[Bug rtl-optimization/22239] [4.0/4.1 Regression] i-cobol.adb:482: error: unrecognizable insn

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-07-09 02:44 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] i-cobol.adb:482: error: unrecognizable insn > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9233&action=view) > file that now ICEs with latest patch. > > Co

[Bug fortran/20836] error needed

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Last reconfirmed|2005-04-09 19:00:33 |2005-07-09 01:41:10 date|

[Bug fortran/20835] error needed with EQUIVALENCE and TARGET

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Last reconfirmed|2005-04-09 17:49:09 |2005-07-09 01:40:55 date|

[Bug ada/22383] New: ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

Another one: with Ada.Task_Identification; use Ada.Task_Identification; with Unchecked_Conversion; package body a is pragma Warnings (Off); function To_Tid is new Unchecked_Conversion (System.Address, Ada.Task_Identification.Task_Id); function To_Task_Id (Id : System.Address)

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22383 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug rtl-optimization/22239] [4.0/4.1 Regression] i-cobol.adb:482: error: unrecognizable insn

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-07-09 00:41 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] i-cobol.adb:482: error: unrecognizable insn > Compile the this file with -O2 -g on an arm-elf cross Looks like a target, or possibly a different loop bug to me:

[Bug target/22382] cris-axis-linux-gnu cross: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/common.f90 -O2 host difference?

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |200

[Bug target/22382] New: cris-axis-linux-gnu cross: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/common.f90 -O2 host difference?

With LAST_UPDATED "Thu Jun 30 14:21:26 UTC 2005", gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/common.f90 fails: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/common.f90 execution, -O1 FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/common.f90 execution, -O2 FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/common.f90 execution, -O2

[Bug ada/22381] Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

-- What|Removed |Added CC||bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22381

[Bug fortran/18022] problem with structure and calling a function

-- What|Removed |Added CC||tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18022

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22381 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug ada/22381] New: Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

Take the following reduced testcase: package body GNAT.Sockets is function To_Inet_Addr return Inet_Addr_Type is Result : Inet_Addr_Type; begin return Result; end To_Inet_Addr; end GNAT.Sockets; package GNAT.Sockets is type Family_Type is (Family_Inet, Family_Inet6); t

[Bug rtl-optimization/22239] [4.0/4.1 Regression] i-cobol.adb:482: error: unrecognizable insn

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 23:02 --- Created an attachment (id=9233) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9233&action=view) file that now ICEs with latest patch. Compile the this file with -O2 -g on an arm-elf cross -- http

[Bug rtl-optimization/22239] [4.0/4.1 Regression] i-cobol.adb:482: error: unrecognizable insn

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 23:00 --- The latest patch causes a bootstrap failure on arm-elf and arm-netbsdelf. I'll attach a file momentarily. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22239

[Bug middle-end/22380] [4.1 Regression] stack usage of g++.dg/opt/inline4.C increased (GC with blocks)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 22:46 --- Confirmed, the stack is overflowing when doing GC, marking the BLOCKs. This test regressed when the early inliner came in. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/22380] New: [4.1 Regression] stack usage of g++.dg/opt/inline4.C increased

On hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, on mainline between 20050627 and 20050630 both at 07:00 UTC, the failure FAIL: g++.dg/opt/inline4.C (test for excess errors) appeared, the error being compile-time stack overflow. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-06/msg00121.html shows the same failure appearin

[Bug middle-end/22379] [4.1 Regression] ICE in cgraph_early_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:990

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:45 --- Confirmed, since this was only a foward from the email. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/22379] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE in cgraph_early_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:990

Forwarded from: void __add_entropy_words(void); void __wake_up(void); void SHATransform(void); static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void add_entropy_words(void){} void extract_entropy(void); static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void

[Bug fortran/21257] [4.0 only] Duplicate use of construct name

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:26 --- Back ported to 4.0 -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESO

[Bug fortran/19926] [4.0 only] Incorrect rank with PARAMETER and array element.

