[Bug c++/18681] template friend declaration not recognized

--- Additional Comments From wolfgang dot roehrl at de dot gi-de dot com 2004-11-29 07:12 --- Subject: Antwort: template friend declaration not recognized Hi all, I'm responding to the "Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 16:19": I do not think that the cited

[Bug tree-optimization/18712] New: [4.0 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(basic_block) push domain error, in insert_phi_nodes_for at tree-into-ssa.c:1049

use '-O1': void *eintr_source (void *arg) { int ts = 0; if (arg) foo (); while (1) { if (arg) foo (); foo1 (&ts); } return 0; } --

[Bug middle-end/17746] [4.0 Regression] ICE when building the Ada RTS

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 06:40 --- > Was this patch rejected? Never approved. The last message about it is: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02600.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17746

[Bug target/9571] [PPC] problems with 'const', -msdata=eabi and sections.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 06:24 --- Subject: Bug 9571 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-29 06:24:31 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog varasm.c Log message:

[Bug fortran/18711] Internal Compiler Error while using derived data type's

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 03:54 --- Fixed already in a new version: GNU F95 version 4.0.0 20041128 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0) -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18711] New: Internal Compiler Error while using derived data type's

The following code fails to compile when derived data types with two-dim arrays are used. The error message is: Richard-Leightons-Computer:/volumes/data/wave3d/gcc_test Richard$ gfortran -v bug_test.f -o bug_test Driving: gfortran -v bug_test.f -o bug_test -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran Reading s

[Bug middle-end/18164] [4.0 Regression] ICE on trivial invalid asm

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 02:21 --- Subject: Bug 18164 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-29 02:21:28 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gimplify.c gcc/tes

[Bug middle-end/18164] [4.0 Regression] ICE on trivial invalid asm

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 02:20 --- Fixed by: 2004-11-18 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR middle-end/18164 * gimplify.c (gimplify_asm_expr): If the length of an output operand is zero, do not process it, just let

[Bug middle-end/18683] [4.0 Regression] seg fault in local allocate

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 02:03 --- We are seg faulting at: 1629 reg_renumber[i] = qty[q].phys_reg + reg_offset[i]; reg_renumber is null at this point. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18683

[Bug middle-end/18683] [4.0 Regression] seg fault in local allocate

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 01:54 --- Hmm, adding either -da, -fdump-tree-all, or -fdump-rtl-all, works. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18683

[Bug tree-optimization/18662] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE c97114a and c97117a verify_stmts failed / Statement marked for throw, but doesn't

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 01:47 --- FIxed by: PR/18662, also backported from tree-cleanup-branch. * tree-ssa-ccp.c (substitute_and_fold): If replaced anything, always call maybe_clean_eh_stmt and modify_stmt. --

[Bug middle-end/18683] [4.0 Regression] seg fault in local allocate

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 01:41 --- Reduced a little further, note removing the templates make it go away: template struct basic_ostream { basic_ostream& operator<<(int __n); }; extern basic_ostream cout; template struct linear_congruential

[Bug libfortran/18710] img part of complex number not written to direct access file

--- Additional Comments From bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 01:32 --- possibly needs a front end change, as well as run-time.. c = __complex__ (1.2e+2, 2.4e+2); _gfortran_filename = "c.f"; _gfortran_line = 4; _gfortran_ioparm.unit = 9; _gfortran_ioparm.rec = 1B;

[Bug middle-end/18683] [4.0 Regression] seg fault in local allocate

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 01:31 --- Reduced down to: __extension__ typedef unsigned long long int uint64_t; template struct char_traits; template > class basic_ostream; typedef basic_ostream ostream; template struct basic_ostream { typedef b

[Bug c++/18635] use of uninitialised reference accepted in C++ front end

--- Additional Comments From llib at computer dot org 2004-11-29 00:54 --- google groups link to discussion: -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug other/17594] [3.4 Regression] GCC does not error about unknown options which starts with a valid option

