Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:25:06PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > H. J. Lu wrote: > > >>>I was trying to load a full 128 bit constant into __float128 variable, > >>>but > >>>with "L" suffix, I was able to load only XFmode constant. Is there a

The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.17 is released

This is the beta release of binutils 2.17.50.0.17 for Linux, which is based on binutils 2007 0615 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various changes. It is purely for Linux. All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree. You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been

Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:10:43AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > BTW: IA64 has the same issues with two FP types (long double XFmode and > > "longer double" TFmode). How is this solved for IA64? > > > > Uros. > > This is different on IA64 HP-UX and IA64 Linux. On HP-UX, 128 bits is > the stand

Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:33:07PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > We need a standard for __float128. Otherwise, a program using > > __float128 may generate different results with different > > compilers on different platforms. > > > > BTW, I had a __float128 patch for glibc. Because there is no >

Re: Object attribute tagging

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:50:27AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > The question was raised a while back on the gcc-patches and gdb-patches > lists of how GCC should tag objects with some ABI information for the use > of GDB, noting that various different methods have been in use >

libjava is broken

This patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2007-q2/msg00322.html breaks libjava build: /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/libjava/gnu/classpath/jdwp/natVMVirtualMachine.cc:700: error: prototype for 'gnu::classpath::jdwp::util::MethodResult* gnu::classpath::jdwp::VMVirtualMachine::executeMetho

Re: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c on gcc-4.2 branch

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:14:55AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Hello H.J.! > > The testscase gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c you ported from mainline > fails on gcc-4.2 branch because __builtin_ia32_vec_ext_v16qi builtin > does not exist in gcc-4.2. This builtin corresponds to pextrb insn > that was

Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:46:10PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote: > On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 06:17 -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still > > hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report: > > > > http://g

Re: $Revision$ in version string?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Hello! > > Is there a way to add automatically updated SVN revision number to gcc > version string? Something similar to $Revision$ in RCS? > > I think it would be quite informative if during development phase "gcc > --version" would

Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:08:15PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:10:43AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > BTW: IA64 has the same issues with two FP types (long double XFmode and > > > "longer double" TFmode). How is this solved for IA64? >

Static stack analysis

Hi! I'm interested in static stack analysis tools. Either using someone else's or creating. Where would I find existing tools? Where would I find existing contracter software developers? michael

Cannot stat gcc/include-fixed/limits.h when installing GCC 4.7.2

e? Why is gcc/include-fixed/limits.h being moved when updating the "install" target? Let me know if I can provide any other information that may help. My build system: * Linux 3.2.0 * EGLIBC 2.13 * GCC 4.7.2 * Binutils 2.22 Thanks, -- Patrick "P. J." McDermott http://www.pehjota.net/ http://www.pehjota.net/contact.html

GNU Make's -n option and $(MAKE) in makefiles (was: Cannot stat gcc/include-fixed/limits.h when installing GCC 4.7.2)

On 2013-04-16 15:00, Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott wrote: [...] > > I'm trying to build and install GCC 4.7.2, and I'm getting the following > error from the "install-mkheaders" target of gcc/Makefile: [...] > > The deletion of syslimits.h, movement of

Effects of adding a *description member to structs?

That way we can have a clean subsystems of commands for easy processing

Need help debugging possible 10.3 bad code generation regression from 10.2/9.3 on Mac OS 10.15.7 (Catalina)

I’m seeing an “Illegal Instruction” fault and don’t quite know how to generate a proper bug report yet. This is the compiler: [Bradleys-Mac-mini:~] lucier% /usr/local/gcc-10.3.0/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/gcc-10.3.0/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-10.3.0/l

Re: Need help debugging possible 10.3 bad code generation regression from 10.2/9.3 on Mac OS 10.15.7 (Catalina)

On Apr 20, 2021, at 9:11 AM, Gabriel Paubert mailto:paub...@iram.es>> wrote: (lldb) di -s 0x000103d6 -c 10 libgambit.dylib`___SCMOBJ_to_NONNULLSTRING: 0x103d6 <+1504>: jl 0x103d60026 ; <+1542> at c_intf.c:3282:9 0x103d60002 <+1506>: orb%al, 0x31(%rbp) 0

Question about information from -fdump-rtl-sched2 on M1 Max

The question: How to interpret scheduling info with the compiler listed below. Specifically, a tight loop that was reported to be scheduled in 23 cycles (as I understand it) actually executes in a little over 2 cycles per loop, as I interpret two separate experiments. Am I misinterpreting somet

Re: Question about information from -fdump-rtl-sched2 on M1 Max

That should be 4 cycles per loop, sorry. > On Apr 29, 2024, at 7:24 PM, Lucier, Bradley J wrote: > > Specifically, a tight loop that was reported to be scheduled in 23 cycles (as > I understand it) actually executes in a little over 2 cycles per loop

Security wrapper around the stack

I know compiling is exponenental when considering it compiles operating systems, but can someone either implement or help me implement some kind of singular security feature for the stack so hacks dont access the heap? Im thinking the first few bytes would be some security software or feature (w

guide me

hi i am a java developer, i want to install gnu java compiler on LINUX 7.2 for testing purpose. i already have gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4) (GCC) in my machine. now i want to add gcj in it. how can i install it? -- regards jahanzeb

<    4   5   6   7   8   9