[Bug middle-end/16266] [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow

--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-10-07 06:48 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 00:44, Joern Rennecke wrote: > > > > > > --- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero do

[Bug target/17770] No NOP after LWL with -mips1

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:46 --- Patch applied. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOL

[Bug middle-end/16266] [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow

--- Additional Comments From amylaar at spamcop dot net 2004-10-07 06:44 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow > > > --- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-06 23:19 > --- > I cannot reproduce this on ma

[Bug debug/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-10-07 06:43 --- I've started a bootstrap and regression test cycle of current mainline with this patch. This will probably take about 24 hours on i686-pc-mingw32. (Thats another thing I wouldn't mind seeing fixed.) I'll

[Bug target/17770] No NOP after LWL with -mips1

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:41 --- Subject: Bug 17770 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 06:41:27 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/mips: m

[Bug target/17770] No NOP after LWL with -mips1

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:38 --- Subject: Bug 17770 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 06:38:48 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug rtl-optimization/17791] [4.0 Regression] doloop can produce wrong code causes Ada bootstrap failure

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:21 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/17791] [4.0 Regression] doloop can produce wrong code causes Ada bootstrap failure

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:20 --- Subject: Bug 17791 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 06:20:35 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog loop-doloop.c loop-iv.c rtl

[Bug tree-optimization/17806] [4.0 Regression] compiler error: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1491 , works -O2, breaks with -O3

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:15 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/17806] [4.0 Regression] compiler error: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1491 , works -O2, breaks with -O3

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:14 --- Subject: Bug 17806 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 06:14:16 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog cfghooks.c cfgloopmanip.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/17027] [3.4 regression] ICE with noreturn function in loop at -O2

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:13 --- Second patch applied. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/17027] [3.4 regression] ICE with noreturn function in loop at -O2

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 06:12 --- Subject: Bug 17027 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 06:12:02 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug middle-end/17835] [4.0 Regression] stage2 compiler is broken because it is built with -fomit-frame-pointer

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 05:59 --- Patch applied. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RES

[Bug middle-end/17835] [4.0 Regression] stage2 compiler is broken because it is built with -fomit-frame-pointer

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 05:56 --- Subject: Bug 17835 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 05:56:53 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog expmed.c Log message:

[Bug middle-end/16815] MIPS n32/n64 inefficient code for float arguments

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 05:37 --- Fixed in mainline. The change isn't suitable for a release branch. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/17857] [4.0 regression] fixproto can't find fix-header

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 05:36 --- Patch applied. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOL

[Bug middle-end/16815] MIPS n32/n64 inefficient code for float arguments

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 05:34 --- Subject: Bug 16815 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 05:34:31 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog function.c gcc/con

[Bug bootstrap/17857] [4.0 regression] fixproto can't find fix-header

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 05:28 --- Subject: Bug 17857 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 05:28:47 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog Makefile.in Log message:

[Bug debug/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From xxhimanshu at yahoo dot com 2004-10-07 05:12 --- Hi All, I ma trying to configure wxWdgets on linux machine for cross platform applciation development using wxWidgets. When i try to compile wxWidgets it shows me following error list while trying to compile...

[Bug libstdc++/16612] [3.4 only] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:57 --- I give this back to Paolo, since he's got the patch. -benjamin -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/17664] Crash in std::map when using _GLIBCXX_DEBUG with multithreading

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:53 --- Lothar, do you have specific source lines, or a patch you can propose? That would probably speed things up. Your test program is quite large. Is there anyway to reproduce this without all of ACE? If so, that a

[Bug c++/17873] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] order of static destructors wrong

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:52 --- Hmm, the patches which in 3.3.4 all were in 3.4.0 except for a few. I was looking at the code gen and it looked fine. The last time I saw this _dso_handle was not marked as hidden. -- What

[Bug libstdc++/17850] [3.4/4.0 regression] bootstrap failure - libstdc++ uses strtold when undeclared

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:40 --- ... of course, if newlib doesn't have strtold or any of the _strtold or __strtold or whatever, then the cross config bits for newlib shouldn't say that it does. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug libstdc++/17850] [3.4/4.0 regression] bootstrap failure - libstdc++ uses strtold when undeclared

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:37 --- Richard note the remappings in c++config.h: #if defined (_GLIBCXX_HAVE__STRTOLD) && ! defined (_GLIBCXX_HAVE_STRTOLD) # define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_STRTOLD 1 # define strtold _strtold #endif I thought _strtold was d

[Bug libstdc++/17856] [3.3 only] assembly error in atomicity.h

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:32 --- I thought this looked familiar. I think this patch looks fine (backport of 3.4.x). I can't imagine Gaby not going for this for the next 3.3.x release. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug c++/14810] [3.4/4.0 regression] tree check failures with invalid code involving templates

-- What|Removed |Added Known to work||3.4.1 4.0.0 Target Milestone|3.4.1 |3.3.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug libstdc++/17864] [4.0 Regression] deallocate_global

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:25 --- ...chill mon! Damn. I believe this is fixed now. If not, please let me know. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17864

[Bug c++/17873] order of static destructors wrong

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:12 --- Woops I looked at the 3.3.5 patches so those should not matter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17873

[Bug c++/17873] order of static destructors wrong

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 03:08 --- Actually, looks like 3.4.0 gets this right. %./H-x86-gcc-3.4.0/bin/g++ -g -O2 -static ~/ordering_1.cc %a.out boo ctor foo ctor foo dtor boo dtor -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17873

[Bug libstdc++/16875] Fails to compile: STL container of const pointer to X

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 02:50 --- *** Bug 17866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16875

[Bug libstdc++/17866] [DR 274] std::allocator fails on CV-related types

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-07 02:50 --- There was a DR report about this, library DR 274 which says the standard said "any type" but it needs to be changed to "any non-const, non-reference type" so this is invalid. See

[Bug libstdc++/16875] Fails to compile: STL container of const pointer to X

--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2004-10-07 02:22 --- For the record, the following was posted on comp.std.c++: Try: std::allocator a; This fails on gcc and is permitted in icc and the other EDG derivatives. While allocating const objects may seem non-sensical

[Bug libstdc++/17866] std::allocator fails on CV-related types

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-07 02:07 --- Well, if you absolutely want to know: That he tried to put a constant element into a container indeed is questionable. That was the question in the other PR. However, allocators can be used for more than jus