defines the
> > range of valid integer. Both min and max are inclusive and work with enums.
> > Warnings are enabled with the new flag: "-Winrange".
>
>
> Is this something that could be applied to variables or types (I've not
> much experience with GCC attrib
On Tuesday, June 7th, 2022 at 10:46 PM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 20:44, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 20:40, Miika via Gcc gcc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, June 6th, 2022 at 9:42 PM, Ben Boeckel ben.boec.
On Wednesday, June 8th, 2022 at 8:42 PM, Eric Gallager
wrote:
> Could you take a look at bug 78155 too? There was a request to add
> something like this in that bug:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155
> (and I think I've seen similar requests elsewhere, too)
I took a look at th
On Thursday, June 9th, 2022 at 7:36 AM, Eric Gallager
wrote:
> Nice, good to hear! I'm looking forward to seeing this get added!
I'll write some tests and try to send the patches next week!
Miika
Thank you for the feedback!
On Sunday, June 12th, 2022 at 7:25 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 01:39, Miika via Gcc gcc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
>
> > Based on Jakub's and Yair's comments I created a new attribute "inrange".
> > Inrage
There was some discussion around std::format support 2 years ago, with
people suggesting to just use the fmt code, and others suggesting that an
independent implementation might be of higher quality. 2 years have since
passed, and we have no implementation, of higher or identical quality.
Could we
iles.
Normally, to investigate a potential gcc defect, one would
preprocess the file and pare down the output. But, preprocessing
the input and compiling the preprocessed output causes the failure
to evaporate. This is probably because the standalone preprocessor
does not produce a verb
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> âs External Email
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:31, thutt--- via Gcc wrote:
> >I am here to solicit ideas on how to further narrow this this
> >down. Is there any undocumented option that I can use to cause the
> >standal
with the recent announcement that rust is supported by gcc
has it been taken into consideration that the draconian (non-free-compatible)
requirements of the rust Trademark make the distribution of the gcc
compiler Unlawful?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013920
if the
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 5:25 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
> > if the word "rust" is entirely removed from the gcc source code then
> > there is no problem whatsoever (recall: "iceweasel").
>
> We’ll call it gust.
love it! the puns i would have recommende
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 5:31 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi Luke,
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 04:28:10PM +0100, lkcl via Gcc wrote:
> > with the recent announcement that rust is supported by gcc
>
> There is just a discussion about whether and how to integrate
> (port
o Richard
(and covered it briefly in my reply to you as well)
> Note that gcc used to come with a full implementation of the
> Java programming language, compiler, runtime and core library
> implementation (for which I was the GNU maintainer). None of that
> required a trademark license bec
absolutely nobody else does.
all *new* gcc developers for example who have *not* been party to
those private conversations may not safely assume that they are part
of any such explicit or implicit consent.
and given that literally anyone in the world may pick up the gcc source
code and consider
sorry, Mark, you're still misunderstanding, on multiple levels
and in so many ways i am having a hard time tracking them
all.
i don't feel that i've been heard, and consequently do not
feel comfortable continuing the conversation, especially
given that i have other priorities.
if you had asked qu
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:09 AM David Brown wrote:
> Speaking as someone who is neither a lawyer, nor a GCC developer, nor
> even (as yet) a Rust user, it seems to me that step 1 would be to hear
> what the Rust Foundation has to say on the matter:
>
> <https://foundation.rust
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 9:50 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> You haven't been ignored. People have expressed reasonable
> disagreements with your interpretation.
>
> Just because every line of your email hasn't been explicitly responded
> to with positive acknowledgement of receipt doesn't mean you'v
a (private) discussion has, fascinatingly, uncovered this, from 1987:
http://archive.adaic.com/pol-hist/policy/trademrk.txt
In order to be a validated Ada compiler, a compiler must pass
an extensive suite of programs called the Ada Compiler Validation
Capability (ACVC). The AJPO has a
(apologies top-posting, strange mobile mailer). i would expect in that case
that the Rust Foundation to work closely with Certification Mark Licensees, and
to come to an accommodation, defining a subset if necessary.
if the gcc developers can clearly enunciate why shipping a "borrow ch
din.
