 only] FAIL: gfortran.dg/dev_null.f90

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: |[4.0 only] FAIL: |gfortran.dg/dev_null.f90|gfortran.dg/dev_null.f90 Target Milestone|-

[Bug middle-end/22242] Removing unused static function variables

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 03:02 --- Fixed by: * cfgexpand.c (expand_one_stack_var): Do not expand variables when we do unit-at-a-time. Thanks Honza. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/21875] [meta-bug] NIST test suite failures

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 02:46 --- (In reply to comment #6) > The mainline patch in comment #4 causes SPEC CPU2000 test mgrid to fail on > powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. This test case: Are you sure that is the testcase which fails since that al

[Bug tree-optimization/22422] [4.1 Regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2843

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 02:37 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/21840] [4.1 Regression] ICE while building Linux kernel (seg fault), missing cast

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 02:33 --- Subject: Bug 21840 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-13 02:33:11 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-pre.c gcc

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- Bug 22368 depends on bug 21840, which changed state. Bug 21840 Summary: [4.1 Regression] ICE while building Linux kernel (seg fault), missing cast http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21840 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug middle-end/21840] [4.1 Regression] ICE while building Linux kernel (seg fault), missing cast

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 02:33 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/22422] [4.1 Regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2843

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 02:25 --- Subject: Bug 22422 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-13 02:25:48 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-structalias.c Lo

[Bug middle-end/22448] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE on dereferencing a label in an asm statement

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 02:24 --- Confirmed, a regression from 3.4.0. (In reply to comment #0) > Admittedly I don't expect it to do anything useful, but I was told in #gcc > that > I should report the ICE anyways. Yes by me :). --

[Bug c/22448] New: ICE on dereferencing a label in an asm statement

With gcc 4.0.1, compiling the following results in an ICE: void foo () { label: asm ("" : : "g" (*&&label)); } Admittedly I don't expect it to do anything useful, but I was told in #gcc that I should report the ICE anyways. (For what it's worth, this same code snippet compiles without error in g

[Bug middle-end/21840] [4.1 Regression] ICE while building Linux kernel (seg fault), missing cast

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 01:37 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/21875] [meta-bug] NIST test suite failures

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 00:01 --- The mainline patch in comment #4 causes SPEC CPU2000 test mgrid to fail on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. This test case: PROGRAM BUG REAL A, B READ 1000, A, B 1000 FORMAT (E8.0,E8.0) ST

[Bug target/22447] gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-07-12 23:27 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Well, for this: > > void f(long *p) { > *(char *) p = 0; > } > > I get > > ldl t0,0(a0) > andnot t0,0xff,t0 > stl t0,0(a0)

[Bug target/22447] gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-07-12 23:16 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Unfortunatelly, with switching to gcc 4.x some code started to > > produce such exceptions (with gcc 3.4 everything was fine). Is there > > an option to make gc

[Bug middle-end/22379] [4.1 Regression] ICE in cgraph_early_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:990

--- Additional Comments From hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 23:15 --- I've commited the patch cited above -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/22447] gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-07-12 22:59 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Unfortunatelly, with switching to gcc 4.x some code started to > produce such exceptions (with gcc 3.4 everything was fine). Is there > an option to make gcc think that passed *variable i

[Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 22:56 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/22447] gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-07-12 22:48 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #0) > > > > Instead of generating the code to store a byte using unaligned load/store > > instruction it uses aligned LDL/STL. The assembler code looks correct using >

[Bug java/19674] Empty declaration through semicolon (;) causes compile failure

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 22:35 --- Subject: Bug 19674 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 22:35:04 Modified files: gcc/java : ChangeLog jvspec.c parse-scan.y Log

[Bug target/22447] gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-07-12 22:27 --- (In reply to comment #0) > Instead of generating the code to store a byte using unaligned load/store > instruction it uses aligned LDL/STL. The assembler code looks correct using > -O0 > optimization flag and inc

[Bug libgcj/1379] converters must be able to throw exception

-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1379

[Bug other/7088] host-x-host builds install broken limits.h

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Last reconfirmed|2003-12-03 05:38:51 |2005-07-12 21:46:14 date|

[Bug libgcj/8685] CNI Invocation of Java code from C++ example fails

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Last reconfirmed|2003-11-29 03:13:25 |2005-07-12 21:46:01 date|

