Martin,
Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic
and not under my control also we're not supposed to
use private emails for work...
Gary
From: Martin Liška
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:20 AM
To: Gary Oblock ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
S
feel like I'm being forced to
act like one. 😉
Now, can anybody answer my question?
Sincerely
Gary
From: Gabriel Ravier
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:56 AM
To: Martin Liška ; Gary Oblock ;
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined g
January 10, 2022 12:36 AM
To: Gary Oblock
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero
[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please
be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection
practices.]
On
Trying to use the dhrystone isn't going to be very useful. It has many
downsides not the least is that gcc's optimizer can run rings about it.
Gary
From: Gcc on behalf of
gcc-requ...@gcc.gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 6:25 AM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Sub
r I'd benchmark it using the applications you built it
for.
Gary
From: Andras Tantos
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 9:22 PM
To: Gary Oblock ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Benchmark recommendations needed
[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from a
Guys,
I've been working on an optimization for quite a bit of time and
in an attempt to move it to GCC 12 I found that FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN
no longer exists. I poked around in the archives and tried a Google
search but found nothing on it.
It suited my needs and I'd hate to have to rewrite a bunch of
Andrew,
That's super! I was dreading an answer along the lines
of "we don't do that anymore so why would you ever want
to do that?" 😉
Many thanks,
Gary
From: Andrew Pinski
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 2:09 PM
To: Gary Oblock
Cc: gcc@gcc.
Erick my friend,
That's exactly why I'm such a big fan of creating things
anew each time I mess with them. 😉
Later,
Gary
From: Erick Ochoa
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 7:29 AM
To: Martin Jambor
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Question on updating function b
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo