s in gcc, glibc, or even the
kernel. I picked gcc for now because gcc-4.7.x and earlier do not exhibit
the problem. So for now, I am stuck on using gcc-4.7.x on these systems
until the problem is located and fixed.
Full details:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61538
Thanks!,
--
On 07/05/2014 23:43, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I filed PR61538 about two weeks ago, regarding gcc-4.8.x and up not
> compiling a g++/pthreads-linked app correctly on SGI R1x000-based systems
> (Octane, Onyx2), running Linux. Running the subsequently-compiled
> application
On 07/28/2014 04:41, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> I know very little about this area but I'll try and offer some advice
> anyway...
>
You know more than I do :)
>> On 07/05/2014 23:43, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I f
significant but
> I may not get chance to look at the differences in detail for a little
> while.
For my own information, what's the cutoff date for fixes to regressions like
this to make it into gcc-4.9.1?
--
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
ku...@gentoo.org
4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28
&
s under Linux. Last version I checked was a gcc-4.9.2
git checkout, and it's still affected.
gcc bugzilla:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61538
Gentoo tracking bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516548
Thanks!,
--
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
ku...@gentoo.org
4096R/D25D95E3
t's located so I can see if
this is something fixable within the Linux kernel in the IP27-specific code, or
if it's a code-generation bug.
Thanks!,
--
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
ku...@gentoo.org
6144R/F5C6C943 2015-04-27
177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943
"The past t
On 01/23/2017 10:34, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 23/01/17 15:26, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> I am not sure what this lone store-doubleword instruction is exactly doing,
>> nor
>> can I locate where in the gcc MIPS code it is being generated from.
>
> It's a stack
On 01/23/2017 11:24, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 23/01/17 16:11, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> So now the question is why stack-probing kills this machine on generic MIPS
>> code that its smaller cousin is seemingly unaffected by. I do know that IP27
>> has a different set of
