Greetings.
I am running up against an interesting compiler bug whereby a bool is
being promoted to an int. I found a Bugzilla entry and a message on the
mailing list that I thought was similar to what I am seeing:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15484
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2
> The alternative of course is to do only crossbuilds. Is it reasonable
> to say that, for platforms where a bootstrap is no longer feasible, a
> successful crossbuild is an acceptable test procedure to use instead?
>
Sure, and get flamed and trounced by Uli on glibc when you talk
about problems
> I am doing a study about compilers. I have to monitor many existing
> compilers and benchmark them. After I have to modify and optimize the
> 'back-end' part for multithreads models.
>
You should go look at Scott's site (http://www.coyotegulch.com/) as he
does a lot of benchmarking.
> I have
> Does this look familiar to anyone? It certainly was happening
> a few days ago. Shouldn't a bootstrap and regression of all
> frontend be required before someone checks in a patch to the
> back-end?
>
Indeed. The last working GCC-4.1 compiler for both MIPS and i686
was back on 20050604. The bu
Greetings.
Has anyone done or is aware of static coverage analysis tools that
can be used with GCC? I know that people have used 'gcov' with the
Linux kernel and User Mode Linux (UML) to do analysis with the
kernel. I actually want to do coverage analysis on bootloader code
from YAMON (used mostly
> I'm trying to determine if we can export the GNU GCC product. Can you
> please let me know if it contains any encryption?
>
You mean besides the documentation itself which is cryptic at times? No.
IIRC, there some one way hashes used, but no encryption. Your question
is amusing considering ever
