[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ abi_check

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 06:48 --- Subject: Bug 22111 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-20 06:48:28 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog Makefile.in acinclude.m4 co

[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ abi_check

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 06:39 --- Ugh. Well, that's that way it used to work apparently now it's different. Here, this gets to the same place, and removes some misleading bits in the current configury. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ abi_check

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 06:39 --- Ugh. Well, that's that way it used to work apparently now it's different. Here, this gets to the same place, and removes some misleading bits in the current configury. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug libstdc++/22109] [4.0 Regression] /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: BFD 2.16.91 20050612 internal error

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-20 06:23 --- It is a linker bug. I posted a patch for ia32/x86_64: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00500.html -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/5645] gcc warns that pure virtual class not explicitly initialized

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|2004-04-26 19:41:58 |2005-06-20 04:06:31 date|

[Bug c++/9381] attribute on member function pointer have no effect

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 04:05 --- I do get a warning now, saying this attribute only applies to function pointers. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/13440] attributes lost in explicit template specializations

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 04:03 --- Fixed in 3.4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOL

[Bug ada/22039] special functions for string concat of 3/4/5 args doc'ed to concat two

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:53 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/21338] gcc with -c -gnatc and -gnatt generates Stack Overflow

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:48 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/20974] ACATS c250002 gnatchop cannot create file with special character on darwin

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/21490] Illegal program not detected, RM 3.6(11)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:43 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/20921] Unable to access components of task access constraint

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:42 --- Fixed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/21489] Wrong code generated for legal program, RM 6.4.1(13), 9.5.1(3), 9.5.3(8)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:39 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/19879] Ada shared libraries should go in libdir

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:32 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug ada/19385] ACATS c974012 fails at runtime on ppc-linux/darwin without ZCX

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|ACATS c974012 fails at |ACATS c974012 fails at |runtime on ppc-linux/darwin |runtime on ppc-linux/darwin

[Bug c/20319] -fkeep-static-consts with -O asserted doesn't keep consts

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20319

[Bug c++/16057] Error message omits overload candidate

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:01 --- *** Bug 20576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16057

[Bug c++/20576] poor diagnostic

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 03:01 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16057 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/20525] 4.1 make install fails trying to install ungenerated fixproto & fix-header dirs.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 02:56 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/20525] 4.1 make install fails trying to install ungenerated fixproto & fix-header dirs.

--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-06-20 02:44 --- Subject: Re: 4.1 make install fails trying to install ungenerated fixproto & fix-header dirs. please mark as apparently fixed, the problem no longer seems to exist. > From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[E

[Bug libstdc++/15448] libstdc++ does not rebuild PCH

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 02:35 --- Even though libstdc++ does not rebuild the PCH, we do check to make sure that the same cc1plus is used now via a checksum. So Paul do you think this could be closed or at least lower the severity? --

[Bug ada/19526] Windows errorcodes wrong in Ada when tasking

-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet||i686-pc-mingw32 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19526

[Bug other/20525] 4.1 make install fails trying to install ungenerated fixproto & fix-header dirs.

-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0 | GCC host triplet|powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0 | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20525

[Bug libstdc++/22109] [4.0 Regression] /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: BFD 2.16.91 20050612 internal error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 00:12 --- See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-06/msg00844.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-06/msg00842.html With those two, this looks like not like a GCC bug at all. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug libstdc++/22109] [4.0 Regression] /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: BFD 2.16.91 20050612 internal error

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-20 00:09 --- It looks like a gcc bug. I got similar failures on both ia32 and x86_64: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1025 Starting program: /export/home/hjl/bugs/gcc/got/ld -shared -o foo.so compatibility.o string

[Bug middle-end/21985] [4.0 Regression] miscompiled or wrong code snippet?

