[Bug middle-end/15855] [3.4/4.0 Regression] g++ crash with -O2 and -O3 on input file

--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-11-27 07:49 --- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] g++ crash with -O2 and -O3 on input file It's always amazing to see how such simple oversights can result in such a dramatic difference in the code we generate and to a sma

[Bug c++/18688] New: Default argument of a template class/struct function parse error.

My system info: Configured with: /home/portage/portage/gcc-3.4.2-r2/work/gcc-3.4.2/configure --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.4 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.2/include --datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.

[Bug target/14037] bootstrapping fails when configured with --with-cpu=601

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-27 07:29 --- I believe this should have been fixed with the 3.4.1 release, and also should work on mainline. Would you mind confirming, please? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14037

[Bug middle-end/17926] [4.0 Regression] infinite loop in LAPACK test at -Os and -O2

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 06:13 --- This is also fixed now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/18092] [4.0 Regression] Infinite loop in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:inverse

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 05:54 --- Fixed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/9383] [SYSV] stack frame always made for nested functions

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-27 05:37 --- This is because g1 is allocated space on the stack as a result of the following code in expand_function_start. If a function has local variables (including hidden ones like this one) then it needs a stack

[Bug rtl-optimization/18685] [4.0 Regression] Ada boostrap broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 05:34 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-27 04:32 --- Created an attachment (id=7617) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7617&action=view) 9535 bytes -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687

[Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-27 04:31 --- Created an attachment (id=7616) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7616&action=view) 3338 bytes -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687

[Bug tree-optimization/18687] New: [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression

These two files taken from linux kernel (hashes.c) and zlib (infcodes.c) hashes.c: 3.4.4 4.0.0 delta -O0 0.045 0.0499% -O1 0.067 0.144 115% -O2 0.108 0.177 64% infcodes.c: 3.4.4 4.0.0 delta -O0 0.080 0.0867% -O1 0.120 0.223 86

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18687 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15678

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-27 04:09 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function > --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 > 00:53 --- > I'm going to guess that one solution is to ca

[Bug c++/17278] [4.0 Regression] 24% C++ compile-time regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-27 03:35 --- 3.4.4 4.0.0 delta - -O0 8.2 7.1 -13% -O1 11.0 16.5 50% -O2 23.3 21.8 -6% -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug bootstrap/18627] Bootstrap failure due to needing a new cctools

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 03:12 --- I downloaded the cctools from that URL and it worked for me. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18142 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/18142] "Unknown pseudo-op: .machine" compiling darwin-crt2.c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 03:12 --- *** Bug 18627 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18142

[Bug bootstrap/18627] Bootstrap failed during build of

--- Additional Comments From 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2004-11-27 03:08 --- This bug will not go away for me. I downloaded the libtools fix explained in Bug 18142 and in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01222.html and installed it. The patch did not fix the problem (same o

[Bug c++/18674] [3.4/4.0 Regression] G++ accepts bad elaborated type specifiers

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:45 --- This came in with the two pass namelookup. The problem I think is that we don't mark a as only accepting enums so we don't get an error but I could be wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug preprocessor/13726] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression]cpp -C -dI loses comments on same line as #include directives

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:39 --- libcpp turns off save_comments in start_directive, near the start of _cpp_handle_directive (all in directives.c). This is arguably mistaken, but there's probably a reason for it, so I'm loathe to just rem

[Bug java/17574] [meta-bug] gcj and libgcj 4.0 tracking PR

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:39 --- Only one regression left here: PR 18399. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17574

[Bug c++/14136] [4.0 Regression] double error message for typename used as destructor declarator

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:31 --- The following patch fixes the error message for me. I haven't done bootstrapping and regtesting, though. Index: parser.c === RCS file: /usr/l

[Bug tree-optimization/18662] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE c97114a verify_stmts failed / Statement marked for throw, but doesn't

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:28 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/18596] [4.0 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:16 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/17474] [4.0 Regression] Compiling at -01 yields different results

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:14 --- One of the patches is in; the other one generated a lot of debate and is apparently not sufficient, so removing patch tag. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/17224] [3.4/4.0 Regression]: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 02:05 --- Does the back end need a "number too big for the assembler" hook? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17224

[Bug tree-optimization/18595] [4.0 Regression] IV-OPTS is O(N^3)

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-27 01:45 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Of course it's not very useful to claim that some algorithm > is O(N^x) when you don't say what N is... N is number of nested loops. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug java/18585] uniform passing of the classpath parameter

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:32 --- The only missing option here is "gcj -cp foo". cvs head gcj accepts "-classpath foo" (not sure if 3.x did). gij accepts both short and long forms of options, and understands "-cp". -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/17651] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Erroneous preprocessor output with -g when generating dependencies