[Bug target/22447] gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|alpha-redhat-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|alpha-redhat-linux-gnu | GCC target triplet|alpha-redhat-linux-gnu |alpha-*-linu

[Bug tree-optimization/13745] [tree-ssa] expressions not converted back to array form

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:27 --- It might be a while for me to rewrite the tree combiner so unassigning for now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/18892] missed optimization with & and ==

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:27 --- It might be a while for me to rewrite the tree combiner so unassigning for now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/14287] [tree-ssa] does not remove unnecessary extensions

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:27 --- It might be a while for me to rewrite the tree combiner so unassigning for now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/15346] [tree-ssa] combine two successive divisions

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:27 --- It might be a while for me to rewrite the tree combiner so unassigning for now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/15457] [tree-ssa] Convert a sign bit testing into "a < 0"

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:27 --- It might be a while for me to rewrite the tree combiner so unassigning for now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/15452] [tree-ssa] Optimize cascaded a = a == 0;

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:26 --- It might be a while for me to rewrite the tree combiner so unassigning for now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/14541] [tree-ssa] built-in math functions are not fully optimized at tree level

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:26 --- It might be a while for me to rewrite the tree combiner so unassigning for now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/16107] missed optimization with some math function builtins

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:25 --- It might be a while for me to rewrite the tree combiner so unassigning for now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug other/13906] genmodes.c:964: internal compiler error: Bus error in md5_process_block

--- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-07-12 21:24 --- Fixed for 4.1. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/22447] gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-07-12 21:24 --- Created an attachment (id=9255) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9255&action=view) produced assembler output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22447

[Bug target/22447] gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-07-12 21:23 --- Created an attachment (id=9254) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9254&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22447

[Bug target/22447] New: gcc produces code that generate unaligned exceptions

-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.2 20050712 (prerelease) and gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: alpha-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release --with

[Bug target/18078] Contradicting function attributes (cdecl vs stdcall)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:20 --- Fixed in 4.1.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOL

[Bug middle-end/20593] [4.0 Regression] Simple array of string access miscompiled on x86 and x86_64 and PPC

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:07 --- Subject: Bug 20593 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 21:07:20 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug middle-end/20593] [4.0 Regression] Simple array of string access miscompiled on x86 and x86_64 and PPC

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:06 --- Fixed also in 4.0.2. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|

[Bug tree-optimization/22105] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cxg2018 for_each_index, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:219

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:05 --- Subject: Bug 22105 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 21:04:23 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/22105] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cxg2018 for_each_index, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:219

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-17 21:34 --- Fixed. --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:03 --- Fixed also in 4.0.2 for sure now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/21704] failure during building 64-bit native compiler by crosscompiler.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:01 --- Fixed in 4.0.2 and above. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/21704] failure during building 64-bit native compiler by crosscompiler.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 21:01 --- Subject: Bug 21704 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 21:01:17 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug bootstrap/21704] failure during building 64-bit native compiler by crosscompiler.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 20:59 --- Subject: Bug 21704 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 20:59:01 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config : h

[Bug c++/22446] Invocation of destructor of element of array changes vtable

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 20:45 --- This is not a bug. Inside ~B() we change to the A vtable and then call ~A(). test[9-i] = b; That just calls "operator=" which does not copy the vtable which is correct. -- What|Rem

[Bug libfortran/21593] FAIL: gfortran.dg/dev_null.f90

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 20:40 --- Commit for 4.1 here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-07/msg00486.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21593

[Bug c++/22446] Invocation of destructor of element of array changes vtable

--- Additional Comments From Forest dot Rouse at ansys dot com 2005-07-12 20:39 --- Created an attachment (id=9252) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9252&action=view) preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22446

[Bug libfortran/21593] FAIL: gfortran.dg/dev_null.f90

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 20:39 --- Subject: Bug 21593 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 20:39:12 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog gcc/testsuite : C

[Bug c++/22446] New: Invocation of destructor of element of array changes vtable

Say B is a subclass of A. I create an compile time array of 10 objects of type B and invoke the destructor on each member of the array. Afterwards, the vtable pointer for each element of B is to instances of A. This came up with a template collection class that is a combination of vector and a c