> Are you a lawyer? If so please consider volunteering your time to the
> GCC Steering Committee *privately*. If not, it seems to me to be a
> terrible idea to try to get the developers to pontificate in public
> about alleged legal issues with the project, their implications, a
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:41 AM David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> Luke,
>
> The GCC Community will give the issues that you raised due
> consideration and resolve any problems through appropriate channels.
David: although this was a private reply I am assuming that is in
error, a
Currently, when importing the standard library, one has to
separately compile each unit they want to use, which is a hindrance to the
build process and a gap in the implementation.
Is there any particular reason why gcc doesn't provide importable header
units for the standard library? Is th
> On 25/07/2022 08:45 CEST Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> while commit 3f30a274913b ("libiberty: Update D symbol demangling
> for latest ABI spec") mentions in its description that tuple encoding
> has changed, there's no real adjustment to dlang_parse_tuple() there,
> nor are there any n
Z
However, it gets worse the more I stare at it. Looks like it was not understood
what 'Number' meant in the old ABI. I assumed it was the encoded number of
tuple elements - same as static arrays - however what I see in the front-end is
instead an encoded buffer length.
https://githu
As part of my gcj work, I need to call a couple of variables and functions
from ltdl.m4 (installed in usr/share/aclocal, as part of libltdl).
Should I reference the system installed copy? How would I do that?
Or should I copy it into the gcc root directory, like what was done with
libtool.m4? If
asrsciences
Gcc Server - Passwогd Expiгed
The Passwогd to your mailbox gcc@gcc.gnu.org has expired.
System will log you out and generate a new Passwогd exactly at 24 hours from
2022-07-29 12:57:pm
Hi,
Fortran 2018 introduced intrinsic functions for all the IEEE-754 comparison
operations, compareQuiet* and compareSignaling* I want to introduce those into
the Fortran front-end, and make them emit the right code. But cannot find the
correspondance between IEEE-754 nomenclature and GCC
Hi Jakub,
>> 2. All the functions are available as GCC type-generic built-ins (yeah!),
>> except there is no __builtin_ iseqsig
>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77928). Is there a
>> fundamental problem with creating one, and could someone help there?
>
Hi,
> Dunno if we really need a builtin for this, especially if it is lowered
> to that x >= y && x <= y early, will defer to Joseph.
I think it’d be nice to have one for consistency, as the other standard
floating-point functions are there. It would also make things slightly easier
for our For
printf("%d\n", iseqsig(x, __builtin_inff()));
foo();
}
$ ./bin/gcc a.c -lm -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations -frounding-math
-fsignaling-nans -O0 && ./a.out
0
Invalid raised
0
Invalid raised
$ ./bin/gcc a.c -lm -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations -frounding-math
-fsignaling-nans -O1 && ./a.out
0
0
Do you want me to file a bug report?
FX
For the record, this is now PR 106805
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106805
FX
Hi Joseph,
I have a Fortran patch ready to submit, but before I do so I’d like to know: do
you support or oppose a __builtin_iseqsig()?
Jakub said he was against, but deferred to you on that.
For me, it makes the Fortran front-end part slightly simpler, so if it is
decided to go that route I’ll
> See N3047 Annex F for the current bindings (there have been a lot of
> changes to the C2x working draft after N3047 in the course of editorial
> review, but I don't think any of them affect the IEEE bindings for
> comparisons).
Thanks for the pointer, it is very helpful.
The next thing I nee
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022, 10:30 Junk Trash via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to get the opinions of GCC developers regarding adding CMake as a
> build system for GCC. Is it something you would like, something you are
> neutral about, or something you are strongly against?
