[Bug tree-optimization/20701] New: [tcb] VRP does not eliminate a redundant "if" statement.

Consider: typedef struct { int code; } *rtx; int can_combine_p (rtx insn, rtx elt) { rtx set; set = 0; if (insn->code == 3) set = insn; else { set = elt; if (set == 0) return 0; } if (set == 0) return 1; return 0; } Note that the last "if" sta

[Bug c++/772] Statement expressions issues

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 07:26 --- Only a C++ front-end problem now. -- What|Removed |Added Component|c

[Bug target/19139] data referenced as short misplaced in non-short linkonce section

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19139

[Bug target/19139] data referenced as short misplaced in non-short linkonce section

--- Additional Comments From jbeulich at novell dot com 2005-03-31 06:44 --- Correct. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/20607] [3.4 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing causes incorrect scheduling

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr 2005-03-31 06:30 --- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing causes incorrect scheduling > I think it's fixable. I'm not sure exactly why the C++ front-end is > inserting the additional operations, but they're certai

[Bug c++/20700] x86_64 code bloat on templates

--- Additional Comments From ms6ep at cs dot virginia dot edu 2005-03-31 05:09 --- Hmm, I am sorry. I just made some changes to the code, and I got the bloat to go away. And now I can't reproduce the version that produces the code bloat. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug c/20689] strict aliasing with temporary variable never gives warnings

--- Additional Comments From varun0005 at gmail dot com 2005-03-31 05:05 --- please ignore previous code and consider this piece as example ... problem is same .the exact programs are following and command line was gcc -Wall -O2 test1.c test2.cIn this why test1.c not giving warning b

[Bug c++/20700] x86_64 code bloat on templates

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 04:59 --- Can you provide the preprocessed source? -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/20700] New: x86_64 code bloat on templates

I've got a small piece of C++ code that makes extensive use of templates. To my surprize it compiles to en executable of about 20 MBytes on x86_64 architecture. When I compiled it on an x86 machine the executable is about 6 Kbytes. Is code bloat of this magnitude normal? The code I'm trying to

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 02:35 --- >I would like to solve this problem by moving the compilation and >execution of abi_check.cc into DejaGNU, and check having "make >abi_check" invoke DejaGNU appropriate to run just that test. No, assuming "m

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8501) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8501&action=view) Testcase part3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20697

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:43 --- Created an attachment (id=8500) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8500&action=view) Testcase part2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20697

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:43 --- Created an attachment (id=8499) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8499&action=view) Testcase part1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20697

[Bug tree-optimization/20605] [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c scan-tree-dump-times iter 0 fails

-- What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug java/20697] New: Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

When the testcase is compiled like this: $ gcj -o A --main=C A.java B.java C.java C.java: In class `C': C.java: In method `C.m()': C.java:5: error: Can't find method `m()' in type `B'. Candidates are: `B.m()' in `B' `A$A1.m()' in `A$A1'. super.m(); ^ 1 error We get

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-30 23:41 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30

[Bug bootstrap/20698] New: [4.0 Regression] configure broken

The file "compile" lacks execute permissions, or it needs to be executed using the shell. This causes various compilations used in header checks by configure to fail. -- Summary: [4.0 Regression] configure broken Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UN

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:33 --- Aha! The failures occur with "make bootstrap" followed by "make check" followed by "make install"; without "make check" in between the install works fine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18131 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20697

[Bug debug/20268] With optimization, generating incomplete debug information

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20268

[Bug target/19139] data referenced as short misplaced in non-short linkonce section

--- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-03-30 23:26 --- I think this defect is fixed with the patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00589.html that was checked in back in January of 2005. Jan, can you confirm that the defect is fixed? It looks OK to me on a

[Bug libmudflap/20696] New: all libmudflap tests fail on mips{,el}-linux

all libmudflap tests fail on mips{,el}-linux. /home/doko/gcc/gcc-4.0-4.0ds9/build/mipsel-linux/./libmudflap/.libs/libmudflap.so: undefined reference to `_start' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status compiler exited with status 1 output is: /home/doko/gcc/gcc-4.0-4.0ds9/build/mipsel-linux/./libmudfla