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 00:41 --- Fixed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.4.0 4.0.0

[Bug other/17594] [3.4/4.0 Regression] GCC does not error about unknown options which starts with a valid option

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 00:38 --- Subject: Bug 17594 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-29 00:37:54 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog opts.c gcc/testsui

[Bug libfortran/18710] img part of complex number not written to direct access file

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 00:34 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug target/18489] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 00:24 --- Look for "Committed: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C: Allow other label ending delimeters. PR target/18489" at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/>. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/18489] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-29 00:21 --- Subject: Bug 18489 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-29 00:21:24 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/g++.

[Bug libfortran/18710] New: img part of complex number not written to direct access file

this from nist test fm910.for $ cat c.f COMPLEX C OPEN(UNIT=9,FILE='A',ACCESS='DIRECT',STATUS='OLD',RECL=132) C = (120.0,240.0) WRITE(9,REC=1)C C = (0.0,0.0) READ(9,REC=1)C PRINT*,C END $ gfc c.f $ ./a.out ( 120., 0.00

[Bug middle-end/15855] [3.4/4.0 Regression] g++ crash with -O2 and -O3 on input file

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-28 23:52 --- Jeff, thanks for working on these problems! BTW, I'm assigning this bug to you since you are the one working on it right now. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/17746] [4.0 Regression] ICE when building the Ada RTS

--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:50 --- Was this patch rejected? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17746

[Bug tree-optimization/18463] [4.0 Regression] Moving floating point through an integer register

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-28 23:38 --- While the patch looks great to me, it is not feasable as you said for 4.0. Since this is a 4.0 regression, we should probably look for a way to fix this problem in a less intrusive (even if not totally corr

[Bug target/18484] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:32 --- Look for "Committed: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C: Xfail warning for mmix-*-*. PR target/18484." in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/>. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug preprocessor/17651] [3.4 Regression] Erroneous preprocessor output with -g when generating dependencies

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:29 --- Subject: Bug 17651 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 23:29:41 Modified files: gcc: c-ppoutput.c c-opts.c Log message:

[Bug target/18484] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:28 --- Subject: Bug 18484 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 23:28:05 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/g++.

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-28 23:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function > Do you think we could canonicalize only when > we compare a function pointer to a function pointer > (rather than when comparing a function

[Bug preprocessor/17651] [3.4 Regression] Erroneous preprocessor output with -g when generating dependencies

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:05 --- Aargh wrong bug. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.4.0 |3.4

[Bug tree-optimization/18693] ivopts regression metabug

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:04 --- Clearly too few to worry about. :-) -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/18348] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/uninit-H.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:59 --- Look for "Committed: gcc.dg/uninit-H.c (ASM): For unknown targets, define to "= 0". PR target/18348." in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/>. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18348] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/uninit-H.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:57 --- Subject: Bug 18348 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 22:57:38 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug tree-optimization/18463] [4.0 Regression] Moving floating point through an integer register

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:56 --- I have the (experimental) patch for addressing mode selection on trees (http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~rakdver/diff_lower_address.diff). It indeed helps; we get i = 0; :; mem[aa + 4B * i]{*D.1047} =

[Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-28 22:47 --- But the call to assemble_external has been there since the very beginning. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17982

[Bug target/18345] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/intmax_t-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:43 --- Look for "Committed, gcc.dg/intmax_t-1.c: Add mmix-*-* to dg-error. PR target/18345." at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/>. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18345] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/intmax_t-1.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:39 --- Subject: Bug 18345 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 22:39:05 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug c++/18708] Obscene amount of memory required to optimize file

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:36 --- Fixed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/17651] [3.4 Regression] Erroneous preprocessor output with -g when generating dependencies

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:33 --- Fix committed to mainline; working on 3.4 backport. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fa

[Bug preprocessor/17610] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Empty #include statement halts gcc

