[Bug fortran/21375] Rising run-time errors at DEALLOCATE with STAT clause

--- Additional Comments From naf at naf dot net dot ru 2005-05-04 05:58 --- Tested with GNU F95 version 4.1.0 20050502 (experimental) (i386-linux) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21375

[Bug fortran/21375] Rising run-time errors at DEALLOCATE with STAT clause

--- Additional Comments From naf at naf dot net dot ru 2005-05-04 05:57 --- Created an attachment (id=8815) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8815&action=view) Sample code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21375

[Bug fortran/21375] New: Rising run-time errors at DEALLOCATE with STAT clause

When errors happens in DEALLOCATE with STAT the run-time error rises instead setting up STAT variable. For example, following code: - PROGRAM MAIN INTEGER, POINTER :: foo INTEGER IERR DEALLOCATE(foo,STAT=IERR) WRITE (*,*) IERR END PROGRAM -

[Bug rtl-optimization/10588] [PPC] i==0||j==0 should use cntlzw and srawi

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 04:28 --- I have not looked at this for a long time now. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|pin

[Bug java/20309] gcjh needs a -force option

--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-04 02:32 --- Fixed on mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLV

[Bug middle-end/8081] ICE with variably sized types and nested functions

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 02:30 --- I also filed PR 21374 for a tree dumping ICE. -- What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005

[Bug tree-optimization/21374] New: ICE in declare_return_variable, at tree-inline.c:906

This is a split off of PR8081 but is a different problem but this time with the tree dumper (I think), compile the following at -O2 -fdump-tree-all: int main (int argc, char **argv) { int size = 10; int i; typedef struct { char val[size]; } block; block b; block retframe_block

[Bug bootstrap/21365] libiberty/regex.c:49:25: error: sys/types.h: No such file or directory

--- Additional Comments From yuri_you2003 at yahoo dot com 2005-05-04 02:29 --- Subject: Re: libiberty/regex.c:49:25: error: sys/types.h: No such file or directory What is a combined build? --- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Additional Comments

[Bug tree-optimization/17046] An unused array is not optimized away.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 02:16 --- Fixed for 4.1.0, most likely by the patches by Jan Honza. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/14841] [tree-ssa] const_array[CST] is not folded

-- Bug 14841 depends on bug 17046, which changed state. Bug 17046 Summary: An unused array is not optimized away. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17046 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug tree-optimization/15618] Missed bool optimization

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:52 --- Subject: Bug 15618 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-04 01:52:07 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c gcc/t

[Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools

-- Bug 18908 depends on bug 15618, which changed state. Bug 15618 Summary: Missed bool optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15618 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/15017] [tree-ssa] compare (equal) with casts are not removed

-- Bug 15017 depends on bug 15618, which changed state. Bug 15618 Summary: Missed bool optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15618 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/15826] don't use "if" to extract a single bit bit-field.

-- Bug 15826 depends on bug 15618, which changed state. Bug 15618 Summary: Missed bool optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15618 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

-- Bug 19987 depends on bug 15618, which changed state. Bug 15618 Summary: Missed bool optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15618 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/15618] Missed bool optimization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:52 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/14442] [tree-ssa] missed sib if conversion optimization on the tree level

-- Bug 14442 depends on bug 15618, which changed state. Bug 15618 Summary: Missed bool optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15618 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/19719] missed optimization on boolean operation with boolean arguments

-- Bug 19719 depends on bug 15618, which changed state. Bug 15618 Summary: Missed bool optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15618 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug java/20309] gcjh needs a -force option

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:46 --- Subject: Bug 20309 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-04 01:46:42 Modified files: gcc/java : ChangeLog Make-lang.in config-lang.in

[Bug middle-end/21318] [4.1 Regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21318

[Bug middle-end/21318] [4.1 Regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:39 --- Fixed, I assume. Reopen if not. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/21318] [4.1 Regression] ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:38 --- Subject: Bug 21318 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-04 01:38:14 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog function.c Log message:

[Bug bootstrap/21365] libiberty/regex.c:49:25: error: sys/types.h: No such file or directory

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:27 --- (In reply to comment #2) Oh you need to do a combine build. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21365

[Bug middle-end/21360] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] wrong result of 'if' statement with comparing of floating point with gcc.