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 00:24 --- Confirmed, I think this is a dup of bug 18119. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug debug/20268] With optimization, generating incomplete debug information

--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:18 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-31 00:10 --- Subject: Re: New: make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Nightly mainline bootstraps for powerpc64-linux have been failing > intermittently sin

[Bug bootstrap/20698] [4.0 Regression] configure broken

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-03-31 00:59 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] configure broken > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 > 00:37 --- > hmm, what compiler are you using which don't understa

[Bug c++/20607] [3.4 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing causes incorrect scheduling

--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-31 00:54 --- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing causes incorrect scheduling ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 > 10:53 -

[Bug debug/20268] With optimization, generating incomplete debug information

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |wilson at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/20268] With optimization, generating incomplete debug information

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:08 --- Subject: Bug 20268 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 23:08:23 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog dwarf2out.c Log message:

[Bug c/17855] [4.0/4.1 Regression] modification of function struct return not diagnosed

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:07 --- Patch posted , awaiting review. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17855

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:58 --- Created an attachment (id=8503) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8503&action=view) Second part of smaller testcase. New Testcase. I think it is the same problem. $ gcj A1.java B1.java B1.

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:56 --- Created an attachment (id=8502) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8502&action=view) First part of smaller testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20697

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:55 --- If you modify the testcase file A.java so that the inner class A1 is no longer static, the testcase converts to an ice-on-invalid-code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20697

[Bug bootstrap/20698] [4.0 Regression] configure broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 00:37 --- hmm, what compiler are you using which don't understand -c -o? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20698

[Bug java/20697] Invalid Can't find method error on call to super

--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 23:45 --- I should add that I think this is a target independent bug as it also fails for a mipsel-linux target. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/16871] missing vector support

--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2005-03-30 22:49 --- Subject: Re: missing vector support steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 > 11:21 --- > Is anyone going to work on these intr

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-30 22:45 --- Subject: Re: New: make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Nightly mainline bootstraps for powerpc64-linux have been failing > intermittently sin

[Bug c++/20629] internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:1552

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 21:42 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm still seeing this, but some info... > a) I'm only seeing this with LANG=C, export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 and there is no > crash > b) compiling the dumped proprocessed code isn't cr

[Bug libgcj/20654] exception.o is not included in libgcj.a due to case-insensitivity

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2005-03-30 21:10 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/19225] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C fails with -fpic/-fPIC on i686-pc-linux-gnu

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.4 |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19225

Re: gcc rs6000 target without glibc

On Mar 30, 2005, at 3:22 PM, lothar wrote: Hello, Michael Meissner redirected me to this list, I contacted him because his emailaddress was in rs6000/linux.h. I don't know who currently maintains this file I ran into trouble when trying to build a cross compiler for the RS6000 (target=ppc-linux

[Bug middle-end/19225] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C fails with -fpic/-fPIC on i686-pc-linux-gnu

--- Additional Comments From dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 20:27 --- Fixed (4.1 only) -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOL

[Bug libgcj/20693] javax-imageio.lo failed to build

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-30 20:26 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg02792.html -- What|Removed |Added

gcc rs6000 target without glibc

Hello, Michael Meissner redirected me to this list, I contacted him because his emailaddress was in rs6000/linux.h. I don't know who currently maintains this file I ran into trouble when trying to build a cross compiler for the RS6000 (target=ppc-linux). In gcc-3.4.0/gcc/config/rs6000/linux.h

[Bug middle-end/19225] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C fails with -fpic/-fPIC on i686-pc-linux-gnu

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 20:21 --- Subject: Bug 19225 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 20:21:39 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog calls.c Log message:

[Bug target/20670] IA-64 exception mechanism erase $f29

--- Additional Comments From ochem at gnat dot com 2005-03-30 20:13 --- The test case is ok, I get an abort if I compile it with -O2 option on a 3.4 compiler. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20670

[Bug libgcj/20693] javax-imageio.lo failed to build

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-30 20:06 --- It is a libtool bug, which depends on the order of the output from "find -name '*.class" -print". On my Linux/i686: [EMAIL PROTECTED] libjava]$ pwd /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-i686-linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava [EMA

[Bug c/17913] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE jumping into statement expression

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 19:59 --- Subject: Bug 17913 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 19:59:21 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug c/772] Statement expressions issues

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 19:59 --- Subject: Bug 772 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 19:59:21 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLo

[Bug c/17913] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE jumping into statement expression

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 19:56 --- Subject: Bug 17913 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 19:56:40 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c c-tree.h c-typeck.

[Bug c/772] Statement expressions issues

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 19:56 --- Subject: Bug 772 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 19:56:40 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c c-tree.h c-typeck.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/20376] The missed-optimization of general induction variables in the new rtl-level loop optimizer cause performance degradation.

-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-03-

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com 2005-03-30 19:48 --- Subject: Re: New: make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test > (I didn't actually change this particularly thing; it was probably > getting built at make install time all along. But, my ch

[Bug c/20368] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have integer_type in start_function, at c-decl.c:5777

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 19:39 --- Subject: Bug 20368 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 19:39:35 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug c/20368] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have integer_type in start_function, at c-decl.c:5777

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 19:35 --- Subject: Bug 20368 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 19:35:49 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c gcc/tests

[Bug middle-end/20491] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in subreg_regno_offset, at rtlanal.c:3042

--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 19:28 --- Subject: Re: [PR middle-end/20491] combine generates bad subregs On Mar 29, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 28, 2005, Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 24

[Bug rtl-optimization/20413] VOIDmode LABEL_REFs are generated

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||20695 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20413

[Bug target/20695] New: sh64-*-* port deos not handle 32 / 64 bit conversions properly

The sh64-*-* port plays fast and loos with the distinction between 32 and 64 bit values. In particular, it pretends a truncation from 64 to 32 bit is a no-op, while a sign extension is needed, and that the sh5-32media and sh-compact subtargets can expose the indexed addressing mode directly to the

[Bug middle-end/20491] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in subreg_regno_offset, at rtlanal.c:3042

--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 19:00 --- I'm now sure it wasn't fixed. Somehow I forgot the problem didn't occur on x86_64-linux-gnu, not even with -m32, even though it did on i686-pc-linux-gnu. I I had only one i686-only bug, and I knew it was a

[Bug fortran/20460] Nasty extensions that should always warn

--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-03-30 18:57 --- Subject: Re: [PR tree-optimization/20460] add phi args to dests of dce-redirected edges On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 02:56 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > When remove_dead_stmt() redirects a control stmt, the edge r

[Bug libgcj/20693] javax-imageio.lo failed to build

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 18:57 --- Why does this work for me and other people on i686-pc-linux-gnu? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-03/msg02051.html -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug bootstrap/20692] configuring libgfortan infinite loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 18:54 --- Looks like not a gfortran bug but a gmp one: #0 0xdfb7bdac in __gmpn_mul_basecase () from /opt/csw/lib/libgmp.so.3 #1 0xdfb97840 in ?? () from /opt/csw/lib/libgmp.so.3 #2 0x0006 in ?? () #3 0x0804759

[Bug middle-end/20491] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in subreg_regno_offset, at rtlanal.c:3042

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 18:51 --- I still can reproduce it also on x86. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug bootstrap/20692] configuring libgfortan infinite loop

--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-03-30 18:49 --- Created an attachment (id=8496) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8496&action=view) gdb session, with backtrace, for f951 gdb session running the command f951 for which the wait is done in gfortr

[Bug bootstrap/20692] configuring libgfortan infinite loop

--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-03-30 18:48 --- Created an attachment (id=8495) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8495&action=view) verbose output of gfortran This is the output of gfortran -v as requested. The binary on which we wait is f951.

