ned that. Maybe GCC does not include it as
a keyword, I am not sure about that, am I missing something? Maybe someone
of you could clarify for me. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
----
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:07:49 -0400
On Aug 18, 2005, at 11:04 PM, Yao qi wrote:
Hi, everyone,
I have looked th
Hi,Pinski,
Got it! Thanks.
Best Regards
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC
Date: Thu, 18 A
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
> look at --enable-checking
> and
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html
> There are more cflags...
>
> The gcc/Makefile.in is also a good reference :)
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Jiang
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
> look at --enable-checking
> and
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html
> There are more cflags...
>
> The gcc/Makefile.in is also a good reference :)
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Jiang
question. My solution to this is just to remove
./config.cache in every sub-directories and try again. This solution
is effective although I am not sure about it. Anyone could confirm or
deny this.
I think "make distclean" should be done before ./configure if the
option of configure is changed.
--
Regards, Yao
Yao Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
? May I need to
know the architecture of PowerPC and ABI for it?
Any one could clarify it for me. Thanks in advance!
Best Regards
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online
21 }
And I compile it like this:
[qiyao@ qiyao]$ gcc -o nan-3 nan-3.c
And run it,
[qiyao@ qiyao]$ ./nan-3
error 1
error 2
error 3
error 5
It seems that the result do not obey IEEE754. I am not so sure about it, Anyone
could confirm or deny this? Thanks in advance!
--
Regards, Yao
Yao Qi
From: "Meissner, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao Qi qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:11:50 -0400
There was also a PowerPC NT ABI at one point, but since Windows NT on
PowerPC wa
From: Ian Lance Taylor
To: "Yao Qi qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: 07 Sep 2005 09:14:49 -0700
"Yao Qi qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It might help if you give a brief overview of what you are tryi
othing about it. Could anyone tell me which file define these two macros?
I grep it in gcc/config/rs6000/ but it seems that there is no file define
it. Could
anybody here have a look at it and verify it for me, any comments are highly
appreicated.
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards
-
ing is
enabled for whatever pass is executing at the moment. Using -da turns
on debugging for all RTL passes.
Ian
Best Regards
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - ge
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yao qi)
CC: ian@airs.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 01:51:58 -0400 (EDT)
> BTW, I am concerned about the value of TARGET_HARD_FLOAT and
TARGET_FPRS,
> I think both
From: "Meissner, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:19:25 -0400
Yes, the eABI is a modification of the System V ABI. IIRC (but it has
been several
ured the compiler and exactly what options you pass.
Ian
Best Regards
----
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.clic
blend
together.
Best Regards
----
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
abort when executed.
It seems that this problem itself has nothing to do with rs6000 backend and
I was confused by the symptom at first.
Thank you very much for all your previous reply.
Best Regards
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
anyone like to take some look? Any suggestion and
comments are highly appreciated!
May I code a patch on this?
--
Regards, Yao
Yao Qi
Thanks for your comments. Here is a patch for it.
2005-09-22 Yao Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gcc/intl/Makefile.in (distclean): Add config.cache.
* gcc/fixincludes/Makefile.in (distclean): Likewise.
Index: gcc/fixincludes/Makef
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:30 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
> appointed Tom de Vries as nvptx maintainer.
>
Congratulations, Tom!
--
Yao (齐尧)
Hi,
I failed to compile GDB with GCC trunk (8.0.0 20171117) because of some
-Werror=stringop-overflow= and -Werror=stringop-truncation warnings.
Some of them are not necessary to me,
1. ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/python/py-gdb-readline.c:79:15: error: ‘char*
strncpy(char*, const char*, size_t)’ outp
On 17-11-20 09:33:46, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 08:51 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >I failed to compile GDB with GCC trunk (8.0.0 20171117) because of some
> >-Werror=stringop-overflow= and -Werror=stringop-truncation warnings.
> >Some of them are not
Hi,
I observed that gfortran 7.2 and 8.0 generate different debug info for
dynamical array. Here is a case simplified from gdb test case
gdb.fortran/vla-datatypes.f90
$ cat vla-datatypes.f90
program vla_primitives
integer, allocatable:: intvla(:, :, :)
logical :: l
al
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I observed that gfortran 7.2 and 8.0 generate different debug info for
> dynamical array.
> Attributes DW_AT_data_location and DW_AT_allocated are different. There
> is an extra "DW_OP_plus_uconst: 8"
Hi Paulo,
I noticed that GDB buildbot pending build queue on aarch64-linux
becomes longer and longer,
https://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/Ubuntu-AArch64-m64
as it takes longer to finish each build and test.
Looks that you deployed aarch64-linux buildslave for GCC buildbot
on gcc114 as well, th
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 PM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> Apologies for the clash on resources. Using gcc115 and gcc116 only now.
>
Thank you, Paulo.
--
Yao (齐尧)
This
mode doesn't scale very well. IMO, it is necessary to have a
target-independent framework for code size optimization. I have no
idea to do that framework though.
--
Yao Qi
CodeSourcery
y...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x739
want to mark the operation as a potential reference
to a and b".
My questions is
How many aliases do p have? According to the doc here, it is
said that "p will have two aliases, namely variables a and b." What I
learned from compiler book is that p points-to &a, and q points
From: "Meissner, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:13:56 -0400
And note Yao qi, that there are different ABIs on the rs6000, each of
which has dif
From: Ian Lance Taylor
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: 06 Sep 2005 11:05:38 -0700
"Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These are partially documented in gcc/doc/tm.texi. Unfortunately the
d
30 matches
Mail list logo
