Huh? I can cross-compile GCC, its all the packages that require
native configuration/building
Is it fesable for people in this sort of situation to build GCC on a fast
machine but with the final host and target both set to whatever the slower
machine is (in this case coldfire)
Does GCC even
> Neither does Linux - by linking against a recent library you are
> *asking* for a binary that requires that library. If you understand
> that you might understand why everyone is saying you should build on the
> lowest common denominator of the systems you're targetting.
>
> If you insist on shi
- sizeof(int) == 4, sizeof(long long) == 8
I swear 16 bit compilers have sizeof(int) = 2 with sizeof(long) = 4
I just tried with Internet Explorer 6 (as installed by Windows XP Service
Pack 2) and it worked just fine.
Did you try another browser (e.g. Mozilla or Firefox)?
> The discussion kind of wandered off, but I'd like to note that I am in
> favor of adding __try/__finally as a GNU extension for both C and C++.
> It's true, of course, that it's just syntactic sugar which can be
> implemented in other ways, but sometimes sugar is sweet.
How would this mesh with
