Re: Sourceware Survey 2025

On Fri, 2025-03-14 at 01:29 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > The Sourceware Project Leadership Committee would like to know who our > users are, which hosted projects they feel part of, what services they > rely on and what the priorities should be for new initiatives. &

Sourceware Open Office Friday, May 9, 16:00 UTC

Friday May 9, 16:00 UTC At #overseers on irc.libera.chat To get the right time in your local timezone: $ date -d "Fri May 9 16:00 UTC 2025" - Got issues with the new Anubis "protection", please let us know! https://inbox.sourceware.org/20250421155940.ge2...@gnu.wildebeest.org - Want to discuss

Sourceware @ Conservancy - Year Two

f the Forgejo experiment will be making sure the resource estimates are correct. Sergio and Mark created the initial setup, which is almost fully scripted, but still has to be done by hand: https://sourceware.org/cgit/forge/tree/SETUP Claudio has been turning this into a fully automated An

Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

ve the SC > to "make major decisions" (as the docs say they do). Agreed. Maintainers already can approve new Write after Approval accounts. This seems a natural extension. For more transparancy I suggest the commit that updates the MAINTAINERS file adds one or more Approved-By: And we should a

DWZ 0.16 released

6edaa9ac7ea857ffd6b430cc0f70cc0b dwz-0.16.tar.xz The tar files are signed (as dwz-0.16.tar.{gz,xz}.asc) with https://www.klomp.org/mark/gnupg-pub.txt There is a web page for DWZ at: https://sourceware.org/dwz/ DWZ 0.16 includes the following bug fixes and enhancements: - Add support for

Sourceware Open Office Friday, June 13, 16:00 UTC

Friday June 14, 16:00 UTC At #overseers on irc.libera.chat To get the right time in your local timezone: $ date -d "Fri June 13 16:00 UTC 2025" - Want to become your project's secure development policy champion? Follow the check list and document your project's verifiable cybersecurity policy

Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

rs don't have any extra ability to make decisions. All major project decisions are made by community consensus: https://inbox.sourceware.org/pine.lnx.4.64.1203262157410.23...@digraph.polyomino.org.uk Cheers, Mark

Re: Sourceware Open Office Friday, June 13, 16:00 UTC

ent your project's verifiable cybersecurity policy: https://sourceware.org/cyber-security-faq.html#policy-checklist Please let us know. https://sourceware.org/mission.html#organization Cheers, Mark

Re: An alternative way of appointing reviewers and maintainers

Hi Segher, On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 11:07:15AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:40:02AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 05:53:18PM -0600, Jeff

9 Nov 06 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

ON THE CALL: Kenny Zadack (Natural Bridge), Diego Novillo (Red Hat), Vladimir Makarov (Red Hat), Mark Smith (Gelato), Bob Kidd (UIUC), Andrey Belevantsev (RAS), Arutyun Avetisyan (RAS), Mark Davis (Intel), Sebastian Pop (Ecole des Mines de Paris) Agenda: 1) Gelato ICE April GCC track proposed

ANNOUNCE: Gelato ICE GCC track, San Jose, CA, April 16-18, 2007

The following GCC track is part of the Gelato ICE (Itanium Conference & Expo) technical program, April 16-18, 2007, San Jose, CA. All interested GCC developers are invited to attend . A working list of speakers and topics can be found here: This year there is a strong focus on Linux. Andrew Morto

RE: testing GCC 4.2 on IA64 using Debian as a test suite <--- correction

> Eight IA64 specific and 10 generic GCC defects previously unknown > were identified. All these bugs have been reported to the GCC bug > tracker together with test cases and have all been fixed. Correction/clarification: All IA-64 specific bugs have been fixed.

Error building 4.0.1-RC2

ake target `../include/ansidecl.h', needed by `regex.o'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/backup/linux/gcc/gcc-4.0.1-20050616/build-i686-pc-linux-gnu/libiberty' make: *** [all-build-libiberty] Error 2 Anything else you guys need to know? Mark W.

Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2

>On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 15:02 +0930, Mark Williams (MWP) wrote: >> Thought i should report this... >> >> Building 4.0.1 RC2, i get this error: >> >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/backup/linux/gcc/gcc-4.0.1-20050616/intl' >> make[1]: Entering di

Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2

ll. Ok, that fixed it, thanks. Maybe a warning should be included in the configure script that is shown when poeple do run configure from the gcc source root? Thanks again, Mark W.