>
> Tha
Dear all,
The functions encode_ieee_single()/encode_ieee_double() encode the GCC
internal representation (i.e., REAL_VALUE_TYPE) to the corresponding IEEE
single precision/double precision formats. The constant values in a program
(i.e., float a = 3.14;) will be parsed and then transferred to
5PM +0800, pengsheng.chen--- via Gcc wrote:
> > The functions encode_ieee_single()/encode_ieee_double() encode the GCC
> > internal representation (i.e., REAL_VALUE_TYPE) to the corresponding IEEE
> > single precision/double precision formats. The constant values in a
> program
&
Hi,
I have some questions about the frame_info and stack of variable length type:
In the current gcc framework, it seems that 'poly_uint64(coeff0, coeff1)'
is used to calculate 'cfun->machine->frame', but only one variable length
type(vector) can be processed.
If I
Dear gcc,
Please see attached paid invoice.
Thank you for your business!
InnovativePay
Due date:18/10/2022 10:11 PM
For: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
gcc.gnu.org
Hi!
I am interested in contributing to GCC but I am fairly new to this project
and wish for some heads up and guidance about how to start working! Please
help me understand where are the 'issues' and source code.
Regards,
Aman.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 04:42 David Brown via Gcc wrote:
> On 13/11/2022 19:43, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi Andrew!
> >
> > On 11/13/22 19:41, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:40 AM Andrew Pinski
> wrote:
> >>>
>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 10:49 David Brown wrote:
>
>
> On 14/11/2022 16:10, NightStrike wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 04:42 David Brown via Gcc
> >
> > Warnings are not perfect - there is always the risk of false
> positives
> >
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 3:09 PM Paul Koning via Gcc wrote:
> But in any case, how does that relate to the error messages I got? They
> don't seem to have anything to do with missing compilers, but rather with the
> use of language features too new for the available (down
Hi,
I'm working to find one solution for PR106736, which requires us to
make some built-in types only valid for some target features, and
emit error messages for the types when the condition isn't satisfied.
A straightforward idea is to guard the registry of built-in type under
the corresponding
Hi Richard,
on 2022/12/5 15:31, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working to find one solution for PR106736, which requires us to
>> make some built-in types only valid for some target features, and
>> emit error messages for the types when the condition isn't satisf
Hi Andrew,
on 2022/12/5 18:10, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 11:33 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc
> wrote:
>>
>> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm working to find one solution for PR106736, which requires us to
>
ming.
My previous concern was there were tons of `-fmodule-*` options in clang, which
are not standard c++ modules. So I was afraid the name `-fmodule-output` may be
confusing.
So I proposed `-fsave-std-cxx-module-file=`. But I didn't recognize we need to
keep the option consistency between g
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 15:23:09 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I disagree. I can easily remember "module output" but I would have to check
> the manual every time to see if it's "std c++ module save file" or some
> other permutation of those words
I can say that in developing the CMake side of t
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 16:18:00 +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> I think it is reasonable to include c++ in the spelling, since other
> languages supported by
> GCC (and clang in due course) have modules.
Especially given that Fortran doesn't necessarily have one module to
output; F
Hi,
I absolutely need your opinion on all these documents attached.
VIEW DOCUMENTS
Have a good working day
It looks like `-fmodule-file` is better from the discussion. So let's take it.
Thanks for everyone here~
Thanks,
Chuanqi
--
From:Nathan Sidwell
Send Time:2022年12月8日(星期四) 01:00
To:Iain Sandoe ; GCC Development
Cc:Jonathan W
Dear team,
I am working in the compiler domain.
Can you please provide the source application where the mis-compilation
errors occurred which has been detected by the GCC compiler.
This support is very helpful for my PHD work.
-
P Rajshekhar Rao
Thanks and Regards
> On Dec 6, 2022, at 9:22 AM, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> In the following function, past_end is a pointer to one-past-the-end of the
> array. Holding such a pointer is legal in C. I use it as a sentinel value
> that helps (1) avoid overrunning the b
appen?
The module file will be deleted. The behavior is the same with `-o`.