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:26 --- Back ported to 4.0 -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESO

[Bug fortran/17792] [4.0 only] deallocate does not return stat

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:25 --- Back port to 4.0 -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLV

[Bug fortran/19926] [4.0 only] Incorrect rank with PARAMETER and array element.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:21 --- Subject: Bug 19926 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 21:21:38 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Change

[Bug fortran/17792] [4.0 only] deallocate does not return stat

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:21 --- Subject: Bug 17792 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 21:21:38 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Change

[Bug fortran/21257] [4.0 only] Duplicate use of construct name

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:21 --- Subject: Bug 21257 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 21:21:38 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Change

[Bug fortran/21375] Rising run-time errors at DEALLOCATE with STAT clause

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:21 --- Subject: Bug 21375 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 21:21:38 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Change

[Bug fortran/17792] [4.0 only] deallocate does not return stat

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:19 --- Subject: Bug 17792 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 21:19:28 Modified files: gcc/fortran: Change

[Bug fortran/19926] [4.0 only] Incorrect rank with PARAMETER and array element.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:19 --- Subject: Bug 19926 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 21:19:28 Modified files: gcc/fortran: Change

[Bug fortran/21257] [4.0 only] Duplicate use of construct name

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:19 --- Subject: Bug 21257 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 21:19:28 Modified files: gcc/fortran: Change

[Bug fortran/21375] Rising run-time errors at DEALLOCATE with STAT clause

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:19 --- Subject: Bug 21375 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 21:19:28 Modified files: gcc/fortran: Change

[Bug libfortran/21593] FAIL: gfortran.dg/dev_null.f90

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 21:01 --- I've committed FX's mainline change to dev_null.f90 that causes this test program to only be compiled on linux and solaris to the 4.0 branch. Andrew, is this sufficient to close this PR? The behavior of ftru

[Bug tree-optimization/21356] [4.1 Regression] Dominance error after aggressive dead code elimination (cd_dce)

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|REOPENED

[Bug tree-optimization/21356] [4.1 Regression] Dominance error after aggressive dead code elimination (cd_dce)

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 20:53 --- The patch for this PR causes bootstrap failures after enabling the new points-to solver. I will try to find another solution for this problem. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/22361] Fails to identify

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-08 20:48 --- Yes, they were. Fixed now. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22361

[Bug ada/22328] Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-

Compiler error from libio.h & stdio.h

Please help, I cant figure out why there would be a parse error from a standard library.. Here is the log: g++ -c -c -Wall -I. -c -o bkos.o bkos.cpp In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:65, from bkos.cpp:25: /usr/include/libio.h:457: type specifier omitted for parameter

[Bug c++/22378] [regression 4.0.1 -> 4.0.0,3.4.x] Friend decl ceases to declare class

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 19:53 --- The code is in fact invalid. friend should not inject the class at all. The reason why we did not have a deprecated period or allow it with -fpermissive is because we actually got a bug report about acce

[Bug c++/22378] New: [regression 4.0.1 -> 4.0.0,3.4.x] Friend decl ceases to declare class

[EMAIL PROTECTED] misc]$ cat -n decl_friend_class.cpp 1 2 #ifdef DD 3 class d; 4 #endif 5 6 class c 7 { 8friend class d; 9d* p; 10 }; 11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] misc]$ /usr/local/gcc/gcc-4.0.0/bin/g++ -c -W -Wall decl_friend_class.cpp [E

[Bug middle-end/17961] ICE for operation on small vector with altivec enabled

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 19:34 --- Subject: Bug 17961 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 19:34:41 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/22329] VRP produces mis-matched (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 19:26 --- Subject: Bug 22329 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 19:26:17 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa-propagate.c

[Bug tree-optimization/22329] VRP produces mis-matched (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 19:25 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- Bug 22368 depends on bug 22329, which changed state. Bug 22329 Summary: VRP produces mis-matched (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22329 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug tree-optimization/22335] DOM creates mis-matched types

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 19:12 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug regression/20139] [4.0/4.1 regression] cris-elf testsuite: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020720-1.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 19:12 --- Subject: Bug 20139 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 19:11:55 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfg.c tree-optimize.c

[Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22377 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12725