Important m$6h?3p

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Norman Virus Control a supprimé le message original qui contenait le virus [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-30 18:32 --- Subject: Re: New: make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test Benjamin Kosnik wrote: >>Is it considered desirable behavior to build abi_check at "make install" >>time? > > > No, this

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com 2005-03-30 18:31 --- Subject: Re: New: make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test > Is it considered desirable behavior to build abi_check at "make install" > time? No, this doesn't make any sense, as abi_chec

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-30 18:22 --- Subject: Re: New: make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Nightly mainline bootstraps for powerpc64-linux have been failing > intermittently sin

[Bug c/20368] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have integer_type in start_function, at c-decl.c:5777

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 18:10 --- Testing a fix. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jsm28 a

[Bug c/18715] [4.0/4.1 Regression] warning: "enumeration value not handled in switch" for '...' ranges

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 18:09 --- Is there a more recent patch version than that referred to in comment #4, taking account of Mark's comments on that patch version? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18715

[Bug c/17913] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE jumping into statement expression

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 18:08 --- Patch at addresses the issue for C and noncomputed gotos by disallowing such jumps; awaiting any comments on the proposed statement expression semantic

[Bug c/17855] [4.0/4.1 Regression] modification of function struct return not diagnosed

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 18:05 --- Testing a fix. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jsm28 at

[Bug libstdc++/20694] [4.1 Regression] make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Severity|normal

[Bug bootstrap/20692] configuring libgfortan infinite loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 18:04 --- #0 0xdfa2b0e0 in _waitid () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #1 0xdfa43aeb in _waitpid () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xdfa79957 in waitpid () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #3 0x08057a42 in execute () at ../../sources/g

[Bug libstdc++/20694] New: make install failure building abi_check with leftover libv3test

Nightly mainline bootstraps for powerpc64-linux have been failing intermittently since changes went in last week to allow running libstc++ tests on installed tools. For "make bootstrap", abi_check is built three times: for 32-bit bit, 64-bit, and 32-bit soft-float. "make install" tries to build it

[Bug libgcj/20693] New: javax-imageio.lo failed to build

As of Wed Mar 30 00:24:21 UTC 2005, I got /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-i686-linux/./gcc/gcj -B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-i686-linux/./gcc/ -B/usr/gcc-4.1/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/gcc-4.1/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/gcc-4.1/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -i

[Bug bootstrap/20692] configuring libgfortan infinite loop

--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-03-30 17:37 --- Created an attachment (id=8494) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8494&action=view) back trace tentative I tried to isolate the bug and run in gdb. The issue appears as reported. After terminatin

[Bug bootstrap/20692] configuring libgfortan infinite loop

--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-03-30 16:54 --- Forgot the content of the conftest.F: program main #ifndef __GNUC__ choke me #endif end -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20692

[Bug bootstrap/20692] New: configuring libgfortan infinite loop

- bootstraping gcc-4.0-20050326 - system type: SUN LX50: Sol8 x86 server 2 x 1404MHz - head and tail of the objdir/i386-pc-solaris2.8/libgfortran/config.log: [...] It was created by GNU Fortran Runtime Library configure 0.2, which was generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59. Invocation command line was

[Bug middle-end/20491] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in subreg_regno_offset, at rtlanal.c:3042

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 16:21 --- Are you sure the bug is fixed? The testcase is failing for me with today's mainline compiler on i686-pc-linux-gnu, ia64-hp-hpux11.23 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.{11,23}. Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu is that quoted

[Bug c++/9737] [DR150] Partial template specialisation selection failure involving template parameter defaults

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 16:00 --- *** Bug 20691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/20691] accept-invalid template template argument

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 16:00 --- This is PR 9737 and C++ DR report 150 (which was closed as an extension which means that it might become part of the standard in the future). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 9737 *** --

[Bug c++/20691] New: accept-invalid template template argument

>"Ioannis Vranos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... > >> #include >> >> >> template< template class ContainerTemplate, class ValueType> >> inline void test(const ValueType &val) >> { >> ContainerTemplate container(val); >> } >> >> >> >> int main() >> { >> using namespace std; >> >> test(10)

[Bug c/20689] strict aliasing with temporary variable never gives warnings

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 15:45 --- Also this is not done because void* cannot be dereferenced. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/20177] ICE in schedule-insns for -O2 -fmodulo-sched

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 15:39 --- Fixed in 4.0.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOL

[Bug libstdc++/20690] Bug in std::vector

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Component|c++ |libstdc++ http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug c++/20687] namespace bug

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-03-30 15:15 --- > One more argument is that this feature is required to compile correctly > STLport. *Assuming* this is true, it's a serious problem for STLPort ;) because the other widespread C++ front-end, used by many comme

[Bug c++/20690] Bug in std::vector

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-03-30 15:09 --- Irrespective of the fact that the code compiles or doesn't, I believe it's *invalid*, because, according to 23.1/8, "All other constructors for these container types take an Allocator& argument, an allocator whose

[Bug c++/20687] namespace bug

--- Additional Comments From jozef at syncad dot com 2005-03-30 14:56 --- Subject: Re: namespace bug Hi, This is not about the same : 7.3.4.5 d1++; // shows that there is a conflict between a symbol in your // namespace and a symbol imported using using namespace f(1); // sho

[Bug rtl-optimization/20376] The missed-optimization of general induction variables in the new rtl-level loop optimizer cause performance degradation.

--- Additional Comments From canqun at nudt dot edu dot cn 2005-03-30 14:42 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Waiting for a test case... Part 1 ! Test sase for address giv (general induction variable) optimization. subroutine dot_product (sum, a, b, n) real*8 a(n), b(n), sum sum = 0

[Bug c++/20690] New: Bug in std::vector

There is no allocator rebinding for some STL containers i.e. std::vector, so the following code dose not compiled: #include #include using namespace std; typedef std::vector > Vec; Vec v; -- Summary: Bug in std::vector Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3

[Bug middle-end/20177] ICE in schedule-insns for -O2 -fmodulo-sched

: ChangeLog ddg.c modulo-sched.c passes.c Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: 20050321-1.c 20050330-1.c Log message: Fix PR middle-end/20177 and two new test cases. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branc

[Bug c++/19203] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Partial ordering failure between function reference and generic const reference

--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 13:10 --- We don't implement DR214 but edg does. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#214 I shall see how tricky it is to implement ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1920

[Bug c/20689] strict aliasing with temporary variable never gives warnings

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-03-30 12:23 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I mean that since in case where you are doing "void *p=(void *)&i" then > according to strict-aliasing rules we get " warning: dereferencing type-punned > pointer will break strict-aliasin

[Bug c/20689] strict aliasing with temporary variable never gives warnings

--- Additional Comments From varun0005 at gmail dot com 2005-03-30 12:02 --- I mean that since in case where you are doing "void *p=(void *)&i" then according to strict-aliasing rules we get " warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" , but same thing i

[Bug c++/20584] [4.0/4.1 Regression] inline function used but never defined

--- Additional Comments From nerijus at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-03-30 11:59 --- It seems I get these warnings only when precompiled headers are not used. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20584

[Bug rtl-optimization/20376] The missed-optimization of general induction variables in the new rtl-level loop optimizer cause performance degradation.

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 11:38 --- Waiting for a test case... -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/16871] missing vector support

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 11:21 --- Is anyone going to work on these intrinsics? Is there a list somewhere of what intrinsics we are talking about here? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16871

[Bug c++/20607] [3.4 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing causes incorrect scheduling

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30 10:53 --- Hum... type-punning simply doesn't work in this case with the C++ compiler, but does work with the C compiler. The problem is that: union u { x_uint64_t first; x_uint32_t

  1   2   >