Andrew Pinski wrote:
On 8/17/07, Stephen M. Kenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cross compiling works for me out of the box if done correctly. Yes I
have to compile GCC and glibc (or newlib) twice but I don't care as it
is all scripted.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Great! Scripting is wo
During the recent discussion about cross compilers I was told "bugs
happen", so I went hunting.
I have been digging into why building a cross compiler dies in different
ways for different targets.
As seen below, the Linux targets which use glibc define
MD_UNWIND_SUPPORT and have
a customized lin
David Daney wrote:
You never state what you are trying to build. "cross compiler" does
not really narrow it down.
Also you don't state what errors you are experiencing.
I'm experimenting with building a Linux based cross compiler/tool-chain
for building the Kernel and Apps
for every target in
Can anyone explain why LIMITS_H_TEST is defined in cris/t-linux, while
it is not defined for any other linux target? It's a relatively recent
change. "ChangeLog-2005" line 5810 says
"2005-10-12 Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> config/cris/t-linux
(LIMITS_H_TEST): Define."
It breaks
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Steve Kenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is it ever possible to build libmudflap, libssp, or libgomp when
inhibit_libc is set?
It seems unlikely.
OK, then I'll pursue this idea
If not, is is reasonable to add a check to the top level configure to detect
I'm working on a patch to the top level configure to detect if inhibit_libc
will set for gcc and to avoid trying to build certain libraries in that
case.
I started to just clone the inhibit_libc logic from the gcc/configure,
but as
Ian commented, it is a bit strange. Then I realized that build-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-02 10:03:56 +0800 Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. wrote:
what is darwin_register_objc_includes in gcc/config/darwin-c.c for?
is
it needed for linux?
/* Register the GNU objective-C run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-02 10:07:25 +0800 Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. wrote:
I have also moved all my changes to gcc.c and c-incpath.c into
config/linux.h and config/frameworks.c. the latter is just darwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-02 10:52:38 +0800 Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snipped..]
P.S.: cc'ed to the GNUstep list just for informational purpose
[ assuming that list is still closed, since, you didn't say they
opened it ]
Will you please stop doing that.
Hello,
Thanks for the response.
Please provide more information (template disclaimer text etc) on how the
assignment should be performed.
Thanks,
Swami
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Ted Teah via RT wrote:
> Hello Swami,
>
>
> You can either assign the work through the process of each indivudal who
>
Hello,
I have write, open and read statements in a fortran program and compile as,
gfortran -c test.f90
and create a dll with
gfortran -shared test.dll -o test.o
I import this dll in C# with dllimport and call one of the routine. After
the call the program hangs on write(*,*) statement.
May I
Hello,
I have ported gcc to a 16-bit target. Now problem is, gcc generates wrong code
with -O1 and above optimization for move and load/store instructions, b using
the 32-bit registers with 16-bit instructions. For ex:
===
move r13, r1 // move 0-15 bit to r1 register
move r13, r0 // move 16-31
To solve the above issue, can I use the "define_peephole2" insn pattern?
No. At most you could abuse it to hide the issue some of the time.
You probably have one or more of your target macros / hooks wrong,
e.g. HARD_REGNO_NREGS.
Thank you very much for your reply. In my case, code generation
Esben Mose Hansen writes:
> this program SEGFAULTs
>
> #include
>
> int main() {
> int numbers[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 };
> const std::size_t nn = sizeof(numbers)/sizeof(int);
> int sum = 0;
> int f = 5;
> std::for_each(&numbers[0], &numbers[nn], [&] (int n) {
> sum +=
Jim Wilson wrote:
Rogelio Serrano wrote:
When building gcc-4.1.0 with uclibc im getting and undefined
BITS_PER_UNIT error when building libgcc at the muldi3.
Using grep would show that it is defined in the defaults.h file.
Using grep again shows that defaults.h is supposed to be automaticall
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.1.1 has been released.
This release is a bug-fix release for problems in GCC 4.0.2. GCC
4.1.1 contains changes to correct regressions from previous releases,
but no new features.
This release is available from the FTP servers listed here:
http://www.gnu.org/ord
Hi Gcc Team,
I am trying to download gcc compiler but didn't download the compiler
please give me solution, how to do download this?
Regards,
Dinesh M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-02-25 19:22:11 +0800 Joseph S. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I intend to commit my new C parser to mainline today once it is
confirmed
that the 4.0 branch has been created and after final testing against
today's
mainline on x86_64-unknown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-02-25 20:54:22 +0800 Lars Segerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
btw. what Wiki ??
