Dear all,
I'm using the native GCC version[1] of my GNU/Linux distribution. I
wonder whether GCC's optimization behavior is in the following case
correct. Consider the following two programs:
(1)
int test(int n) {
if (n > 0)
return 1;
return 0;
}
(2)
int test(int n) {
if (2*n > 0
On 04/23/2010 07:35 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Heinz Riener
wrote:
[...]
Signed interger overflow is undefined. Use -fwrapv or
-fno-strict-overflow if you want gcc to behave as signed interger
overflow being defined.
Yes, that's w
