[Bug c++/16635] g++ instantiates templates at the wrong place

--- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26 06:53 --- Here's the same thing with overloaded functions, causing a wrong-code error. If the last definition of 'bar' is commented out, the testcase passes, but otherwise not. template int func(T & x) { return

[Bug bootstrap/21230] gcc-4.0.0 bootstrap failed unless bootstrap compiler is gcc.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26 04:55 --- If this is really a bug, then the following change caused it: 2005-01-23 Joseph S. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * warnings.m4 (ACX_PROG_CC_WARNING_ALMOST_PEDANTIC): Don't do anything for non-

[Bug bootstrap/21230] gcc-4.0.0 bootstrap failed unless bootstrap compiler is gcc.

--- Additional Comments From kunisawa at access dot co dot jp 2005-04-26 04:44 --- The error is missing libcpp/Makefile during make bootstrap. % make bootstrap ... ... checking whether cc supports -Wold-style-definition... no /tmp/z/gcc-4.0.0/libcpp/configure: test: argument expected m

[Bug bootstrap/21230] gcc-4.0.0 bootstrap failed unless bootstrap compiler is gcc.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26 04:15 --- What was the error? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21230

[Bug ada/20270] [4.1 Regression] Link error: unsatisfied symbols

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26 03:59 --- Try this patch for ada/Makefile.in: it's the "dumb solution" which might work. --- Makefile.in 7 Apr 2005 19:07:41 - 1.116 +++ Makefile.in 26 Apr 2005 03:58:11 - @@ -245,7 +245,9 @@ # an

[Bug bootstrap/20155] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long"

--- Additional Comments From htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-04-26 03:18 --- on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1, the make[3]: execvp: /bin/sh: Arg list too long make[3]: *** [libgcj0_convenience.la] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/gcc-4.x-build-dir/alphaev68-dec-osf5

[Bug bootstrap/21230] New: gcc-4.0.0 bootstrap failed unless bootstrap compiler is gcc.

I am using Sun Forte to bootstrap gcc-4.0.0. A config script does not work unless GCC is set. Here is a patch to fix the problem. --- config/warnings.m4.0Mon Jan 24 04:21:24 2005 +++ config/warnings.m4 Tue Apr 26 11:06:52 2005 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ AC_SUBST([WARN_PEDANTIC])dnl AS_VAR_PUSHDE

[Bug bootstrap/20155] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long"

--- Additional Comments From htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-04-26 02:43 --- had the same problem with alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 as well. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |green at redhat dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26 01:55 --- But it does not on i686-pc-linux-gnu confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UN

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26 01:52 --- This works fine for me on ppc-darwin with the mainline GCC. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21229

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21229

[Bug c++/21228] [4.0/4.1 Regression] -Wunreachable-code produces spurious warnings for constructor

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26 01:47 --- Let first say this is the C++ front-end producing the default constructor of testStringBase which is declared as: testStringBase()throw() {} and plus that at the wrong line (which is a different bug whic

[Bug middle-end/20965] [4.1 Regression] GCC can no longer build itself on ppc-darwin

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26 01:29 --- Fixed, thanks RTH for reverting the patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21229

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

--- Additional Comments From pupeno at pupeno dot com 2005-04-26 00:51 --- I forgot to mention my gcc version (libffi from the same version of gcc): Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5-20050130/specs Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1/wor

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

--- Additional Comments From pupeno at pupeno dot com 2005-04-26 00:50 --- Created an attachment (id=8742) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8742&action=view) A makefile to easy compilation (and show how I am compiling it). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

--- Additional Comments From pupeno at pupeno dot com 2005-04-26 00:49 --- Created an attachment (id=8741) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8741&action=view) Test library for ffi. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21229

[Bug libffi/21229] LibFFI can't handle Longs

--- Additional Comments From pupeno at pupeno dot com 2005-04-26 00:49 --- Created an attachment (id=8740) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8740&action=view) Test program for FFI. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21229

[Bug libffi/21229] New: LibFFI can't handle Longs

I've had troubles in the FFI module I'm building when dealing with (unsigned) longs, what happens is that the second unsigned long argument never reached the function I'm calling with ffi_call. I've built a small test (attached) to show this particular problem (in the hope that the problem woul