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21360

[Bug target/21316] [3.4 Regression] pointer lookup cache misses more frequent

--- Additional Comments From kpmassey at gmail dot com 2005-05-04 01:20 --- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] pointer lookup cache misses more frequent Actually, no. Gentoo doesn't yet have 4.0.0 in portage, and being a novice, I am reluctant to build myself. On 4 May 2005 01:16:33 -

[Bug target/21316] [3.4 Regression] pointer lookup cache misses more frequent

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:16 --- I could not reproduce this on a pentium4. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21316

[Bug rtl-optimization/16967] Iterating gcse.c CPROP and PRE does not reach a fixed point

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:16 --- PRE should notice the value is AVAIL in the block it's placing it in, so it shouldn't end up in the insert bitmap. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16967

Re: Gcc 4.0.0 on NCR

Bruzzone Mirko wrote: make: fatal error: don't know how to make ./../include/ansidecl.h (bu42). *** Error code 1 (bu21) Are you building in the srcdir or a separate objdir? Building in the srcdir is supposed to work, but is known to be broken in gcc-4.0.0. So you must build in a separate objdir

[Bug ada/20270] [4.1 Regression] Link error: unsatisfied symbols

-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|2005-03-30 10:00:18 |2005-05-04 01:05:07 date|

[Bug other/21328] bogus permissions on files in CVS

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-05-04 00:57 --- Fixed in the CVS repository. Should now be fixed for people who check out a fresh working directory. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/21316] [3.4 Regression] pointer lookup cache misses more frequent

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-04 00:16 --- Can you try with 4.0.0? -- What|Removed |Added Summary|pointer lookup cache misses

[Bug libstdc++/21371] Segmentation violation for repeated calls of destrictor for STL container

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-04 00:08 --- Both. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21371

[Bug libgcj/8995] race cases in interpreter

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 23:17 --- FWIW that patch has long since gone missing :-( Perhaps this problem can most easily be solved using the new __sync built-ins. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8995

[Bug tree-optimization/20742] [4.0 Regression] Hang in tree_ssa_iv_optimize_loop

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 23:05 --- Subject: Bug 20742 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-rhl-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 23:05:32 Modified files: gcc: Ch

[Bug middle-end/21285] gij fails to handle NullPointerException exception

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-03 23:03 --- Ok, somehow generic exception handler is missed on linux alpha. At this point I don't undestand how and leave it for professionals. Just check the same test on: gij (GNU libgcj) version 3.4.3 20050227 (Red Hat 3.4.3-22

[Bug target/21098] .note.GNU-stack emitted

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 23:03 --- Subject: Bug 21098 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-rhl-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 23:02:54 Modified files: gcc: Ch

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:48 --- I checked in the fix to the trunk, the 4.0 branch, and Classpath. Thanks for the clear test case and patch. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:47 --- Subject: Bug 21372 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 22:47:13 Modified files: libjava: Change

[Bug c++/14179] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers

--- Additional Comments From debora dot j dot estey at lmco dot com 2005-05-03 22:44 --- any word on this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179

[Bug libstdc++/21371] Segmentation violation for repeated calls of destrictor for STL container

--- Additional Comments From john dot e dot bussoletti at boeing dot com 2005-05-03 22:39 --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is undefined so a seg fault is okay. Which part is undefined, the invocation of member functions of an object for which a destructor has been called (this part

[Bug ada/20270] [4.1 Regression] Link error: unsatisfied symbols

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-05-03 22:39 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Link error: unsatisfied symbols > --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 > 01:33 --- > I'm waiting for feedback here; because

[Bug libfortran/20930] [4.0/4.1 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-05-03 22:39 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 > 18:24 --- > (In reply to comment #7) >

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:38 --- Subject: Bug 21372 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 22:38:17 Modified files: libjava: ChangeLog libjava/java/nio/c

[Bug other/21328] bogus permissions on files in CVS

-- What|Removed |Added CC||overseers at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

[Bug libstdc++/21371] Segmentation violation for repeated calls of destrictor for STL container

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:34 --- This is undefined so a seg fault is okay. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/21265] [4.0/4.1 regression] GCC fails to optimize tail call to memset

gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: 20050503-1.c Log message: PR middle-end/21265 * expr.h (enum block_op_methods): Add BLOCK_OP_TAILCALL. (clear_storage): Add argument. * expr.c (emit_block_move_via_libcall

[Bug libgcj/21326] seg fault in _Jv_Linker

--- Additional Comments From rspencer at x10sys dot com 2005-05-03 22:16 --- I don't see how that is possible on the application side as the source code is 100% Java and it is all compiled with the same options (there's only one compilation command that compiles all sources). Perhaps you

