Re: Swing replacements

2008-03-03 Thread Ted Byers
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Pardon my intrusion, I suspect that you are not the > right > people to ask, but I'm hoping that you might know > whom I > _should_ be asking. > If you have questions about licensing and distribution of Sun's JRE, go straight to Sun's site and ask in their most re

Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs.

2007-11-01 Thread Ted Byers
--- David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 22:34:33 -0400 > > > I think what is more important is the resulting > binary -- does it > > run faster? > > The answer to this is situational dependant. > > For example, for me, the speed

Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs.

2007-11-03 Thread Ted Byers
--- David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:42:01 -0400 > > > I agree with you 100%. It has always been my view > that if you can't > > compile fast enough, then get another machine and > use distcc, or get a > > quad core and d

Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs.

2007-11-03 Thread Ted Byers
--- David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Ted Byers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 21:32:43 -0400 (EDT) > > > On a different note, I wish I had your budget for > > hardware. :-) > > What budget? > > These systems sit right at