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:28 --- Subject: Bug 17610 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 22:28:13 Modified files: libcpp : ChangeLog directives.c gcc

[Bug target/18337] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/array-quals-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:19 --- I'll settle for an xfail, but would've preferred skipping the test. Look for message titled "Committed: gcc.dg/array-quals-1.c: Xfail for mmix-*-* (PR target/18337)" in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/>

[Bug bootstrap/17364] [4.0 Regression] c99 designators in nptl break libstdc++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:16 --- *** Bug 18709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18709] x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:16 --- Yes there is PR 17364. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17364 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18337] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/array-quals-1.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:14 --- Subject: Bug 18337 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 22:14:34 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug target/18709] x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:13 --- { .__data = { .__kind = PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP } } This is a bug in glibc's headers, there is a dup of this bug somewhere. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18709

[Bug target/18709] x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2004-11-28 22:09 --- Created an attachment (id=7630) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7630&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18709

[Bug target/18709] New: x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++

building CVS 20041128 on x86_64-linux, the bootstrap fails in /home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc-4.0-4.0ds1/build/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc-4.0-4.0ds1/build/gcc/ -nostdinc++ -L/home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc-4.0-4.0ds1/build/x86_64-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc

[Bug c++/18708] Obscene amount of memory required to optimize file

--- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org 2004-11-28 22:05 --- Created an attachment (id=7629) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7629&action=view) Problematic test -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18708

[Bug c++/18708] New: Obscene amount of memory required to optimize file

This file fails to compile after attempting to allocate 2G of memory with -O3. g++ test.ii -O3 I guess that the PowerPCAsmPrinter::printInstruction method is the problem. This file comes from the LLVM PPC backend. -Chris -- Summary: Obscene amount of memory required to optimize fil

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:57 --- That TT.java example program also fails for me. The other testcases I had work again when reverting the patch in comment #3. The TT testcase fails even when I revert that patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug target/17767] [4.0 Regression] MMX intrinsics cause internal compiler error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:43 --- Hmm, a x86_64 compiler with -m32 works. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17767

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-28 21:24 --- Recompiled libgcj and I still get the above stacktrace. Here is a testcase. import java.util.Observable; import java.util.Observer; class TT extends Observable implements Runnable, Observer { p

[Bug middle-end/12454] [4.0 Regression] [tree-ssa] Regression in g++.dg/parse/stack1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:11 --- Hmm (at least on ppc-darwin), with --disable-checking this works but without we get a stack overflow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

[Bug c++/10349] testsuite failure in g++.dg/parse/stack1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:10 --- #1138 0x0005d820 in cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser=0x424b6c40) at /Users/pinskia/ src/local3/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:6541 #1139 0x00053100 in cp_parser_statement (parser=0x424b6c40, in_statement

[Bug target/9348] [HP-UX] error in int to unsigned long multiplication

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-11-28 21:07 --- *** Bug 14449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/14449] long long & unsigned calculation gives wrong result

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-11-28 21:07 --- This bug is a duplicate of PR target/9348 that I fixed on mainline back in February. Although this isn't technically a regression, I'm currently bootstrapping a regression testing a backport to the 3.4 branch fo

[Bug target/18334] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/assert4.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:00 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02472.html> -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug target/18334] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/assert4.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 20:52 --- Subject: Bug 18334 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 20:52:19 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug regression/18707] [4.0 Regression] Performance regression at -O2 with gzip

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |regression Keywords||missed-optimization Summary|Performance

[Bug c/18707] New: Performance regression at -O2 with gzip

GCC 4.0.0pre generates worse code than GCC 3.4.4pre at -O2 for gzip 1.2.4 on UltraSPARC III. I've also included Sun ONE Studio 8 as a comparison point. 32-bit GCC vs Sun ONE Studio 8 CC: cc: "-fast -xarch=v8plusb -xchip=ultra3" gcc: "-O2 -mcpu=ultrasparc3" -rwxrwxr-x 1 eric eric 724

[Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename

--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-28 20:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename You continue not to get it. In this context, DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME has been set because assemble_external has been

[Bug bootstrap/18532] libgcc.mk isn't parallel build safe for multilib

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-28 19:25 --- *** Bug 18486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug bootstrap/18486] [4.0 Regression] fixincl fails with make -jN profilebootstrap

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-28 19:25 --- I believe this is the same as bug 18532. I have submitted a patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg01456.html *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18532 *** -- What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/18595] [4.0 Regression] IV-OPTS is O(N^3)

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:42 --- IVOPTs should behave quadratically on this type of tests; I do not know where does the extra O(N) factor come from, and I would not expect the times to grow this fast. -- What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/18705] [4.0 Regression] ACATS c34002a and c460007 ICE expected integer_cst, have var_decl/nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:3783

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:42 --- Confirmed, what is happening is that DOM asked for the MIN/MAX_EXPR for the type but DOM thought that MIN/MAX_EXPR for a integer type is always an INTEGER_CST. -- What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/18664] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE cxaa010 expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:660

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 18:39 --- Note: if I deactivate ZCX on x86 and x86_64 (setting the system-linux-xxx.ads constants below to False) it passes. ZCX_By_Default: constant Boolean := True; GCC_ZCX_Support : constant

[Bug tree-optimization/18662] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE c97114a and c97117a verify_stmts failed / Statement marked for throw, but doesn't

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 18:38 --- c97117a fails the same way: /home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20041128T003315/gcc/xgcc -c -B/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20041128T003315/gcc/ -gnatws -O2 -I/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20041128T003315/

[Bug tree-optimization/18662] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE c97114a verify_stmts failed / Statement marked for throw, but doesn't

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 18:34 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does not happen on ppc-darwin, I wonder why. This problem is due to ZCX being active on x86 and x86_64 but not on ppc, if I deactivate ZCX on x86 and x86_64 (setting the system-linux-x

[Bug ada/18706] ACATS cc1221c and ce2208b ICE expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:637

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug ada/18705] ACATS c34002a and c460007 ICE expected integer_cst, have var_decl/nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:3783

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Summary|ACATS c34002

[Bug ada/18706] New: ACATS cc1221c and ce2208b ICE expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:637

This occurs on powerpc-darwin only (works on x86 and x86_64). Andrew Pinski commented: "most likely not renaming VOPS after getting the new virtual ops". +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0) GCC err

[Bug ada/18705] New: ACATS c34002a and c460007 ICE expected integer_cst, have var_decl/nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:3783

This occurs on powerpc-darwin only (works on x86 and x86_64), Andrew Pinski suggested this is a DOM problem. +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0) GCC error: | | tree check: expected integer_cst,

[Bug tree-optimization/18704] [4.0 Regression] Inlining limits cause 340% performance regression

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:22 --- This is most likely the same as PR 17863. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug tree-optimization/18704] [4.0 Regression] Inlining limits cause 340% performance regression

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/18704] New: Inlining limits cause 340% performance regression

Compared to 3.4, the default inlining limits in 4.0 cause a 340% performance regression on the tramp3d-v3.cpp testcase here: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/gcc/tramp3d-v3.cpp.gz The regression can be attributed to the inlining limits, as patching both compilers with the leafify pa

[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:13 --- This is most likely related to PR 18241. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug middle-end/18641] [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload of a psuedo reg into f0 for a DImode expr

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 18:12 --- (In reply to comment #10) > I should mention I also see this in a testcase in Ada acats testsuite on ppc-darwin. For the record this is ACATS c761010 and it's ppc only (works on x86 and x86_64), from Andrew's lo

[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:08 --- The misscompilation appears in the .t54.dom3 dump. With -fno-tree-dominator-opts the testcase is not misscompiled. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694

[Bug other/17594] [3.4/4.0 Regression] GCC does not error about unknown options which starts with a valid option