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-20 00:03 --- (In reply to comment #11) > Regarding comment #10, I can confirm that the test fails on > mmix-knuth-mmixware > too (a 64-bit target), ever since it was committed; but not on cris-elf, > cris-axis-linux-gnu

[Bug target/15425] 128-bit division do not work

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 23:42 --- Closing as fixed for 3.4.0 as 3.3.x branch is no longer maintained. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/15425] 128-bit division do not work

--- Additional Comments From hebisch at math dot uni dot wroc dot pl 2005-06-19 23:39 --- Works fine with gcc-3.4.4 or gcc-4.0.0. IIRC gcc-3.4.0 also worked. gcc-3.3.6 still fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15425

[Bug tree-optimization/22100] [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in tree_verify_flow_info

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 23:16 --- Patch was posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21076] [4.1 Regression] ACATs ICE cxh1001 at tree-vrp.c:124

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 23:15 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I think I fixed the bug which removed the non useless casts. Diego wasn't > there a workaround in VRP > for this bug? I should say the following patch fixed the removing of the

[Bug libgcj/13708] static java program crashes at startup, UTF-8 environment

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 23:05 --- *** Bug 22094 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/22094] gcj compiled executable runtime crash

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 23:05 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Subject: gcj compiled executable runtime crash > > how do I solve this problem? > ie, how do I link these symbols runtime? Figure out how to build libgcj as a .dll. *** This b

[Bug libgcj/13708] static java program crashes at startup, UTF-8 environment

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 23:04 --- Static linking can never work correctly with libjava/libgcj/gcj. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/22093] Unaligned access to HI values causes unrecognizable insn error

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22093

[Bug libgcj/22090] Attempt to compile java1.5 classes with gcj

-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|Linux 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 #1 | |Wed Feb 9 23:06:42 EST 2005 | |i686 i686 | GCC target

[Bug target/15425] 128-bit division do not work

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 22:58 --- Does this worh with 3.4.x or 4.0.x? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15425

[Bug middle-end/19795] GCC needs mechanism to expose compile-time declared reserved global registers to asm programs.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 22:57 --- I don't understand what you want here, a preprocessed define when -ffixed-reg-* is supplied. Well that is hard really and not very useful as usually asm is not preprocessed. I am closing this as "will no

[Bug c/19994] warn on parameter name mismatch

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 22:55 --- Hmm, as JSM replied, this is not something which is useful for a lot of code and would cause too many false warnings so closing as "won't fix". -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libfortran/22124] eoshift with dim=2 fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 22:50 --- Confirmed, I think we are going over the bounds of the array but I could be wrong. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/22028] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE after invalid struct declaration

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 20:16 --- Another testcase: void foo() { struct { struct a _a; } c; } >From the dup bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22028

[Bug middle-end/22028] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE after invalid struct declaration

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 20:15 --- *** Bug 22125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/22125] ICE on invalid code.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 20:15 --- Even though PR 22028 has a different testcase this is the same bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22028 *** -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug other/22125] New: ICE on invalid code.

x27; (error_mark) in gimplify_type_sizes, at gimplify.c:4491 gcc version 4.1.0 20050619 -- Summary: ICE on invalid code. Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other

[Bug testsuite/22123] gcc.dg/fold-mod-1.c scan-tree-dump a % 4294967288 fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 19:57 --- Assigning to James as he caused it and requested to be assigned this bug so he does not forget. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ ABI

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 19:57 --- Mine. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot gn

[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ ABI

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 19:53 --- This isn't a critical error. I think the warning is pretty clear. However, it is true that without symbol versioning, 'make check-abi' is pretty useless. The attached patch corrects this. -benjamin --

[Bug libfortran/22124] New: eoshift with dim=2 fails

/ig25 --enable-languages=c,f95 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.1.0 20050619 (experimental) -- Summary: eoshift with dim=2 fails Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

[Bug target/21812] libgcc could use some ia32/x86_64 specific optimizations

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 19:03 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Could you clarify what you meant by that? Should I file another bug for AMD64? some targets use libgcc1.asm/s I think arm and avr (and a couple other ones too). well AMD64 is just

[Bug target/21812] libgcc could use some i686 specific optimizations

--- Additional Comments From nmiell at comcast dot net 2005-06-19 18:57 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed, some targets already have this. I am just making this for ia32. Could you clarify what you meant by that? Should I file another bug for AMD64? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug testsuite/22123] gcc.dg/fold-mod-1.c scan-tree-dump a % 4294967288 fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 18:41 --- I think this is related to the previous PR 22056. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22123