[Bug tree-optimization/22326] promotions (from float to double) are not removed when they should be able to

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 20:26 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug rtl-optimization/22445] Optimizations done by cselib depend on pointer values

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 20:21 --- This looks like a dup of (or at least related to) PR 4520 (cselib.c hash_rtx incorrectly hashes based on rtx address). -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/22416] [4.1 Regression] 23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/1.cc fails: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:466

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 20:11 --- The failure disappeared again for me on 20050712, but given comments about uninitialized memory I doubt this indicates a fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22416

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 17:33 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I should note that you can now bootstrap C with the patch. But still some > > testsuite regressions in the > > testsuite which have been filed alre

[Bug rtl-optimization/22445] New: Optimizations done by cselib depend on pointer values

We found that some of our in-house code was sometimes compiled to different assembler code when the compilation was repeated. There was one base version that we got most of the time, and a slightly smaller variant that was obtained with a lesser frequency, using identical sources, pathnames and co

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 17:25 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I should note that you can now bootstrap C with the patch. But still some > testsuite regressions in the > testsuite which have been filed already. With the patch in PR 22358 w

[Bug c++/22358] C++ front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 17:22 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 17:04 --- I should note that you can now bootstrap C with the patch. But still some testsuite regressions in the testsuite which have been filed already. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug tree-optimization/22335] DOM creates mis-matched types

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 17:03 --- Subject: Bug 22335 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 17:02:54 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/t

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- Bug 22368 depends on bug 22335, which changed state. Bug 22335 Summary: DOM creates mis-matched types http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22335 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/22335] DOM creates mis-matched types

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 17:02 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/22335] DOM creates mis-matched types

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 17:00 --- Subject: Bug 22335 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 17:00:03 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-dom.c Log messag

[Bug middle-end/21840] [4.1 Regression] ICE while building Linux kernel (seg fault), missing cast

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 16:58 --- Created an attachment (id=9250) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9250&action=view) patch which should fix this without any really bad side effects This patch should fix it. I have not te

[Bug tree-optimization/22444] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure:23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/2.cc ICE

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 16:29 --- Between LAST_UPDATED "Mon Jul 11 09:23:25 UTC 2005" and "Mon Jul 11 18:07:42 UTC 2005", I started getting an additional similar failure for cris-axis-linux-gnu: ... FAIL: 23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/

[Bug tree-optimization/22416] [4.1 Regression] 23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/1.cc fails: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:466

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 16:18 --- I have a fix, the problem is that build_range_check depends on wrapping on signed types being defined which is not correct. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/20172] Invalid non-type template parameters not diagnosed

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 16:08 --- Subject: Bug 20172 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 16:07:39 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c gcc/testsuite

[Bug tree-optimization/22416] [4.1 Regression] 23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/1.cc fails: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:466

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22444 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22416

[Bug tree-optimization/22444] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure:23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/2.cc ICE

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 16:07 --- This looks very much related to PR 22416. -- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|

[Bug tree-optimization/22444] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure:23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/2.cc ICE

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 16:05 --- Created an attachment (id=9248) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9248&action=view) Preprocessed source cc1plus -fpreprocessed 2.ii -march=v10 -quiet -dumpbase 2.cc -auxbase-strip 2.s -g -O2 -v

[Bug tree-optimization/22444] New: [4.1 regression] testsuite failure:23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/2.cc ICE

Last known to work with: "Sat Jul 9 22:01:35 UTC 2005". Known to fail with: "Sun Jul 10 06:32:56 UTC 2005". With LAST_UPDATED: "Tue Jul 12 03:25:01 UTC 2005" I still get: Running /home/hp/combined/combined/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/normal.exp ... FAIL: 23_containers/set/explicit_instanti

[Bug bootstrap/22407] libgfortran build fails because of bad substitution

--- Additional Comments From roessner at rbg dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de 2005-07-12 16:03 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I'm a bit puzzled. Could you post the value of $PATH and the version of the > various tools listed at http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html? TIA.