Thanks,
Chuanqi
--
From:Nathan Sidwell
Send Time:2022年12月12日(星期一) 22:30
To:Iain Sandoe ; GCC Development
Cc:Nathan Sidwell ; Jonathan Wakely
; David Blaikie ;
ity than `-ftime-trace`.
So I think the bahavior should be correct.
Thanks,
Chuanqi
--
From:David Blaikie
Send Time:2022年12月13日(星期二) 23:56
To:chuanqi.xcq
Cc:Iain Sandoe ; GCC Development ; Nathan
Sidwell ; Jonathan Wakely ;
b
At line 276, lra_assert (spill_class != NO_REGS); would trigger
whenever execution reached here with spill_class equal to NO_REGS.
Seems to me that would never happen. Because one of the conditions in
the if statement right above it (line 265) catches spill_class ==
NO_REGS and causes the rest of t
ant to
introduce these options in GCC.
Thanks,
Chuanqi
--
From:Nathan Sidwell
Send Time:2022年12月15日(星期四) 06:29
To:David Blaikie ; chuanqi.xcq
Cc:Iain Sandoe ; GCC Development ; Nathan
Sidwell ; Jonathan Wakely ;
ben.boeckel
Subj
ent, I would expect
> the same build systems folks to want to be able to specify everything
> on the GCC command line too.
Note that it is particularly knowing the *output* module that is
important for distributed builds so that the dispatcher can know what
file(s) need to be sent and retri
Ok.
And as you point out it is redundant code rather than dead code, to be
precise.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022, 1:47 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
>
> > Am 14.12.2022 um 18:28 schrieb G.T. via Gcc :
> >
> > At line 276, lra_assert (spill_class != NO_REGS); would trigger
> &
is turning the cursor on
> > and off (based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code). I
> > apparently fixed this previously by building wine with
> > --without-curses
> > (https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc@gcc.gnu.org/msg86366.html), but that
> > option to win
ing the GCC_COLORS environment variable to an empty string
> >>>> before running the test.
> >>>>
> >>> That didn't help. It looks like this is always escape 25h to start
> >>> the output and 25l to end it, which I think is turning the cursor
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:43 AM Torbjorn SVENSSON
wrote:
> I'm not sure if this helps anyone, but I experienced something similar with
> Cygwin a while back.
> What I had to do in order to have expect working when testing GCC on Windows
> 10 was to defined the "CYGWIN&qu
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 11:29 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 10:44 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> This is either a testsuite problem or an environment problem. The GNU
> >> Fortran I/O module certainly has interesting behavior here. T
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:38 PM Jacek Caban wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I'm responsible for Wine changes that cause your problems. I'm also
> CCing Eric, who is Wine console expert, maybe he has better ideas. Eric,
> see [1] if you're interested in the context.
>
>
> Recent Wine versions implement W
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:37 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > [...]
> > Second, the problems with extra \r's still remain, but I think we've
> > generally come to think that that part isn't Wine and is instead
> > either the testsuite or deja. So I'll keep those replies to Ja
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022, 00:37 Alexander Zaitsev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We are using GCC for our C++ projects. Our projects are huge, commit
> rate is quite huge, so our CI workers are always busy (so as any other
> CI workers, honestly). Since we want to increase build speed, one of
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:00 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:37 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >> NightStrike wrote:
> >>
> >>> [...]
> >>> Second, the problems with extra \r's still remain, but I think we've
> >>> generally come to think that that part
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:33 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:00 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >
> >> NightStrike wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:37 PM Jacob Bachmeyer
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> [...]
> >>> So at least we know for sure th
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:30 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > [...]
> > I did another little test to try to better understand your point. I
> > ran a linux native testsuite under a simulator that just sets SIM to "
> > ". This resulted in extra ^M's also, although many tests
Hi GCC developers,
I am learning GCC. But the GCC code is hard to understand.
I'm reading the c compiler of GCC. It seems the understanding of
AST/GENERIC representation is very important.
Is there a tool can visualize the AST/GENERIC representation?
Do you
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 2:37 PM Jerry D via Fortran wrote:
>
> I had this show up today. I have no idea what this is about.
>
> Please advise.
I assume the buildbot thinks that
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=8011fbba7baa46947341ca8069b5a327163a68d5
broke the build, but I fail to se
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023, 14:37 Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> Modifying the pass manager
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Pass-manager.html#Pass-manager to
> use clock_gettime system call. See
> https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/clock_gettime.2.html
Since we can now use c++11, std::chron
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:20 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Alas http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor has been down for a while,
> and there does not appear to be a new location?
https://wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor/ works
I was building gcc version 4.9.1 on Mac OS version when I got this error:
In file included from ../../gcc-4.9.1/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c:33:
In file included from
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr/include/c++/v1/new:93:
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr
clude-fixed
chmod a+rx include-fixed
if [ -d ../prev-gcc ]; then \
cd ../prev-gcc && \
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make
real-install-headers-tar DESTDIR=`pwd`/../gcc/ \
libsubdir=. ; \
else \
set -e; for ml in `cat fix
Hi, I have the SDK installed but I don't understand how to use the
--with-sysroot command. Is the flag supposed to be with my make all-gcc
command, please elaborate.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 3:49 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi
>
> > On 18 Feb 2023, at 20:28, -xlan- wrote:
> >
Thanks, I'll check it out.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 8:48 AM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
> > On 19 Feb 2023, at 16:27, -xlan- wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I have the SDK installed but I don't understand how to use the
> --with-sysroot command. Is the flag supposed to be w
Номер платежа: 17365003
Продавец: Mineland Network
Номер заказа: 2299581
Сумма: 103 RUB
Метод: Ethereum
Дата оплаты: 25.02.2023 16:29
Статус: Оплачен
--
Cообщение является электронной квитанцией, подтверждающей данный платеж.
По всем вопросам о совершенных платежах вы можете обращаться в службу
Номер платежа: 17365069
Продавец: Mineland Network
Номер заказа: 2299582
Сумма: 92.7 RUB
Метод: Ethereum
Дата оплаты: 25.02.2023 16:32
Статус: Оплачен
--
Cообщение является электронной квитанцией, подтверждающей данный платеж.
По всем вопросам о совершенных платежах вы можете обращаться в службу
Номер платежа: 17365137
Продавец: Mineland Network
Номер заказа: 2299584
Сумма: 103 RUB
Метод: Ethereum
Дата оплаты: 25.02.2023 16:38
Статус: Оплачен
--
Cообщение является электронной квитанцией, подтверждающей данный платеж.
По всем вопросам о совершенных платежах вы можете обращаться в службу
--
.HY
Hello Everyone I'm Anastasia. I am a prospective GSOC Student. I wish to know
if the project C++: Implement compiler built-in traits for the standard library
traits is still available. I have already build and got my hand dirty on
debugging GCC. How should I proceed to make a proposal. A
Thanks, Martin and Jonathan for your suggestion. I have already finished
building gcc from source. I was looking at other project ideas and found
"Enable incremental Link Time Optimization (LTO) linking" interesting. Can
anyone please explain how to proceed further with this? Curre
*sending this email again, now in plain text
Hi Will,
I'm working at Huawei on verification of atomic primitives. I thought it would
be appropriate to write to you because you're mentioned in several papers on
ARM concurrency (https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/papers/topics.html), gc
Dear maintainers of GCC arm port,
Can you share your thoughts on the email I've sent to the mailing list?
I've originally sent it to Will Deacon, gcc and linux mailing lists, but
no one is responding, so I'm pinging you directly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-Ap
I don't want to receive further emails.