[Bug fortran/21931] problem with fugly-logint flag and evaluating if statements

--- Additional Comments From mark_l_hansen at yahoo dot com 2005-06-19 18:39 --- Correct I am using version 3.4.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931

[Bug testsuite/22123] New: gcc.dg/fold-mod-1.c scan-tree-dump a % 4294967288 fails

FAIL: gcc.dg/fold-mod-1.c scan-tree-dump a % 4294967288 has appeared on mainline on 20050619 on i686-pc-linux-gnu and hppa2.0w-hpux. This is a new testcase. -- Summary: gcc.dg/fold-mod-1.c scan-tree-dump a % 4294967288 fails Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0

[Bug c++/22115] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure: g++.dg/conversion/simd2.C

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 17:23 --- Subject: Bug 22115 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-19 17:23:33 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/g++.

[Bug c++/22115] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure: g++.dg/conversion/simd2.C

--- Additional Comments From aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 17:22 --- Fixed with patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg01630.html -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/22115] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure: g++.dg/conversion/simd2.C

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/22100] [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in tree_verify_flow_info

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 17:02 --- See PR 22122 for C testcase and with -ftree-vectorize. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22100

[Bug tree-optimization/22100] [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in tree_verify_flow_info

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 17:01 --- *** Bug 22122 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22122] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize ICE get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:819

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 17:01 --- Yes this is just not clearing bb->aux so this is a dup of bug 22100. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22100 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22100] [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in tree_verify_flow_info

--- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-06-19 16:58 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in tree_verify_flow_info Hi, this is patch I am testing... 2005-06-19 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * cfgloop.h (DLTHE_RECORD_COPY_NUMBER): New fla

[Bug tree-optimization/22122] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize ICE get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:819

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 16:57 --- Confirmed, I think this is just another case of not clearing bb->aux. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/22122] -ftree-vectorize ICE get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:819

--- Additional Comments From marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2005-06-19 16:52 --- Created an attachment (id=9114) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9114&action=view) thread.i gcc -O2 -ftree-vectorize thread.i -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22122

[Bug middle-end/22122] New: -ftree-vectorize ICE get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:819

sion 4.1.0 20050619 (experimental) -- Summary: -ftree-vectorize ICE get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:819 Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig

[Bug c++/22121] Suspicious "may be used uninitialized" warning.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 16:41 --- This is invalid, the reduced testcase comes down to the following testcase: bool error(); bool hh(int i); int siz(); static inline bool parse(int &V) { for(int i = 0 ; i< siz(); i++) { if (hh(i))

[Bug preprocessor/22042] stringification BUG

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.0.4 3.2.3 3.3.3 3.3.6 ||3.4.4 4.0.0 Known to work|

[Bug ada/18859] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE c37305a at -O0: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3839

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-19 16:05 --- Ooops, didn't check 4.0, leave at open there -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug ada/18859] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE c37305a at -O0: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3839

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-19 16:04 --- PASS on x86 and x86_64-linux with 4.1 20050619, assuming it will work also on ia64 . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/15616] [4.0 Regression] Linking error on legal program using generic package

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-19 15:59 --- With mainline 4.1 20050619, invalid code is flagged: test_246184.adb:9:17: not fully conformant with declaration at line 5 test_246184.adb:9:17: type of "x" does not match -- What

[Bug c++/22121] Suspicious "may be used uninitialized" warning.

--- Additional Comments From rspencer at x10sys dot com 2005-06-19 15:57 --- Created an attachment (id=9112) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9112&action=view) Pre-processed compiler input This file contains the pre-processed input to the compiler from a source file i

[Bug c++/22121] New: Suspicious "may be used uninitialized" warning.

Andrew Pinskia asked me to file this. Warning message: CommandLine.h: In member function 'bool llvm::cl::opthttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22121

[Bug tree-optimization/21076] [4.1 Regression] ACATs ICE cxh1001 at tree-vrp.c:124

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-19 15:53 --- Likely workaround'ed by the following commit: 2005-05-02 Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * tree-vrp.c (set_value_range_to_nonnull): Declare inline. (set_value_range_to_null): Likewise.