[Bug c++/21228] New: -Wunreachable-code produces spurious warnings for constructor

I have a small C++ code segment that produces an invalid warning about unreachable code. It might be similar to #19354 but that bug is reported fixed in 4.0.0, and indeed the example there works in my build. homerun[/home/etalvola]<184> g++ -v -save-temps -m64 -mcpu=v9 -O0 -Wunreachable- code g

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

--- Additional Comments From shanwill44 at yahoo dot com 2005-04-26 00:10 --- Sure I also confirmed it working on i686-pc-linux-gnu (SuSE 9.2). So this must be specific to i386-pc-solaris2.9. Thanks in advance. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

[Bug c++/21227] [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:292

--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-04-26 00:04 --- Damn, you guys are fast! I just checked for this bug on bugzilla *yesterday*, and it didn't show up then. In the 'sliver' of time between when I discovered it, and when I submitted a prepared report tod

[Bug c++/21188] [4.1 Regression] CbcModel.cpp:3571: internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:292

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 23:51 --- *** Bug 21227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/21227] [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:292

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 23:51 --- This was just fixed 6 hours ago. This is a dup of bug 21188. The problem relates to dynamic_cast. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21188 *** -- What|Removed

[Bug c++/21227] [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:292

--- Additional Comments From fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2005-04-25 23:48 --- Created an attachment (id=8739) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8739&action=view) test-case causing ICE -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21227

[Bug c++/21227] New: [4.1 regression] internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:292

Dies somewhere deep in template instantiation, but only when -O2 is turned on. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - command invoked: g++-4 -v -Iutil -IObject -I. -O2 --save-temps Object/art_object_expr_gcc41death.cc -o Object/art_object_expr_gcc41death.o

[Bug c++/20995] [3.4 regression] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1391

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 23:33 --- Subject: Bug 20995 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 23:32:56 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/t

[Bug tree-optimization/21048] [4.1 Regression] use of poisoned ggc memory causes cpu2000 build failures

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 23:32 --- Test results for powerpc64-linux with -m32/-m64 are the same as for my last nightly build. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21048

[Bug libfortran/21226] New: unix_stream small_buffer unaligned

Aligning small_buffer in struct unix_stream would help performance. As an array of char, it can and does appear with byte alignment. -- Summary: unix_stream small_buffer unaligned Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enh

[Bug debug/21022] [4.0 only] ICE while compiling GdkFontMetrics.class with stabs debugging

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/21048] [4.1 Regression] use of poisoned ggc memory causes cpu2000 build failures

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:36 --- Two of the four CPU2000 tests started building again a couple of days ago and the other two are fixed with this patch, on powerpc64-linux with -m64 -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops. Bootstrap of c,c++,f95,objc

[Bug debug/21022] [4.0 only] ICE while compiling GdkFontMetrics.class with stabs debugging

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:36 --- *** Bug 21225 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/21225] gnu/xml/dom/DomDOMException.java:171: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:36 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21022 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/19467] [4.0 only] ICE caused by CHARACTER array in NAMELIST read or write

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:33 --- *** Bug 21224 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/21224] Error when reading arrays of strings in namelist input in gfortran

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:33 --- First thanks for your bug report. Second once you submit the bug you can attach it after wards. If the source is small (like yours is), it is better if it was in the comments. This is a duplicate of bug

[Bug libgcj/21225] New: gnu/xml/dom/DomDOMException.java:171: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

libjava of gcc 4.0.0 won't build on Tru64 alpha. Tried with either the dec cc compiler and gcc 3.4.3, with and without '-Wa,-oldas'. gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc/alphaev68-dec-osf5.1/3.4.3/specs Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.3/configure Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.3 The me

[Bug fortran/21224] New: Error when reading arrays of strings in namelist input in gfortran

// Here is the exact command I used to compile my program for this bug report: gfortran_temp/irun/bin/gfortran -save-temps test.F90 // Here is the exact output I get at the command line: test.F90: In function 'MAIN__': test.F90:9: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_string_parameter, at fortran