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Last reconfirmed|2004-11-27 01:31:48 |2004-11-27 01:32:23 date|

[Bug preprocessor/17651] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Erroneous preprocessor output with -g when generating dependencies

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:31 --- Created an attachment (id=7615) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7615&action=view) Fix The line marker is suppressable (unsurprisingly) with -P. It also shows up with -dM, etc. I'm

[Bug java/17963] [4.0 Regression] Compiling a .jar files fails when files within .jar are in a different order

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:26 --- I downloaded the files, unzipped, and tried with the current cvs gcj. It compiled both .jar files without error. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/17915] [4.0 Regression] Compiling jars fails

-- Bug 17915 depends on bug 17963, which changed state. Bug 17963 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Compiling a .jar files fails when files within .jar are in a different order http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17963 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug java/17915] [4.0 Regression] Compiling jars fails

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:21 --- I tried this with current cvs head and it worked fine. -- What|Removed |Added St

[Bug middle-end/12769] -mlongcall doesn't convert all calls to long calls for builtin functions

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-27 01:19 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/12769] -mlongcall doesn't convert all calls to long calls for builtin functions

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:18 --- Subject: Bug 12769 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 01:18:31 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/18595] [4.0 Regression] IV-OPTS is O(N^3)

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:10 --- Of course it's not very useful to claim that some algorithm is O(N^x) when you don't say what N is... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18595

[Bug tree-optimization/18673] [4.0 Regression] Tree-PRE is O(N^4)

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:09 --- Of course it's not very useful to claim that some algorithm is O(N^x) when you don't say what N is... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18673

[Bug middle-end/12769] -mlongcall doesn't convert all calls to long calls for builtin functions

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:08 --- Subject: Bug 12769 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 01:08:03 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug middle-end/12769] -mlongcall doesn't convert all calls to long calls for builtin functions

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:07 --- Subject: Bug 12769 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 01:06:59 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug rtl-optimization/18685] [4.0 Regression] Ada boostrap broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:07 --- Should be fixed by: 2004-11-26 Richard Kenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * expmed.c (extract_bit_field): When extracting from non-integer mode, force a SUBREG into a register because we may be ta

[Bug bootstrap/18107] [4.0 Regression] [meta-bug] Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-mingw32

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:05 --- Plus there is a new bootstrap failure also because of a change to use %I64 or what ever is the format is. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/17963] [4.0 Regression] Compiling a .jar files fails when files within .jar are in a different order

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:03 --- I think this has been fixed by the merge of the BC branch but I have not tried it yet as I have not compiled a java compiler after. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17963

[Bug java/17915] [4.0 Regression] Compiling jars fails

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 01:02 --- I think this has been fixed by the merge of the BC branch but I have not tried it yet as I have not compiled a java compiler after. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:53 --- I'm going to guess that one solution is to canonicalize any function pointer any time it's cast to a void pointer. (Or do you really, really want noncanonicalized pointers, which is likely to be harder?)

[Bug middle-end/15579] [4.0 Regression] always_inline ignored at -O0

-- Bug 15579 depends on bug 7257, which changed state. Bug 7257 Summary: [3.4/4.0 regression] -O3 -fverbose-asm does not display -flag-inline-functions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7257 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug fortran/9972] [3.4 regression] Failure of g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f

-- Bug 9972 depends on bug 7257, which changed state. Bug 7257 Summary: [3.4/4.0 regression] -O3 -fverbose-asm does not display -flag-inline-functions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7257 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug other/7257] [3.4/4.0 regression] -O3 -fverbose-asm does not display -flag-inline-functions

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:51 --- Did I mention this is fixed? -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/18686] #pragma longcall broken on 3.4.x

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-27 00:51 --- Fixed -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/18686] #pragma longcall broken on 3.4.x

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:50 --- Subject: Bug 18686 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 00:50:22 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/15089] local register variable with a specified register is bad

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:44 --- Removing the regression markes but not removing the target milestone. Richard you want to add the documenation or should someone else do it? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17278] [4.0 Regression] 24% C++ compile-time regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:39 --- Anybody want to do new timings for typecode.ii at -O1 because I think that testcase is now fixed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17278

[Bug preprocessor/16621] [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:36 --- Any news on this bug, it has been opened for a while now (4 months) and no news about it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16621

[Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:30 --- HJ's latest patch probably doesn't fix the problem entirely :-(, but it is certainly correct to allow "renames" which don't change anything. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17982

[Bug tree-optimization/18673] [4.0 Regression] Tree-PRE is O(N^4)

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:28 --- I have a patch that brings the time on 150 loops to 1.40 seconds, but i haven't decided whether to apply it or not. I have to do more testing on real code. I could make it nothing if i scoped the other bitm

