s are welcomed.
Thanks!
--
Zhang Le, Robert
http://zhllg.blogspot.com
http://zh.gentoo-wiki.com
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/pgubook
http://groups.google.com/group/gentoo-china
http://groups.google.com/group/szlug
First of all, my apology. It seems that I should have posted this
email to binutils's ML.
On 3/5/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:47:41PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> Wouldn't it be great that we go one step further that we let ld look
On 3/6/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:05:06AM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> I have used "strace -f" to check where linker looked for -lqt-mt. From
> what I have observed, it seems that ld didn't use
> $SYSROOT/etc/ld.so.conf.
On 3/6/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:05:06AM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> I have used "strace -f" to check where linker looked for -lqt-mt. From
> what I have observed, it seems that ld didn't use
> $SYSROOT/etc/ld.so.conf.
solution is easy, just turn on 'vanilla' USE flag in Gentoo.
Sorry for the noise.
Zhang Le
version is get like this:
version := $(shell cat $(srcdir)/../gcc/BASE-VER)
So what about we do the same in libgcc/Makefile.in?
Because this can ensure that the install dir will be new gcc's path.
If this is ok, I will post a little patch.
Zhang Le
On 00:06 Sat 11 Oct , Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > If this is ok, I will post a little patch.
>
> That sounds fine, but the whole process is trouble.
Would you explain why it is trouble? Thanks!
The patch is included.
Zhang Le
diff --git a/libgcc/ChangeLog b/libgcc/ChangeLog
i
et in step to run case 3.
I will send the patch to gcc-patches after testing.
Zhang Le
On 04:19 Mon 13 Oct , Eus wrote:
> Hi Ho!
>
> On Saturday, October 11, 2008, "Zhang Le" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another problem when cross building the native mips compiler.
> > I.e. build=x86, host=target=mipse
e sure the destination register is different from source
registers.
I have read some docs, but still not sure how to do it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Modifiers.html#Modifiers
If there is anything wrong, do tell me.
Also if you have any suggestions, I am all ears.
Thanks in advance!
Zhang, Le
On 18:31 Sun 09 Nov , Andrew Haley wrote:
> Zhang Le wrote:
>
> >
> > The other would be make sure the destination register is different from
> > source registers.
> > I have read some docs, but still not sure how to do it.
>
> That's just an e
On 19:18 Mon 10 Nov , Zhang Le wrote:
> However, now I think adding a earlyclobber constraint may be the way to go.
> Since it is a less intrusive and more elegant (comparing with my patch above)
> change.
This solution is as easy as adding two bytes (two &s's) to
+ output_asm_insn (s, operands);
+ s = "teq\t%2,%.,7";
+ }
}
else
{
I have tried it. It seems to be working.
However, now I think adding a earlyclobber constraint may be the way to go.
Since it is a less intrusive and more elegant (comparing with my patch above)
change.
Zhang, Le
, DRIVER_SELF_SPECS in linux64.h has no
LINUX_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS.
Is it left out intentionally?
However it seems to me that -mplt works on N32 system.
So what about the patch attached? ok to apply?
Zhang, Le
--- gcc/config/mips/linux64.h.orig 2008-12-01 13:55:43.0 +
+++ gcc/config/mips
On 10:33 Mon 01 Dec , David Daney wrote:
> Zhang Le wrote:
>> BASE_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
>> +LINUX_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
>> " %{!EB:%{!EL:%(endian_spec)}}" \
>> " %{!mabi=*: -mabi=n32}"
>
> You are missing a comma there between BASE_DRIVER_
On 11:02 Mon 01 Dec , David Daney wrote:
> Zhang Le wrote:
>> On 10:33 Mon 01 Dec , David Daney wrote:
>>> Zhang Le wrote:
>>>> BASE_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
>>>> +LINUX_DRIVER_SELF_SPECS \
>>>> " %{!EB:%{!EL:%(endian_spec)}}" \
16 matches
Mail list logo
