Re: Graphite header order

2015-11-20 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:14:47AM -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:31 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > > Sebastian, > > > > I have tried to build GCC with Graphite and ISL on AIX and encountered > > two problems: > > > > (1) isl/ctx.h > > > > typedef enum { > > isl_stat_

Re: [GSoC] questions about graphite_clast_to_gimple.c

2014-05-06 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:02:09PM +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > I am busy for the next 6 weeks, but am planning to work on the isl patch > after. Sven, do you happen to have any time to work on the isl patch? No. It's going to be difficult enough for me to finish what I need to finish for the C

Re: RFC: Update ISL under gcc/infrastructure/ ? // Remove CLooG?

2014-11-06 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:43:16AM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > is there any chance we can add the deprecated isl_int includes back into isl > 0.14.1. This would unblock the testing and we could remove them as soon as > gcc 4.8/4.9 has been phased out. I prefer Richard's solution. In any case, y

Re: RFC: Update ISL under gcc/infrastructure/ ? // Remove CLooG?

2014-11-09 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 09:01:14PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 08.11.2014 20:49, Roman Gareev wrote: > >>Sounds good as long as they will compile and pass tests independently. > >>Please also remember updating the documentation. > > > >I’m trying to build Graphite without CLooG, but I get the