I see it in godbolt
GCC compiles to:
movsx eax, BYTE PTR [rdi+2]
cmp al, 9
ja .L42
Clang:
movzx edx, byte ptr [rdi + 2]
cmp edx, 9
ja .LBB0_40
GCC extend with sign, Clang with zero.
cmp with 32 bit register is apparently faster than 8bit
pon., 24 kwi 2023 o 17:34 Basile Starynkevitch
napisał(a
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 5:41 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:35:23AM +0200, Helmut Zeisel wrote:
> > >Von: "Jakub Jelinek"
> > >An: "Helmut Zeisel"
> > >Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > >Betreff: Re: GCC 13.1 co
Hi,
After reading some of this discussion, I figured I should add my own support
for this proposal. It seems to me very few (none?) of the people arguing
against this change actually have a "horse in the race", and instead are
appealing to some theoretical ancient legacy code maintainer who is b
id foo(int array[static 1]);
I checked what warnings this produces - gcc by default produces, none,
but with -Wall it produces for this code:
int foo(int array[static 1]){ return array[0]; }
int main(void)
{
#define NULL (void*)0
foo(NULL);
}
bruh.c: In function 'main':
bruh.c:8:9:
There is this paragraph in ABOUT-GCC_NLS:
By and large, only diagnostic messages have been internationalized.
Some work remains in other areas; for example, GCC does not yet allow
non-ASCII letters in identifiers.
It seems like this hasn't been true since GCC 10. I can see in release
out the
feature roadmap? I can understand why there isn't one if that isn't the
case, I imagine it would just cause a nuisance for the developers. I
had read the GCC Development Plan document a few months ago and given
the information in it I decided to wait for development to move on to
GCC1
Welcome to z3n Precreated Account. Please click the link below to create a
password and sign-in.
https://activeitzone.zendesk.com/verification/email/DCK6wByYNm5x6eur7u8PAgdP2N6C7tba
If you didn’t sign up to Active IT zone using this email address, you can
safely ignore this email.
---
I want to preface this stating that I have little to no experience in compiler
development, I am only merely just getting into it. With that said, I have
messed around
with library design a fair amount, and this seems like something that could be
implemented in a library. It might be slightly comf
>This is from just one source file, which otherwise is "plain C". If I
>was to put it into a library that use "asm tweaked fancy pointers", a
>portable fragment of code becomes "target dedicated" - this is undesired.
I sympathize with your desire to not lock your codebase to a particular
target, I
uch you're using it, and even then there are mitigations for that.
I'm happy to answer more questions and help, however I'm concerned this is
getting fairly unrelated to GCC.
-Alex
test_funct(Iter iter, Iter end, char opt) {
> > for (; iter != end; ++iter) {
> > // dereferencing iter would get buff
> > if (!*iter) { *iter = opt; break; }
> > }
> > return iter;
> > }
>
> ------ TEST.CPP is the above code
> $ g+
hi,
I am using ldscripts / elf_x86_64.xce for linking one c++ program, and need to
mlock the rodata during software startup phase(make sure there is no min
pagefault during accessing the many large static const array), how can we get
the address of that rodata(seem we could get the __executabl
Hello there,
just wanted to let you know that while going over
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Options.html , I've noticed certain
sections, namely haswell, broadwell, skylake, knl, knm, skylake-avx512,
cannonlake, icelake-client, icelake-server, cascadelake, cooperlake, tige
Hi,
I've been spending some (spare) time checking what it would take to
make LRA work for the avr target.
Right after I removed the TARGET_LRA_P hook disabling LRA, building
libgcc failed with a weird ICE. On the avr, the stack pointer (SP)
is not used to access stack slots - TARGET_CAN
On Fri, 2023-07-14 at 09:29 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On 7/13/23 05:27, SenthilKumar.Selvaraj--- via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >I've been spending some
Hi,
The avr target has a bunch of patterns that directly set hard regs at expand
time, like so
(define_expand "cpymemhi"
[(parallel [(set (match_operand:BLK 0 "memory_operand" "")
(match_operand:BLK 1 "memory_operand" ""))
(use (match_operand:HI 2 "const_int_
1301 - 1400 of 10345 matches
Mail list logo