[Bug middle-end/21223] Output register variable is reloaded into the wrong register for asm

--- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:12 --- The problem is in reg_is_set or its caller. Because the output is an earlyclobber operand, it needs to be marked as born before the insn, to conflict with its inputs. I do not see an obvious way to get from n

[Bug middle-end/21223] Output register variable is reloaded into the wrong register for asm

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:09 --- And here is an x86 testcase: int bar(int *mem) { return ({ register int a_oldval asm ("eax"); register int a_tmp asm ("ebx"); int a_oldval2 = 3; __asm__ __volatile__ ("#

[Bug rtl-optimization/21223] Output register variable is reloaded into the wrong register for asm

--- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:07 --- The reload was created because the earlyclobber operand conflicts with a_oldval2, which is placed in r3 by local-alloc. I think I see why... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21223

[Bug rtl-optimization/21207] [4.0 regression] ICE folding large floating-point values

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:04 --- Confirmed. Here's a reduced snippet which crashes on i686-pc-linux-gnu when compiled with -O2: = double d=1; inline double foo() { return d ? 1e100 : 0.0; }

[Bug c++/21087] [4.0 Regression] ICE in do_nonmember_using_decl

--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 20:54 --- Fixed -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/21087] [4.0 Regression] ICE in do_nonmember_using_decl

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 20:54 --- Subject: Bug 21087 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 20:54:27 Modified files: gcc/cp : Change

[Bug libgcj/21222] must restrict access to gnu.classpath.*

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 21:01 --- the package.access Security property should be set whenever the classpath.security file is read and it defines such a property. At the moment the default classpath.security file doesn't have such a property. A

[Bug rtl-optimization/21223] Output register variable is reloaded into the wrong register for asm

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 20:54 --- Confirmed, also on powerpc-darwin. Weird. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug rtl-optimization/21223] New: Output register variable is reloaded into the wrong register for asm

Compile this test with an ARM-targeted compiler. Using -O2, it works out OK; but for -O0 or -O1 it doesn't. I originally encountered the bug in -O2 compiled code, but a more complex testcase is probably necessary for that. int bar(int *mem) { return ({ register int a_oldval asm ("r0");

[Bug fortran/18857] MATMUL failing with ALLOCATED matrices, unless base indices given

--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-04-25 20:47 --- Subject: Re: MATMUL failing with ALLOCATED matrices, unless base indices given paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr wrote: > Does this do it for you? - it works with those assertions elim

[Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools

--- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org 2005-04-25 20:42 --- note that the correct simplification for f4 is "*p = 1". -Chris -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

[Bug libgcj/21222] must restrict access to gnu.classpath.*

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 20:35 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug fortran/18857] MATMUL failing with ALLOCATED matrices, unless base indices given

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-04-25 20:31 --- Subject: Re: MATMUL failing with ALLOCATED matrices, unless base indices given Tobi, Does this do it for you? - it works with those assertions eliminated. !{ dg-do run } ! Test MATMUL for various kinds of

[Bug java/1305] [JSR133] GCJ ignores volatile modifier

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 20:28 --- http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jmm/cookbook.html Changing to New as JSR133 was voted on and approved in September. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/20995] [3.4 regression] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1391

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 20:22 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/20995] [3.4 regression] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1391

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 19:59 --- Subject: Bug 20995 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 19:58:53 Modified files: gcc/cp : Change

[Bug libgcj/21222] New: must restrict access to gnu.classpath.*

Access to gnu.classpath.* classes must be restricted to classes loaded by the bootstrap loader. See this thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath-patches/2004-12/msg00035.html Ostensibly this is done by setting the package.access property, but this does not seem to be done anywhere in

Re: shared library locations

On Apr 25, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Karl Berry wrote: Greetings, In gcc-4.0.0 (and all previous releases), the C++ shared libraries (for example) are not found without adding specific link flags. For example, compiling a C++ hello,world (source below, not that it matters): $ which g++ g++ is /usr/loca

shared library locations

Greetings, In gcc-4.0.0 (and all previous releases), the C++ shared libraries (for example) are not found without adding specific link flags. For example, compiling a C++ hello,world (source below, not that it matters): $ which g++ g++ is /usr/local/gnu/bin/g++ $ g++ hello.cc $ ldd a.out

