Sent from my iPhone
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 21:39 vspefs via Gcc wrote:
> Current `-Mmodules` output is based on [P1602R0](wg21.link/p1602r0), which
> speaks about a set of Makefile rules that can handle modules, with the
> help of
> module mappers and a modified GNU Make.
>
> The proposal came ou
GCC conjures up both .o file and .gcm file in one invocation when possible, too.
And yes, that can be managed well with grouped target - but a rule with grouped
target must have a recipe, which I think is a little beyond `gcc -M`'s scope.
Thanks for bringing up the pattern rule workaround, t
On Sunday, March 2nd, 2025 at 02:13, Ben Boeckel via Gcc
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 16:15:12 +, vspefs wrote:
>
> > I read a few mails from the autoconf thread. I'll try to read all now.
> > However,
> > a maybe-off-topic-but-could-be-on-topic questi
Hello,
Direct questions listed at the end for the impatient :)
Hopefully my mail client wraps the text properly, if not, I apologize in
advance. I haven’t used this client for mailing list posts before…
I’m looking for information on GCC patch submission, hoping someone can
provide some
On Wednesday, March 5th, 2025 at 21:06, Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
wrote:
> Worth noting that GCC already provides a mapper that you can customise:
>
> $ g++ -fmodules -fmodule-mapper='|@g++-module-server -r path' -c m.cpp
>
> for an m.cpp that provides a module &quo
Title: Type-Based Alias Analysis in GCC using TySan
Overview
Both LLVM and GCC share a common sanitizer library called libsanitizer.
Recently, libsanitizer has introduced support for Type-Based Sanitization
(TySan). The goal of this project is to investigate and prototype the use of
type
Hello! I'm interested in the idea of "Name Resolution Pass Rewrite".
I took the compiler course and implemented a ALGOL-like language compiler.
I have huge passion about compiler and would love to contribute to GCC
community.
I looked up some resources on this topic. Name resolu
Dear all,
I hope you’ve been doing well!
I’m Zhiwen, an undergraduate who is working towards his degree jointly in
mathematics and computer science.
I’m writing to express my interest in working on a medium-sized (or
large-sized) project that, broadly speaking, extends the static-analysis
pass
nternetMail/2.74
X-Originating-Client: Alpine/2.23(Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_0)
X-MSMail-Priority: 2
Message-ID: <93e87ab58330193e87ab58330193e87ab583...@adams.net>
X-Powered-By: Koa
X-Sieve: fileinto 'INBOX.important';
X-Mailer-LID: 1045531-239087046
Return-Path: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Da
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:46 PM zzmic wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
> I hope you’ve been doing well!
>
> I’m Zhiwen, an undergraduate who is working towards his degree jointly in
> mathematics and computer science.
>
>
> I’m writing to express my interest in working on a medium-sized (or
> large-siz
This is great, thank you so much!
Martin Jambor 于2025年3月25日周二 07:11写道：
> Hello,
>
> we are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting.
>
> On Sun, Mar 16 2025, Christina / via Gcc wrote:
> > Hello! I'm interested in the idea of "Name Resolution Pass Re
mber
> of passes there At that level you (and likely should) account
> below functions to individual statements and declarations.
> You may also need to limit yourself to specific
> languages (e.g. C/C++ only)
>
> I would separate these two cases in the project plan because
>
Hello GCC and GNU support, I am the proxy service lead for Lockheed Martin and
something seems to be blocking our traffic when our US users try to reach
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/. Our Non-US users do not have the same issues.
Our reserved Zscaler IP Space for US users is the following
I recommend creating a different name for your own memcpy() implementation,
and use that. You may also make it configurable which implementation to use.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025, 08:51 Wasim Khan via Gcc-help
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a custom implementation of memcpy() function and don'
I encountered one problem with loop-im pass.
I compiled the program dhry2reg which belongs to unixbench(
https://github.com/kdlucas/byte-unixbench).
The gcc used
gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
The commands executed as following
make
./Run -c -i 1 dhry2reg
The results are shown below.
Dhrystone 2 using
I bootstrapped and tested on Power8 and Power9 BE in both 32-bit and
64-bit modes, and on Power8, Power9 & Power10 LE in 64-bit mode, and
everything looks good.
On 24/04/25 4:28 am, Peter Bergner wrote:
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 15.1 is available from
>
> https:/
.com
libc-al...@sourceware.org
dilfri...@gentoo.org
binut...@sourceware.org
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
g...@sourceware.org
~~//~~
Invitation from Google Calendar: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/
You are receiving this email because you are an attendee on the event.
Forwarding this invitation could allow any
I bootstrapped and tested on Power8 and Power9 BE in both 32-bit and
64-bit modes, and on Power8, Power9 & Power10 LE in 64-bit mode, and
everything looks good.
On 24/04/25 4:30 am, Peter Bergner wrote:
>
> The second release candidate for GCC 15.1 is available from
>
> htt
I encountered one problem with loop-im pass.
I compiled the program dhry2reg which belongs to unixbench(
https://github.com/kdlucas/byte-unixbench).
The gcc used
gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
The commands executed as following
make
./Run -c -i 1 dhry2reg
The results are shown below.
Dhrystone 2 using
Ave gcc people
Build environment:
-Redhat 7.3 with fedora legacy updates.
-gcc build configured with : ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.0.2-RC1
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=posix --disable-shared
My build of gcc 4.0.2 RC1 is still bootstrapping but I see these snippets
in my
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
> Original Message
> >From: Gcc K6 testing account
> >Sent: 14 September 2005 19:43
>
> > Ave gcc people
>
> ¡Hola!
>
> > Is "-DENABLE_CHECKING" supposed to happen in a RC/release?
> > Or
Hey all,
I'm picking this work up from Andrew. Last time it was decided that the timing
wasn't right to upgrade the minimum version to C++11. Is the timing better now
to get this change through?
I've attached the patch Andrew prepared. Can I get feedback on the change and
some help testing on
> On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > Some nitpicks:
> >
> > Timing-wise, the GCC developer community is focusing on gcc 10
> > bugfixing right now (aka "stage 4" of the release cycle). So this
> > patch
> On 2/12/20 8:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> The patch will need an update to the docs; search for
> "Tools/packages necessary for building GCC" in
> gcc/doc/install.texi, which currently has some paragraphs labelled:
>@item ISO C++98 compiler
> that will need cha
t; (I'm not speaking on behalf of anyone other than myself here, as a GCC
> maintainer, and I don't mean for this to come across as personal)
>
> Thanks
> Dave
Guidance from my side is to get an individual's license to proceed. Can you
send me over the forms to get that done?
Modi
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 9.3 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.3.0-RC-20200305/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.3.0-RC-20200305/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
r9-8351
Hi Folks,
thanks for the work to migrate to the new server.
In the transition, I observe some changes to the integration of mail with
the web-pages.
In particular, my existing links seem to point now to:
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gxxx
If I reconnect from the GCC front page
$ git clone https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
Cloning into 'gcc'...
fatal: repository 'https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git/' not found
Uros.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 08:41:11AM +0100, Uros Bizjak via Gcc wrote:
> $ git clone https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
> Cloning into 'gcc'...
> fatal: repository 'https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git/' not found
I believe #overseers are aware of this and other still unresol
ownloading RPMs from older systems and
> unpacking them) which is sufficient to build GCC (and binutils etc.) I
> need the GCC binaries I create to be compiled using this sysroot so
> that they can run on older systems.
I suggest using containers for this. Once you've got a working
Do
dah utilities are great alternatives to docker itself.
> >
> > By building in a container using something like "FROM centos:6" you
> > know you're using those packages, not trying to convince GCC to use a
> > cobbled-together sysroot based on old RPMs.
>
The GNU Compiler Collection version 9.3 has been released.
GCC 9.3 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 9 branch
containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
GCC 9.2 with more than 157 bugs fixed since the previous release.
This release is available from the FTP servers listed at
Status
==
GCC 9.3 has been released and the branch is again open for regression
and documentation fixes. History makes us expect a GCC 9.4 release
from end of year up to almost a year from now.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
info.rar
Description: Binary data
sible during LTO **and** are declared external
> are functions defined in libraries which have not been compiled with
> -flto. An example of this is glibc.
>
> Indeed, I have implemented an analysis pass in gcc which prints out
> undefined functions, and it prints out the following:
>
&
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:32 PM Tamar Christina
wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gcc On Behalf Of Richard Biener
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 11:12 AM
> > To: Kewen.Lin
> > Cc: GCC Development ; Segher Boessenkool
> >
> > S
It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments
made by others(*). Fox instance, commit r10-7151 for PR 92071 shows
in comment #16 on the bug under Martin Liška's name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071#c16
Similarly, commits r9-8372, r10-7152, and r8-10
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:46:40AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments
> made by others(*). Fox instance, commit r10-7151 for PR 92071 shows
> in comment #16 on the bug under Martin Liška's name.