/ Lars Segerlund
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki
- --
Got Sharapova?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMa
Hello,
We are a system software development company focusing on R&D in the
areas of software development tools and application platforms for
embedded and enterprise applications. We also provide GNU tools related
services like porting GNU C/C++ compiler toolchain to new processors,
implementin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
what is darwin_register_objc_includes in gcc/config/darwin-c.c for? is
it needed for linux?
- --
Got Sharapova?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail
iD8DBQFCH2HHyihxuQOYt8wRAlnnAJ4gA2q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-02-26 04:18:13 +0800 Matt Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have frameworks working too, did you do the whole
shebang binutils/gcc/glibc changes?
My ld-linker broke. I dont know why so im starting from scratch again.
The uclibc dynamic linker s
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Check options -fdump-tree-* in the GCC documentation.
Cheers,
Manuel.
Can this dump then be used to generate a running excutable?
On 12/02/2008, Dasarath Weeratunge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to dump the ssa representation and alias informati
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Joseph,
> The following target architectures have seen no test results posted in
> the past year: arc, c4x (as listed above), crx, iq2000, mt, pdp11,
> score, stormy16, vax.
Please do not deprecate the "crx" target. We are actively working on to update
this target and
Hello,
I am trying the build the crx-elf target gcc compiler tools from gcc trunk
sources, but the below error message displayed.
Could any one suggest the reason for build fail?
===Error log
In file included from /trunk/gcc/sel-sched-dump.c:37:
/trunk/gcc/sel-sched-ir.h:93: error: ex
Hello,
I am building the gcc tools using the gcc trunk sources and my configuration is:
=
/gcc/trunk/configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-mingw32
--prefix=/release --target=crx-elf --disable-nls --enable-languages=c,c++
--disable-libssp --with-mpfr=/scratch/mpfr-2.3.1/rel --with-
Hello,
I am trying to build the gcc tools on cygwin host. But the build failed with
below errors:
$ gcc -I../../../trunk/libdecnumber -I. -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstr
ict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-att
ribute -Wcast-qual -pedantic -Wn
Here is a minute tidbit.
When I click on the Modula-3 link:
http://www.m3.org/
it rolls over to:
http://www.igencorp.com/igencorp/
Ii looks like they moved to:
http://www.modula3.org/
Ed Smith-Rowland
Hello,
I am learning about memory alignment and noticed that on my x86-64 machine
with GCC 14, a `complex double` has a size of 16 bytes, but an alignment of
only 8 bytes. I am curious as to why this is. Doesn't it run the risk of
ending up with a `complex double` that straddles cache lines?
Tha
A good reason why Richard should be on the SC is to that he does
demonstrates the values of the GNU project, that of the free software
movement and the FSF. GCC is a important project, and having the head
of the GNU project involved -- even if mostly uninvolved in daily
topics, is a ultimately a g
I ("new moderator") won't recount what happened, it is neither here,
or there, but Mark is presenting a very biased view of what occured,
and also one of the reasons why he no longer is a moderator.
The claims about doxxing, etc, are entierly untrue and unfounded.
[...] That "gnu-stucture" document was written by RMS a couple of
months ago and doesn't represent how the GNU project and its
maintainers have worked for years.
It reflects the same message that has been sent to new GNU maintainers
for the decades. The GNU structure and organization doc
"We've always done it this way" is not necessarily a good defence of an
existing practice.
That wasn't the claim, it is how we do it currently, and have been
doing for decades though. If you have concrete suggestions, please
send them to the GNU Advisory Committee.
> Â Â The GNU Assemb
These discussions are slightly off topic for gcc@, I'd suggest they
are moved to gnu-misc-discuss@ or some other more suitable list.
To me GNU is people wanting to create a software system that respects
users freedom according to the GNU Social Contract:
https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-
Please move these off-topic discussions somewhere else, people are
already annoyed and angry as it is -- on both sides!
It should remain an acronym, but it should now stand for "GCC Compiler
Collection". That allows the project to be disassociated from the GNU
name while still subtly acknowledging its heritage.
Then it would not longer be GCC. It would be something different.
The whole point of GCC is to
DF or XML or an HTML tarball)
GCC 11.1 Standard C++ Library Reference Manual (also in PDF or XML GPL
or XML GFDL or an HTML tarball)
...
The remaining items under "GCC 11.1 manuals" seem to be OK.
Thank you for your indispensable work
Regards
Pablo M. Ronchi
GCC was created as part of the GNU Project but has grown to operate as
an autonomous project.
That is true for all GNU project.
The GCC Steering Committee has decided to relax the requirement to
assign copyright for all changes to the Free Software Foundation. GCC
will continue to
> What is the rationale after these changes anyway?
Development of new features for libstdc++ has already moved away from
gcc.gnu.org to avoid the copyright assignment. Other contributors have
expressed a desire to do the same.