[Bug fortran/22417] [4.0/4.1 Regression] gfortran preprocessing regression: nonsense warning about file left but not entered

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:50 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug bootstrap/22440] make install fails with --enable-bootstrap

-- What|Removed |Added Component|other |bootstrap http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22440

[Bug tree-optimization/22433] ICE with autovectorisation: verify_ssa failed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:35 --- It works on i686-pc-linux-gnu. -- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|x86_64-unknown-linu

[Bug libfortran/22437] Missing array intrinsics for kind=10 and kind=16

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:31 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug libfortran/22436] print *,tiny(1._10) yields asterisks

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:30 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/19699] [4.0/4.1 Regression] warning about not returning from end of a non-void function because of dead code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:28 --- *** Bug 22435 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/22435] Incorrect "may reach end of non-void function" warning

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:28 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19699 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gcov/profile/21388] gcov-io.h compilation warning

-- What|Removed |Added CC||matz at suse dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21388

[Bug c++/22431] -Weff++ warns about missing usage of const initalizer list in synthesized ctors

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:20 --- Confirmed, not a regression. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal

[Bug bootstrap/22443] Installation problem

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:18 --- > Following the guidelines, I'm using a separate OBJDIR and SRCDIR. They also recommend configuring with an absolute path on that platform: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-x-solaris2 --

[Bug middle-end/22439] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with char array: size_binop, at fold-const.c:1637

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:16 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed. Reduced testcase: Reduced testcase which fails everywhere (even on 64bit targets): char foo(__SIZE_TYPE__ n) { char c[1][n]; return c[0][0]; } == Here is the

[Bug tree-optimization/22442] [4.1 regression] scev cprop causes wrong code

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:14 --- The following patch fixes the problem, I am just testing it: Index: tree-chrec.c === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-chrec.c,v retrieving revi

[Bug bootstrap/22407] libgfortran build fails because of bad substitution

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:13 --- > Including f95? All languages (except treelang). You're the very first one who reports such kind of problems with F95 on SPARC/Solaris. > Anyway, I reconfigured (with absolute path to configure) & rebu

[Bug c/22441] ICE on redefined inline function

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:12 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21975 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/21975] [4.0 Regression] Segmentation fault while compiling ipw2100

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:12 --- *** Bug 22441 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22438] [4.1 Regression] ICE SEGV in is_gimple_variable at tree-gimple.c:239

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/21242] [4.1 Regression] wrong array copy code (ACATS c52102b c52102d)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:07 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Fixed between: > > LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 9 23:06:33 UTC 2005 > LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jul 11 22:29:49 UTC 2005 Known to be fixed before that: LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 10 00:31:54 UTC 2

[Bug c++/22443] New: Build/Install documentation error (HTML)

GCC VERSION: 3.4.3 OS Type: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 CONFIG: --prefix=/home/rmadsen/gnu/sol-2.8 --with-ld=/home/rmadsen/gnu/sol-2.8/bin/ld --with-gnu-ld --with-as=/home/rmadsen/gnu/sol-2.8/bin/as --with-gnu-as BUILD: make CFLAGS='-O' LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' \ LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2 -fno-implicit-t

[Bug c++/22430] /usr/include/c++/3.3/fstream:478: internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:1817

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 15:05 --- Can you attach the preprocessed source? -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/22442] [4.1 regression] scev cprop causes wrong code

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/22442] [4.1 regression] scev cprop causes wrong code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 14:59 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gc

[Bug tree-optimization/22442] [4.1 regression] scev cprop causes wrong code

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2005-07-12 14:58 --- Subject: Re: New: scev cprop causes wrong code > // fork from bug 22230 > // fails with-O1 > // doesn't fail with -O1 -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts > // introduced bet

[Bug bootstrap/22407] libgfortran build fails because of bad substitution

--- Additional Comments From roessner at rbg dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de 2005-07-12 14:45 --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Ok, rebuilt with "CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash; export CONFIG_SHELL". > > Did you use an absolute path to invoke configure, as strongly recommended? > FWIW >

[Bug tree-optimization/22230] [4.1 Regression] value range propagation error

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2005-07-12 14:44 --- // corrected tescase // fails with -O1 -ftree-vrp // doesn't fail with -O1 // introduced between 2005-06-15 2005-06-16 void abort (void); int main (void) { long a, i; for (i = 0; i

[Bug target/22432] Wrong code generation using MMX intrinsics on amd64

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Keywords||ssemmx, wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

  1   2   >