Hello,
I have discovered that volatile expresions can cause the tree-ssa
pre pass to loop forever in "compute_antic". The problem seems to be
that the expresion is assigned a different value number at each
iteration, hence the fixed point required to exit the loop is never reached.
Thi
Thank you for your answer. I give some more information below:
Daniel Berlin wrote:
On 11/6/06, Ricardo FERNANDEZ PASCUAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have discovered that volatile expresions can cause the tree-ssa
pre pass to loop forever in "compute_antic". T
Andrew Haley wrote:
Ricardo FERNANDEZ PASCUAL writes:
> So, I think the real question is: are COMPONENT_REF nodes allowed
> to be marked as volatile by themselves? I think they should, and
> actually it seems to work (the generated code looks correct).
volatile is a type qualifier.
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
At a wild guess, maybe strip_useless_type_conversions() is doing
something Bad.
Almost there. It looks like strip_useless_type_conversions is not
used, and then something Bad happens.
Thank you Andrew and Paolo for your quick answers. I have made a report
for this b
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The following patch fixes it, but it's completely untested.
2006-11-07 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gimplify.c (fold_indirect_ref_rhs): Use
STRIP_USELESS_TYPE_CONVERSION rather than STRIP_NOPS.
Index: ../../gcc/gimplify.c
=
Hello,
I am writing a new GCC front end. One of the features provided by my
language (CIL) is explicit field layout and size for records.
I don't know if any other languaje supported by GCC provides this
feature. If that's the case, please point me to it so that I can see how
to do i
Duncan Sands wrote:
I am writing a new GCC front end. One of the features provided by my
language (CIL) is explicit field layout and size for records.
I don't know if any other languaje supported by GCC provides this
feature. If that's the case, please point me to it so that I can see
Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:58:26PM +0200, Ricardo FERNANDEZ PASCUAL wrote:
I am writing a new GCC front end. One of the features provided by my
language (CIL) is explicit field layout and size for records.
Any