>
>
On 3/13/20 9:50 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:46:40AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments
made by others(*). Fox instance, commit r10-7151 for PR 92071 shows
in comment #16 on the bug under Martin
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:56:58AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 3/13/20 9:50 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:46:40AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> > > It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments
> > > made
of Parallel Compilation Viability**
[Giuliano Belinassi]{style="color: darkgreen"}\
Timezone: GMT$-$3:00\
University of São Paulo -- Brazil\
IRC: giulianob in \#gcc\
Email: [`giuliano.belina...@usp.br`](mailto:giuliano.belina...@usp.br)\
Github: <https://github.com/giulianobelinassi/&g
On March 14, 2020 10:55:09 AM GMT+01:00, "FRÉDÉRIC RECOULES"
wrote:
>Hello the GCC community,
>I just want to share some thoughts on inlining a function even if
>it is called through a function pointer.
>My starting point is the version 9.2 (used at https://godbolt.or
Una duda ¿Usted conoce o tiene cuenta de Netflix, HBO o Amazon Prime?
Ahora usted imagine una plataforma igual, pero con cientos de cursos y
conferencias profesionales impartidas por expertos en todas las áreas. Eso es
exactamente lo que vengo a ofrecerle, una suscripción a nuestra nueva
plata
Hi,
since the change to the new list management, there has been
an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
bounces and that I would get removed from the list unless I
confirmed it (which I then did).
So, a request: C
In Which Format I have to Send Gsoc Proposal On this Mail PDF or DOC Format
Su cuenta BBVA Empresas
(Net
Cash) está temporalmente
restringida.
Estimado gcc@gcc.gnu.org
,
su cuenta bancária de BBVA Empresas (Net Cash)
está
restringida por actividad Inusual.
Se adjunta su prueba de
transferencia SEPA.
Lamentamos cualquier inconveniente que esto
pueda
In the given link I shared My GSOC 2020 Project Proposal And Tell Me If Any
Other Extra Point I have to Add on it. Any Give Me feedback About My
Project Proposal .
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J2lCtkDPoU0gwp5zk8Ygy0Vg82fNn-ZH0gsv5dBkKok/edit?usp=sharing
Hi, Shivan.
On 03/15, shivam tiwari via Gcc wrote:
> In Which Format I have to Send Gsoc Proposal On this Mail PDF or DOC Format
Perhaps the best way to write your proposal is to write LaTeX, and
then convert it to Markdown using pandoc, and attach it to the mailing
list. One example of t
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Martin Liška wrote:
> It's probably related to the following email tag:
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> The format is problematic when copying a patch.
> Email example:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/542053.h
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 14:13, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 3/16/20 2:54 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > Are you trying to copy from the raw message representation?
>
> Exactly.
That's never been reliable.
>
> 2) ipa-split is very simplistic and only splits when there is no value
>computed in header of function used in the tail. We should support
> adding extra parameters for values computed and do more general SESE
>outlining
> Note that we do SESE outlining for openMP but this code is
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:11:14PM +, Aditya K via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > 2) ipa-split is very simplistic and only splits when there is no value
> >computed in header of function used in the tail. We should support
> > adding extra parameters for values computed
Bu mesajın metin bölümüdür.
Eski tip email müşteri kullanıcıları için gösterilir.
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 21:15, David Korczynski wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> My name is David Korczynski and I have been doing some work on
> integrating fuzzing by way of OSS-Fuzz into the gcc project. This came
> out of fuzzing libiberty within the binutils project where we found
>
reuse them.
-Aditya
From: Jakub Jelinek
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 5:19:16 PM
To: Aditya K
Cc: Jan Hubicka ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fw: GSoC topic: Implement hot cold splitting at GIMPLE IR level
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:11:14PM +, Aditya K via Gcc
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:33 PM Aditya K via Gcc wrote:
>
> As I understand the openmp outliner is also at the tree level. A region based
> outliner could be reused there. I’m not particular about the outliner being
> specific to ipa-split. A GSoC project can help us get the co
>
> > Here is the proposal, and I am attaching a pdf file for better
> > readability:
> >
> > **Automatic Detection of Parallel Compilation Viability**
> >
> > [Giuliano Belinassi]{style="color: darkgreen"}\
> > Timezone: GMT$-$3:00\
> >
\
Timezone: GMT$-$3:00\
University of São Paulo -- Brazil\
IRC: giulianob in \#gcc\
Email: [`giuliano.belina...@usp.br`](mailto:giuliano.belina...@usp.br)\
Github: <https://github.com/giulianobelinassi/>\
Date:
About Me Computer Science Bachelor (University of São Paulo), currently
pursuing a M
Good Morning
We have attach our March order to this mail, confirm this order
by return mail and issue send Invoice Asap.