15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

ON THE CALL: Bob Kidd (UIUC), Vladimir Makarov (Red Hat), Mark Smith (Gelato), Wenguang Chen (Tsinghua), Mark Davis (Intel), Diego Novillo (Red Hat), Andrey Belevantsev (RAS), Dan Berlin (dberlin.org), Wen-mei Hwu (UIUC) The call covered: - current status / updates on the 3 improvement areas

RE: 15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

Another correction: Shin-ming Liu (HP) attended the meeting. In fact, he led the call :-) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mark K. Smith > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 4:00 PM > To: Gelato-GCC; GCC > Subject:

notes, presentations from GCC Improvement for Itanium sessions at Gelato meeting, Oct 3-4, 2005

http://gcc.gelato.org/PortoAlegreMeeting We had excellent sessions and extended time to discuss improving GCC on Itanium. Please refer to the discussion notes for additional information. Many thanks to the presenters and to Shin-ming Liu (HP) for leading the discussion.

10 Nov notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

ON THE CALL: Shin-ming Liu (HP), Vladimir Makarov (Red Hat), Diego Novillo (Red Hat), Mark Smith (Gelato), Andrey Belevantsev (RAS), Arutyun Avetisyan (RAS), Bob Kidd (UIUC), Mark Davis (Intel) The call covered: 1. Setting up GCC branch for Itanium-related work 2. Alias analysis update from RAS

8 Dec 05 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

ON THE CALL: Shin-ming Liu (HP), Vladimir Makarov (Red Hat), Diego Novillo (Red Hat), Mark Smith (Gelato), Bob Kidd (UIUC), Mark Davis (Intel) A fair amount of time was spent discussing the pros and cons of LLVM vs. LTO. Keep in mind that the next Gelato conference is coming up in April 06. If

Draft: 12 Jan 06 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

ON THE CALL: Shin-ming Liu (HP), Vladimir Makarov (Red Hat), Diego Novillo (Red Hat), Mark Smith (Gelato), Bob Kidd (UIUC), Andrey Belevantsev (RAS), Arutyun Avetisyan (RAS) Dan Berlin (IBM) was not able to join the call but did email an aliasing update (see below). We spent some time up front

Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2

optimisation guides? For reference, the gcc compiler is gcc 4.3.2 under Debian Lenny and the compile flags are: -Os -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wundef -Wendif-labels -Wstrict-aliasing -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes

Re: Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2

ide the code so that we can try it, we could help. If people don't mind me posting a patch and instructions to the list, I'm happy to do that. Many thanks, Mark. -- Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect PostgreSQL - PostGIS Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom ht

Re: Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2

inking along the right lines in that it's related to alignment of something changing. It is possible to run this test on a Linux system, isn't it? Yes - I use x86_64 Linux as my main work environment. Many thanks, Mark. -- Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect Postg

ANNOUNCE: GCC track at Gelato ICE conference

ions scheduled for the GCC track: * LLVM - Chris Lattner * LTO - Mark Mitchell * Aliasing update - Dan Berlin * Parallel programming with GCC - Diego Novillo * ORC back end for GCC - Shin-Ming Liu * Superblock work - Bob Kidd * Russian Academy of Science scheduler improvement update - Andrey Belevan

16 Feb 06 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

ON THE CALL: Shin-ming Liu (HP), Vladimir Makarov (Red Hat), Diego Novillo (Red Hat), Mark Smith (Gelato), Bob Kidd (UIUC), Andrey Belevantsev (RAS), Arutyun Avetisyan (RAS), Mark Davis (Intel) We spent some time up front discussing the GCC track at the upcoming Gelato ICE conference

16 Mar 06 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

ON THE CALL: Shin-ming Liu (HP), Vladimir Makarov (Red Hat), Mark Smith (Gelato), Bob Kidd (UIUC), Andrey Belevantsev (RAS), Arutyun Avetisyan (RAS), Mark Davis (Intel) Diego Novillo (Red Hat) was unable to join the call, but supplied an update to include in these notes. The GCC track at the

ANNOUNCE: GCC track at Gelato ICE finalized - April 24 & 25

pm - Bob Kidd Superblock Update * 8:00 pm - Andrey Belevantsev An Interblock VLIW Targeted Instruction Scheduler for GCC * 8:30 pm - Diego Novillo Parallel programming with GCC Tuesday Afternoon (4/25/06): * 2:30 pm - Mark Mitchell LTO: A Brief Introduction * 3:30 pm - Chris Lattner

ANNOUNCE: Gelato ICE GCC presentations available

O: A Brief Introduction, Mark Mitchell - LLVM: A Brief Introduction, Chris Lattner

ANNOUNCE: Gelato GCC Improvement on Itanium Workshop Summary, 7-8 August, Moscow Russia

Pop * PDO in GCC, Jan Hubicka * Itanium Architecture and ICC Tutorial, Mark Davis * Performance Metrics & Measurement, Shin-Ming Liu * CERN Loops Dissected, Sverre Jarp * Alias Analysis in GCC, Diego Novillo * Software Pipelining in GCC, Vladimir Makarov * Data Prefetchin

please keep the "deprecated" -I- option: it has important functionality not available elsewhere

ase don't remove -I- (or make it possible to disable the current directory search, with some other option).  Thank you, Mark Galeck

FW: is "syslimits.h" likely to change?

ge the GCC source to remove the file syslimits.h or change it to a different functionality, I would be left incompatible. So, is syslimits.h likely to disappear or change? Thank you, Mark

RE: FW: is "syslimits.h" likely to change?