[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ ABI

--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-06-19 15:33 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Why, libstdc++ and the new compiler still works, you just don't get symbol >versioning at all. I know do not get symbol versioning but what is causing the testsuite then? --

[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ ABI

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 15:29 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I think it may be a good idea to abort build compared to building it and > generating a testsuite failure. Why, libstdc++ and the new compiler still works, you just don't get symb

[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ ABI

--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-06-19 15:27 --- Looking through my build log it shows: configure: WARNING: === Linker version 21500 is too old for configure: WARNING: === full symbol versioning support in this release of GCC. configure: WARNING: === Y

[Bug tree-optimization/21076] [4.1 Regression] ACATs ICE cxh1001 at tree-vrp.c:124

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 15:26 --- I think I fixed the bug which removed the non useless casts. Diego wasn't there a workaround in VRP for this bug? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21076

[Bug libstdc++/22109] [4.0 Regression] /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: BFD 2.16.91 20050612 internal error

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 15:08 --- Dave, does the 2.15 binutils build complete without error? (And testresults are correct?) I have not tried this version of binutils. For what it's worth (not much) %ld --version GNU ld version 2.16.1 works

[Bug c++/16245] Arrays decay too quickly

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 15:05 --- Fixed in 4.0.0 and above. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/19780] Floating point computation far slower for -mfpmath=sse

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19780

[Bug target/19653] x87 reg allocated for constants for -mfpmath=sse

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:58 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c/19820] How to get results from a V2SF ?

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19820

[Bug target/19780] Floating point computation far slower for -mfpmath=sse

-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | Keywords||missed-optim

[Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:55 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug target/19593] ICE at build_def_use, at regrename.c:763

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:54 --- Does this work with 3.4.4? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19593

[Bug middle-end/18956] [3.4 only] [hppa] 'bus error' at runtime while passing a special struct to a C++ member function

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:53 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/18617] missed volatile variable optimizations

-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|ppc | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18617

[Bug java/19325] Invoking gcj -C on a list of source files consumes insane amount of memory

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug bootstrap/17777] AIX bootstrap comparison failure with xlc6

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:51 --- Does this work now? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1

[Bug target/19204] [m68k] pea can force reloads that cause inefficient code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:49 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/19206] [cc0] insn-output.c should optimize sign-tests better

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:48 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/19202] [cc0] Potential problem with cc_status.value2 (from old PROBLEMS)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:48 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug target/17306] function_vector attribute in H8300H/H8S

-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC target triplet|h8300-unknown-elf |h8300-elf

[Bug target/17280] -mrelax and -O cause .uses directives in assembler to refer to non-existent local labels

-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu | GCC target triplet|sh-unknown-elf |sh-elf htt

[Bug libf2c/18874] ? in namelist read leads to I/O recursion

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:45 --- This works with me in 3.4.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18874

[Bug target/18830] bootstrap of a biarch compiler fails in libstdc++.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:41 --- Does this work in the real release of 4.0.0? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18830

[Bug c/18814] Incorrect reinitialization of compound literal

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:40 --- Suspending based on comment #9. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c/18814] Incorrect reinitialization of compound literal

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:40 --- Confirmed, but ... -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NE

[Bug target/18748] first instruction in each procedure isn't unwindable

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:39 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug libstdc++/22111] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libstdc++ ABI

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:39 --- The log file indicates that symbol versioning is turned off. This is most probably due to an old version of binutils. You should see this when configuring libstdc++: configure: versioning on shared library s

[Bug c++/21835] compilation of CRTP fails if the ABC is after template

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:32 --- Fixed on the mainline (for 4.1.0), since this is not a regression, I am closing as fixed. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/12333] [DR 272] Explicit call to MyClass::~MyClass() not allowed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:27 --- *** Bug 19243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12333

[Bug c++/19243] Misleading error message for ill-formed explicit destructor invocation

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:27 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12333 *** -- What|Removed |Added

  1   2   >