On 04/17/2015 09:01 AM, Peter Sewell wrote:
On 17 April 2015 at 15:19, wrote:
On Apr 17, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Peter Sewell wrote:
Dear gcc list,
we are trying to clarify what behaviour of C implementations is
actually relied upon in modern practice, and what behaviour is
guaranteed by curren
On 05/05/2015 08:27 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
For the following illustrative code,
double f1(int x) { return (double)(float)x; } --> return (double)x;
int f2(double x) { return (int)(float)x; } --> return (int)x;
Is it Okay for the compiler to do the simplifications shown above with
fast-ma
> On Dec 6, 2022, at 9:22 AM, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> In the following function, past_end is a pointer to one-past-the-end of the
> array. Holding such a pointer is legal in C. I use it as a sentinel value
> that helps (1) avoid overrunning the buffer, and (2) detect tr