[Bug tree-optimization/21048] [4.1 Regression] use of poisoned ggc memory causes cpu2000 build failures

--- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-04-25 19:20 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] use of poisoned ggc memory causes cpu2000 build failures The patch fixes the testcase for me on AIX. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21048

[Bug tree-optimization/21048] [4.1 Regression] use of poisoned ggc memory causes cpu2000 build failures

--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-04-25 19:18 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] use of poisoned ggc memory causes cpu2000 build failures Yes, I'll do a bootstrap and testrun and try the CPU2000 test. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21

[Bug bootstrap/21215] gcc build fails on Solaris 10, opteron

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 19:12 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/20930] [4.0 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test

--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 19:10 --- The problem (on AIX) appears to be related to reaching the end of file. Specifically, nr=0 20 continue read (3,end=30,err=90) n, (x(n),n=1,10) nr=nr+1 goto 30 30 continue counts the number of rec

[Bug bootstrap/21215] gcc build fails on Solaris 10, opteron

--- Additional Comments From igor at ipass dot net 2005-04-25 19:06 --- Thanks, this worked! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21215

[Bug testsuite/21062] Incorrect declaration of printf() in alias2.C

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 18:29 --- Subject: Bug 21062 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 18:28:55 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/g++.

[Bug testsuite/21062] Incorrect declaration of printf() in alias2.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 18:29 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/21062] Incorrect declaration of printf() in alias2.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 18:23 --- Confirmed, I am taking care of this. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/18832] missed jump threading with ||

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 18:20 --- They all produce the same asm on PPC now, thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18832

[Bug c++/21188] [4.1 Regression] CbcModel.cpp:3571: internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:292

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 18:09 --- Subject: Bug 21188 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 18:08:36 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/cp : C

[Bug c++/21188] [4.1 Regression] CbcModel.cpp:3571: internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:292

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 18:08 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libgcj/21221] [Win32] File.isHidden() method always returns 'true' in windows.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 17:53 --- Hmm, we should have got an exception or an assert: JvAssert (query == DIRECTORY || query == ISFILE); oh, well. The problem can be seen in natFileWin32.cc in that _stat does not understant ISHIDDEN at all

[Bug c++/21188] [4.1 Regression] CbcModel.cpp:3571: internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:292

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 17:44 --- Patch posted: . -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug java/21221] New: File.isHidden() method always returns 'true' in windows.

File.isHidden() method always returns 'true' in windows. Here is a simple code: import java.io.*; public class canRead { public static void main( String [] args ) { File file = new File( args[0] ); System.out.println( args[0] + ":"

[Bug fortran/21203] Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90

--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 17:14 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > The origin of this issue seems to be f951's check's for REAL 8 (kind=8). > > > > The h8300 doesn't seem to provide this type and thereby seems to

[Bug fortran/21203] Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 16:38 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > The origin of this issue seems to be f951's check's for REAL 8 (kind=8). > > The h8300 doesn't seem to provide this type and thereby seems to trigger a bug > in f951's error handl

[Bug c++/21189] weird behavior

--- Additional Comments From gnu04 at yahoo dot com 2005-04-25 16:27 --- Subject: Re: weird behavior Thanks a lot! And sorry for the spamming. I should be careful. Andy --- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc

Re: gcc-4.0.0, srcdir=objdir, ansidecl.h error

On Apr 25, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Karl Berry wrote: With gcc-4.0.0 on GNU/Linux (specifically, Red Hat WS 4), GNU make 3.80, I get an error when trying to build with srcdir = objdir. Since the documentation says this "should" work, even though it recommends compiling with srcdir != objdir, I'm report

[Bug target/21220] cross compiler bootstrap fails with internal compiler error

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug c/21220] New: cross compiler bootstrap fails with internal compiler error

