Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
Martin, Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic and not under my control also we're not supposed to use private emails for work... Gary From: Martin Liška Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:20 AM To: Gary Oblock ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org S

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
feel like I'm being forced to act like one. 😉 Now, can anybody answer my question? Sincerely Gary From: Gabriel Ravier Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:56 AM To: Martin Liška ; Gary Oblock ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined g

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-10 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
January 10, 2022 12:36 AM To: Gary Oblock Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero [EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection practices.] On

Re: Benchmark recommendations needed

2022-02-20 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
Trying to use the dhrystone isn't going to be very useful. It has many downsides not the least is that gcc's optimizer can run rings about it. Gary From: Gcc on behalf of gcc-requ...@gcc.gnu.org Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 6:25 AM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Sub

Re: Benchmark recommendations needed

2022-02-22 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
r I'd benchmark it using the applications you built it for. Gary From: Andras Tantos Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 9:22 PM To: Gary Oblock ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Benchmark recommendations needed [EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from a

What replaces FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN

2022-03-02 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
Guys, I've been working on an optimization for quite a bit of time and in an attempt to move it to GCC 12 I found that FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN no longer exists. I poked around in the archives and tried a Google search but found nothing on it. It suited my needs and I'd hate to have to rewrite a bunch of

Re: What replaces FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN

2022-03-02 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
Andrew, That's super! I was dreading an answer along the lines of "we don't do that anymore so why would you ever want to do that?" 😉 Many thanks, Gary From: Andrew Pinski Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 2:09 PM To: Gary Oblock Cc: gcc@gcc.

Re: Question on updating function body on specialized functions

2022-03-08 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
Erick my friend, That's exactly why I'm such a big fan of creating things anew each time I mess with them. 😉 Later, Gary From: Erick Ochoa Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 7:29 AM To: Martin Jambor Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Question on updating function b

<    1   2