[Bug rtl-optimization/21239] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Illegal elimination of SSE2 load/store using xmm intrinsics

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:16 --- Subject: Bug 21239 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 22:16:02 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog combine.c gcc/test

[Bug tree-optimization/21367] VRP does not fold "if (a == b)" in a certain situation

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:11 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug tree-optimization/21368] VRP does not know that &s.a != NULL

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:11 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug java/21245] gcjh creates invalid/empty header files

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21245

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:57 --- There is already a ChangeLog entry with the patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21372

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:56 --- (In reply to comment #5) > This patch looks good to me. > Could you write a ChangeLog entry for it? He did in Confirmed, -- What|R

[Bug fortran/21370] gfortran: TARGET attribute for dummy argument and declaration order

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:54 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:54 --- This patch looks good to me. Could you write a ChangeLog entry for it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21372

[Bug target/18759] [x86] using both -fomit-frame-pointer and -momit-leaf-frame-pointer enables frame pointers for non-leaf functions

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:54 --- Subject: Bug 18759 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: csl-sol210-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 21:54:14 Modified files: . :

[Bug middle-end/21285] gij fails to handle NullPointerException exception

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:51 --- Hmm, maybe this is not a bug in libgcj and in the middle-end related to EH. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libgcj/21285] gij fails to handle NullPointerException exception

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-03 21:49 --- So far I was able to debug to interpret.cc:3211. It seems that unwind logic worked correctly (as far as I could understand) and catch handler was called. The logic here didn't find exception handler and "thrown" excepti

[Bug c++/21165] [4.0/4.1 Regression] bogus error on a user-defined conversion in a template

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:44 --- *** Bug 21373 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/21373] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Strange error message on reference to static const member initialized via cast

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:44 --- Confirmed: t.cc: In member function âbool foo::toobig(long long unsigned int)â: t.cc:7: internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8813) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8813&action=view) patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21372

[Bug c++/21373] New: Strange error message on reference to static const member initialized via cast

Test program: template class foo { public: static const unsigned long long max = (T)~0ULL; bool toobig (unsigned long long val) { return val > max; } }; Message: test.cc: In member function ‘bool foo::toobig(long long unsigned int)’: test.cc:7: error: ‘T’ used where a ‘

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:29 --- Created an attachment (id=8812) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8812&action=view) second part to the test case Run this while TestLocking2 is running. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:28 --- Created an attachment (id=8811) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8811&action=view) test case part 1 Run this file and leave it running while you try to run the second attachment (forthcoming)

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:24 --- Created an attachment (id=8810) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8810&action=view) test case part 1 Run this part first. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21372

[Bug libgcj/21372] New: FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

According to the spec, FileChannel.tryLock() should return null in the event that it cannot acquire a lock. libgcj's implementation does not currently do this and returns a FileLock object even though the lock has not been acquired. See attached test case. -- Summary: FileChannel.try

[Bug c++/21371] New: Segmentation violation for repeated calls of destrictor for STL container

The sample code runs differently in 32 bit (g++ 3.2-7) and 64 bit (g++ 3.2.3-49) versions of the compiler. I'm not sure which behavior is correct, but both version of the compiler yield information on the vector A entity via calls to A.size() and A.capacity() calls. I would have expected a bomb

[Bug target/18759] [x86] using both -fomit-frame-pointer and -momit-leaf-frame-pointer enables frame pointers for non-leaf functions

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:04 --- I'm backporting this patch to csl-sol210-3_4-branch. In theory there's a regression on vanilla 3.4 if you build pr9771-1.c with -momit-leaf-frame-pointer in addition to the options specified in that testcase

[Bug java/21245] gcjh creates invalid/empty header files

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 20:55 --- I checked in a fix for this. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libgcj/21285] gij fails to handle NullPointerException exception

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-03 20:54 --- How could I check that? I ran "make check" in libffi library and it has not produced any errors. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21285

[Bug java/21245] gcjh creates invalid/empty header files

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 20:51 --- Subject: Bug 21245 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 20:51:32 Modified files: gcc/java : ChangeLog gjavah.c Log message:

[Bug c++/21369] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Template function definition rejected if function return type begins with 'struct'

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 20:50 --- Confirmed, it worked with "4.0.0 20041124" but not right before the branch of 4.0.0. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/21370] New: gfortran: TARGET attribute for dummy argument and declaration order

Hi, the following code fails to compile unless the two marked lines are interchanged: subroutine gfcbug27 (x) real, intent(inout) :: x(:) real :: tmp(size (x,1)) ! gfc produces an error unless target:: x! these 2 lines interchanged real, pointer :: p(:)