Thanks & Best Regards
May Lee
Know How International GmbH & Co. KG
Import
.
For example:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268827&root=gcc&view=rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267096&root=gcc&view=rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244881&root=gcc&view=rev
Are they supposed to work and if so, is anyone else having trouble with
them and is
On 3/18/20 3:49 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
I've been getting Error 403 (Forbidden - You don't have permission
to access /viewcvs on this server) following the Subversion links
in Bugzilla for some time now (they worked for me before the switch
to Git, but I'm not sure i
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 21:54, Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> I'm one of the old timers that likes our current work flow, but even I
> think that we are risking our future by staying with antiquated tools.
> One of the first things I need to teach new people is now to use email
> "properly". It is a barrier
N.B. the CC list has got too big and is causing posts to this thread
to be held for moderator approval.
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 22:45, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>
> > > Some git based projects are using gerrit.
> >
> > Which I looked into previously and decided I didn't like it. If I
> > recall correctly, gerri
Greetings Segher,
I've not sure if I've misunderstanding something in the combine code but
in make_more_copies
for combine.c this seems very odd:
if (!(REG_P (dest) && !HARD_REGISTER_P (dest)))
continue;
rtx src = SET_SRC (set);
if (!(REG_P (src) && HARD_REGISTER_P (src)))
th chiming in late after visible
progress and archeology would be harder. I think following all
patch reviews by clicking on websites rather than watching gcc-patches
is impractical.
Richard.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 07:16, jf wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a printf-like function lover. I always found that better than doing
> something like out << "blabla : " << var1 << ", blabla" << etc.
>
> Now, I use a lot of different platforms and to be portable, I'm supposed
> to use PRIxxx constants fo
Dear Sir/ma'am:
I'm a new learner wanted to contribute in your open source project so i
want to know how to start contributing in your open source projects and
want to know all the requirements for contributing in your organization.
Kindly tell me the whole process for this asap.
Having skills :
Hi,
since the change to the new list management, there has been
an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
bounces and that I would get removed from the list unless I
confirmed it (which I then did).
This has now ha
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:40 PM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > since the change to the new list management, there has been
> > an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
> > and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
&
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 15:24, PRIYANSHU ARYA via Gcc wrote:
>
> Dear Sir/ma'am:
>
> I'm a new learner wanted to contribute in your open source project so i
> want to know how to start contributing in your open source projects and
> want to know all the requireme
Am 21.03.20 um 21:29 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc:
Hi -
since the change to the new list management, there has been
an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
bounces and that I would get removed from the list
;
> > https://www.ime.usp.br/~belinass/Automatic_Detection_of_Parallel_Compilation_Viability.pdf
> >
> > **Automatic Detection of Parallel Compilation Viability**
> >
> > [Giuliano Belinassi]{style="color: darkgreen"}\
> > Timezone: GMT$-$3:00\
> > University
I was glad to see that compiler flags such as -fopt-info-vec-missed ...
provide information about what is happening under the hood w.r.t code that
can and can't be vectorized.
Can anyone point me to a document, etc. that would be helpful in
understanding what the messages output from the compiler
On 3/20/20 12:37 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
> Further, URLs such as
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev
> https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456
>
> are mapped to
On 3/24/20 12:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>> Thanks for working on this!!! However, I still see at least one issue
>> in the following bugzilla entry:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123#c4
>>
>> The first two git style links work, but the last one which points
>> to th
On March 24, 2020 5:45:05 PM GMT+01:00, Roger Martz via Gcc
wrote:
>I was glad to see that compiler flags such as -fopt-info-vec-missed ...
>provide information about what is happening under the hood w.r.t code
>that
>can and can't be vectorized.
>
>Can anyone point me t
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:02 AM Gunther Nikl wrote:
>
> Dear GCC developers!
>
> I just noticed that the server migration for GCC and sourceware.org
> brought a surprising change: The list archives are now provided with
> mailman. Maybe its only me, but IMO with this change
jobserver.
- Week \[5, 8\] -- June 1 to June 26:\
Update the `gcc` driver to take each file in ``, then
assemble and partially link them together. Here, an important
optimization is to use a named pipe in `` to avoid having
to wait every partition to end its compilation before
d would
be the mentor for the GSoC project.
Several students have expressed an interest in this project, but AFAIK
no-one has yet submitted a formal application.
I wrote a fairly broad project idea on the GCC wiki page, so there may
be room for more than one student.
> Specifically, I'm inte
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I do not want to start a flame war.