>From the GCC mission statement:
- Other components
But GPL3 has been a good license for GCC; giving up the theoretical ability
to change the license (other than to a later GPL) does not seem like a
significant loss.
That will cause trouble incorperating code or documentation snippets
from the code base into the GCC manual; which is not un
ldron.
Let me know if any of you are interested in this, and I can put you in touch
with the staff at SFC who orgainze FOSSY.
Let me know!
--
Bradley M. Kuhn - he/them
Policy Fellow & Hacker-in-Residence at Software Freedom Conservancy
.
Thank you for considering my interest, and I look forward to your response.
Warm regards,
M Hamza Nadeem
Thanks, I'll check them out.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm Martin Jambor, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 24 2024, M Hamza Nadeem via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi Sir / mam,
> >
> >
> > I hope this email finds you well. As an enthusiastic contributor with a
> >
Hi Martin,
I wanted to write GSoC proposal on Improve nothrow Detection in GCC, . What
are the main points to be added in proposal
Hi Martin,
I wanted to write GSoC proposal on Improve nothrow Detection in GCC, . What
are the main points to be added in proposal ?
g?
I need LTO. Is there a way to have LTO in GCC, without LTOing the GCC
itself? This way my builds will be many times faster.
Regards and thanks to your awesome compilers
--
*Ghorban M. Tavakoly*
Phone number: +98 (902) (2²⁰+2¹⁹+2¹⁸+…+2²+2¹+2⁰)
>> Is there any change to have some LTO progress indicator information in
upstream GCC output? Do I need to report a bug?
Is there any chance ... (sorry for typo)
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 2:41 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly
wrote:
> I build GCC from git repo regularly. Unfortunately my system i
Hi
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 11:59 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Is there any change to have some LTO progress indicator information
> in
> > > upstream GCC outpu
Hi, and thank you for your answer.
Is there an option to have LTO in the final GCC, but without using LTO in
compiling GCC itself?
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 9:00 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > >> Is
at 10:01 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-09-15 at 15:20 +0330, Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 11:59 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
> > >
On 2024-10-30 11:45, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Carlos,
On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 08:32 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
I can get down to specific requirements and possible solutions for
them, including
things like securing logins with 2FA etc. Which *could* be solved by
Sourceware
today possibly usin
> On 11/24/24 11:49 AM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> > One size doesn't necessarily fit all. Perhaps if you're changing the DCO
> > text for the toolchain projects at this moment, it might be a good time to
> > consider if the Linux DCO text suits your project pe
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=d4563201f33a022fc0353033d9dfeb1606a88330
(IANAL and TINLA, but I've regularly studied this policy issue since the DCO
was first introduced.)
--
Bradley M. Kuhn - he/the
Hello,
Thanks for the response.
Please provide more information (template disclaimer text etc) on how the
assignment should be performed.
Thanks,
Swami
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Ted Teah via RT wrote:
> Hello Swami,
>
>
> You can either assign the work through the process of each indivudal who
>
Hello,
Thanks for the response.
Please provide more information (template disclaimer text etc) on how the
assignment should be performed.
Thanks,
Swami
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Ted Teah via RT wrote:
> Hello Swami,
>
>
> You can either assign the work through the process of each indivudal who
>
Hi,
We would like use corporate assignment. Could you please send us the
requited templates for this?. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Swami
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Ted Teah via RT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I assume you want to use individual assignments, is that correct?
> I have attached the emplo
Hello,
Please find the name of the organization, the name and title of the person
who will sign on the contract:
Name of the Organization: Sankhya Technologies Private Limited
Name : A.R.S.Kumar
Title : Asst.Manager - Legal Compliances
Mailing Address:
Sankhya Technologies
Hello,
Please send your response for the below (forwarded) message. Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Swami
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:11:38 +0530 (IST)
From: M Ranga Swami Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ted Teah via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Уважаемый господин / госпожа,
Комплимент сезона,
Я надеюсь, это электронное письмо дойдет до тебя.
Я хотел бы поговорить с вами о бизнесе и инвестициях.
Надеюсь услышать ваш положительный ответ.
С уважением,
Greetings,
I am M V V S Manoj Kumar, an Open Source Contributor to Rust-GCC (GitHub
<https://github.com/mvvsmk/>, contributions
<https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Amvvsmk+is%3Aclosed>),
and I want to pursue a GSoC project regarding constant folding in Rust
hi
i am a java developer, i want to install gnu java compiler on LINUX
7.2 for testing purpose. i already have gcc version 4.8.5 20150623
(Red Hat 4.8.5-4) (GCC) in my machine. now i want to add gcj in it.
how can i install it?
--
regards
jahanzeb
101 - 162 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