[Bug rtl-optimization/17428] internal compiler error: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:1880 (-fspeculative-prefetching)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:25 --- Even though this huge failure, it is no longer a regression as -fspeculative-prefetching is not enabled wth -fprofile-generate/use but it still needs to be fixed but not necessarly for 4.0.0. Really some

[Bug rtl-optimization/17491] -fspeculative-prefetching fails on powerpc-*

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:24 --- Even though this huge failure, it is no longer a regression as -fspeculative-prefetching is not enabled wth -fprofile-generate/use but it still needs to be fixed but not necessarly for 4.0.0. Really some

[Bug c++/18514] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Alternate "asm" name ignored for redeclared builtin function imported into namespace std

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:20 --- In 3.4.2 (Debian's version), I can import into *any* namespace (xxx, for instance) and get the same "problem". However, it *is* essential that the function be "snprintf", and not "bar". fancy_snprintf is

[Bug tree-optimization/17355] [4.0 Regression] ICE in calculate_live_on_entry, at tree-ssa-live.c:724

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:19 --- Assuming fixed so closing as I hear reports about eclipse building on running on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug regression/16703] [4.0 Regression] g++ v4.0.0 produces slower code than v3.4.1 for loops.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:16 --- Fixed with the current mainline I get 1.4937 on the nestedloop test now. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/17679] [4.0 Regression] Aliasing problem with ivopts

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:04 --- Then should we close this bug as fixed or at least move it from being a 4.0 regression? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17679

[Bug c++/14136] [4.0 Regression] double error message for typename used as destructor declarator

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:00 --- Any news it has been 9 months since you said you would look into it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14136

[Bug c++/17053] [4.0 Regression] Repo functionality partially broken on AIX (collect2.c)

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 23:28 --- DJE said he'd develop the collect2 fix, so assigning... -- What|Removed |Added Assi

[Bug c++/15674] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] [DR214] template argument binding differs between member and static fumctions

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 23:22 --- Nathan's conclusion was that neither case was a regression (although both were wrong-code bugs). Should the "Regression" tag be removed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15674

[Bug rtl-optimization/18237] [4.0 regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:58

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 23:12 --- The orginal bug was fixed by my patch and the new bug was filed under PR 18685. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/18572] [4.0 Regression] Bus error compiling makegpr.adb on Mac OS X 10.3

-- Bug 18572 depends on bug 18237, which changed state. Bug 18237 Summary: [4.0 regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:58 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18237 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug c/14635] [3.3 Regression] nan functions should not be C90 built-ins

--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-26 23:12 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] nan functions should not be C90 built-ins On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > This bug is fixed on mainline and 3.4.x; nan functions are not current

[Bug c++/18681] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] template friend declaration not recognized

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Keywords|

[Bug c/14635] [3.3 Regression] nan functions should not be C90 built-ins

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 23:07 --- This bug is fixed on mainline and 3.4.x; nan functions are not currently C90 builtins. Please open a different bug if there are other problems with nan builtin handling on mainline; meanwhile I'm marking

[Bug middle-end/12769] -mlongcall doesn't convert all calls to long calls for builtin functions

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |amodra at bigpond dot net |dot org |dot au Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/12769] -mlongcall doesn't convert all calls to long calls for builtin functions

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-26 23:03 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02324.html -- What|Removed |Added K

[Bug target/18686] #pragma longcall broken on 3.4.x

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-26 23:00 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02326.html -- What|Removed |Added K

[Bug tree-optimization/18673] [4.0 Regression] Tree-PRE is O(N^4)

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 23:00 --- Actually, Tree-PRE is provably O(n^2). We just have a larger constant than we'd like. On all the branches i have checked out (tcb, mainline) 150 loops takes 30 seconds, not 160. THis includes the constifica

[Bug tree-optimization/18291] [4.0 Regression]: ICE in merge_alias_info

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-11-26 22:53 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression]: ICE in merge_alias_info On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 22:50 +, dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/18291] [4.0 Regression]: ICE in merge_alias_info

On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 22:50 +, dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 > 22:50 --- > (In reply to comment #6) > > > Diego, if you are too busy, just let me know which you prefer and i'll > implement it. > > > I'

[Bug tree-optimization/17050] [4.0 Regression] Performance pessimisation as compared to GCC 3.4

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-26 22:51 --- Fixed then. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/17431] [3.4/4.0 regression] Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-26 22:50 --- Nathan, even if there is not an official committee position on the correct semantic of this program, is there way to get a patch in to stop cc1plus from segfaulting? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug tree-optimization/18291] [4.0 Regression]: ICE in merge_alias_info

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 22:50 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Diego, if you are too busy, just let me know which you prefer and i'll implement it. > I'll take a look, but in principle it seems to me that NMT.1 and NMT.2 should actually be t

