[Bug libfortran/16434] gfortran SP edit descriptor failure: test f77-edit-s-out.f

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:33 --- Subject: Bug 16434 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:33:18 Modified files: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77: f77-edit-s-out.f

[Bug libfortran/17706] reading a value of 0.0 gives a value of -0.0

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:33 --- Subject: Bug 17706 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:33:18 Modified files: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77: f77-edit-s-out.f

[Bug libfortran/16434] gfortran SP edit descriptor failure: test f77-edit-s-out.f

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:32 --- Subject: Bug 16434 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:32:13 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog libgfortran: C

[Bug libfortran/17706] reading a value of 0.0 gives a value of -0.0

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:32 --- Subject: Bug 17706 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:32:13 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog libgfortran: C

[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous

--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:12 --- ah, [3.4.2]/2a says koenig is not done when regular lookup finds a member fn. Forgot that bit. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829

[Bug ada/13897] gnat does not implement tasking on powerpc

--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:04 --- Implemented on mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug ada/13897] gnat does not implement tasking on powerpc

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:01 --- Subject: Bug 13897 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:01:52 Modified files: gcc/ada: Makefile.in ChangeLog Added files:

[Bug middle-end/16973] [4.0 Regression] Differences between addresses of labels broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 14:46 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/15014] [4.0 regression] labels after are removed even though they are used

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 14:46 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/15014] [4.0 regression] labels after are removed even though they are used

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 14:29 --- Mine I will send it out soon. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do

[Bug middle-end/16973] [4.0 Regression] Differences between addresses of labels broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 14:29 --- Mine, I have a fix will send it out soon. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassign

[Bug target/17824] Hard-coded AS and LD in c4x.h

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 13:28 --- For number 2, read which is on the contribute page: "When you have all these pieces, bundle them up in a mail message and send it to the appropriate mailing list(s). (Patches will go to one or more lists d

[Bug target/17824] Hard-coded AS and LD in c4x.h

--- Additional Comments From ralf_corsepius at rtems dot org 2004-10-04 13:22 --- 1. I am used to my patches being ignored :( Therefore I usually attach them to a PR they are trying to solve to prevent them from being ignored. 2. Note that http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html doesn't even

[Bug libgcj/17438] clean up thread native state using phantom reference

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 13:12 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug fortran/17612] ICE in gfortran

--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 13:12 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/17817] [4.0 Regression] restage[1,2,3] and then bootstrap no longer cause build dir to be rebuilt

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |200

[Bug target/17824] Hard-coded AS and LD in c4x.h

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:54 --- Because normally if you have a patch you just post it in the first place to gcc-patches@ and bypass bugzilla and only make a new bug iff you patch is ignored. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug target/17824] Hard-coded AS and LD in c4x.h

--- Additional Comments From ralf_corsepius at rtems dot org 2004-10-04 12:51 --- 1. The PR is against 3.4-branch, because this is what I am using, what I tested the patch with and what I am reporting the bug against. 2. The patch applies to HEAD without changes. 3. Why is GCC asking t

[Bug target/17774] -O2: internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:5861

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17774

[Bug target/17773] -O2: internal compiler error: in sched_analyze_2, at sched-deps.c:757

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17773

[Bug target/17771] -O2 -mmvcle: internal compiler error: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:1915

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17771

[Bug rtl-optimization/17825] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE in reg_bitfield_target_p

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:49 --- Confirmed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:46 --- I don't know but Comeau C++ online tester accepts the code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829

[Bug tree-optimization/17671] PHI-OPT is not smart enough

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:45 --- Posted a new patch here: . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17671

[Bug c++/13717] duplicated parameter name not caught ?

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-04 12:45 --- As mentioned in PR 17786 by Nathan: correct. there is a related bug in that we fail to compile things like void foo (int x, int ary[sizeof(x)]); -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous

--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:44 --- Doesn't koenig lookup apply? That'll pull in ::parseFontName because of ::QString -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829

[Bug c/16202] The -Wsequence-point warnng misses many important instances

--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-10-04 12:44 --- Subject: Re: The -Wsequence-point warnng misses many important instances On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote: > JSM, can you have a look at this patch? It is said to be fully > func

[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:43 --- Related to bug 17801 which was caused by the same patch. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:39 --- Note if I change QString to be just an int, we accept the code. Confirmed, we should find the class version as we do with changing QString to be an int. -- What|Removed

[Bug c++/17544] [4.0 Regression] incorrect -Wunreachable-code warning for reachable code following a do statement

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-04 12:38 --- Setting this as C++ bug, the C++ frontend should mark the statement in some special way that middle-end can later detect to avoid the warning. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/17544] [4.0 Regression] incorrect -Wunreachable-code warning for reachable code following a do statement

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-04 12:37 --- The implicit return statement is added within cp/decl.c:finish_function: if (DECL_MAIN_P (current_function_decl)) { /* Make it so that `main' always returns 0 by default. */ #if VMS_

[Bug c++/17829] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:36 --- : Search converges between 2004-09-27-014001-trunk (#563) and 2004-09-27-161002-trunk (#564). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829

[Bug c++/17829] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:35 --- Reduced to: class QString {}; class QFontDatabase { static void findFont(); static void parseFontName(const QString &name, QString &foundry, QString &family); }; static void parseFontName(con