On 6/17/07, michael.a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I appreciate the thought, but there is sort of an imperitive with this
effort to shy away from Boost/STL/virtual inheritance completely.
You'd be hard-pressed to find any instance of dynamic polymorphism
anywhere in Boost. Most of Boost is based
Let's say I have a function that looks like this:
void a()
{
int n = x();
__try
{
y();
}
__finally
{
z(n);
w();
}
}
... assuming a hypothetical extension to C syntax that turns a __try {
... } __finally { ... } into the proper TRY_FINALLY_EXPR (maybe ju
On 7/2/07, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So there we are. Any suggestions?
If I understand correctly, nested functions *are* what you want and
there is code to do exactly what you want in the implementation of OpenMP.
k, cool. Will look into it (mostly, though, I was *hoping* I wou