Thank you Ian, hopefully I will be compatible then for a long time, as Larry Wall would say "at least until the heat death of the Universe". I can't "ignore it" :) My build system cannot handle "include_next" - it cannot handle the situation where you are finding a header file in one -I direct

successful build and install gcc 3.4.4

Mark Simulation Science CCS-5, MS M997 Los Alamos National Laboratory 505-667-8147

All Kinds Of High Quality Patches With Factory Rate+Fastest Turnaround Time

. Chenille Patches 3. Leather Patches 4. Iron Patches 5. Bullion Patches 6. Name Patches 7. Printed Patches 8. Woven Patches 9. PVC Patches And all type of which you need… Welcome to email us and get the best price ASAP. Thank you! Best Regards, Mark Sloan

Re: Has FSF stopped processing copyright paperwork?

s the assignment was submitted. Note that it might be a holiday this Friday/Monday over there. Also the FSF might be a bit busy at the moment with changing its management team and board: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/executive-director/management-team-members-resigning Cheers, Mark

Re: unrecognizable insn generated in plugin?

ing that at the point at which they gain control of rip they have control over some state somewhere. If you could explain the exact attack scenario that you have in mind then perhaps I could provide a better explanation of how one might bypass it. Regards, Mark smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [PATCH] arm64/io: Remind compiler that there is a memory side effect

//gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html ... which says: | Note: GCC 12 has not been released yet Surely we can fix it prior to release? Thanks, Mark. > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h | 8 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(

GCC 12 miscompilation of volatile asm (was: Re: [PATCH] arm64/io: Remind compiler that there is a memory side effect)

ret | func_with_msr_side_effects: | pushrbp | pushrbx | mov rbx, rdi | mov rbp, rsi | callmsr_rmw_set_bits | mov rsi, rbp | mov rdi, rbx | callmsr_rmw_set_bits | mov rsi, rbp | mov rdi, rbx | callmsr_rmw_set_bits | mov rsi, rbp | mov rdi, rbx | callmsr_rmw_set_bits | pop rbx | pop rbp | ret Thanks, Mark.

Re: GCC 12 miscompilation of volatile asm (was: Re: [PATCH] arm64/io: Remind compiler that there is a memory side effect)

Sorry, I copied the wrong version of the x86_64 assembly as generated by GCC 11.2.0). Updated below. On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:51:30PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > My x86_64 test case is: > > | unsigned long rdmsr(unsigned long reg) > | { > | unsigned int lo, hi; > | &g

Re: GCC 12 miscompilation of volatile asm (was: Re: [PATCH] arm64/io: Remind compiler that there is a memory side effect)

On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 04:05:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:51:30PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > [adding kernel folk who work on asm stuff] > > > > As a heads-up, GCC 12 (not yet released) appears to erroneousl

Re: GCC 12 miscompilation of volatile asm (was: Re: [PATCH] arm64/io: Remind compiler that there is a memory side effect)

On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:51:30PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi all, > > [adding kernel folk who work on asm stuff] > > As a heads-up, GCC 12 (not yet released) appears to erroneously optimize away > calls to functions with volatile asm. Szabolcs has raised an issue on

Regarding gnu.org

Hello , I am currently representing the sale of the following domain: *GNU .ai* I can share with you the pricing and other details. Looking forward to hearing from you. Regards, Mark Smith

Re: Regarding gnu.org

Hi, So, what do you think? Regards, Mark Smith [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&;> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=si

Re: [RISC-V] [sig-toolchains] RISC-V V C Intrinsic API v1.0 release meeting reminder (Oct 03, 2022)

+sig-vec...@lists.riscv.org On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 5:57 AM eop Chen wrote: > Hi all, > > A reminder that an open meeting to draft the RISC-V V C Intrinsic API v1.0 > release is > going to be held later on 2022/10/03 7AM (GMT -7) / 10PM (GMT +8). > > Slide has been posted and agenda is in the se

Re: GCC used to store pointers in FP registers on aarch64

y more information about the configuration(s) that you see this with, e.g. * Which CPU(s)? If you're not able to say which CPU(s) specifically, knowing whether SVE and/or SME are present would be helpful. * Which kernel version(s), assuming this is with Linux? If virtualization is involved, knowing the guest and host kernel versions would be helpful. Thanks, Mark.

Sddm.net is for sale!

me. Top Domain Sellers (TDS) Mark James Bautista [image: beacon]

<    14   15   16   17   18   19