[Bug tree-optimization/17050] [4.0 Regression] Performance pessimisation as compared to GCC 3.4

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-11-26 22:48 --- Seems fixed in mainline too. On my P4-2400: 4.0.0 20041126 -- run time: 8.684465 8.810u 0.010s 0:08.86 99.5% 0+0k 0+0io 133pf+0w 3.4.3 - run time: 35.656412 36.200u 0.010s 0:36.37 99.5%0

[Bug c++/18681] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] template friend declaration not recognized

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |3.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18681

[Bug tree-optimization/17050] [4.0 Regression] Performance pessimisation as compared to GCC 3.4

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 22:33 --- On my pentium-m, 3.4 gets: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> gcc -O3 -std=c99 coyotebench_mole.i -ffast-math -lrt -lm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> time ./a.out run time: 23.438668 real0m24.187s user0m23.147s sys 0m

[Bug target/18686] #pragma longcall broken on 3.4.x

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed||1 Known to fail||3.3

[Bug target/18686] New: #pragma longcall broken on 3.4.x

#pragma longcall (1) extern int extfunc (void); #pragma longcall (0) long long testfunc (long long a, long long b) { extfunc (); return a / b; } results in /src/tmp/pr12769.c:1: warning: number must be 0 or 1 /src/tmp/pr12769.c:1: warning: ignoring malformed #pragma longcall /src/tmp/pr12769

[Bug tree-optimization/18291] [4.0 Regression]: ICE in merge_alias_info

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 22:11 --- The real bug here is that may_propagate_copy (op, val) returns true, but we abort when domopts calls propagate_value with the same arguments. We think something has gone wrong horribly wrong with regards to

[Bug rtl-optimization/18685] [4.0 Regression] Ada boostrap broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 22:04 --- Also on ppc-darwin and ppc-linux. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/18685] New: Ada boostrap broken

Hi, I identified the patch that causes the Ada bootstrap failure on x86 and x86_64 (at least): ../../xgcc -B../../ -c -g -O2 -fPIC -W -Wall -gnatpg s-stratt.adb -o s-stratt.o +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041123 (experimental) (i686-pc

[Bug target/18117] [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-k*bsd-gnu

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 21:38 --- Fixed now. Thanks for your report. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/18684] static member function not defined in std::locale::facet class

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-11-26 21:36 --- The function is defined in src/locale.cc and is not tailored to the users of the library. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17431] [3.4/4.0 regression] Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 21:10 --- Here's a slightly shorter testcase (inspired by PR18677): === struct A {}; struct B : A { B(int); B(B&); B(A); }; B b=0; === -- What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/18684] static member function not defined in std::locale::facet class

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 21:07 --- Most likely this is not exported as it works on the mainline on ppc-darwin which really does not use a version script at all. Also the underscoped functions are reserved so there might be a reason why thi

[Bug c++/18684] New: static member function not defined in std::locale::facet class

The g++ compiler version and machine information are as follows: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64-redhat-linux/3.4.2/specs Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man -- infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable- checking --with-system-zli

[Bug c++/17431] [3.4/4.0 regression] Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 21:00 --- *** Bug 18677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18677] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 21:00 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17431 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/18683] [4.0 Regression] seg fault in local allocate

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18683

[Bug middle-end/18683] New: [4.0 Regression] seg fault in local allocate

Using the code in PR 12850 at -O0, I get a seg fault on the mainline. I think this is a recent regression but I don't know for sure. -- Summary: [4.0 Regression] seg fault in local allocate Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED K

[Bug java/18305] Class initialization optimization is not done when compiled from .class

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 18:05 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug java/18305] Class initialization optimization is not done when compiled from .class

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 18:04 --- Subject: Bug 18305 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-26 18:04:46 Modified files: gcc/java : ChangeLog decl.c expr.c java-tree.h j

[Bug java/18682] gcj doesnt reject invalid code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-26 17:46 --- Hmm interesting we even produce valid bytecode with the source, maybe we are converting into the correct type which is why this is accepted. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/18644] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-11-26 17:45 --- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in "bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > The diagnostic is nonsensical. The fix is to fix the diagnostic, not |

Re: [Bug libstdc++/18644] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in

"bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > The diagnostic is nonsensical. The fix is to fix the diagnostic, not | > to paper over the problem. | | That's certainly the best solution. -Wsynth should just not trigger in | libstdc++ headers. yes, and even more in user c

[Bug java/18682] gcj doesnt reject invalid code

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Known to fail||3.3.4 3.

[Bug java/18682] New: gcj doesnt reject invalid code

GCJ does not reject the following invalid code: public class NullTest { public static void main (String[] args) { int index = 1; if (index == null) index++; } } -- Summary: gcj doesnt reject invalid code Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0

  1   2   >