[Bug java/22377] New: BC compilation fails to detect abstract instantiation

Suppose you have bytecode that tries to instantiate an abstract class. The compiler accepts this (as it ought to), but then at runtime the instantiation succeeds. Instead it should throw InstantiationException (This problem applies to interfaces as well.) The simplest way to fix this would be to

[Bug c++/22361] Fails to identify

--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-07-08 18:49 --- Er - aren't the "known to fail" and "known to work" reversed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22361

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:49 --- Just checked in a fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22360

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:49 --- Subject: Bug 22360 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 18:49:07 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree.c Log message:

[Bug tree-optimization/22335] DOM creates mis-matched types

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:43 --- Another testcase for a different related problem but still in DOM: void abort(void) __attribute__((__noreturn__)); typedef struct { int container; } edge_iterator; struct ls_expr { int index; int store

[Bug tree-optimization/22329] VRP produces mis-matched (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:41 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/21766] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-cygwin

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:40 --- (In reply to comment #22) > Is the just released 4.0.1 on another branch? is that working? Yes and yes (well bootstrap is). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21766

[Bug middle-end/21766] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-cygwin

--- Additional Comments From dims at yahoo dot com 2005-07-08 18:39 --- Is the just released 4.0.1 on another branch? is that working? -- dims -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21766

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

-- What|Removed |Added Known to work|3.3.3 4.1.0 |3.3.3 4.1.0 4.0.2 Target Milestone|4.0.2 |3.4.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:35 --- Patch applied to gcc-4.0 and gcc-3.4 branches. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:33 --- Subject: Bug 22083 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 18:33:45 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:28 --- Subject: Bug 22083 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 18:28:25 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/18316] Missed IV optimization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:19 --- We still have either a ra issue (or ivopts issue which our current ra cannot resolve). On the tree level we get the following difference. strength_test2: :; *(data + (int *) ((unsigned int) *pretmp.9 * 4)

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- Bug 22368 depends on bug 22356, which changed state. Bug 22356 Summary: mis-match types in cplxlower http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22356 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/22356] mis-match types in cplxlower

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:05 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/22356] mis-match types in cplxlower

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:05 --- Subject: Bug 22356 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 18:05:12 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-complex.c gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/22356] mis-match types in cplxlower

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 17:23 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/22340] Ada build fails with --enable-bootsrap

--- Additional Comments From v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2005-07-08 17:19 --- The "fix" doesn't fix it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22340

[Bug c++/22369] C++ produces mis-matched types with pointers to member functions

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 16:30 --- Oh, I copied the wrong testcase. Anyways here is the testcase which fails: struct A { void f() { } }; struct B: public A { }; struct C: public A { }; struct D : public B, public C { }; typedef void (C::*cp)

[Bug middle-end/22376] New: PTA is slow on a silly unrealistic test case

Compile this at -O1, and you get tree PTA : 12.25 (36%) usr 0.08 ( 5%) sys 12.35 (35%) wall 44137 kB (16%) ggc === int *a; #define C1(A) \ a[A##1] = A; a[A##2] = A; a[A##3] = A; a[A##4] = A; a[A##5

[Bug tree-optimization/22375] New: DOM (or fold_builtins) creates mis-matched types

Take the following fortran code: ! { dg-do run } ! Option passed to avoid excess errors from obsolete warning ! { dg-options "-w" } ! PR18827 integer i,j common /foo/ i,j assign 1000 to j j = 5 goto j 1000 continue end We get errors as __builtin_expect is foldd

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22375 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug c++/22374] New: C++ front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR (dynamic_cast)

Testcase: struct B { virtual int f() { } } ob; struct D : public B { virtual int f() { } } od; main() { B *b = &ob; D *c = &dynamic_cast(*b); } Reduced from g++.old-deja/g++.mike/dyncast2.C Patch in PR 22368 is used to find this. -- Summary: C++ front-end produces mis-match

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22374 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22373 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug tree-optimization/22373] New: loop linear produces type mis-match