[Bug c++/21369] New: Template function definition rejected if function return type begins with 'struct'

This test program: struct bar; template struct bar *foo (T *p) { return p->t; } produces an error in 4.0.0: test.cc:3: error: 'bar' is not a template type Without the keyword "struct" it compiles fine. Earlier versions (3.3.2, and I'm pretty sure 3.4.1 as well) don't complain. I've seen

[Bug tree-optimization/21357] Erroneous warning: " ... may be used uninitialized in this function"

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 20:20 --- Not a C front end bug and previously reported more than once. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5035 *** -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/5035] Incorrectly produces '`' might be used uninitialized in this function'

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 20:20 --- *** Bug 21357 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/21322] O2 and O3 memory access error - compiled program - incorrect debug output

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 20:16 --- Not a bug in the C front end. The next step in tracking down the problem would be to try compiling just one file with -O2, the rest with -O0, and find which file being compiled with -O2 yields the problem. T

[Bug c/18502] [3.3/3.4 Regression] trigraphs don't work with -std=gnu99

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 20:04 --- Fixed for 3.4.4. Will not now be fixed on 3.3 branch. -- What|Removed |Added Sta

[Bug bootstrap/21365] libiberty/regex.c:49:25: error: sys/types.h: No such file or directory

--- Additional Comments From yuri_you2003 at yahoo dot com 2005-05-03 19:56 --- Subject: Re: libiberty/regex.c:49:25: error: sys/types.h: No such file or directory The failure is not on the cygwin compiler, I believe the missing headers are not part of the standard gcc headers. The

[Bug libgcj/21285] gij fails to handle NullPointerException exception

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:52 --- Hmm, could it be that the libffi does not handle exceptions. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/20744] [4.0 only] size= isn't implemented correctly

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:52 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 17992, which changed state. Bug 17992 Summary: [4.0 only] reading empty line does not return 0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17992 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/17992] [4.0 only] reading empty line does not return 0

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:51 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20661] [4.0 only] End of record not detected

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:51 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/19595] [4.0 only] eor does not work

-- Bug 19595 depends on bug 20661, which changed state. Bug 20661 Summary: [4.0 only] End of record not detected http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20661 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug libfortran/19595] [4.0 only] eor does not work

-- Bug 19595 depends on bug 19568, which changed state. Bug 19568 Summary: [4.0 only] incorrect formatted read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19568 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/20661] [4.0 only] End of record not detected

-- Bug 20661 depends on bug 19568, which changed state. Bug 19568 Summary: [4.0 only] incorrect formatted read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19568 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/19568] [4.0 only] incorrect formatted read

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:51 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20108] [4.0 only] incorrect run time error on formatted read

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:49 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 20108, which changed state. Bug 20108 Summary: [4.0 only] incorrect run time error on formatted read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20108 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug libfortran/17992] [4.0 only] reading empty line does not return 0

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:49 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17992

[Bug libfortran/20661] [4.0 only] End of record not detected

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:48 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20661

[Bug libfortran/20131] [4.0 only] gfortan - incorrectly reads beyond the end of line.

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:47 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 20092, which changed state. Bug 20092 Summary: [4.0 only] console input doesn't deal correctly with CR http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libfortran/20092] [4.0 only] console input doesn't deal correctly with CR

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:47 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/20005] [4.0 only] reading a single "return" character fails

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:46 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libgcj/21285] gij fails to handle NullPointerException exception

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-03 19:46 --- Here is another stack dump from attempt of running the "ant": exec "/usr/lib/jvm/java/bin/java" -classpath "/usr/share/java/ant.jar:/usr/share/java/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/java/jaxp_parser_impl.jar:/usr/share/java/x

[Bug libfortran/19595] [4.0 only] eor does not work

--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:45 --- Patch committed to 4.0.1. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/21368] New: VRP does not know that &s.a != NULL

Consider struct s { int a; } s; int foo (void) { int *p = &s.a; if (p == 0) return 123; /* Force VRP to run by having it insert at least one ASSERT_EXPR. */ *p = 456; return 0; } Note that with -fno-dominator-opts, VRP does not fold the "if" statement. expr_computes_non

[Bug libfortran/20131] [4.0 only] gfortan - incorrectly reads beyond the end of line.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 19:40 --- Subject: Bug 20131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 19:39:36 Modified files: libgfortran: Change

  1   2   3   >