>
> I just am curious what was the reason why
> the old system cannot be used any more?
The software it ran on hasn't been maintained for years.
> Would there be a possibility to get the old look-a
cripts/miscripts/-/blob/master/gcc/get_gcc_mail
to do so in mutt) but it only replies to the sender. The list isn't
CC'd and neither are any other people CC'd on the original mail (which
might include people who aren't subscribed to the list, and now won't
receive your reply).
days is
> >> lore.kernel.org, powered by public-inbox[1]. ISTM that software can
> >> address most
> >> if not all needs of those involved in GCC development and even has NNTP
> >> support,
> >> though I've no idea whether it could be an acceptable so
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:03:15PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> See the link at the bottom of every page in the old archive:
> http://www.mhonarc.org/
>
> > what is the exact problem that prevents it from being used any longer?
>
> It's not packaged for RHEL
Hello,
I am an undergrad interested in extending GCC’s static analysis pass for GSoC
2020. In particular, I’m interested in adding C++ support.
The selected project ideas list mentions adding new/delete checking and
exception checking. The features that immediately come to my mind would be
ch
Hello
I am a researcher from Jam Petrochemical company I want to use OpenACC with
GCC compiler. I have a question about your compiler.
Does your compiler support OpenACC in windows OS or not?
Thanks very much
--
Mahdi Lotfi
Student at Sharif University of Technology
Please don't cross-post to both the gcc and gcc-help mailing lists.
Either your question is about GCC development, or it's about help
using GCC, not both. Pick one list.
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 08:44, MAHDI LOTFI via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello
> I am a researcher from Jam Petrochem
Thanks a lot.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:32 PM Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> Please don't cross-post to both the gcc and gcc-help mailing lists.
> Either your question is about GCC development, or it's about help
> using GCC, not both. Pick one list.
>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:01 PM lizekun (A) wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have a question on function "get_symbol_initial_value" in lto-stream-out.c.
>
> When the initial value of symbol is constructor, it will be replaced by an
> error_mark.
> What's the benefit of donging this? In some cases, it increase
chard.
> Best regards!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 2020年3月26日 20:27
> > To: lizekun (A)
> > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: Question on lto-stream-out
> >
> > On Thu,
Thanks for your answer.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 6:00 PM Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2020-03-26T12:14:53+0430, MAHDI LOTFI via Gcc wrote:
> > I am a researcher from Jam Petrochemical company I want to use OpenACC
> with
> > GCC compiler. I have a question about y
Hi all!
Recently I attempted to build glibc-2.31 with --enable-static-pie (gcc-9.3.0).
Some targets work just fine, some don't. A few faulty ones so far are:
- alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
- hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
- hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
- m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
- sparc-unknown-linu
I wrote a blog post "Static analysis in GCC 10" giving an idea of the
current status of the -fanalyzer feature:
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2020/03/26/static-analysis-in-gcc-10/
At some point I'll write up the material for our changes.html page.
Dave
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:43:37 +
Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Recently I attempted to build glibc-2.31 with --enable-static-pie
> > (gcc-9.3.0).
> > Some targets work just fine, some
On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 15:36 -0700, Andrew Briand via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am an undergrad interested in extending GCC’s static analysis pass
> for GSoC 2020. In particular, I’m interested in adding C++ support.
Hi Andrew, thanks for your interest in the project.
> The s
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 22:38, Andrew Briand wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am an undergrad interested in extending GCC’s static analysis pass for GSoC
> 2020. In particular, I’m interested in adding C++ support.
>
> The selected project ideas list mentions adding new/delete checking and
> exception chec
lly, would consider
> spending more time on it. Or maybe another overseer will jump in and
> offer to convert the system to majordomo or something.
I think one of the things folks need to keep in mind is that maintenance of
sourceware/gcc is a volunteer effort. Chris, Frank, & co inh
Ich arbeite bei der SGB Bank in Frankreich. Ich bin da, um allen zu helfen,
die einen Kredit benötigen. Unsere Kapazität liegt zwischen 3000 und
500.000 Euro mit einem Satz von 2%. Wenn Sie interessiert sind, versuchen
Sie uns eine Nachricht zu senden in unserer Mailbox:
veroniquecarde...@gmail.com
x86_64-linux-musl targets do not support multilib layout as-is
and usually expects libdir=lib. glibc target usually uses libdir=lib64.
In https://bugs.gentoo.org/675954 (also touched on https://gcc.gnu.org/PR90077)
Gentoo discovered the following discrepancy when gcc is built with
--disable
1501 - 1600 of 10345 matches
Mail list logo