Testcase: double u[1782225]; int foo(int N, int *res) { unsigned int i, j; double sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { for (j = 0; j < N; j++) { sum = sum + u[i + 1335 * j]; } } *res = sum + N; } Patch in PR 22368 finds

[Bug tree-optimization/22372] New: Vectorizer produces mis-match types

Testcase: void f(int *); int main () { int i; char ia[16]; char ic[16] = {0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36,39,42,45}; char ib[16] = {0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36,39,42,45}; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) ia[i] = ib[i] + ic[i]; f(ia); return 0; } See PR 22368 for the patch wh

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22372 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug target/20126] [3.4 Regression] Inlined memcmp makes one argument null on entry

--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:48 --- (In reply to comment #51) > I don't know whether I just forgot about it, or figured we'd be better off > leaving it as it was for a bit longer, so as to expose more cases we could > handle especially. Well

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22371 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug c/22371] New: C front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR

Reduced from gcc.dg/debug/redecl-2.c: typedef int IA[]; typedef int A5[5]; int array10[10]; A5 *ap; void f (void) { int ap; { extern IA *ap; ap = &array10; } } See PR 22368 for the patch which catches this. -- Summary: C front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR

[Bug ada/22328] Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #9230|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| Attachment #9230 is|0 |1

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22370 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug middle-end/22370] New: Vec lower produces mis-match types

Testcase: typedef short __attribute__((vector_size (16))) vecint; vecint i; vecint j; vecint k; int main () { k = i ^ j; } See PR 22368 for the patch which finds this. -- Summary: Vec lower produces mis-match types Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status

[Bug ada/22328] Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From bosch at adacore dot com 2005-07-08 15:39 --- Subject: Re: Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR Something like the attached patch (untested) should work. I've got child duty today, so won't be able to test this until at least tonight

[Bug c++/22369] New: C++ produces mis-matched types with pointers to member functions

Testcase: struct A { void f() { } }; struct B: public A { }; typedef void (B::*bp)(); int main() { bp b = &A::f; } -- Summary: C++ produces mis-matched types with pointers to member functions Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status:

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22369 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-

[Bug middle-end/22366] [meta-bug] issues holding up the removal of loop.c

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:30 --- Bug 19581 is about store motion that only loop.c currently does. Bug 19078 reports on a few tuning issues with BIV splitting in the unroller. Bug 11707 is about the lack of a constant propagation pass a

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22356 BugsThisDependsOn||22358 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22329 BugsThisDependsOn||22335 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug ada/22328] Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||22368 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22328

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22328 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug other/22368] New: [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

This is a meta bug for all of the mis-match type bugs in GCC. -- Summary: [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compone

[Bug target/22085] [4.1 Regression] error with -fpreprocessed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:20 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/22366] [meta-bug] issues holding up the removal of loop.c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:15 --- [[old loop optimizer]] -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/22367] constraints on '&' not fully implemented

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:08 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:07 --- This also blocks the tree combiner even though I don't see the regression on ppc-darwin. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:06 --- Confirmed, this is a latent bug in 4.0.0. The code was not in 3.4.0 so this is 4.0.0 regression. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/22340] Ada build fails with --enable-bootsrap

--- Additional Comments From v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2005-07-08 15:02 --- I have the same problem on FreeBSD. The following patch seems to fix (bootstrap still in progess). Index: Makefile.in === RCS file: /cvs/

[Bug c++/22363] Problems with friend function injection and destructor

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-08 14:58 --- I don't quite know what to say, whether this is a bug or not. Take this reduced snippet: --- template struct S { friend void foo(T *); }; template void bar() { foo((T*)0); }

[Bug target/21323] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||22366 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21323

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22367 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16989

[Bug c/22367] New: constraints on '&' not fully implemented

extern void v; void f(void) { &v; } is invalid in both C90 and C99: lvalues cannot have type void, although they can have types const void or volatile void, and none of the other possibilities for operands on '&' are met. However, GCC fails to diagnose this code. extern void *p; void f(void) { &

[Bug fortran/22359] fseek intrinsic appears to be unimplemented

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:58 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||19292

[Bug c/16620] [meta-bug] C90 conformance bugs

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22367 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16620

  1   2   >