Funny input line: timestamp gen-protos: 1346 entries 341 collisions ../../gcc-4.0.0/gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__udivmoddi4': ../../gcc-4.0.0/gcc/libgcc2.c:1050: internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1800 host gcc is 3.3.5 -- Summary: cross compiler bootstrap fa

gcc-4.0.0, srcdir=objdir, ansidecl.h error

With gcc-4.0.0 on GNU/Linux (specifically, Red Hat WS 4), GNU make 3.80, I get an error when trying to build with srcdir = objdir. Since the documentation says this "should" work, even though it recommends compiling with srcdir != objdir, I'm reporting it. (The problem does not happen when srcdir

[Bug fortran/18857] MATMUL failing with ALLOCATED matrices, unless base indices given

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-04-25 15:35 --- Subject: Re: MATMUL failing with ALLOCATED matrices, unless base indices given >> The question remains: What to do with the offset field? >> Fix it in the front end for static arrays, or remove it >> altoge

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 15:18 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 14:49 +, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From jakub

[Bug tree-optimization/21219] Segfault in tree-gimple.c:196

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 15:15 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21048 *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21048 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/21048] [4.1 Regression] use of poisoned ggc memory causes cpu2000 build failures

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 15:15 --- *** Bug 21219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21219] Segfault in tree-gimple.c:196

--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-04-25 15:12 --- Created an attachment (id=8737) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8737&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21219

[Bug tree-optimization/21219] New: Segfault in tree-gimple.c:196

I get a segfault compiling qt334 with som options. This problem occurs not with snapshot 20050410, but with current and 2005041. Michael Cieslinski g++41i -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.1-20050424/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc41i -- progr

[Bug tree-optimization/21207] ICE with gcc4.0.0 in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:1922

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:59 --- It is also not reproducable with "4.0.0 20050410" with all checking enabled. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/19639] Funny (horrible) code for empty destructor

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:51 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:49 --- Are you going to commit the testcase to the branch as well? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21173

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:49 --- Patch posted: . -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:47 --- *** Bug 21167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21167] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands at tree-ssa-operands.c when compiling MySQL-4.1

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:47 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21173 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/21217] "Argument list too long" when guilding gcj

-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21217

[Bug libgcj/21217] "Argument list too long" when guilding gcj

-- What|Removed |Added Component|java|libgcj http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21217

[Bug tree-optimization/21218] [4.1 regression] ICE using -ftree-vectorize

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:43 --- Confirmed. Failing since at least 20050421. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug tree-optimization/21218] New: [4.1 regression] ICE using -ftree-vectorize

Compiling the following code snippet with "-ftree-vectorize -O2 -march=pentium4" triggers an ICE on mainline (the 4.0 branch is not affected): struct A { double d[2]; double foo(int i) { return d[i]; } }; struct B : public A {}; void bar(B& b)

[Bug java/21217] New: "Argument list too long" when guilding gcj

I'm using Debian Sid on a Pentium IV. I downloaded the released version of 4.0.0 (gcc-4.0.0.tar.gz). I unzipped it into: /home/cjc/packages/gcc-4.0.0 I created a directory to build into: /home/cjc/packages/o In the /home/cjc/packages/o directory, I ran this command: /home/cjc/packages/gcc-4.0.

[Bug bootstrap/21215] gcc build fails on Solaris 10, opteron

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:34 --- Subject: Bug 21215 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 14:33:31 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug fortran/21203] Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90

--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:33 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hmm. The origin of this issue seems to be f951's check's for REAL 8 (kind=8). The h8300 doesn't seem to provide this type and thereby seems to trigger a bug in f951's error hand

[Bug bootstrap/21215] gcc build fails on Solaris 10, opteron

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:30 --- Subject: Bug 21215 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 14:30:26 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/doc: i

[Bug middle-end/21117] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE after error about returning an incomplete type

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:30 --- Confirmed. This crashes since gcc 3.2.1. The error message on mainline is: bug.cc: In function 'wxString GetHeader()': bug.cc:5: error: return type 'struct wxString' is incomplete bug.cc:7: internal comp

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 14:18 --- Subject: Bug 21173 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-25 14:18:31 Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute: pr21173.c Log mess

  1   2   >