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:03 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/18628] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-11-28 18:01 --- Hmm... This is a difficult one. We manage to split a table jump sequence, and introduce a label between the indexed load of a jump table and the indirect jump. We then hoist the indexed load, and later simplify

[Bug rtl-optimization/15289] [3.4/4.0 Regression] reload error with non-lowpart subregs

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-28 17:54 --- RTH, this is another subreg quirk. Care to take a look? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18703] [4.0 regression] ICE with negative array index of VLA in loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 16:42 --- It was fixed on the 12th. : Search converges between 2004-11-11-161001-trunk (#629) and 2004-11-12-014001-trunk (#630). -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-28 16:41 --- I reverted that patch and 'make clean' in build's boehm-gc directory but now I get the following. Do I need a complete rebuild? Collecting from unknown thread. Program received signal SIGABRT, Ab

[Bug tree-optimization/18703] [4.0 regression] ICE with negative array index of VLA in loop

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703

[Bug tree-optimization/18703] [4.0 regression] ICE with negative array index of VLA in loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 16:36 --- Hmm, it works with "GNU C version 4.0.0 20041126 (experimental) (alpha-linux)", Can you try a newer compiler? -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/18703] New: [4.0 regression] ICE with negative array index of VLA in loop

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp% cat ffv1.c void encode_rgb_frame(int ring_size) { int sample[3][ring_size]; int i; for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) sample[1][-1] = sample[1][0]; } [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp% gcc -O -c -v ffv1.c Reading specs from /usr/local/stow/gcc-2004.11.11/bin/../lib/gcc/alphae

[Bug ada/18692] Ada should have a dg testsuite

--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 16:14 --- I've gone through the Debian BTS bugs and tried to pull the testcases from the bugs marked fixed-upstream. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18692

[Bug rtl-optimization/13300] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Variable incorrectly identified as a biv

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.3, 3.4, 4.0 regression] |[3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] |Variable incorrectly|Variable incorrectly

[Bug rtl-optimization/13300] [3.3, 3.4, 4.0 regression] Variable incorrectly identified as a biv

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2004-11-28 16:00 --- Still present in 3.3, 3.4, and 4.0 branch. Regression from 2.95. -- What|Removed |Added S

[Bug rtl-optimization/18294] [4.0 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info during bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:53 --- Fixed also by the patch which fixed PR18420. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/18294] [4.0 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info during bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:46 --- Since PR 18420 is fixed, I checking this one too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18294

[Bug rtl-optimization/18420] [4.0 Regression] ICE compiling mesa at -O2

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:40 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/18702] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:32 --- So, the fault of the test seems *at least* that the test should not assume that no other options are present that cause a stdio.h to be included from elsewhere than the installed location, which is the case for t

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:28 --- Reverting this patch seems to make things work again: Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/boehm-gc/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.212

[Bug ada/18661] ACATS c974012 ICE calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:376

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:17 --- So closing as fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |

[Bug target/18702] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:13 --- > Hmm, the test is correct. Here's what I get on Solaris: gax% gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -S -isysroot /home/eric/cvs/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp isysroot-1.c In file included from gcc/include/iso/stdio_iso.h:44,

[Bug target/18701] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware gcc.c-torture/execute failures: 20010224-1.c, 20020216-1.c, 20040218-1.c, 20040709-2.c

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug target/18702] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:07 --- Hmm, the test is correct. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18702

[Bug rtl-optimization/18325] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020227-1.c (change in behavior)

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 14:56 --- The whole test now passes; time to close this bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 14:50 --- Also seeing this with some simple AWT programs (see bug #18697) and a recent gjdoc build (as described at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2004-11/msg00169.html). -- What|Removed

[Bug target/18702] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 28 13:19:06 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c (test for excess errors) With the message in the .log being: /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c:8: error: 'foo' undeclared (first use in this function) /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c:8: error: (Each

  1   2   >